Photo Resources  Photo Gallery	Web PhotoDigital.net

Date view Subject view Author view Attachment view Previous Folder, Thread view Next Folder, Thread view List of Folders 100 Messages Starting: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:11:38 EST Ending: Sun Nov 27 2005 - 00:30:23 EST Subject Author Date Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera jjs Fri Oct 29 2004 - 11:57:52 EDT Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera Phil Tobias Fri Oct 29 2004 - 13:04:26 EDT --> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera Nicholas O. Lindan Fri Oct 29 2004 - 19:22:21 EDT --> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera Phil Tobias Fri Oct 29 2004 - 22:00:41 EDT Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera Bob Salomon Fri Oct 29 2004 - 13:40:40 EDT Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera Frank Pittel Fri Oct 29 2004 - 14:49:22 EDT --> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera jjs Fri Oct 29 2004 - 17:57:56 EDT --> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera Frank Pittel Sat Oct 30 2004 - 00:16:18 EDT Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera Leonard Evens Sat Oct 30 2004 - 12:04:40 EDT --> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera jjs Sat Oct 30 2004 - 12:28:00 EDT --> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera Leonard Evens Sat Oct 30 2004 - 14:34:05 EDT --> Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera jjs Sat Oct 30 2004 - 14:51:59 EDT Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera Argon3 Thu Oct 28 2004 - 20:43:46 EDT Re: this statement is made pending the issue of the official complaint against matt parker http://tinyurl.com/ii35 Fri Oct 29 2004 - 05:40:17 EDT Infrared on LF (Filters?) Chris Maness Wed Oct 27 2004 - 16:26:46 EDT Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) Chris Maness Wed Oct 27 2004 - 16:51:30 EDT Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) Bob Salomon Wed Oct 27 2004 - 16:57:54 EDT --> Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) Chris Maness Wed Oct 27 2004 - 17:16:31 EDT Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) jjs Wed Oct 27 2004 - 16:59:00 EDT --> Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) Chris Maness Wed Oct 27 2004 - 17:31:21 EDT --> Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) jjs Wed Oct 27 2004 - 17:54:52 EDT --> Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) Chris Maness Wed Oct 27 2004 - 18:16:02 EDT --> Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) John McGraw Thu Oct 28 2004 - 04:23:22 EDT --> Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) jjs Thu Oct 28 2004 - 08:12:50 EDT --> Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) John McGraw Thu Oct 28 2004 - 18:23:26 EDT --> Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) John McGraw Thu Oct 28 2004 - 04:23:23 EDT Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) mr. chip Wed Oct 27 2004 - 19:06:29 EDT More on the restart Collin Brendemuehl Wed Oct 20 2004 - 08:50:28 EDT Re: More on the restart Nice Portrait! Collin Brendemuehl Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:33:55 EDT Re: More on the restart Collin Brendemuehl Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:44:10 EDT Re: More on the restart jjs Wed Oct 20 2004 - 12:43:15 EDT Re: More on the restart Collin Brendemuehl Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:35:43 EDT Alternatives to 2x enlarging Albert L. Tue Oct 26 2004 - 13:14:48 EDT Re: Alternatives to 2x enlarging Chris Ellinger Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:18:01 EDT Re: Alternatives to 2x enlarging Donald Qualls Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:48:52 EDT Re: Alternatives to 2x enlarging Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 16:13:40 EDT Re: Alternatives to 2x enlarging Argon3 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:19:13 EDT Re: Alternatives to 2x enlarging f/256 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 22:31:08 EDT Re: Ball head for (old) Linhof tripod Lloyd Erlick-Usenet Wed Oct 27 2004 - 08:38:11 EDT Re: Ball head for (old) Linhof tripod Bob Salomon Wed Oct 27 2004 - 11:17:58 EDT Re: throw a molotov cocktail through the window of matt parker matt parker Wed Oct 27 2004 - 07:41:34 EDT Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10" sympatico.ca Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:15:15 EDT Re: Speaking of sheet films (Tri-X /Bush thread) --Hows the J&C House brand in 4x5 thru 11x14? Efke sheet films? jjs Mon Oct 25 2004 - 12:24:23 EDT Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 20:56:03 EDT Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Chris Ellinger Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:11:50 EDT Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Shelley Thu Oct 21 2004 - 07:49:29 EDT Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Shelley Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:01:46 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob G Mon Oct 25 2004 - 12:25:14 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob Salomon Mon Oct 25 2004 - 14:07:10 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Donn Cave Tue Oct 26 2004 - 01:35:12 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob Salomon Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:21:47 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:39:10 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:54:32 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob Salomon Tue Oct 26 2004 - 13:28:52 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 14:17:15 