PhotoDigital.netPhoto Resources  Photo Gallery
Google
  Web PhotoDigital.net

rec.photo.equipment.large-format Discussion: By Thread

6205 Messages
Starting:Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:11:38 EST Ending:Sun Nov 27 2005 - 00:30:23 EST

</
SubjectAuthor Date
Re: Back in TimeDavid StarrTue Mar 29 2005 - 18:13:38 EST
Re: Back in TimejjsTue Mar 29 2005 - 20:49:53 EST
Re: Back in Timewayne99_at_email.domain.hiddenTue Mar 29 2005 - 21:13:54 EST
--> Re: Back in TimeGregory BlankTue Mar 29 2005 - 21:27:44 EST
--> Re: Back in TimeGregory BlankTue Mar 29 2005 - 21:43:46 EST
LF drum scan technologyP. MeschterTue Mar 15 2005 - 07:20:12 EST
Re: LF drum scan technologyJean-David BeyerTue Mar 15 2005 - 08:07:41 EST
Re: LF drum scan technologyrafe bustinTue Mar 15 2005 - 08:54:31 EST
Re: LF drum scan technologyNo OneTue Mar 15 2005 - 12:09:59 EST
Re: LF drum scan technologyDr. Georg N.NymanTue Mar 15 2005 - 15:22:42 EST
Informal survey on roll filmsteven.sawyer_at_email.domain.hiddenSun Mar 13 2005 - 17:49:50 EST
Re: Informal survey on roll filmDavid NebenzahlSun Mar 13 2005 - 19:09:08 EST
Re: Informal survey on roll filmBandicootSun Mar 13 2005 - 21:24:31 EST
--> Re: Informal survey on roll filmScott NorwoodMon Mar 14 2005 - 08:43:02 EST
Re: Informal survey on roll filmDr. Georg N.NymanSun Mar 13 2005 - 21:51:39 EST
--> Re: Informal survey on roll filmsteven.sawyer_at_email.domain.hiddenSun Mar 13 2005 - 21:44:46 EST
--> Re: Informal survey on roll filmDr. Georg N.NymanMon Mar 14 2005 - 09:27:26 EST
Re: Informal survey on roll filmStaceyMon Mar 14 2005 - 02:35:00 EST
Re: Informal survey on roll filmMichael WeinsteinMon Mar 14 2005 - 07:59:18 EST
--> Re: Informal survey on roll filmBandicootMon Mar 14 2005 - 09:07:51 EST
--> Re: Informal survey on roll filmdr bobTue Mar 15 2005 - 08:55:43 EST
Re: Informal survey on roll filmDale StrouseMon Mar 14 2005 - 11:49:30 EST
Re: Informal survey on roll filmhoarcroft_at_email.domain.hiddenMon Mar 14 2005 - 11:54:22 EST
Re: Informal survey on roll filmDavid J. LittleboyMon Mar 14 2005 - 22:27:35 EST
--> Re: Informal survey on roll filmBill HiltonTue Mar 15 2005 - 10:55:04 EST
--> Re: Informal survey on roll filmBandicootTue Mar 15 2005 - 19:25:12 EST
Re: Informal survey on roll filmChris BrownTue Mar 15 2005 - 04:30:07 EST
Re: Informal survey on roll filmjimmyTue Mar 15 2005 - 20:16:17 EST
Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsNicholas O. LindanSun Mar 13 2005 - 14:37:43 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsdeath skunk fiveSun Mar 13 2005 - 14:45:31 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsGregory BlankSun Mar 13 2005 - 19:40:39 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsTom PhillipsSun Mar 13 2005 - 22:41:49 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsTom PhillipsSun Mar 13 2005 - 15:07:12 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsbobMon Mar 14 2005 - 11:32:17 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsrafebMon Mar 14 2005 - 11:50:42 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsbobMon Mar 14 2005 - 12:48:32 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsTom PhillipsMon Mar 14 2005 - 15:13:16 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsbobMon Mar 14 2005 - 16:03:05 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsNicholas O. LindanMon Mar 14 2005 - 17:05:32 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsDavid NebenzahlMon Mar 14 2005 - 18:32:02 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsbobTue Mar 15 2005 - 10:10:50 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsNicholas O. LindanTue Mar 15 2005 - 15:44:51 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsTom PhillipsMon Mar 14 2005 - 15:09:45 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsbobMon Mar 14 2005 - 15:38:19 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsf/256Sun Mar 13 2005 - 16:41:26 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsShelleySun Mar 13 2005 - 18:34:27 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsGregory BlankSun Mar 13 2005 - 19:23:46 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsjjsSun Mar 13 2005 - 18:57:44 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsAlan SmitheeSun Mar 13 2005 - 19:46:42 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsrafe bustinSun Mar 13 2005 - 19:56:51 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsjjsSun Mar 13 2005 - 21:22:20 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsjimmySun Mar 13 2005 - 19:27:36 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsGregory BlankSun Mar 13 2005 - 19:52:55 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsTom PhillipsSun Mar 13 2005 - 22:44:46 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsGregory BlankSun Mar 13 2005 - 23:33:34 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsTom PhillipsMon Mar 14 2005 - 05:18:13 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsSteven, Mon Mar 14 2005 - 05:11:24 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsbobMon Mar 14 2005 - 11:29:50 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsNicholas O. LindanMon Mar 14 2005 - 11:47:12 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsNicholas O. LindanMon Mar 14 2005 - 16:52:13 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsPhilip HomburgMon Mar 14 2005 - 17:26:55 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsDavid J. LittleboyMon Mar 14 2005 - 18:01:45 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsBoatMon Mar 14 2005 - 23:57:37 EST
--> Where will B&W be tomorrowNo OneTue Mar 15 2005 - 12:06:36 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be tomorrowjjsTue Mar 15 2005 - 12:56:37 EST
Re: Where will B&W be tomorrowGregory BlankTue Mar 15 2005 - 13:35:34 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsrafe bustinTue Mar 15 2005 - 08:44:33 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsbobTue Mar 15 2005 - 09:12:01 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsPhilip HomburgTue Mar 15 2005 - 10:15:19 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsbobTue Mar 15 2005 - 10:07:02 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsTom PhillipsTue Mar 15 2005 - 10:47:29 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsrafebTue Mar 15 2005 - 12:13:31 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsTom PhillipsTue Mar 15 2005 - 12:41:33 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsbobTue Mar 15 2005 - 13:58:50 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsRafe BustinTue Mar 15 2005 - 14:25:34 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsTom PhillipsTue Mar 15 2005 - 14:57:29 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsjjsTue Mar 15 2005 - 15:14:51 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsjjsTue Mar 15 2005 - 15:09:07 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsrafebTue Mar 15 2005 - 15:53:05 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsPhilip HomburgTue Mar 15 2005 - 12:54:37 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsbobTue Mar 15 2005 - 13:51:56 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsChris BrownTue Mar 15 2005 - 17:29:42 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsjjsTue Mar 15 2005 - 19:42:04 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsbobTue Mar 15 2005 - 13:28:28 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsTom PhillipsTue Mar 15 2005 - 13:39:30 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsbobTue Mar 15 2005 - 13:55:01 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsGregory BlankTue Mar 15 2005 - 14:12:42 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsbobTue Mar 15 2005 - 14:45:34 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsGregory BlankTue Mar 15 2005 - 15:08:32 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsbobTue Mar 15 2005 - 15:37:39 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsGregory BlankTue Mar 15 2005 - 15:56:19 EST
--> Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsTom PhillipsTue Mar 15 2005 - 15:12:01 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsNicholas O. LindanTue Mar 15 2005 - 14:52:25 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsJohn CostelloTue Mar 15 2005 - 12:04:55 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsGregory BlankTue Mar 15 2005 - 13:43:41 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsNicholas O. LindanTue Mar 15 2005 - 15:53:29 EST
Re: Where will B&W be in 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 .... yearsNeil GouldTue Mar 15 2005 - 17:25:44 EST
Re: ShotsChris HutchesonSun Mar 13 2005 - 13:33:50 EST
Re: ShotsInaccessibleSun Mar 13 2005 - 18:17:35 EST
Linhof MedizinHarry Smart via PhotoKB.comSun Mar 13 2005 - 10:49:56 EST
Old Calumet 4X5 questionsLillySat Mar 12 2005 - 16:13:30 EST
Re: Old Calumet 4X5 questionsJean-David BeyerSat Mar 12 2005 - 18:20:14 EST
--> Re: Old Calumet 4X5 questionsLillySat Mar 12 2005 - 18:34:18 EST
--> Re: Old Calumet 4X5 questionsJean-David BeyerSat Mar 12 2005 - 21:16:18 EST
--> Re: Old Calumet 4X5 questionsFrank PittelSat Mar 12 2005 - 22:36:58 EST
--> Re: Old Calumet 4X5 questionsLillySun Mar 13 2005 - 13:23:48 EST
--> Re: Old Calumet 4X5 questionsFrank PittelSat Mar 12 2005 - 22:34:56 EST
Re: Old Calumet 4X5 questionsThomMon Mar 14 2005 - 00:32:52 EST
Satin Snow Ground GlassMatt ClaraSat Mar 12 2005 - 04:27:23 EST
Re: Satin Snow Ground GlassShelleySat Mar 12 2005 - 07:54:54 EST
--> Re: Satin Snow Ground GlassJos. BurkeSat Mar 12 2005 - 13:59:48 EST
Re: Satin Snow Ground GlassStealthSun Mar 13 2005 - 15:47:00 EST
--> Re: Satin Snow Ground GlassRichard KnoppowSun Mar 13 2005 - 16:24:26 EST
--> Re: Satin Snow Ground GlassShelleySun Mar 13 2005 - 18:20:04 EST
--> Re: Satin Snow Ground GlassInaccessibleSun Mar 13 2005 - 19:22:25 EST
--> Re: Satin Snow Ground GlassShelleySun Mar 13 2005 - 23:07:19 EST
Re: Satin Snow Ground GlassP. MeschterTue Mar 15 2005 - 07:30:27 EST
--> Re: Satin Snow Ground GlassGregory BlankTue Mar 15 2005 - 08:55:08 EST
Re: shooting modelsjjsFri Mar 11 2005 - 20:07:01 EST
Re: Shen-Hao Finish (or, just playin with my new extension bellows)Gordon MoatThu Mar 10 2005 - 14:03:24 EST
Re: Shen-Hao Finish (or, just playin with my new extension bellows)Gregory BlankThu Mar 10 2005 - 14:17:16 EST
Re: Shen-Hao Finish (or, just playin with my new extension bellows)Matt ClaraThu Mar 10 2005 - 18:46:02 EST
Re: Shen-Hao Finish (or, just playin with my new extension bellows)Matt ClaraThu Mar 10 2005 - 18:46:59 EST
Re: Shen-Hao Finish (or, just playin with my new extension bellows)BandicootFri Mar 11 2005 - 12:19:48 EST
Re: Shen-Hao Finish (or, just playin with my new extension bellows)ShelleyFri Mar 11 2005 - 16:39:56 EST
Re: Shen-Hao Finish (or, just playin with my new extension bellows)jjsFri Mar 11 2005 - 18:01:00 EST
--> Re: Shen-Hao Finish (or, just playin with my new extension bellows)David NebenzahlFri Mar 11 2005 - 18:47:24 EST
--> Re: Shen-Hao Finish (or, just playin with my new extension bellows)jjsFri Mar 11 2005 - 20:10:28 EST
Scanning WorkshopTed HarrisFri Sep 02 2005 - 10:20:49 EDT
Star trailsChris BrownThu Sep 01 2005 - 11:30:57 EDT
Re: Star trailslaura hallidayThu Sep 01 2005 - 12:20:43 EDT
--> Re: Star trailsNick FotisThu Sep 01 2005 - 17:42:02 EDT
Re: Star trailsBrian ReynoldsThu Sep 01 2005 - 18:26:52 EDT
--> Re: Star trailsCharlesThu Sep 01 2005 - 18:33:49 EDT
--> Re: Star trailsChris BrownFri Sep 02 2005 - 09:29:39 EDT
--> Re: Star trailslaura hallidayFri Sep 02 2005 - 10:49:43 EDT
--> Re: Star trailsChris BrownThu Sep 01 2005 - 19:28:13 EDT
Re: Star trailsDennis O'ConnorFri Sep 02 2005 - 09:33:06 EDT
Large rolls of color film availableDavid NebenzahlWed Aug 31 2005 - 16:44:56 EDT
Re: Large rolls of color film availableKen HartWed Aug 31 2005 - 16:46:25 EDT
The penis is way too delicate for masturbationdgrj1400_at_email.domain.hiddenWed Aug 31 2005 - 08:42:30 EDT
Hand of GodMatt ClaraTue Aug 30 2005 - 13:53:47 EDT
Re: Hand of GodDavid NebenzahlTue Aug 30 2005 - 15:11:18 EDT
--> Re: Hand of GodBjorn A. Payne DiazThu Sep 01 2005 - 13:30:52 EDT
--> Re: Hand of GodQ.G. de BakkerThu Sep 01 2005 - 13:53:46 EDT
Re: Hand of GodFrank PittelTue Aug 30 2005 - 16:52:04 EDT
--> Re: Hand of GodStaceyThu Sep 01 2005 - 20:33:21 EDT
Hand of GodMatt ClaraTue Aug 30 2005 - 13:46:19 EDT
Re: Hand of GodLorem IpsumTue Aug 30 2005 - 15:21:34 EDT
--> Re: Hand of GodMatt ClaraTue Aug 30 2005 - 16:01:16 EDT
--> Re: Hand of GodLorem IpsumTue Aug 30 2005 - 16:25:57 EDT
Re: Hand of GodBill HiltonTue Aug 30 2005 - 17:29:16 EDT
--> Re: Hand of GodNick ZentenaTue Aug 30 2005 - 18:33:27 EDT
--> Re: Hand of GodIan MorrisonTue Aug 30 2005 - 18:54:21 EDT
Re: Hand of GodAlan BrowneThu Sep 01 2005 - 21:00:29 EDT
4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?Matt ClaraTue Aug 30 2005 - 13:21:05 EDT
Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?Malcolm StewartTue Aug 30 2005 - 13:35:09 EDT
Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?CheeseheadTue Aug 30 2005 - 14:26:23 EDT
Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?Nicholas O. LindanTue Aug 30 2005 - 14:44:12 EDT
Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?David NebenzahlTue Aug 30 2005 - 15:02:10 EDT
Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?Lorem IpsumTue Aug 30 2005 - 15:27:17 EDT
--> Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?Matt ClaraTue Aug 30 2005 - 15:36:44 EDT
--> Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?Matt ClaraTue Aug 30 2005 - 17:11:19 EDT
--> Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?Udie LafingTue Aug 30 2005 - 21:26:41 EDT
Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?laura hallidayTue Aug 30 2005 - 16:08:29 EDT
--> Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?CheeseheadWed Aug 31 2005 - 07:34:00 EDT
Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?Robert S. DeanTue Aug 30 2005 - 20:54:32 EDT
Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?Dave MorrisonTue Aug 30 2005 - 23:43:32 EDT
Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?Dennis O'ConnorWed Aug 31 2005 - 08:34:33 EDT
--> Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?Matt ClaraWed Aug 31 2005 - 12:56:36 EDT
Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?MonoWed Aug 31 2005 - 12:07:29 EDT
--> Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?David NebenzahlWed Aug 31 2005 - 13:07:48 EDT
--> Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?MonoWed Aug 31 2005 - 21:09:09 EDT
Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?wiltThu Sep 01 2005 - 11:03:34 EDT
--> Re: 4x5 sheet film--how do you prefer to develop it?LR KalajainenFri Sep 02 2005 - 11:20:56 EDT
Manfrotto hydrostat locking system headMalcolm StewartSat Aug 27 2005 - 21:35:20 EDT
Building homemade 4X5, digital backs?Lawrence Allan KrieseFri Aug 26 2005 - 15:40:40 EDT
Re: Building homemade 4X5, digital backs?Gregory BlankFri Aug 26 2005 - 16:21:38 EDT
--> Re: Building homemade 4X5, digital backs?wiltFri Aug 26 2005 - 16:32:42 EDT
--> Re: Building homemade 4X5, digital backs?Lorem IpsumFri Aug 26 2005 - 16:54:14 EDT
--> Re: Building homemade 4X5, digital backs?Lawrence Allan KrieseSat Aug 27 2005 - 21:33:54 EDT
--> Re: Building homemade 4X5, digital backs?Gordon MoatSun Aug 28 2005 - 12:42:49 EDT
--> Re: Building homemade 4X5, digital backs?Lorem IpsumMon Aug 29 2005 - 11:19:01 EDT
--> Re: Building homemade 4X5, digital backs?VinDevoThu Sep 01 2005 - 07:05:37 EDT
--> Re: Building homemade 4X5, digital backs?Gregory BlankThu Sep 01 2005 - 07:43:31 EDT
Re: Building homemade 4X5, digital backs?Lorem IpsumFri Aug 26 2005 - 16:52:26 EDT
Re: New photo websiteJack Campin - bogus addressSun Aug 21 2005 - 19:01:22 EDT
Ball head or three-way head?Francois HendrickxSun Aug 21 2005 - 15:55:54 EDT
Re: Ball head or three-way head?Lorem IpsumSun Aug 21 2005 - 17:22:56 EDT
Re: Ball head or three-way head?Malcolm StewartSun Aug 21 2005 - 17:41:42 EDT
Re: Ball head or three-way head?William SchneiderSun Aug 21 2005 - 17:53:38 EDT
Re: Ball head or three-way head?BandicootMon Aug 22 2005 - 00:09:23 EDT
Re: Ball head or three-way head?Chris EllingerMon Aug 22 2005 - 08:13:53 EDT
Re: Ball head or three-way head?wiltMon Aug 22 2005 - 18:04:51 EDT
--> Re: Ball head or three-way head?Drew SaundersTue Aug 23 2005 - 12:52:43 EDT
--> Re: Ball head or three-way head?wiltWed Aug 24 2005 - 12:27:57 EDT
--> Re: Ball head or three-way head?Francois HendrickxTue Aug 23 2005 - 13:38:00 EDT
--> Re: Ball head or three-way head?Lorem IpsumTue Aug 23 2005 - 14:23:56 EDT
Re: Ball head or three-way head?Nicholas O. LindanTue Aug 30 2005 - 14:57:51 EDT
Re: Ball head or three-way head?Ted HarrisTue Aug 30 2005 - 09:25:32 EDT
Re: Where would a 4x5 holder leak?Richard KnoppowSun Aug 21 2005 - 03:34:43 EDT
Re: Where would a 4x5 holder leak?Lorem IpsumMon Aug 22 2005 - 20:33:34 EDT
light holder leak FOLLOWUPMikeSun Aug 21 2005 - 00:36:48 EDT
Re: light holder leak FOLLOWUPRichard KnoppowSun Aug 21 2005 - 03:29:39 EDT
--> Re: light holder leak FOLLOWUPDavid NebenzahlSun Aug 21 2005 - 16:56:58 EDT
--> Re: light holder leak FOLLOWUPMalcolm StewartTue Aug 23 2005 - 17:11:25 EDT
--> Re: light holder leak FOLLOWUPRob YoungSun Aug 21 2005 - 12:26:57 EDT
Re: Photo backpack rain problemMark McGilvrayThu Aug 18 2005 - 15:15:23 EDT
Re: Photo backpack rain problemArt SchwartzThu Aug 18 2005 - 20:18:40 EDT
--> Re: Photo backpack rain problemLorem IpsumThu Aug 18 2005 - 21:32:17 EDT
shutter sourcesJack Campin - bogus addressSat Aug 20 2005 - 14:31:40 EDT
Re: shutter sourcesLorem IpsumSat Aug 20 2005 - 16:04:34 EDT
Re: shutter sourcesRichard KnoppowSat Aug 20 2005 - 20:01:27 EDT
WTB 11X14 HoldersGordon ChappleWed Aug 17 2005 - 09:49:49 EDT
WTB 24" Red Dot ArtarGordon ChappleWed Aug 17 2005 - 09:49:13 EDT
Re: WTB 24" Red Dot ArtarRichard KnoppowWed Aug 17 2005 - 19:19:39 EDT
Calling Germany, Hahnemuhle papernobodyWed Aug 17 2005 - 09:07:15 EDT
Re: Calling Germany, Hahnemuhle paperMartin JangowskiThu Aug 18 2005 - 02:41:42 EDT
--> Re: Calling Germany, Hahnemuhle papernobodyThu Aug 18 2005 - 04:48:26 EDT
Re: Lens WantedBCTue Aug 16 2005 - 11:00:07 EDT
Re: Lens WantedNicholas O. LindanTue Aug 16 2005 - 13:58:53 EDT
Re: Lens WantedCheeseheadTue Aug 30 2005 - 13:50:36 EDT
Film Calibration: EpilogueDarin HeinzTue Aug 16 2005 - 00:12:27 EDT
regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensHenrik TivedMon Aug 15 2005 - 23:32:14 EDT
Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lenswiltTue Aug 16 2005 - 00:00:24 EDT
Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lenswiltTue Aug 16 2005 - 00:05:55 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensHenrik TivedTue Aug 16 2005 - 01:00:50 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensBob GTue Aug 16 2005 - 02:35:19 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensBob GTue Aug 16 2005 - 02:43:02 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensHenrik TivedTue Aug 16 2005 - 03:42:45 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lenswiltTue Aug 16 2005 - 10:12:31 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensHenrik TivedTue Aug 16 2005 - 10:32:25 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensGordon MoatSun Aug 21 2005 - 14:59:51 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensHenrik TivedTue Aug 23 2005 - 21:50:15 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensNicholas O. LindanWed Aug 24 2005 - 10:23:02 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensGordon MoatWed Aug 24 2005 - 13:29:24 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensHenrik TivedSat Aug 27 2005 - 10:12:34 EDT
8x10 ground glass anecdoteNo OneMon Aug 15 2005 - 21:01:07 EDT
Re: 8x10 ground glass anecdoteGregory BlankMon Aug 15 2005 - 21:28:47 EDT
Re: 8x10 ground glass anecdotejohnboyMon Aug 15 2005 - 22:16:33 EDT
--> Re: 8x10 ground glass anecdoteNo OneTue Aug 16 2005 - 13:31:18 EDT
--> Re: 8x10 ground glass anecdoteMatt ClaraTue Aug 16 2005 - 22:48:28 EDT
--> Re: 8x10 ground glass anecdoteHenrik TivedWed Aug 17 2005 - 11:59:20 EDT
Re: 8x10 ground glass anecdoteJanisSat Aug 20 2005 - 23:25:58 EDT
Re: carts for trails?Francois HendrickxThu Aug 18 2005 - 09:29:41 EDT
Re: carts for trails?Claude DiBugnaraSat Aug 20 2005 - 22:25:14 EDT
Re: carts for trails?Larry HeathFri Aug 26 2005 - 20:17:36 EDT
Re: carts for trails?Matt ClaraWed Aug 31 2005 - 14:10:09 EDT
--> Re: carts for trails?Jim HemenwayThu Sep 01 2005 - 14:02:21 EDT
--> Re: carts for trails?Nicholas O. LindanThu Sep 01 2005 - 14:38:20 EDT
3/8in tripod head screwMalcolm StewartSun Nov 14 2004 - 20:21:29 EST
Re: an official complaint against matt parker was filed with the us embassyhttp://tinyurl.com/ii35Sun Nov 14 2004 - 05:56:37 EST
Toyo 4x5 Field CameraAlanSun Nov 14 2004 - 02:05:36 EST
Re: Toyo 4x5 Field CameraBob GSun Nov 14 2004 - 09:12:36 EST
--> Re: Toyo 4x5 Field CameraShelleySun Nov 14 2004 - 10:14:21 EST
Re: Toyo 4x5 Field CameraArgon3Sun Nov 14 2004 - 09:30:43 EST
FernandojjsSat Nov 13 2004 - 11:53:12 EST
Re: FernandoArgon3Sat Nov 13 2004 - 18:27:53 EST
--> Re: FernandoFernandoSat Nov 13 2004 - 20:33:57 EST
Re: FernandoFernandoSat Nov 13 2004 - 20:30:13 EST
Re: Wow, I'm really confused now! :-))ShelleyThu Nov 11 2004 - 22:02:55 EST
Re: Wow, I'm really confused now! :-))Chris EllingerFri Nov 12 2004 - 13:30:59 EST
Re: Wow, I'm really confused now! :-))BandicootFri Nov 12 2004 - 19:06:23 EST
Re: Wow, I'm really confused now! :-))Dan FrommSat Nov 13 2004 - 18:24:25 EST
--> Re: Wow, I'm really confused now! :-))ShelleySat Nov 13 2004 - 19:26:26 EST
--> Re: Wow, I'm really confused now! :-))jjsSat Nov 13 2004 - 20:15:26 EST
shutter speedMichele SmithFri Nov 12 2004 - 00:58:35 EST
