PhotoDigital.netPhoto Resources  Photo Gallery
Google
  Web PhotoDigital.net

rec.photo.equipment.medium-format Discussion: By Thread

97 Messages
Starting:Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:53:24 EST Ending:Wed Nov 30 2005 - 00:36:37 EST

SubjectAuthor Date
FA HUGE HORSEMAN MEDIUM FORMAT LOTBill and LisaWed Sep 07 2005 - 14:25:55 EDT
FA HUGE HASSELBLAD LOTBill and LisaWed Sep 07 2005 - 14:24:19 EDT
Re: FA HUGE HASSELBLAD LOTLorem IpsumWed Sep 07 2005 - 15:59:48 EDT
Confused about the upcoming Mamiya ZD BackMike FriedmanTue Sep 06 2005 - 17:33:49 EDT
Re: Confused about the upcoming Mamiya ZD BackDavid J. LittleboyTue Sep 06 2005 - 20:13:11 EDT
--> Re: Confused about the upcoming Mamiya ZD BackTony PolsonWed Sep 07 2005 - 05:16:26 EDT
--> Re: Confused about the upcoming Mamiya ZD BackDavid J. LittleboyWed Sep 07 2005 - 06:10:21 EDT
--> Re: Confused about the upcoming Mamiya ZD BackTony PolsonWed Sep 07 2005 - 17:48:31 EDT
--> Re: Confused about the upcoming Mamiya ZD BackDavid J. LittleboyWed Sep 07 2005 - 18:26:03 EDT
--> Re: Confused about the upcoming Mamiya ZD BackGregory BlankWed Sep 07 2005 - 22:16:00 EDT
--> Re: Confused about the upcoming Mamiya ZD BackDavid J. LittleboyWed Sep 07 2005 - 23:12:33 EDT
--> Re: Confused about the upcoming Mamiya ZD BackGregory BlankWed Sep 07 2005 - 23:57:23 EDT
--> Re: Confused about the upcoming Mamiya ZD BackQ.G. de BakkerThu Sep 08 2005 - 04:03:19 EDT
--> Re: Confused about the upcoming Mamiya ZD BackGregory BlankThu Sep 08 2005 - 07:00:41 EDT
--> Re: Confused about the upcoming Mamiya ZD BackTony PolsonThu Sep 08 2005 - 06:05:44 EDT
Re: Confused about the upcoming Mamiya ZD BackJulian BarkwayWed Sep 07 2005 - 00:49:38 EDT
Re: Confused about the upcoming Mamiya ZD BackGordon MoatThu Sep 08 2005 - 14:18:47 EDT
--> Re: Confused about the upcoming Mamiya ZD BackMike FriedmanThu Sep 08 2005 - 17:32:18 EDT
Old Kievshairlessmunkee_at_email.domain.hiddenTue Sep 06 2005 - 16:45:32 EDT
Re: Old KievsJordan W.Tue Sep 06 2005 - 17:21:59 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsThe Dave©Tue Sep 06 2005 - 19:43:44 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsThomTue Sep 06 2005 - 21:11:35 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsRandall AinsworthTue Sep 06 2005 - 21:19:23 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsDave the GuyWed Sep 07 2005 - 16:58:59 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsStaceyThu Sep 08 2005 - 03:36:56 EDT
Re: Old KievsPaul FridayTue Sep 06 2005 - 18:20:49 EDT
Re: Old KievsStephenTue Sep 06 2005 - 19:13:38 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsLassi HippeläinenWed Sep 07 2005 - 07:16:53 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsBandicootWed Sep 14 2005 - 08:56:42 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsStaceyThu Sep 15 2005 - 00:56:11 EDT
Re: Old KievsStaceyWed Sep 07 2005 - 01:02:27 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsDave the GuyWed Sep 07 2005 - 10:01:22 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsStaceyThu Sep 08 2005 - 03:36:00 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsDave the GuyThu Sep 08 2005 - 09:45:28 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsRobert C.Thu Sep 08 2005 - 22:17:48 EDT
Re: Old KievssatbunnyTue Sep 13 2005 - 07:42:10 EDT
--> Re: Old Kievsno_nameTue Sep 13 2005 - 09:07:35 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsLorem IpsumTue Sep 13 2005 - 21:37:24 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsQ.G. de BakkerWed Sep 14 2005 - 04:45:40 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsPaul FridayWed Sep 14 2005 - 19:24:49 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsDave the GuyWed Sep 14 2005 - 22:13:14 EDT
--> Kiev alternative bodiesJim HemenwayThu Sep 15 2005 - 09:02:25 EDT
--> Re: Kiev alternative bodiesNick ZentenaThu Sep 15 2005 - 09:16:59 EDT
--> Re: Kiev alternative bodiesRalf R. RadermacherThu Sep 15 2005 - 09:37:18 EDT
--> BTW, Ralph (was Re: Kiev alternative bodies)NoonsWed Sep 28 2005 - 04:37:18 EDT
