PhotoDigital.netPhoto Resources  Photo Gallery
Google
  Web PhotoDigital.net

rec.photo.equipment.medium-format Discussion: By Thread

97 Messages
Starting:Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:53:24 EST Ending:Wed Nov 30 2005 - 00:36:37 EST

SubjectAuthor Date
Re: Seeking a 'better' Seagull TLR manualPeter IrwinSun Feb 22 2004 - 23:41:46 EST
Re: Seeking a 'better' Seagull TLR manualDanMon Feb 23 2004 - 02:49:11 EST
Re: Seeking a 'better' Seagull TLR manualPoeticWaxMon Feb 23 2004 - 07:43:52 EST
Re: Seeking a 'better' Seagull TLR manualPoeticWaxTue Feb 24 2004 - 12:37:49 EST
Re: Backing paper what's it good for?Bob MonaghanMon Feb 23 2004 - 17:30:53 EST
Re: Backing paper what's it good for?Nick ZentenaMon Feb 23 2004 - 18:17:40 EST
Help with Mamiya C330ZosoliasTue Feb 24 2004 - 06:05:17 EST
Re: Help with Mamiya C330Dennis O'ConnorTue Feb 24 2004 - 07:36:52 EST
Re: Help with Mamiya C330Stefan PatricTue Feb 24 2004 - 18:56:13 EST
--> Re: Help with Mamiya C330NapperWmTue Feb 24 2004 - 21:50:25 EST
Feedback on cordless flash syncsRobert J. MathesMon Feb 23 2004 - 17:44:16 EST
cheap medium format cameras from the 30s to 70sapkeshMon Feb 23 2004 - 21:38:45 EST
Re: cheap medium format cameras from the 30s to 70sapkeshMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:02:11 EST
--> Re: cheap medium format cameras from the 30s to 70sjjsMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:35:09 EST
Re: cheap medium format cameras from the 30s to 70sjjsMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:34:39 EST
Re: cheap medium format cameras from the 30s to 70sDavid J. LittleboyMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:45:50 EST
--> Re: cheap medium format cameras from the 30s to 70sjjsMon Feb 23 2004 - 23:02:46 EST
--> Re: cheap medium format cameras from the 30s to 70scurious dudeTue Feb 24 2004 - 00:57:51 EST
Re: family gathering shoot (repost)StaceyMon Feb 23 2004 - 16:08:41 EST
Re: family gathering shoot (repost)zeitgeistTue Feb 24 2004 - 02:26:50 EST
Re: family gathering shoot (repost)Stewart GardinerWed Feb 25 2004 - 09:41:13 EST
--> Re: family gathering shoot (repost)Robert J. MathesWed Feb 25 2004 - 21:00:30 EST
Photo Equipment for Sale: Mamiya RB67, 645 lenses etc.SSTSun Feb 22 2004 - 19:36:17 EST
Zoom viewfinder for 6 X 7Alan HoggSun Feb 22 2004 - 18:46:11 EST
Re: Zoom viewfinder for 6 X 7Bob MonaghanMon Feb 23 2004 - 17:20:51 EST
Re: Zoom viewfinder for 6 X 7Peter StöckleinTue Feb 24 2004 - 04:46:14 EST
Kodachrome 120?LunarayMon Feb 23 2004 - 01:29:59 EST
Re: Kodachrome 120?Q.G. de BakkerMon Feb 23 2004 - 06:47:21 EST
Re: Kodachrome 120?Bill HiltonMon Feb 23 2004 - 12:28:51 EST
--> Re: Kodachrome 120?LunarayMon Feb 23 2004 - 13:19:59 EST
--> Re: Kodachrome 120?Gearóid Ó Laoi/Garry LeeMon Feb 23 2004 - 14:11:21 EST
--> Re: Kodachrome 120?Martin FrancisMon Feb 23 2004 - 19:13:11 EST
Digital Back for Mamiya RB67 Pro S?Claudia EngelFri Feb 20 2004 - 23:37:47 EST
Re: Digital Back for Mamiya RB67 Pro S?David J. LittleboySat Feb 21 2004 - 00:00:56 EST
--> Re: Digital Back for Mamiya RB67 Pro S?Claudia EngelSat Feb 21 2004 - 17:27:45 EST
--> Re: Digital Back for Mamiya RB67 Pro S?David J. LittleboySat Feb 21 2004 - 19:22:40 EST
Re: Digital Back for Mamiya RB67 Pro S?Neil GouldTue Feb 24 2004 - 12:05:46 EST
--> Re: Digital Back for Mamiya RB67 Pro S?Neil GouldTue Feb 24 2004 - 16:36:39 EST
--> Re: Digital Back for Mamiya RB67 Pro S?Neil GouldWed Feb 25 2004 - 14:28:01 EST
--> Re: Digital Back for Mamiya RB67 Pro S?Neil GouldWed Feb 25 2004 - 22:50:31 EST
--> Re: Digital Back for Mamiya RB67 Pro S?Neil GouldThu Feb 26 2004 - 20:15:06 EST
Re: Digital Back for Mamiya RB67 Pro S?lowrance_at_email.domain.hiddenSat Feb 28 2004 - 10:59:43 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsjjsMon Feb 23 2004 - 13:04:19 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsKBobMon Feb 23 2004 - 16:42:55 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsBob MonaghanMon Feb 23 2004 - 17:44:54 EST
--> Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsjjsMon Feb 23 2004 - 21:54:56 EST
--> Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsBob MonaghanTue Feb 24 2004 - 17:16:58 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsRaphael BustinFri Feb 20 2004 - 20:42:05 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsDaveSat Feb 21 2004 - 15:03:51 EST
--> Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsStaceySat Feb 21 2004 - 10:22:25 EST
--> Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsjjsSat Feb 21 2004 - 16:53:57 EST
--> Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsNick ZentenaSat Feb 21 2004 - 16:14:57 EST
--> Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsjjsSat Feb 21 2004 - 16:52:04 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsKBobSat Feb 21 2004 - 17:43:36 EST
--> Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsJeremySat Feb 21 2004 - 18:08:38 EST
--> Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsRaphael BustinSat Feb 21 2004 - 20:21:10 EST
--> Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsKBobSat Feb 21 2004 - 21:32:58 EST
--> Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsjjsSat Feb 21 2004 - 23:13:14 EST
--> Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsjjsSat Feb 21 2004 - 21:32:30 EST
--> Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsKBobSun Feb 22 2004 - 01:07:29 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsWilt WFri Feb 20 2004 - 21:21:52 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsWilt WFri Feb 20 2004 - 21:32:01 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsPatrick L.Fri Feb 20 2004 - 23:02:41 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsStaceySat Feb 21 2004 - 10:20:00 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsJackDMon Feb 23 2004 - 18:25:13 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsjjsMon Feb 23 2004 - 21:57:11 EST
Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?jjsFri Feb 20 2004 - 21:56:34 EST
Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?Raphael BustinFri Feb 20 2004 - 22:19:17 EST
--> Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?ColdCanuckFri Feb 20 2004 - 23:07:54 EST
--> Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?Raphael BustinFri Feb 20 2004 - 23:20:24 EST
--> Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?Lassi Hippeläinen Mon Feb 23 2004 - 01:26:44 EST
--> Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?jjsFri Feb 20 2004 - 23:32:35 EST
--> Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?Raphael BustinSat Feb 21 2004 - 01:04:37 EST
Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?Lassi Hippeläinen Mon Feb 23 2004 - 01:38:26 EST
Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?Jukka-Pekka SuominenSat Feb 21 2004 - 09:04:30 EST
Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?Raphael BustinSat Feb 21 2004 - 10:01:23 EST
--> Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?Jukka-Pekka SuominenSat Feb 21 2004 - 12:15:06 EST
Re: Machinist in the house?GeorgeSun Feb 22 2004 - 00:04:29 EST
Re: homebrew AF confirmation for non-AF kits? Re: AF mf cameraNeil GouldTue Feb 17 2004 - 21:44:37 EST
Re: homebrew AF confirmation for non-AF kits? Re: AF mf cameraNeil GouldWed Feb 18 2004 - 22:09:17 EST
Re: Repair filter threads on lens?DougSun Feb 22 2004 - 07:48:06 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicSat Feb 21 2004 - 01:21:13 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureSat Feb 21 2004 - 08:04:55 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicSat Feb 21 2004 - 09:15:02 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MikeWhySat Feb 21 2004 - 14:16:09 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicSat Feb 21 2004 - 17:34:25 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureSat Feb 21 2004 - 16:49:57 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicSat Feb 21 2004 - 17:36:01 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureSun Feb 22 2004 - 10:04:51 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?StaceySat Feb 21 2004 - 10:15:41 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureSat Feb 21 2004 - 17:29:57 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?StaceySat Feb 21 2004 - 16:36:56 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureSun Feb 22 2004 - 10:16:30 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyThu Feb 19 2004 - 00:54:01 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureMon Feb 23 2004 - 07:26:59 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureMon Feb 23 2004 - 07:43:04 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicMon Feb 23 2004 - 08:19:31 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureMon Feb 23 2004 - 17:35:02 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?jjsMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:31:10 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureTue Feb 24 2004 - 06:35:16 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?jjsTue Feb 24 2004 - 09:26:59 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyMon Feb 23 2004 - 15:46:11 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MikeWhyMon Feb 23 2004 - 21:57:38 