PhotoDigital.netPhoto Resources  Photo Gallery
Google
  Web PhotoDigital.net

rec.photo.equipment.medium-format Discussion: By Date

97 Messages
Starting:Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:53:24 EST Ending:Wed Nov 30 2005 - 00:36:37 EST

SubjectAuthorDate
Re: What was wrong with film?Nick ZentenaTue Feb 24 2004 - 07:41:51 EST
Re: Help with Mamiya C330Dennis O'ConnorTue Feb 24 2004 - 07:36:52 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Gregory W BlankTue Feb 24 2004 - 07:35:56 EST
Re: Kodachrome 120?Bill HiltonMon Feb 23 2004 - 12:28:51 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureTue Feb 24 2004 - 06:35:16 EST
Help with Mamiya C330ZosoliasTue Feb 24 2004 - 06:05:17 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureTue Feb 24 2004 - 06:21:47 EST
Feedback on cordless flash syncsRobert J. MathesMon Feb 23 2004 - 17:44:16 EST
Re: Zoom viewfinder for 6 X 7Peter StöckleinTue Feb 24 2004 - 04:46:14 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyMon Feb 23 2004 - 21:34:38 EST
Re: family gathering shoot (repost)zeitgeistTue Feb 24 2004 - 02:26:50 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyMon Feb 23 2004 - 21:16:48 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyMon Feb 23 2004 - 21:13:57 EST
Re: cheap medium format cameras from the 30s to 70scurious dudeTue Feb 24 2004 - 00:57:51 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Raphael BustinMon Feb 23 2004 - 23:53:43 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Nick ZentenaMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:47:09 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?jjsMon Feb 23 2004 - 23:05:36 EST
Re: cheap medium format cameras from the 30s to 70sjjsMon Feb 23 2004 - 23:02:46 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyMon Feb 23 2004 - 17:50:52 EST
Re: cheap medium format cameras from the 30s to 70sDavid J. LittleboyMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:45:50 EST
Re: cheap medium format cameras from the 30s to 70sjjsMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:35:09 EST
Re: cheap medium format cameras from the 30s to 70sjjsMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:34:39 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?jjsMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:31:10 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Raphael BustinMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:19:35 EST
Re: cheap medium format cameras from the 30s to 70sapkeshMon Feb 23 2004 - 22:02:11 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?MikeWhyMon Feb 23 2004 - 21:57:38 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsjjsMon Feb 23 2004 - 21:57:11 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsjjsMon Feb 23 2004 - 21:54:56 EST
cheap medium format cameras from the 30s to 70sapkeshMon Feb 23 2004 - 21:38:45 EST
Re: family gathering shoot (repost)StaceyMon Feb 23 2004 - 16:08:41 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyMon Feb 23 2004 - 15:46:11 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?StaceyMon Feb 23 2004 - 15:41:16 EST
Re: Kodachrome 120?Martin FrancisMon Feb 23 2004 - 19:13:11 EST
Re: Backing paper what's it good for?Nick ZentenaMon Feb 23 2004 - 18:17:40 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsJackDMon Feb 23 2004 - 18:25:13 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsBob MonaghanMon Feb 23 2004 - 17:44:54 EST
Re: Backing paper what's it good for?Bob MonaghanMon Feb 23 2004 - 17:30:53 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureMon Feb 23 2004 - 17:35:02 EST
Re: Zoom viewfinder for 6 X 7Bob MonaghanMon Feb 23 2004 - 17:20:51 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsKBobMon Feb 23 2004 - 16:42:55 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsjjsMon Feb 23 2004 - 13:04:19 EST
Photo Equipment for Sale: Mamiya RB67, 645 lenses etc.SSTSun Feb 22 2004 - 19:36:17 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicMon Feb 23 2004 - 08:19:31 EST
Re: Seeking a 'better' Seagull TLR manualPoeticWaxMon Feb 23 2004 - 07:43:52 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureMon Feb 23 2004 - 07:43:04 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureMon Feb 23 2004 - 07:26:59 EST
Re: Kodachrome 120?Q.G. de BakkerMon Feb 23 2004 - 06:47:21 EST
Zoom viewfinder for 6 X 7Alan HoggSun Feb 22 2004 - 18:46:11 EST
Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?Lassi Hippeläinen Mon Feb 23 2004 - 01:38:26 EST
Kodachrome 120?LunarayMon Feb 23 2004 - 01:29:59 EST
Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?Lassi Hippeläinen Mon Feb 23 2004 - 01:26:44 EST
Re: Seeking a 'better' Seagull TLR manualDanMon Feb 23 2004 - 02:49:11 EST
Re: Seeking a 'better' Seagull TLR manualPeter IrwinSun Feb 22 2004 - 23:41:46 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureSun Feb 22 2004 - 10:16:30 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureSun Feb 22 2004 - 10:04:51 EST
Re: Repair filter threads on lens?DougSun Feb 22 2004 - 07:48:06 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsKBobSun Feb 22 2004 - 01:07:29 EST
Re: Machinist in the house?GeorgeSun Feb 22 2004 - 00:04:29 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsjjsSat Feb 21 2004 - 23:13:14 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?StaceySat Feb 21 2004 - 16:36:56 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsKBobSat Feb 21 2004 - 21:32:58 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsjjsSat Feb 21 2004 - 21:32:30 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsRaphael BustinSat Feb 21 2004 - 20:21:10 EST
Re: Digital Back for Mamiya RB67 Pro S?David J. LittleboySat Feb 21 2004 - 19:22:40 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsJeremySat Feb 21 2004 - 18:08:38 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsKBobSat Feb 21 2004 - 17:43:36 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicSat Feb 21 2004 - 17:36:01 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicSat Feb 21 2004 - 17:34:25 EST
Re: Digital Back for Mamiya RB67 Pro S?Claudia EngelSat Feb 21 2004 - 17:27:45 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureSat Feb 21 2004 - 17:29:57 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsjjsSat Feb 21 2004 - 16:53:57 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsjjsSat Feb 21 2004 - 16:52:04 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureSat Feb 21 2004 - 16:49:57 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsNick ZentenaSat Feb 21 2004 - 16:14:57 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsStaceySat Feb 21 2004 - 10:22:25 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsStaceySat Feb 21 2004 - 10:20:00 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?StaceySat Feb 21 2004 - 10:15:41 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsDaveSat Feb 21 2004 - 15:03:51 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?MikeWhySat Feb 21 2004 - 14:16:09 EST
Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?Jukka-Pekka SuominenSat Feb 21 2004 - 12:15:06 EST
Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?Raphael BustinSat Feb 21 2004 - 10:01:23 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicSat Feb 21 2004 - 09:15:02 EST
Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?Jukka-Pekka SuominenSat Feb 21 2004 - 09:04:30 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?Reciprocity FailureSat Feb 21 2004 - 08:04:55 EST
Re: What was wrong with film?MxsmanicSat Feb 21 2004 - 01:21:13 EST
Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?Raphael BustinSat Feb 21 2004 - 01:04:37 EST
Re: Digital Back for Mamiya RB67 Pro S?David J. LittleboySat Feb 21 2004 - 00:00:56 EST
Digital Back for Mamiya RB67 Pro S?Claudia EngelFri Feb 20 2004 - 23:37:47 EST
Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?jjsFri Feb 20 2004 - 23:32:35 EST
Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?Raphael BustinFri Feb 20 2004 - 23:20:24 EST
Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?ColdCanuckFri Feb 20 2004 - 23:07:54 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsPatrick L.Fri Feb 20 2004 - 23:02:41 EST
Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?Raphael BustinFri Feb 20 2004 - 22:19:17 EST
Re: Best scan size for 8x10 prints?jjsFri Feb 20 2004 - 21:56:34 EST
Re: Resolution -- 8x10" PrintsWilt WFri Feb 20 2004 - 21:32:01 EST
Re: homebrew AF confirmation for non-AF kits? Re: AF mf cameraNeil GouldWed Feb 18 2004 - 22:09:17 EST
Re: homebrew AF confirmation for non-AF kits? Re: AF mf cameraNeil GouldTue Feb 17 2004 - 21:44:37 EST

Last message date: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 00:36:37 EST Archived on: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 01:12:58 EST