--> Re: Kiev alternative bodiesJim HemenwayThu Sep 15 2005 - 23:45:12 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsNoonsThu Sep 15 2005 - 04:54:10 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsHartmut KrafftThu Sep 15 2005 - 05:57:00 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsLorem IpsumThu Sep 15 2005 - 09:02:30 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsNick ZentenaThu Sep 15 2005 - 09:21:31 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsLorem IpsumThu Sep 15 2005 - 14:36:17 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsStaceyThu Sep 15 2005 - 19:01:52 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsPaul FridaySun Sep 18 2005 - 17:08:17 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsLucaThu Sep 22 2005 - 01:15:26 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsQ.G. de BakkerThu Sep 22 2005 - 11:10:59 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsStaceyFri Sep 23 2005 - 00:28:12 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsRalf R. RadermacherFri Sep 23 2005 - 04:14:25 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsLassi HippeläinenFri Sep 23 2005 - 13:59:03 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsAndrew PriceFri Sep 23 2005 - 18:46:16 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsRandall AinsworthFri Sep 23 2005 - 11:39:16 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsAndrew PriceFri Sep 23 2005 - 18:49:56 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsRalf R. RadermacherFri Sep 23 2005 - 19:18:27 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsAndrew PriceFri Sep 23 2005 - 20:06:10 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsFrank PittelFri Sep 23 2005 - 01:26:35 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsNoonsThu Sep 15 2005 - 10:13:22 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsLorem IpsumThu Sep 15 2005 - 14:45:55 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsHartmut KrafftThu Sep 15 2005 - 17:20:40 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsRandall AinsworthThu Sep 15 2005 - 21:49:50 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsLorem IpsumThu Sep 15 2005 - 07:41:34 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsStaceyThu Sep 15 2005 - 18:59:24 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsQ.G. de BakkerFri Sep 16 2005 - 05:01:07 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsStaceyFri Sep 23 2005 - 20:02:37 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsRalf R. RadermacherSat Sep 24 2005 - 03:22:41 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsBandicootSat Sep 24 2005 - 13:34:37 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsQ.G. de BakkerSat Sep 24 2005 - 21:09:19 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsStaceySun Sep 25 2005 - 02:03:09 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsRalf R. RadermacherSun Sep 25 2005 - 06:04:19 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsStaceyMon Sep 26 2005 - 00:08:35 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsQ.G. de BakkerSat Sep 24 2005 - 05:27:58 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsRalf R. RadermacherFri Sep 16 2005 - 05:22:21 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsNoonsFri Sep 16 2005 - 08:05:21 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsStaceyFri Sep 23 2005 - 20:04:55 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsBandicootSat Sep 24 2005 - 13:39:07 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsNoonsSun Sep 25 2005 - 00:15:32 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsStaceySun Sep 25 2005 - 02:05:38 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsNoonsSun Sep 25 2005 - 05:38:35 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsStaceyMon Sep 26 2005 - 00:11:07 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsRalf R. RadermacherSun Sep 25 2005 - 06:04:19 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsRandall AinsworthSun Sep 25 2005 - 09:59:09 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsRalf R. RadermacherSun Sep 25 2005 - 10:05:28 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsRandall AinsworthSun Sep 25 2005 - 11:03:52 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsRalf R. RadermacherSun Sep 25 2005 - 12:30:23 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsStaceyMon Sep 26 2005 - 00:14:40 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsStaceyMon Sep 26 2005 - 00:13:36 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsNoonsMon Sep 26 2005 - 01:07:25 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsDavid J. LittleboyMon Sep 26 2005 - 01:36:26 EDT