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:25:40 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:42:20 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:33:11 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:10:22 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:02:57 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 19:27:42 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:35:38 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:17:40 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Largformat Wed Oct 27 2004 - 09:26:37 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Largformat Fri Oct 29 2004 - 12:07:34 EDT Re: Cheapest E6 Jos. Burke Wed Oct 20 2004 - 22:28:02 EDT Re: Cheapest E6 Nick Zentena Wed Oct 20 2004 - 08:11:55 EDT Re: Cheapest E6 Donald Qualls Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:49:37 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Nick Zentena Wed Oct 20 2004 - 13:08:16 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Donald Qualls Wed Oct 20 2004 - 16:42:26 EDT Re: Cheapest E6 Donald Qualls Tue Oct 19 2004 - 18:50:31 EDT Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? Msherck Thu Oct 28 2004 - 10:35:02 EDT Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? Msherck Fri Oct 29 2004 - 09:44:38 EDT Re: Question on Convertible Lenses jjs Mon Oct 25 2004 - 12:26:50 EDT Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Bob G Mon Oct 25 2004 - 13:47:21 EDT Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Tom Ferguson Mon Oct 25 2004 - 15:46:26 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses jjs Mon Oct 25 2004 - 16:36:44 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses brian Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:52:55 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Tom Ferguson Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:51:25 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Richard Knoppow Thu Nov 04 2004 - 14:22:31 EST Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Donald Qualls Sun Oct 24 2004 - 18:29:10 EDT Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Richard Knoppow Wed Oct 27 2004 - 06:53:39 EDT Re: Tri-X sympatico.ca Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:01:55 EDT Re: Tri-X Argon3 Sun Oct 24 2004 - 21:23:16 EDT Re: Tri-X Argon3 Mon Oct 25 2004 - 11:26:37 EDT Re: Tri-X Lloyd Erlick-Usenet Wed Oct 27 2004 - 08:47:49 EDT Re: Tri-X Frank Pittel Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:21:15 EDT Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Tue Oct 26 2004 - 19:09:07 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Frank Pittel Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:10:32 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Tue Oct 26 2004 - 21:59:55 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Frank Pittel Wed Oct 27 2004 - 00:27:55 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Wed Oct 27 2004 - 01:43:27 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Wed Oct 27 2004 - 01:45:18 EDT Re: Tri-X rafe bustin Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:40:50 EDT Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:31:29 EDT Re: Tri-X Donald Qualls Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:34:39 EDT Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:45:24 EDT Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:33:05 EDT Re: Tri-X jjs Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:38:23 EDT Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Douglas Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:21:54 EDT Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Donald Qualls Mon Oct 25 2004 - 10:43:33 EDT Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Douglas Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:37:08 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:27:16 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Matt Clara Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:52:54 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:00:37 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Wise Ass Poaster Wed Oct 20 2004 - 19:08:20 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Tue Oct 19 2004 - 10:56:05 EDT Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:48:59 EDT Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Wed Oct 20 2004 - 12:45:28 EDT --> Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 18:28:46 EDT Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:56:36 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 08:50:24 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument rafe bustin Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:32:54 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Uranium Committee Tue Oct 19 2004 - 21:15:22 EDT Re: Meaningless drivel/NG's digress into Name calling etc. Jim Phelps Wed Oct 20 2004 - 05:10:07 EDT Re: Meaningless drivel/NG's digress into Name calling etc. Gregory W Blank Wed Oct 20 2004 - 08:27:32 EDT Re: Meaningless drivel/NG's digress into Name calling etc. Uranium Committee Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:17:52 EDT Re: What happens to film as it ages? Andy Phillips Sat Oct 23 2004 - 16:09:51 EDT Re: Calter 150 filter size Matt Ashbrook Thu Oct 21 2004 - 05:42:19 EDT Last message date: Sun Nov 27 2005 - 00:30:23 EST Archived on: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 01:14:28 EST Date view Subject view Author view Attachment view Previous Folder, Thread view Next Folder, Thread view List of Folders

Feedback, Contact Us, Legal Information, Your Privacy Copyright ©1998-2004 metro.isp Inc.    All rights reserved.