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Raphael BustinMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:19:35 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyMon Feb 23 2004 - 17:50:52 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?jjsMon Feb 23 2004 - 23:05:36 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Nick ZentenaMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:47:09 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Raphael BustinMon Feb 23 2004 - 23:53:43 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyMon Feb 23 2004 - 21:16:48 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyMon Feb 23 2004 - 21:34:38 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?David StarrTue Feb 24 2004 - 17:41:51 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyTue Feb 24 2004 - 19:05:22 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Gregory W BlankTue Feb 24 2004 - 07:35:56 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Raphael BustinTue Feb 24 2004 - 08:36:28 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyTue Feb 24 2004 - 19:06:59 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Nick ZentenaTue Feb 24 2004 - 07:55:26 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Raphael BustinTue Feb 24 2004 - 08:48:08 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Nick ZentenaTue Feb 24 2004 - 09:54:09 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyTue Feb 24 2004 - 19:11:36 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldWed Feb 25 2004 - 07:41:03 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Raphael BustinWed Feb 25 2004 - 08:16:10 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldWed Feb 25 2004 - 10:59:55 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicWed Feb 25 2004 - 09:25:38 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?jjsWed Feb 25 2004 - 13:02:36 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicWed Feb 25 2004 - 15:50:39 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Lassi Hippeläinen Thu Feb 26 2004 - 04:00:20 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicThu Feb 26 2004 - 04:17:16 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Gregory W BlankThu Feb 26 2004 - 07:28:43 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicThu Feb 26 2004 - 13:21:28 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Gregory W BlankThu Feb 26 2004 - 19:00:22 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicThu Feb 26 2004 - 23:13:49 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Gregory W BlankThu Feb 26 2004 - 19:02:06 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?jjsThu Feb 26 2004 - 19:52:27 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyThu Feb 26 2004 - 15:07:53 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicThu Feb 26 2004 - 23:14:36 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Gregory W BlankFri Feb 27 2004 - 07:02:10 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldFri Feb 27 2004 - 07:19:15 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?JeremyFri Feb 27 2004 - 09:27:48 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicFri Feb 27 2004 - 14:16:14 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?JeremyFri Feb 27 2004 - 15:50:34 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?jjsFri Feb 27 2004 - 21:41:13 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?A.L.FSat Feb 28 2004 - 20:12:21 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicFri Feb 27 2004 - 17:01:43 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldFri Feb 27 2004 - 17:07:21 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?jjsFri Feb 27 2004 - 17:44:56 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldSat Feb 28 2004 - 06:59:31 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?jjsSat Feb 28 2004 - 10:55:52 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicSat Feb 28 2004 - 15:15:06 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Bob MonaghanTue Mar 02 2004 - 21:21:42 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Gregory W BlankWed Mar 03 2004 - 01:06:27 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicWed Mar 03 2004 - 06:38:58 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Gregory W BlankWed Mar 03 2004 - 08:01:27 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Generic EricWed Mar 03 2004 - 08:53:14 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicWed Mar 03 2004 - 22:10:29 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Gregory W BlankWed Mar 03 2004 - 23:33:38 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicThu Mar 04 2004 - 04:45:06 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Gregory W BlankThu Mar 04 2004 - 07:34:31 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicThu Mar 04 2004 - 08:18:21 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Gregory W BlankThu Mar 04 2004 - 09:44:16 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Generic EricThu Mar 04 2004 - 08:26:03 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldSat Feb 28 2004 - 13:41:21 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?jjsSat Feb 28 2004 - 13:53:13 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldSat Feb 28 2004 - 16:31:44 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?jjsSat Feb 28 2004 - 20:02:11 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicSat Feb 28 2004 - 20:24:30 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldSat Feb 28 2004 - 23:51:06 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicSun Feb 29 2004 - 03:26:21 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldSun Feb 29 2004 - 07:38:45 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Generic EricMon Mar 01 2004 - 10:23:15 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicMon Mar 01 2004 - 11:51:16 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Generic EricMon Mar 01 2004 - 12:06:38 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicMon Mar 01 2004 - 12:17:56 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Generic EricMon Mar 01 2004 - 12:34:09 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicMon Mar 01 2004 - 13:18:35 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MikeWhyMon Mar 01 2004 - 21:06:09 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldFri Feb 27 2004 - 13:02:35 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Gregory W BlankFri Feb 27 2004 - 09:28:46 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldFri Feb 27 2004 - 13:03:50 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?jjsFri Feb 27 2004 - 13:18:03 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldFri Feb 27 2004 - 13:38:42 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Generic EricMon Mar 01 2004 - 09:49:50 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicMon Mar 01 2004 - 10:19:47 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Generic EricMon Mar 01 2004 - 10:52:22 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?jjsMon Mar 01 2004 - 11:29:20 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicMon Mar 01 2004 - 12:01:51 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicMon Mar 01 2004 - 11:57:29 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Generic EricMon Mar 01 2004 - 12:21:46 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicMon Mar 01 2004 - 13:21:36 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Generic EricMon Mar 01 2004 - 13:44:52 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?jjsMon Mar 01 2004 - 18:07:18 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?jjsThu Feb 26 2004 - 10:16:57 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldWed Feb 25 2004 - 11:06:56 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicWed Feb 25 2004 - 15:49:58 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldWed Feb 25 2004 - 18:05:12 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?jjsWed Feb 25 2004 - 18:15:24 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicWed Feb 25 2004 - 19:31:43 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldWed Feb 25 2004 - 22:31:39 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicThu Feb 26 2004 - 03:56:50 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldThu Feb 26 2004 - 07:32:10 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyWed Feb 25 2004 - 15:01:29 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyWed Feb 25 2004 - 14:59:59 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldWed Feb 25 2004 - 22:35:29 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyMon Feb 23 2004 - 21:13:57 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Nick ZentenaTue Feb 24 2004 - 07:41:51 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyTue Feb 24 2004 - 19:03:17 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyMon Feb 23 2004 - 15:41:16 EST
--> Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureTue Feb 24 2004 - 06:21:47 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Neil GouldSun Feb 22 2004 - 18:54:59 EST

Last message date: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 00:36:37 EST Archived on: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 01:12:58 EST