Re: shutter speedMalcolm StewartFri Nov 12 2004 - 19:28:06 EST
Re: shutter speedRichard KnoppowSat Nov 13 2004 - 05:36:15 EST
--> Re: shutter speedf/256Sun Nov 14 2004 - 08:51:22 EST
Re: shutter speedf/256Sat Nov 13 2004 - 07:59:56 EST
--> Re: shutter speedRichard KnoppowSat Nov 13 2004 - 20:28:53 EST
Chris PerezjjsThu Nov 11 2004 - 22:12:29 EST
Re: Chris PerezChristopher PerezFri Nov 12 2004 - 11:14:45 EST
--> Re: Chris PerezjjsSat Nov 13 2004 - 13:52:06 EST
Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongChristopher PerezThu Nov 11 2004 - 15:47:57 EST
Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongChristopher PerezThu Nov 11 2004 - 17:05:37 EST
--> Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongLeonard EvensThu Nov 11 2004 - 17:28:15 EST
--> Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongjjsThu Nov 11 2004 - 17:57:18 EST
--> Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongBob GFri Nov 12 2004 - 09:32:01 EST
--> Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongChristopher PerezFri Nov 12 2004 - 11:12:27 EST
--> Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongJos. BurkeFri Nov 12 2004 - 18:09:13 EST
--> Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongjjsFri Nov 12 2004 - 17:58:45 EST
--> Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongChristopher PerezFri Nov 12 2004 - 11:10:54 EST
Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongBob GThu Nov 11 2004 - 17:26:43 EST
--> Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongChristopher PerezFri Nov 12 2004 - 11:13:06 EST
Are all Caltar II lenses rebadged Rodenstocks?Matt ClaraThu Nov 11 2004 - 09:34:11 EST
Re: Are all Caltar II lenses rebadged Rodenstocks?Thor Lancelot SimonThu Nov 11 2004 - 09:43:28 EST
--> Re: Are all Caltar II lenses rebadged Rodenstocks?StaceyFri Nov 12 2004 - 12:28:53 EST
--> Re: Are all Caltar II lenses rebadged Rodenstocks?Thor Lancelot SimonFri Nov 12 2004 - 00:33:52 EST
Re: Are all Caltar II lenses rebadged Rodenstocks?Christopher PerezThu Nov 11 2004 - 11:21:20 EST
Re: Are all Caltar II lenses rebadged Rodenstocks?Frank PittelThu Nov 11 2004 - 11:40:53 EST
Re: Are all Caltar II lenses rebadged Rodenstocks?Dean Van PraotlThu Nov 11 2004 - 16:34:55 EST
Re: Are all Caltar II lenses rebadged Rodenstocks?Frank PittelSat Nov 13 2004 - 19:48:46 EST
For you LF guys--I've recently acquired some long barrel lenses (400-600mm) !Jos. BurkeSat Nov 06 2004 - 12:11:05 EST
Re: For you LF guys--I've recently acquired some long barrel lenses (400-600mm) !Richard KnoppowSat Nov 06 2004 - 16:49:01 EST
Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsFernandoThu Nov 11 2004 - 03:54:01 EST
Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsJos. BurkeThu Nov 11 2004 - 09:15:43 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsjjsThu Nov 11 2004 - 08:45:02 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsArgon3Thu Nov 11 2004 - 09:24:17 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsjjsThu Nov 11 2004 - 09:45:25 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsFernandoThu Nov 11 2004 - 10:04:00 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsFernandoFri Nov 12 2004 - 10:12:45 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsLR KalajainenThu Nov 11 2004 - 11:43:29 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsjjsThu Nov 11 2004 - 11:58:07 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsLR KalajainenThu Nov 11 2004 - 23:32:11 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsMalcolm StewartThu Nov 11 2004 - 14:55:38 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsJos. BurkeFri Nov 12 2004 - 00:25:15 EST
Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsShelleyThu Nov 11 2004 - 08:41:47 EST
ID-ing LF negativesMalcolm StewartFri Nov 05 2004 - 13:28:39 EST
Re: ID-ing LF negativesMalcolm StewartFri Nov 05 2004 - 19:14:43 EST
Re: ID-ing LF negativesDonald QuallsFri Nov 05 2004 - 13:40:19 EST
Re: ID-ing LF negativesArgon3Fri Nov 05 2004 - 13:51:32 EST
Re: ID-ing LF negativesjjsFri Nov 05 2004 - 14:34:39 EST
--> Re: ID-ing LF negativesArgon3Fri Nov 05 2004 - 17:28:46 EST
Re: TestingUranium CommitteeWed Nov 10 2004 - 18:16:50 EST
OLD ROLLEFLEXANDYLEWWed Nov 10 2004 - 13:57:53 EST
Re: OLD ROLLEFLEXCameraWed Nov 10 2004 - 15:51:08 EST
Re: OLD ROLLEFLEXRichard KnoppowWed Nov 10 2004 - 21:04:22 EST
Shutters & high speed settingjjsWed Nov 10 2004 - 11:39:31 EST
Re: Shutters & high speed settingJean-David BeyerWed Nov 10 2004 - 12:58:27 EST
Re: Shutters & high speed settingMalcolm StewartWed Nov 10 2004 - 14:57:18 EST
--> Re: Shutters & high speed settingjjsWed Nov 10 2004 - 19:16:14 EST
Re: Shutters & high speed settingRichard KnoppowWed Nov 10 2004 - 21:32:01 EST
Step 3 -- film handling & managementCollin BrendemuehlWed Nov 10 2004 - 11:21:09 EST
Re: Step 3 -- film handling & managementShelleyWed Nov 10 2004 - 23:56:58 EST
Agfa Returns !!! Email the new president !!!davidbSun Nov 07 2004 - 18:19:25 EST
Re: Agfa Returns !!! Email the new president !!!StaceyMon Nov 08 2004 - 14:22:01 EST
Re: Agfa Returns !!! Email the new president !!!Michael BenvenisteSun Nov 07 2004 - 22:40:47 EST
Re: Agfa Returns !!! Email the new president !!!Argon3Tue Nov 09 2004 - 16:28:49 EST
--> Re: Agfa Returns !!! Email the new president !!!Frank PittelTue Nov 09 2004 - 23:52:13 EST
Polaroid 545 backStephen M.GluckSun Nov 07 2004 - 16:13:42 EST
Re: Polaroid 545 backRichard KnoppowMon Nov 08 2004 - 20:29:56 EST
--> Re: Polaroid 545 backStephen M.GluckTue Nov 09 2004 - 09:26:30 EST
Re: Polaroid 545 backFrank PittelTue Nov 09 2004 - 14:27:55 EST
what light meter do you use?Ed MargiewiczMon Nov 01 2004 - 23:47:28 EST
Re: what light meter do you use?Pieter LitchfieldTue Nov 02 2004 - 06:43:05 EST
Re: what light meter do you use?Jean-David BeyerTue Nov 02 2004 - 07:13:37 EST
Re: what light meter do you use?ShelleyTue Nov 02 2004 - 08:39:43 EST
Re: what light meter do you use?Chris EllingerTue Nov 02 2004 - 09:32:09 EST
Re: what light meter do you use?Stefan PatricWed Nov 03 2004 - 00:19:09 EST
Re: what light meter do you use?Tom PhillipsMon Nov 01 2004 - 21:31:51 EST
Re: what light meter do you use?Nicholas O. LindanTue Nov 02 2004 - 10:20:08 EST
Re: what light meter do you use?Ed MargiewiczThu Nov 04 2004 - 07:52:20 EST
Re: what light meter do you use?PeteTue Nov 02 2004 - 10:01:39 EST
Kalart rangefinderMatt AshbrookSun Oct 31 2004 - 16:17:33 EST
Re: Kalart rangefinderNicholas O. LindanSun Oct 31 2004 - 19:52:39 EST
--> Re: Kalart rangefinderDavid NebenzahlSun Oct 31 2004 - 21:35:42 EST
--> Re: Kalart rangefinderDonald QuallsMon Nov 01 2004 - 09:22:31 EST
--> Re: Kalart rangefinderDavid NebenzahlMon Nov 01 2004 - 11:56:19 EST
--> Re: Kalart rangefinderRichard KnoppowThu Nov 04 2004 - 05:38:11 EST
--> Re: Kalart rangefinderDonald QuallsThu Nov 04 2004 - 08:44:07 EST
--> Re: Kalart rangefinderRichard KnoppowThu Nov 04 2004 - 14:07:53 EST
--> Re: Kalart rangefinderNicholas O. LindanThu Nov 04 2004 - 17:08:05 EST
--> Re: Kalart rangefinderDonald QuallsThu Nov 04 2004 - 17:46:41 EST
graplex.org forumMatt AshbrookSun Oct 31 2004 - 16:08:53 EST
Re: graplex.org forumAlecjMon Nov 01 2004 - 14:49:58 EST
Cut film edge ID mark ?Malcolm StewartSun Oct 31 2004 - 15:36:02 EST