--> Another canon fanatic..StaceyMon Sep 26 2005 - 02:46:14 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..David J. LittleboyMon Sep 26 2005 - 03:08:52 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsMon Sep 26 2005 - 04:35:17 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..David J. LittleboyMon Sep 26 2005 - 05:48:32 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsMon Sep 26 2005 - 07:07:42 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Chris BrownMon Sep 26 2005 - 06:54:21 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsMon Sep 26 2005 - 06:55:15 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Chris BrownMon Sep 26 2005 - 09:30:49 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsTue Sep 27 2005 - 02:29:43 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Chris BrownTue Sep 27 2005 - 07:29:52 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsTue Sep 27 2005 - 08:31:42 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..David J. LittleboyTue Sep 27 2005 - 08:56:14 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsTue Sep 27 2005 - 11:12:33 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Q.G. de BakkerTue Sep 27 2005 - 11:24:44 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..David J. LittleboyTue Sep 27 2005 - 11:33:07 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsTue Sep 27 2005 - 11:35:35 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Q.G. de BakkerTue Sep 27 2005 - 11:52:01 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsTue Sep 27 2005 - 11:48:53 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Q.G. de BakkerTue Sep 27 2005 - 12:02:01 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Sander VesikTue Sep 27 2005 - 14:37:59 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsWed Sep 28 2005 - 05:11:50 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Q.G. de BakkerWed Sep 28 2005 - 11:09:43 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsTue Sep 27 2005 - 11:32:46 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Q.G. de BakkerTue Sep 27 2005 - 11:47:33 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsTue Sep 27 2005 - 11:41:59 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Q.G. de BakkerTue Sep 27 2005 - 11:53:09 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsTue Sep 27 2005 - 11:47:46 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Q.G. de BakkerTue Sep 27 2005 - 12:00:14 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Chris BrownTue Sep 27 2005 - 12:28:30 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..RobGNTue Sep 27 2005 - 15:21:19 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Lorem IpsumTue Sep 27 2005 - 15:33:50 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..RobGNTue Sep 27 2005 - 15:50:31 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Chris BrownTue Sep 27 2005 - 16:33:16 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsWed Sep 28 2005 - 04:23:22 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Neil GouldWed Sep 28 2005 - 06:46:06 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsWed Sep 28 2005 - 09:32:18 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Chris BrownWed Sep 28 2005 - 07:29:37 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsWed Sep 28 2005 - 09:27:41 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Chris BrownWed Sep 28 2005 - 13:30:48 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Lorem IpsumWed Sep 28 2005 - 09:28:40 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsWed Sep 28 2005 - 10:06:47 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Lorem IpsumWed Sep 28 2005 - 10:35:53 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsWed Sep 28 2005 - 11:22:12 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Chris BrownWed Sep 28 2005 - 13:30:48 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Lorem IpsumWed Sep 28 2005 - 15:21:12 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Chris BrownTue Sep 27 2005 - 12:28:30 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..StaceyTue Sep 27 2005 - 19:59:27 