PhotoDigital.netPhoto Resources  Photo Gallery
Google
  Web PhotoDigital.net

rec.photo.equipment.large-format Discussion: By Thread

99 Messages
Starting:Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:11:38 EST Ending:Sun Nov 27 2005 - 00:30:23 EST

SubjectAuthor Date
regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensHenrik TivedMon Aug 15 2005 - 23:32:14 EDT
Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lenswiltTue Aug 16 2005 - 00:00:24 EDT
Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lenswiltTue Aug 16 2005 - 00:05:55 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensHenrik TivedTue Aug 16 2005 - 01:00:50 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensBob GTue Aug 16 2005 - 02:35:19 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensBob GTue Aug 16 2005 - 02:43:02 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensHenrik TivedTue Aug 16 2005 - 03:42:45 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lenswiltTue Aug 16 2005 - 10:12:31 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensHenrik TivedTue Aug 16 2005 - 10:32:25 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensGordon MoatSun Aug 21 2005 - 14:59:51 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensHenrik TivedTue Aug 23 2005 - 21:50:15 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensNicholas O. LindanWed Aug 24 2005 - 10:23:02 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensGordon MoatWed Aug 24 2005 - 13:29:24 EDT
--> Re: regarding Sinar P and wide angle lensHenrik TivedSat Aug 27 2005 - 10:12:34 EDT
8x10 ground glass anecdoteNo OneMon Aug 15 2005 - 21:01:07 EDT
Re: 8x10 ground glass anecdoteGregory BlankMon Aug 15 2005 - 21:28:47 EDT
Re: 8x10 ground glass anecdotejohnboyMon Aug 15 2005 - 22:16:33 EDT
--> Re: 8x10 ground glass anecdoteNo OneTue Aug 16 2005 - 13:31:18 EDT
--> Re: 8x10 ground glass anecdoteMatt ClaraTue Aug 16 2005 - 22:48:28 EDT
--> Re: 8x10 ground glass anecdoteHenrik TivedWed Aug 17 2005 - 11:59:20 EDT
Re: 8x10 ground glass anecdoteJanisSat Aug 20 2005 - 23:25:58 EDT
3/8in tripod head screwMalcolm StewartSun Nov 14 2004 - 20:21:29 EST
Re: an official complaint against matt parker was filed with the us embassyhttp://tinyurl.com/ii35Sun Nov 14 2004 - 05:56:37 EST
Toyo 4x5 Field CameraAlanSun Nov 14 2004 - 02:05:36 EST
Re: Toyo 4x5 Field CameraBob GSun Nov 14 2004 - 09:12:36 EST
--> Re: Toyo 4x5 Field CameraShelleySun Nov 14 2004 - 10:14:21 EST
Re: Toyo 4x5 Field CameraArgon3Sun Nov 14 2004 - 09:30:43 EST
FernandojjsSat Nov 13 2004 - 11:53:12 EST
Re: FernandoArgon3Sat Nov 13 2004 - 18:27:53 EST
--> Re: FernandoFernandoSat Nov 13 2004 - 20:33:57 EST
Re: FernandoFernandoSat Nov 13 2004 - 20:30:13 EST
Re: Wow, I'm really confused now! :-))ShelleyThu Nov 11 2004 - 22:02:55 EST
Re: Wow, I'm really confused now! :-))Chris EllingerFri Nov 12 2004 - 13:30:59 EST
Re: Wow, I'm really confused now! :-))BandicootFri Nov 12 2004 - 19:06:23 EST
Re: Wow, I'm really confused now! :-))Dan FrommSat Nov 13 2004 - 18:24:25 EST
--> Re: Wow, I'm really confused now! :-))ShelleySat Nov 13 2004 - 19:26:26 EST
--> Re: Wow, I'm really confused now! :-))jjsSat Nov 13 2004 - 20:15:26 EST
shutter speedMichele SmithFri Nov 12 2004 - 00:58:35 EST
Re: shutter speedMalcolm StewartFri Nov 12 2004 - 19:28:06 EST
Re: shutter speedRichard KnoppowSat Nov 13 2004 - 05:36:15 EST