Re: Cut film edge ID mark ?Donald QuallsMon Nov 01 2004 - 09:12:35 EST
--> Re: Cut film edge ID mark ?Malcolm StewartMon Nov 01 2004 - 09:40:34 EST
--> Re: Cut film edge ID mark ?Donald QuallsMon Nov 01 2004 - 14:11:08 EST
Linhof Technika optical viewersjjsSun Oct 31 2004 - 13:47:08 EST
Re: Linhof Technika optical viewersBob SalomonSun Oct 31 2004 - 13:56:18 EST
--> Re: Linhof Technika optical viewersjjsSun Oct 31 2004 - 15:10:02 EST
Re: Linhof Technika optical viewersJPMOSESat Nov 13 2004 - 09:04:17 EST
--> Re: Linhof Technika optical viewersBob SalomonSat Nov 13 2004 - 09:18:09 EST
--> Re: Linhof Technika optical viewersjjsSat Nov 13 2004 - 11:08:26 EST
Information about rec.photo.marketplace.large-format [27may2001]Helge NareidSun Oct 31 2004 - 11:36:05 EST
2 lens systemMatt ClaraSat Nov 06 2004 - 17:33:34 EST
Re: 2 lens systemJos. BurkeSat Nov 06 2004 - 23:43:25 EST
--> Re: 2 lens systemMatt ClaraSun Nov 07 2004 - 08:22:41 EST
--> Re: 2 lens systemJos. BurkeSun Nov 07 2004 - 10:42:32 EST
--> Re: 2 lens systemMatt ClaraSun Nov 07 2004 - 11:05:06 EST
Re: 2 lens systemjjsSat Nov 06 2004 - 18:12:22 EST
--> Re: 2 lens systemMatt ClaraSun Nov 07 2004 - 11:07:56 EST
--> Re: 2 lens systemDouglasSun Nov 07 2004 - 11:42:15 EST
--> Re: 2 lens systemjjsSun Nov 07 2004 - 12:29:02 EST
--> Re: 2 lens systemjjsSun Nov 07 2004 - 12:24:35 EST
--> Re: 2 lens systemLeonard EvensSat Nov 06 2004 - 18:23:26 EST
Re: 2 lens systemShelleySat Nov 06 2004 - 19:26:28 EST
--> Re: 2 lens systemMatt ClaraSat Nov 06 2004 - 20:16:24 EST
--> Re: 2 lens systemjjsSat Nov 06 2004 - 20:56:36 EST
--> Re: 2 lens systemShelleySun Nov 07 2004 - 07:29:27 EST
Re: 2 lens systemDouglasSun Nov 07 2004 - 11:21:44 EST
Re: 2 lens systemDouglasSun Nov 07 2004 - 13:58:39 EST
--> Re: 2 lens systemBandicootSun Nov 07 2004 - 19:32:10 EST
Re: 2 lens systemCollin BrendemuehlMon Nov 08 2004 - 09:59:37 EST
Knoppow on Kalert RFJim HemenwayThu Nov 04 2004 - 08:43:25 EST
Re: Knoppow on Kalert RFJim HemenwayThu Nov 04 2004 - 12:27:25 EST
Re: Knoppow on Kalert RFNicholas O. LindanThu Nov 04 2004 - 16:59:35 EST
--> Re: Knoppow on Kalert RFRichard KnoppowFri Nov 05 2004 - 06:02:14 EST
hopeless newbie questionnoneTue Nov 02 2004 - 21:26:54 EST
Re: hopeless newbie questionShelleyWed Nov 03 2004 - 06:20:09 EST
--> Re: hopeless newbie questionDavid NebenzahlWed Nov 03 2004 - 12:13:33 EST
--> Re: hopeless newbie questionDonald QuallsWed Nov 03 2004 - 13:10:49 EST
--> Re: hopeless newbie questionJohn BartleyWed Nov 03 2004 - 13:30:30 EST
--> Re: hopeless newbie questionDonald QuallsWed Nov 03 2004 - 17:34:25 EST
Re: hopeless newbie questionDonald QuallsWed Nov 03 2004 - 13:04:34 EST
Re: hopeless newbie questionJos. BurkeTue Nov 02 2004 - 22:57:51 EST
Re: hopeless newbie questiontracym_at_email.domain.hiddenThu Nov 04 2004 - 10:42:31 EST
What is a Field Camera, really?jjsTue Nov 02 2004 - 17:47:24 EST
Re: What is a Field Camera, really?Donn CaveWed Nov 03 2004 - 00:55:59 EST
Re: What is a Field Camera, really?CamArtsMagTue Nov 02 2004 - 20:38:17 EST
--> Re: What is a Field Camera, really?Bob SalomonWed Nov 03 2004 - 03:42:36 EST
--> Re: What is a Field Camera, really?ShelleyWed Nov 03 2004 - 06:31:27 EST
--> Re: What is a Field Camera, really?Frank PittelThu Nov 04 2004 - 02:21:05 EST
--> Re: What is a Field Camera, really?otziThu Nov 04 2004 - 08:45:26 EST
--> Re: What is a Field Camera, really?Frank PittelThu Nov 04 2004 - 14:58:04 EST
A field camera to mount <65mm lenses?RoninTue Nov 02 2004 - 09:31:17 EST
Re: A field camera to mount <65mm lenses?RoninTue Nov 02 2004 - 09:35:01 EST
--> Re: A field camera to mount <65mm lenses?RoninTue Nov 02 2004 - 09:35:34 EST
--> Re: A field camera to mount <65mm lenses?jjsTue Nov 02 2004 - 09:49:50 EST
--> Re: A field camera to mount <65mm lenses?Dan FrommTue Nov 02 2004 - 17:36:18 EST
Re: A field camera to mount <65mm lenses?Bob SalomonTue Nov 02 2004 - 11:22:21 EST
--> Re: A field camera to mount <65mm lenses?jjsTue Nov 02 2004 - 12:24:15 EST
Re: A field camera to mount <65mm lenses?Dan FrommTue Nov 02 2004 - 17:34:39 EST
Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 cameraCafferata FamilyThu Oct 28 2004 - 18:01:04 EDT
Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camerajjsThu Oct 28 2004 - 18:11:45 EDT
Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 cameraBob SalomonThu Oct 28 2004 - 18:36:03 EDT
--> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camerajjsFri Oct 29 2004 - 11:57:52 EDT
--> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 cameraPhil TobiasFri Oct 29 2004 - 13:04:26 EDT
--> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 cameraNicholas O. LindanFri Oct 29 2004 - 19:22:21 EDT
--> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 cameraPhil TobiasFri Oct 29 2004 - 22:00:41 EDT
--> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 cameraBob SalomonFri Oct 29 2004 - 13:40:40 EDT
--> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 cameraFrank PittelFri Oct 29 2004 - 14:49:22 EDT
--> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camerajjsFri Oct 29 2004 - 17:57:56 EDT
--> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 cameraFrank PittelSat Oct 30 2004 - 00:16:18 EDT
--> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 cameraLeonard EvensSat Oct 30 2004 - 12:04:40 EDT
--> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camerajjsSat Oct 30 2004 - 12:28:00 EDT
--> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 cameraLeonard EvensSat Oct 30 2004 - 14:34:05 EDT
--> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camerajjsSat Oct 30 2004 - 14:51:59 EDT
Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 cameraArgon3Thu Oct 28 2004 - 20:43:46 EDT
Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 cameratracym_at_email.domain.hiddenThu Nov 04 2004 - 10:45:43 EST
--> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 cameraGregory W BlankThu Nov 04 2004 - 11:34:09 EST
--> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 cameratracym_at_email.domain.hiddenThu Nov 04 2004 - 13:01:48 EST
7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Christopher PerezMon Nov 01 2004 - 17:19:42 EST
Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?jjsMon Nov 01 2004 - 21:50:06 EST
Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Jos. BurkeMon Nov 01 2004 - 22:37:28 EST
Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?jjsMon Nov 01 2004 - 21:52:21 EST
--> Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Donald QuallsTue Nov 02 2004 - 06:04:32 EST
--> Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Christopher PerezTue Nov 02 2004 - 10:16:20 EST
Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Richard KnoppowThu Nov 04 2004 - 14:01:54 EST
--> Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Christopher PerezFri Nov 05 2004 - 11:30:35 EST
--> Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Richard KnoppowSat Nov 06 2004 - 02:28:32 EST
--> Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?jjsSat Nov 06 2004 - 10:46:20 EST
--> Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Kirk FrySun Nov 07 2004 - 20:48:02 EST
--> Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Richard KnoppowTue Nov 09 2004 - 01:43:32 EST
--> Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Richard KnoppowMon Nov 08 2004 - 20:44:46 EST
--> Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Jos. BurkeFri Nov 05 2004 - 14:32:06 EST
--> Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Christopher PerezFri Nov 05 2004 - 15:40:38 EST
--> Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Richard KnoppowSat Nov 06 2004 - 02:52:46 EST
--> Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Christopher PerezMon Nov 08 2004 - 14:19:45 EST
Political Camera Fun?Collin BrendemuehlMon Nov 01 2004 - 14:50:50 EST
Re: Political Camera Fun?Bob HarringtonMon Nov 01 2004 - 17:32:42 EST
Re: Political Camera Fun?Mark MMon Nov 01 2004 - 22:57:27 EST
--> Re: Political Camera Fun?Tom PhillipsTue Nov 02 2004 - 01:35:29 EST
Re: Political Camera Fun?Michael BenvenisteMon Nov 01 2004 - 16:03:32 EST
Re: Political Camera Fun?TonyMon Nov 01 2004 - 18:15:47 EST
--> Re: Political Camera Fun?meTue Nov 02 2004 - 09:30:42 EST
Re: Political Camera Fun?Al DenelsbeckMon Nov 01 2004 - 20:29:13 EST
Re: Political Camera Fun?Tom PhillipsMon Nov 01 2004 - 21:21:43 EST
Re: Political Camera Fun?Bob HickeyMon Nov 01 2004 - 21:32:17 EST
Found a fragment of the Holy Grail...Christopher PerezMon Nov 01 2004 - 11:39:11 EST
Re: Found a fragment of the Holy Grail...jjsMon Nov 01 2004 - 12:18:10 EST
Bound for Zion...John EmmonsMon Nov 01 2004 - 10:16:39 EST
Re: Bound for Zion...Nicholas O. LindanMon Nov 01 2004 - 10:20:44 EST
Please note my excellent Fuji 420 L in LF, MarketPlace,groupJos. BurkeSun Oct 31 2004 - 14:33:38 EST
Schneider 121mm Super AngulonJohnMon Nov 01 2004 - 00:47:33 EST
Re: Schneider 121mm Super AngulonRolandoMon Nov 01 2004 - 06:54:10 EST
--> Re: Schneider 121mm Super AngulonJohnMon Nov 01 2004 - 11:24:37 EST
--> Re: Schneider 121mm Super AngulonRolandoTue Nov 02 2004 - 08:05:40 EST
--> Re: Schneider 121mm Super AngulonjjsTue Nov 02 2004 - 08:39:20 EST
--> Re: Schneider 121mm Super AngulonRolandoTue Nov 02 2004 - 08:46:48 EST
--> Re: Schneider 121mm Super AngulonJohnTue Nov 02 2004 - 10:11:28 EST
Re: Schneider 121mm Super AngulonP. MacGahanWed Nov 10 2004 - 14:17:02 EST
Re: Schneider 121mm Super AngulonAlecjSat Nov 06 2004 - 17:18:57 EST
--> Re: Schneider 121mm Super AngulonRichard KnoppowMon Nov 08 2004 - 20:47:12 EST
--> Re: Schneider 121mm Super AngulonAlecjFri Nov 12 2004 - 00:08:28 EST
--> Re: Schneider 121mm Super AngulonjjsMon Nov 08 2004 - 21:31:19 EST
De Vere Monorail?Andrew McCallSun Oct 31 2004 - 19:20:21 EST
Re: De Vere Monorail?Donald QuallsMon Nov 01 2004 - 09:16:52 EST
Re: De Vere Monorail?Donald QuallsMon Nov 01 2004 - 14:12:36 EST
8x10 Dupe Film QuestionJos. BurkeSun Oct 31 2004 - 22:57:01 EST
Re: 8x10 Dupe Film QuestionDonald QuallsMon Nov 01 2004 - 09:06:19 EST
--> Re: 8x10 Dupe Film QuestionHank SeidelTue Nov 02 2004 - 14:01:19 EST
Cheapest E6 reduxArgon3Fri Oct 29 2004 - 18:57:18 EDT
Re: Cheapest E6 reduxFrank PittelFri Oct 29 2004 - 19:46:01 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxTom PhillipsSat Oct 30 2004 - 00:07:20 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxFrank PittelMon Nov 01 2004 - 01:57:06 EST
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxTom PhillipsMon Nov 01 2004 - 21:17:48 EST
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxFrank PittelTue Nov 02 2004 - 01:34:03 EST
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxTom PhillipsTue Nov 02 2004 - 02:07:35 EST
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxFrank PittelThu Nov 04 2004 - 02:31:50 EST
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxTom PhillipsMon Nov 08 2004 - 15:52:35 EST
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxFrank PittelTue Nov 09 2004 - 14:52:42 EST
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxTom PhillipsWed Nov 10 2004 - 00:46:02 EST
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxFrank PittelWed Nov 10 2004 - 12:55:29 EST
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxTom PhillipsWed Nov 10 2004 - 16:53:56 EST
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxDonald QuallsTue Nov 02 2004 - 06:01:33 EST
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxTom PhillipsTue Nov 02 2004 - 07:33:17 EST
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxFrank PittelThu Nov 04 2004 - 02:27:38 EST
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxArgon3Sat Oct 30 2004 - 01:21:38 EDT
Re: Cheapest E6 reduxDonald QuallsFri Oct 29 2004 - 19:21:46 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxArgon3Sat Oct 30 2004 - 01:19:10 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxDonald QuallsSat Oct 30 2004 - 08:00:54 EDT
Anyone else seen the XX Porn Stars doc. on HBO with Timothy Greefield Sanders!Jos. BurkeFri Oct 29 2004 - 17:03:23 EDT
Re: Anyone else seen the XX Porn Stars doc. on HBO with Timothy Greefield Sanders!RaoulSat Oct 30 2004 - 14:56:10 EDT
Re: this statement is made pending the issue of the official complaint against matt parkerhttp://tinyurl.com/ii35Fri Oct 29 2004 - 05:40:17 EDT
Infrared on LF (Filters?)Chris ManessWed Oct 27 2004 - 16:26:46 EDT
Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)Chris ManessWed Oct 27 2004 - 16:51:30 EDT
Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)Bob SalomonWed Oct 27 2004 - 16:57:54 EDT
--> Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)Chris ManessWed Oct 27 2004 - 17:16:31 EDT
Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)jjsWed Oct 27 2004 - 16:59:00 EDT
--> Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)Chris ManessWed Oct 27 2004 - 17:31:21 EDT
--> Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)jjsWed Oct 27 2004 - 17:54:52 EDT
--> Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)Chris ManessWed Oct 27 2004 - 18:16:02 EDT
--> Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)John McGrawThu Oct 28 2004 - 04:23:22 EDT
--> Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)jjsThu Oct 28 2004 - 08:12:50 EDT
--> Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)John McGrawThu Oct 28 2004 - 18:23:26 EDT
--> Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)John McGrawThu Oct 28 2004 - 04:23:23 EDT
Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)mr. chipWed Oct 27 2004 - 19:06:29 EDT
More on the restartCollin BrendemuehlWed Oct 20 2004 - 08:50:28 EDT
Re: More on the restart Nice Portrait!Jos. BurkeWed Oct 20 2004 - 21:31:45 EDT
--> Re: More on the restart Nice Portrait!Collin BrendemuehlThu Oct 21 2004 - 08:33:55 EDT
Re: More on the restartTom PhillipsWed Oct 20 2004 - 18:35:25 EDT
--> Re: More on the restartCollin BrendemuehlThu Oct 21 2004 - 08:44:10 EDT
--> Re: More on the restartTom PhillipsThu Oct 21 2004 - 12:16:24 EDT
--> Re: More on the restartjjsThu Oct 21 2004 - 13:02:09 EDT
Re: More on the restartjjsWed Oct 20 2004 - 12:43:15 EDT
--> Re: More on the restartCollin BrendemuehlThu Oct 21 2004 - 08:35:43 EDT
Alternatives to 2x enlargingAlbert L.Tue Oct 26 2004 - 13:14:48 EDT
Re: Alternatives to 2x enlargingChris EllingerTue Oct 26 2004 - 15:18:01 EDT
Re: Alternatives to 2x enlargingDonald QuallsTue Oct 26 2004 - 15:48:52 EDT
Re: Alternatives to 2x enlargingHemi4268Tue Oct 26 2004 - 16:13:40 EDT
Re: Alternatives to 2x enlargingArgon3Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:19:13 EDT