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..David J. LittleboyTue Sep 27 2005 - 20:49:59 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsWed Sep 28 2005 - 09:40:36 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Lorem IpsumWed Sep 28 2005 - 10:37:43 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsWed Sep 28 2005 - 11:26:58 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Lorem IpsumWed Sep 28 2005 - 11:44:02 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..StaceyThu Sep 29 2005 - 01:02:39 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Tony PolsonThu Sep 29 2005 - 02:01:36 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsThu Sep 29 2005 - 04:41:32 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..David J. LittleboyThu Sep 29 2005 - 05:59:10 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsThu Sep 29 2005 - 07:10:42 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Steve MarshallFri Sep 30 2005 - 05:53:12 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..NoonsFri Sep 30 2005 - 07:13:52 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..StaceyFri Sep 30 2005 - 22:10:04 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Randall AinsworthThu Sep 29 2005 - 08:33:43 EDT
--> Re: Another canon fanatic..Lorem IpsumThu Sep 29 2005 - 18:59:22 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsNoonsSun Sep 25 2005 - 09:55:30 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsPaul FridayThu Sep 15 2005 - 17:28:39 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsNoonsMon Sep 19 2005 - 00:11:33 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsFrank PittelFri Sep 23 2005 - 01:21:32 EDT
Re: Old Kievsgeneric spam harvester baitTue Sep 13 2005 - 09:20:29 EDT
Re: Old KievsThe Dave©Wed Sep 14 2005 - 12:50:54 EDT
--> Re: Old KievsDave the GuyWed Sep 14 2005 - 13:35:39 EDT
Horseman model 980 with loads of extrasBill and LisaTue Sep 06 2005 - 10:41:21 EDT
Rollei 50mm: how many are there?Matt ClaraTue Sep 06 2005 - 08:14:20 EDT
Re: Rollei 50mm: how many are there?Bob SalomonTue Sep 06 2005 - 08:49:16 EDT
--> Re: Rollei 50mm: how many are there?Matt ClaraTue Sep 06 2005 - 09:11:31 EDT
--> Re: Rollei 50mm: how many are there?Neil GouldTue Sep 06 2005 - 10:13:23 EDT
--> Re: Rollei 50mm: how many are there?Lourens SmakThu Sep 15 2005 - 19:36:38 EDT
Re: Rollei 50mm: how many are there?Tony PolsonTue Sep 06 2005 - 09:07:41 EDT
--> Re: Rollei 50mm: how many are there?Matt ClaraTue Sep 06 2005 - 09:54:06 EDT
--> Re: Rollei 50mm: how many are there?Bob SalomonTue Sep 06 2005 - 22:00:50 EDT
Re: Rollei 50mm: how many are there?Gordon MoatTue Sep 06 2005 - 14:52:43 EDT
deceptive auctionThe Dave©Mon Sep 05 2005 - 23:19:07 EDT
Re: deceptive auctionNoonsTue Sep 06 2005 - 00:47:44 EDT
Re: deceptive auctionBob GTue Sep 06 2005 - 00:50:55 EDT
--> Re: deceptive auctionSander VesikTue Sep 06 2005 - 11:43:20 EDT
Re: deceptive auctionJohn FryattTue Sep 06 2005 - 05:16:20 EDT
--> Re: deceptive auctionThe Dave©Tue Sep 06 2005 - 09:59:39 EDT
--> Re: deceptive auctionJohn FryattTue Sep 06 2005 - 10:50:59 EDT
--> Re: deceptive auctionBob GTue Sep 06 2005 - 14:38:17 EDT
[FA][ebay]Bronica AuctionsatbunnySun Sep 04 2005 - 12:30:49 EDT
6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?borkomile_at_email.domain.hiddenSat Sep 03 2005 - 20:53:07 EDT
Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?borkomile_at_email.domain.hiddenSat Sep 03 2005 - 21:04:17 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?Dr. Joel M. HoffmanMon Sep 05 2005 - 11:34:17 EDT
Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?Alan BrowneSat Sep 03 2005 - 21:08:49 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?Alfred MolonSun Sep 04 2005 - 14:05:51 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?Alan BrowneMon Sep 05 2005 - 16:32:28 EDT
Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?UCSat Sep 03 2005 - 22:24:27 EDT
Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?StaceySat Sep 03 2005 - 22:28:11 EDT
Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?Justin ThymeSat Sep 03 2005 - 22:39:48 EDT
Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?Carlos MorenoSun Sep 04 2005 - 00:14:27 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?Justin ThymeSun Sep 04 2005 - 00:55:53 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?borkomile_at_email.domain.hiddenSun Sep 04 2005 - 08:35:00 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?Carlos MorenoSun Sep 04 2005 - 10:28:29 EDT
Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?Bob WilliamsSun Sep 04 2005 - 03:12:13 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?jbarkerSun Sep 04 2005 - 07:39:51 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?Mike WarrenSun Sep 04 2005 - 07:49:03 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?Simon StanmoreSun Sep 04 2005 - 11:36:57 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?Mike WarrenSun Sep 04 2005 - 16:55:23 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?David J. LittleboySun Sep 04 2005 - 17:31:32 EDT
Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?Simon StanmoreSun Sep 04 2005 - 11:29:01 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?Roger MossSun Sep 04 2005 - 11:47:54 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?Pix on CanvasSun Sep 04 2005 - 18:39:06 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?JimWMon Sep 12 2005 - 01:19:07 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?JasenMon Sep 12 2005 - 08:21:27 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?Lorem IpsumMon Sep 12 2005 - 11:19:56 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 42" advertising posters?JimWMon Sep 12 2005 - 11:23:55 EDT
6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 36" advertising posters?borkomile_at_email.domain.hiddenSat Sep 03 2005 - 20:52:53 EDT
Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 36" advertising posters?borkomile_at_email.domain.hiddenSat Sep 03 2005 - 21:03:09 EDT
Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 36" advertising posters?David J. LittleboySat Sep 03 2005 - 23:56:29 EDT
Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 36" advertising posters?George NymanSun Sep 04 2005 - 14:20:17 EDT
--> Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 36" advertising posters?RichSun Sep 04 2005 - 15:45:52 EDT
Re: 6MP Nikon D100 - good enough for critical 24" x 36" advertising posters?Gordon MoatSun Sep 04 2005 - 19:28:08 EDT
Re: Hasselblad 150mm f/4 slow shutterQ.G. de BakkerFri Sep 02 2005 - 04:23:59 EDT
Re: Hasselblad 150mm f/4 slow shutterAlan BrowneFri Sep 02 2005 - 08:02:27 EDT
--> Re: Hasselblad 150mm f/4 slow shutterNick ZentenaFri Sep 02 2005 - 10:39:16 EDT
--> Re: Hasselblad 150mm f/4 slow shuttergeorgeSat Sep 03 2005 - 00:53:57 EDT
--> Re: Hasselblad 150mm f/4 slow shutterAlan BrowneSat Sep 03 2005 - 17:05:56 EDT
--> Re: Hasselblad 150mm f/4 slow shutterQ.G. de BakkerSat Sep 03 2005 - 05:13:29 EDT
--> Re: Hasselblad 150mm f/4 slow shutterAlan BrowneSat Sep 03 2005 - 17:06:52 EDT
Re: Mamiya 6 G f4 50mm L lens price on ebayMatt ClaraFri Sep 02 2005 - 07:54:15 EDT
Re: Mamiya 6 G f4 50mm L lens price on ebayMatt ClaraSat Sep 03 2005 - 21:16:07 EDT
Re: Mamiya 6 G f4 50mm L lens price on ebayAlan BrowneSun Sep 04 2005 - 11:46:30 EDT
Re: Mamiya 6 G f4 50mm L lens price on ebayMatt ClaraSun Sep 04 2005 - 13:35:09 EDT
Re: Mamiya 6 G f4 50mm L lens price on ebayFrank PittelThu Sep 15 2005 - 07:13:04 EDT
Re: Where to Get Small Parts for Baby Speed Graphickfritch_at_email.domain.hiddenSat Sep 03 2005 - 14:02:12 EDT
Re: Where to Get Small Parts for Baby Speed Graphickfritch_at_email.domain.hiddenSat Sep 03 2005 - 14:02:18 EDT
Re: Where to Get Small Parts for Baby Speed GraphicNorm DresnerMon Sep 05 2005 - 16:41:55 EDT
Re: Where to Get Small Parts for Baby Speed GraphicNorm DresnerWed Sep 07 2005 - 09:37:35 EDT
Re: Where to Get Small Parts for Baby Speed Graphicrshepardnon_at_email.domain.hiddenMon Sep 26 2005 - 14:48:25 EDT
Re: Hand of GodAlan BrowneThu Sep 01 2005 - 21:00:29 EDT
Re: Hand of GodwavelengthSat Sep 03 2005 - 21:50:01 EDT
--> Re: Hand of GodAlan BrowneSun Sep 04 2005 - 11:43:41 EDT
--> Re: Hand of GodLorem IpsumTue Sep 06 2005 - 12:21:44 EDT
--> Re: Hand of GodBandicootWed Sep 07 2005 - 06:41:10 EDT
Re: Gicleeno oneFri Sep 02 2005 - 22:23:03 EDT
Re: major aesthetic breakthrough revealed!Alan BrowneSat Sep 03 2005 - 17:11:34 EDT

Last message date: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 00:36:37 EST Archived on: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 01:12:55 EST