--> Re: shutter speedf/256Sun Nov 14 2004 - 08:51:22 EST
Re: shutter speedf/256Sat Nov 13 2004 - 07:59:56 EST
--> Re: shutter speedRichard KnoppowSat Nov 13 2004 - 20:28:53 EST
Chris PerezjjsThu Nov 11 2004 - 22:12:29 EST
Re: Chris PerezChristopher PerezFri Nov 12 2004 - 11:14:45 EST
--> Re: Chris PerezjjsSat Nov 13 2004 - 13:52:06 EST
Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongChristopher PerezThu Nov 11 2004 - 15:47:57 EST
Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongChristopher PerezThu Nov 11 2004 - 17:05:37 EST
--> Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongLeonard EvensThu Nov 11 2004 - 17:28:15 EST
--> Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongjjsThu Nov 11 2004 - 17:57:18 EST
--> Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongBob GFri Nov 12 2004 - 09:32:01 EST
--> Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongChristopher PerezFri Nov 12 2004 - 11:12:27 EST
--> Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongJos. BurkeFri Nov 12 2004 - 18:09:13 EST
--> Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongjjsFri Nov 12 2004 - 17:58:45 EST
--> Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongChristopher PerezFri Nov 12 2004 - 11:10:54 EST
Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongBob GThu Nov 11 2004 - 17:26:43 EST
--> Re: Optics coverage on 7x17inch - my math is wrongChristopher PerezFri Nov 12 2004 - 11:13:06 EST
Are all Caltar II lenses rebadged Rodenstocks?Matt ClaraThu Nov 11 2004 - 09:34:11 EST
Re: Are all Caltar II lenses rebadged Rodenstocks?Thor Lancelot SimonThu Nov 11 2004 - 09:43:28 EST
--> Re: Are all Caltar II lenses rebadged Rodenstocks?StaceyFri Nov 12 2004 - 12:28:53 EST
--> Re: Are all Caltar II lenses rebadged Rodenstocks?Thor Lancelot SimonFri Nov 12 2004 - 00:33:52 EST
Re: Are all Caltar II lenses rebadged Rodenstocks?Christopher PerezThu Nov 11 2004 - 11:21:20 EST
Re: Are all Caltar II lenses rebadged Rodenstocks?Frank PittelThu Nov 11 2004 - 11:40:53 EST
Re: Are all Caltar II lenses rebadged Rodenstocks?Dean Van PraotlThu Nov 11 2004 - 16:34:55 EST
Re: Are all Caltar II lenses rebadged Rodenstocks?Frank PittelSat Nov 13 2004 - 19:48:46 EST
For you LF guys--I've recently acquired some long barrel lenses (400-600mm) !Jos. BurkeSat Nov 06 2004 - 12:11:05 EST
Re: For you LF guys--I've recently acquired some long barrel lenses (400-600mm) !Richard KnoppowSat Nov 06 2004 - 16:49:01 EST
Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsFernandoThu Nov 11 2004 - 03:54:01 EST
Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsJos. BurkeThu Nov 11 2004 - 09:15:43 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsjjsThu Nov 11 2004 - 08:45:02 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsArgon3Thu Nov 11 2004 - 09:24:17 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsjjsThu Nov 11 2004 - 09:45:25 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsFernandoThu Nov 11 2004 - 10:04:00 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsFernandoFri Nov 12 2004 - 10:12:45 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsLR KalajainenThu Nov 11 2004 - 11:43:29 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsjjsThu Nov 11 2004 - 11:58:07 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsLR KalajainenThu Nov 11 2004 - 23:32:11 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsMalcolm StewartThu Nov 11 2004 - 14:55:38 EST
--> Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsJos. BurkeFri Nov 12 2004 - 00:25:15 EST
Re: Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rollsShelleyThu Nov 11 2004 - 08:41:47 EST
ID-ing LF negativesMalcolm StewartFri Nov 05 2004 - 13:28:39 EST
Re: ID-ing LF negativesDonald QuallsFri Nov 05 2004 - 13:40:19 EST
Re: ID-ing LF negativesArgon3Fri Nov 05 2004 - 13:51:32 EST
Re: ID-ing LF negativesjjsFri Nov 05 2004 - 14:34:39 EST
--> Re: ID-ing LF negativesArgon3Fri Nov 05 2004 - 17:28:46 EST
Re: TestingUranium CommitteeWed Nov 10 2004 - 18:16:50 EST
Re: OLD ROLLEFLEXRichard KnoppowWed Nov 10 2004 - 21:04:22 EST
Re: Shutters & high speed settingjjsWed Nov 10 2004 - 19:16:14 EST
Re: Shutters & high speed settingRichard KnoppowWed Nov 10 2004 - 21:32:01 EST
Re: Step 3 -- film handling & managementShelleyWed Nov 10 2004 - 23:56:58 EST
Re: Polaroid 545 backRichard KnoppowMon Nov 08 2004 - 20:29:56 EST
Re: Polaroid 545 backStephen M.GluckTue Nov 09 2004 - 09:26:30 EST
Re: Polaroid 545 backFrank PittelTue Nov 09 2004 - 14:27:55 EST
Re: Linhof Technika optical viewersJPMOSESat Nov 13 2004 - 09:04:17 EST
Re: Linhof Technika optical viewersBob SalomonSat Nov 13 2004 - 09:18:09 EST
--> Re: Linhof Technika optical viewersjjsSat Nov 13 2004 - 11:08:26 EST
Re: Knoppow on Kalert RFRichard KnoppowFri Nov 05 2004 - 06:02:14 EST
Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Christopher PerezFri Nov 05 2004 - 11:30:35 EST
Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?jjsSat Nov 06 2004 - 10:46:20 EST
Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Richard KnoppowTue Nov 09 2004 - 01:43:32 EST
Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Richard KnoppowMon Nov 08 2004 - 20:44:46 EST
Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Jos. BurkeFri Nov 05 2004 - 14:32:06 EST
Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Christopher PerezFri Nov 05 2004 - 15:40:38 EST
--> Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Richard KnoppowSat Nov 06 2004 - 02:52:46 EST
--> Re: 7x17 ULF users - short lenses?Christopher PerezMon Nov 08 2004 - 14:19:45 EST
Re: Schneider 121mm Super AngulonAlecjSat Nov 06 2004 - 17:18:57 EST
Re: Schneider 121mm Super AngulonRichard KnoppowMon Nov 08 2004 - 20:47:12 EST
--> Re: Schneider 121mm Super AngulonAlecjFri Nov 12 2004 - 00:08:28 EST
--> Re: Schneider 121mm Super AngulonjjsMon Nov 08 2004 - 21:31:19 EST
Re: Cheapest E6 reduxTom PhillipsMon Nov 08 2004 - 15:52:35 EST
Re: Cheapest E6 reduxFrank PittelTue Nov 09 2004 - 14:52:42 EST
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxTom PhillipsWed Nov 10 2004 - 00:46:02 EST
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxFrank PittelWed Nov 10 2004 - 12:55:29 EST
--> Re: Cheapest E6 reduxTom PhillipsWed Nov 10 2004 - 16:53:56 EST
Re: Cheapest E6 reduxDonald QuallsTue Nov 02 2004 - 06:01:33 EST
Re: Highway RobberyJim PhelpsFri Nov 12 2004 - 00:55:48 EST
Re: Highway RobberyHalbrainerdSun Nov 14 2004 - 00:30:46 EST
--> Re: Highway RobberyJim PhelpsSun Nov 14 2004 - 03:37:57 EST
--> Re: Highway RobberyHalbrainerdSun Nov 14 2004 - 12:08:18 EST

Last message date: Sun Nov 27 2005 - 00:30:23 EST Archived on: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 01:14:28 EST