Re: Alternatives to 2x enlargingf/256Tue Oct 26 2004 - 22:31:08 EDT
Ball head for (old) Linhof tripodMalcolm StewartTue Oct 26 2004 - 06:05:05 EDT
Re: Ball head for (old) Linhof tripodBob SalomonTue Oct 26 2004 - 06:16:18 EDT
Re: Ball head for (old) Linhof tripodLloyd Erlick-UsenetWed Oct 27 2004 - 08:38:11 EDT
--> Re: Ball head for (old) Linhof tripodBob SalomonWed Oct 27 2004 - 11:17:58 EDT
Thanks to all three who repliedJC in IrelandTue Oct 19 2004 - 18:43:11 EDT
Re: throw a molotov cocktail through the window of matt parkermatt parkerMon Oct 25 2004 - 05:20:15 EDT
Re: throw a molotov cocktail through the window of matt parkermatt parkerWed Oct 27 2004 - 07:41:34 EDT
lens board: copal what?Art ReitschTue Oct 19 2004 - 09:58:11 EDT
Re: lens board: copal what?Bob GTue Oct 19 2004 - 11:59:18 EDT
G-Claron 210 for 8x10"PayMon Oct 18 2004 - 17:14:12 EDT
Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10"Andrew KoenigMon Oct 18 2004 - 17:23:54 EDT
--> Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10"PaySat Oct 23 2004 - 08:05:13 EDT
--> Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10"ShelleyMon Oct 18 2004 - 17:33:26 EDT
--> Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10"f/256Mon Oct 18 2004 - 18:24:51 EDT
--> Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10"ShelleyMon Oct 18 2004 - 23:21:46 EDT
--> Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10"f/256Tue Oct 19 2004 - 18:02:10 EDT
Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10"Jos. BurkeTue Oct 19 2004 - 21:19:44 EDT
--> Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10"sympatico.caTue Oct 26 2004 - 17:15:15 EDT
Strange Lens ... or broken?jjsMon Oct 18 2004 - 16:29:30 EDT
Re: Strange Lens ... or broken?Argon3Mon Oct 18 2004 - 16:56:26 EDT
--> Re: Strange Lens ... or broken?jjsMon Oct 18 2004 - 17:04:29 EDT
Speaking of sheet films (Tri-X /Bush thread) --Hows the J&C House brand in 4x5 thru 11x14? Efke sheet films?Jos. BurkeSun Oct 24 2004 - 22:59:39 EDT
Re: Speaking of sheet films (Tri-X /Bush thread) --Hows the J&C House brand in 4x5 thru 11x14? Efke sheet films?jjsMon Oct 25 2004 - 12:24:23 EDT
moving up to this format - advice welcomeJC in IrelandMon Oct 18 2004 - 14:05:04 EDT
Re: moving up to this format - advice welcometracym_at_email.domain.hiddenFri Oct 22 2004 - 01:12:55 EDT
Re: moving up to this format - advice welcomeNick ZentenaMon Oct 18 2004 - 14:41:08 EDT
Re: moving up to this format - advice welcomeArgon3Mon Oct 18 2004 - 14:25:10 EDT
--> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcomeHuntSun Oct 24 2004 - 19:28:51 EDT
Re: moving up to this format - advice welcomeTom PhillipsTue Oct 19 2004 - 09:51:06 EDT
Re: moving up to this format - advice welcomeBandicootTue Oct 19 2004 - 15:30:26 EDT
--> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcomeJC in IrelandWed Oct 20 2004 - 20:18:18 EDT
--> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcomeTom PhillipsWed Oct 20 2004 - 20:35:53 EDT
--> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcomeTom PhillipsWed Oct 20 2004 - 20:56:03 EDT
--> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcomeChris EllingerThu Oct 21 2004 - 08:11:50 EDT
--> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcomeShelleyThu Oct 21 2004 - 07:49:29 EDT
--> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcomeJC in IrelandThu Oct 21 2004 - 18:38:04 EDT
--> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcomejjsThu Oct 21 2004 - 10:54:47 EDT
--> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcomeShelleyThu Oct 21 2004 - 08:01:46 EDT
--> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcomeBandicootThu Oct 21 2004 - 18:50:38 EDT
Roll film back and focal lengthBernhard EssSun Oct 24 2004 - 10:25:09 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal lengthBob SalomonSun Oct 24 2004 - 10:33:52 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal lengthjjsSun Oct 24 2004 - 11:08:20 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthBernhard EssSun Oct 24 2004 - 11:36:12 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthBob GSun Oct 24 2004 - 12:31:54 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthjjsSun Oct 24 2004 - 12:59:16 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthBob GSun Oct 24 2004 - 14:08:43 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthjjsSun Oct 24 2004 - 14:36:32 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthDonn CaveMon Oct 25 2004 - 00:47:56 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthBob GMon Oct 25 2004 - 09:14:18 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthBob SalomonMon Oct 25 2004 - 09:27:52 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthBob GMon Oct 25 2004 - 12:25:14 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthBob SalomonMon Oct 25 2004 - 14:07:10 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthDonn CaveTue Oct 26 2004 - 01:35:12 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthHemi4268Tue Oct 26 2004 - 10:40:50 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthBob SalomonTue Oct 26 2004 - 11:01:06 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthjjsTue Oct 26 2004 - 11:48:11 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthBob SalomonTue Oct 26 2004 - 12:21:47 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthjjsTue Oct 26 2004 - 12:39:10 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthjjsTue Oct 26 2004 - 12:54:32 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthBob SalomonTue Oct 26 2004 - 13:28:52 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthjjsTue Oct 26 2004 - 14:17:15 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthHemi4268Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:25:40 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthjjsTue Oct 26 2004 - 15:42:20 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthHemi4268Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:33:11 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthHemi4268Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:10:22 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthHemi4268Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:02:57 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthjjsTue Oct 26 2004 - 19:27:42 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthHemi4268Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:35:38 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthHemi4268Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:17:40 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthjjsSun Oct 24 2004 - 12:56:26 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal lengthLouie PowellSun Oct 24 2004 - 12:46:04 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal lengthGregory W BlankSun Oct 24 2004 - 11:16:10 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthJos. BurkeSun Oct 24 2004 - 22:41:02 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal lengthRichard KnoppowSun Oct 24 2004 - 18:16:33 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal lengthLargformatWed Oct 27 2004 - 09:26:37 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthJorge GasteazoroThu Oct 28 2004 - 20:47:27 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthLargformatFri Oct 29 2004 - 12:07:34 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthjjsFri Oct 29 2004 - 14:42:46 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthLargformatFri Oct 29 2004 - 15:46:45 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthjjsFri Oct 29 2004 - 17:48:43 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthLargformatFri Oct 29 2004 - 19:23:50 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthCamArtsMagFri Oct 29 2004 - 19:42:52 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthjjsFri Oct 29 2004 - 20:45:26 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthrafe bustinFri Oct 29 2004 - 22:57:03 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthGregory W BlankFri Oct 29 2004 - 22:56:15 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthGregory W BlankFri Oct 29 2004 - 16:37:03 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthjjsFri Oct 29 2004 - 17:50:24 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthGregory W BlankFri Oct 29 2004 - 22:29:16 EDT
--> Re: Roll film back and focal lengthJorge GasteazoroSat Oct 30 2004 - 02:13:15 EDT
Re: matt parker from cottage grove oregon is a big piece of shithttp://tinyurl.com/ii35Mon Oct 18 2004 - 06:18:02 EDT
Information about rec.photo.marketplace.large-format [27may2001]Helge NareidSun Oct 24 2004 - 06:43:42 EDT
Cheapest E6No OneTue Oct 19 2004 - 12:59:51 EDT
Re: Cheapest E6Gordon MoatTue Oct 19 2004 - 15:59:15 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6No OneTue Oct 19 2004 - 16:03:39 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Argon3Tue Oct 19 2004 - 17:12:20 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Gordon MoatWed Oct 20 2004 - 13:57:39 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Mark CudworthTue Oct 19 2004 - 17:35:51 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Argon3Tue Oct 19 2004 - 18:14:29 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Nick ZentenaTue Oct 19 2004 - 18:39:25 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Gregory W BlankTue Oct 19 2004 - 19:45:24 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Jos. BurkeWed Oct 20 2004 - 22:28:02 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Nick ZentenaTue Oct 19 2004 - 18:36:36 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Donald QuallsWed Oct 20 2004 - 07:15:43 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Tom PhillipsSat Oct 23 2004 - 23:54:19 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Nick ZentenaSun Oct 24 2004 - 07:50:13 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Tom PhillipsSun Oct 24 2004 - 16:10:17 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Gregory W BlankSun Oct 24 2004 - 23:15:59 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Tom PhillipsSun Oct 24 2004 - 23:28:26 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Gregory W BlankMon Oct 25 2004 - 09:19:06 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Tom PhillipsMon Oct 25 2004 - 17:02:44 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Gregory W BlankMon Oct 25 2004 - 17:40:32 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Tom PhillipsMon Oct 25 2004 - 17:42:54 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Gregory W BlankMon Oct 25 2004 - 18:27:26 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Tom PhillipsMon Oct 25 2004 - 21:29:59 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Gregory W BlankMon Oct 25 2004 - 21:46:35 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Tom PhillipsMon Oct 25 2004 - 21:54:12 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Nick ZentenaWed Oct 20 2004 - 08:11:55 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Donald QuallsWed Oct 20 2004 - 11:49:37 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Nick ZentenaWed Oct 20 2004 - 13:08:16 EDT
--> Re: Cheapest E6Donald QuallsWed Oct 20 2004 - 16:42:26 EDT
Re: Cheapest E6Donald QuallsTue Oct 19 2004 - 18:50:31 EDT
Re: Cheapest E6Uranium CommitteeTue Oct 19 2004 - 21:10:23 EDT
OT: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork?Matt ClaraSat Oct 23 2004 - 08:54:51 EDT
Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork?John EmmonsSat Oct 23 2004 - 11:28:31 EDT
--> Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork?BBarlow690Sun Oct 24 2004 - 15:58:31 EDT
--> Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork?Matt ClaraTue Oct 26 2004 - 07:46:58 EDT
--> Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork?MsherckThu Oct 28 2004 - 10:35:02 EDT
--> Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork?BBarlow690Thu Oct 28 2004 - 21:17:50 EDT
--> Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork?MsherckFri Oct 29 2004 - 09:44:38 EDT
--> Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork?BBarlow690Sat Oct 30 2004 - 09:54:58 EDT
--> Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork?MsherckSun Oct 31 2004 - 17:32:46 EST
Question on Convertible LensesDr. RoninFri Oct 22 2004 - 13:56:12 EDT
Re: Question on Convertible LensesjjsFri Oct 22 2004 - 19:33:30 EDT
--> Re: Question on Convertible LensesRoninSun Oct 24 2004 - 12:03:31 EDT
--> Re: Question on Convertible LensesjjsSun Oct 24 2004 - 13:04:59 EDT
--> Re: Question on Convertible LensesRoninSun Oct 24 2004 - 17:40:41 EDT
--> Re: Question on Convertible LensesTom FergusonSun Oct 24 2004 - 14:32:15 EDT
--> Re: Question on Convertible LensesRoninSun Oct 24 2004 - 17:45:49 EDT
--> Re: Question on Convertible LensesjjsMon Oct 25 2004 - 12:26:50 EDT
--> Re: Question on Convertible LensesBob GMon Oct 25 2004 - 13:47:21 EDT
--> Re: Question on Convertible LensesTom FergusonMon Oct 25 2004 - 15:46:26 EDT
--> Re: Question on Convertible LensesjjsMon Oct 25 2004 - 16:36:44 EDT
--> Re: Question on Convertible LensesbrianTue Oct 26 2004 - 17:52:55 EDT
--> Re: Question on Convertible LensesTom FergusonTue Oct 26 2004 - 20:51:25 EDT
--> Re: Question on Convertible LensesRichard KnoppowThu Nov 04 2004 - 14:22:31 EST
--> Re: Question on Convertible LensesDonald QuallsSun Oct 24 2004 - 18:29:10 EDT
Re: Question on Convertible LensesRichard KnoppowSun Oct 24 2004 - 18:26:45 EDT
--> Re: Question on Convertible LensesRichard KnoppowWed Oct 27 2004 - 06:53:39 EDT
Tri-XNo OneFri Oct 22 2004 - 09:36:29 EDT
Re: Tri-XArgon3Fri Oct 22 2004 - 11:37:29 EDT
Re: Tri-XjjsFri Oct 22 2004 - 12:36:47 EDT
--> Re: Tri-XJos. BurkeFri Oct 22 2004 - 14:32:04 EDT
--> Re: Tri-XjjsFri Oct 22 2004 - 14:27:04 EDT
--> Re: Tri-XNo OneFri Oct 22 2004 - 16:07:24 EDT
--> Re: Tri-XDouglasFri Oct 22 2004 - 20:34:47 EDT
--> Re: Tri-XNo OneFri Oct 22 2004 - 21:03:17 EDT
--> Re: Tri-XDouglasFri Oct 22 2004 - 21:10:15 EDT
--> Re: Tri-Xsympatico.caTue Oct 26 2004 - 17:01:55 EDT
--> Re: Tri-XDouglasFri Oct 22 2004 - 21:54:40 EDT
--> Re: Tri-XNo OneSat Oct 23 2004 - 10:53:02 EDT
--> Re: Tri-XDouglasSat Oct 23 2004 - 15:17:13 EDT
--> Re: Tri-XNo OneSat Oct 23 2004 - 15:32:07 EDT
--> Re: Tri-XArgon3Sun Oct 24 2004 - 21:23:16 EDT
--> Re: Tri-XjjsSun Oct 24 2004 - 21:45:34 EDT
--> Re: Tri-XDonald QuallsSun Oct 24 2004 - 22:37:19 EDT
--> Re: Tri-XDouglasSun Oct 24 2004 - 21:40:30 EDT
--> Re: Tri-XNo OneSun Oct 24 2004 - 22:12:40 EDT
--> Re: Tri-XDouglasSun Oct 24 2004 - 23:16:40 EDT