rec.photo.equipment.large-format Discussion: By Date

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera	Bob Salomon	Fri Oct 29 2004 - 13:40:40 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	Bob Salomon	Mon Oct 25 2004 - 14:07:10 EDT
Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera	Phil Tobias	Fri Oct 29 2004 - 13:04:26 EDT
Re: Question on Convertible Lenses	Bob G	Mon Oct 25 2004 - 13:47:21 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	Largformat	Fri Oct 29 2004 - 12:07:34 EDT
Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera	jjs	Fri Oct 29 2004 - 11:57:52 EDT
Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork?	Msherck	Fri Oct 29 2004 - 09:44:38 EDT
Re: Question on Convertible Lenses	jjs	Mon Oct 25 2004 - 12:26:50 EDT
Re: Speaking of sheet films (Tri-X /Bush thread) --Hows the J&C House brand in 4x5 thru 11x14? Efke sheet films?	jjs	Mon Oct 25 2004 - 12:24:23 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	Bob G	Mon Oct 25 2004 - 12:25:14 EDT
Re: this statement is made pending the issue of the official complaint against matt parker	http://tinyurl.com/ii35	Fri Oct 29 2004 - 05:40:17 EDT
Re: Tri-X	Argon3	Mon Oct 25 2004 - 11:26:37 EDT
Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT	Donald Qualls	Mon Oct 25 2004 - 10:43:33 EDT
Re: Tri-X	Argon3	Sun Oct 24 2004 - 21:23:16 EDT
Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT	Douglas	Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:37:08 EDT
Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT	Douglas	Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:21:54 EDT
Re: Tri-X	jjs	Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:38:23 EDT
Re: Tri-X	rafe bustin	Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:40:50 EDT
Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork?	Msherck	Thu Oct 28 2004 - 10:35:02 EDT
Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)	jjs	Thu Oct 28 2004 - 08:12:50 EDT
Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)	John McGraw	Thu Oct 28 2004 - 04:23:23 EDT
Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)	John McGraw	Thu Oct 28 2004 - 04:23:22 EDT
Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)	mr. chip	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 19:06:29 EDT
Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)	Chris Maness	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 18:16:02 EDT
Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)	jjs	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 17:54:52 EDT
Re: What happens to film as it ages?	Andy Phillips	Sat Oct 23 2004 - 16:09:51 EDT
Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)	Chris Maness	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 17:31:21 EDT
Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)	Chris Maness	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 17:16:31 EDT
Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)	jjs	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 16:59:00 EDT
Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)	Bob Salomon	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 16:57:54 EDT
Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?)	Chris Maness	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 16:51:30 EDT
Infrared on LF (Filters?)	Chris Maness	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 16:26:46 EDT
Re: Ball head for (old) Linhof tripod	Bob Salomon	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 11:17:58 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	Largformat	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 09:26:37 EDT
Re: More on the restart	Collin Brendemuehl	Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:44:10 EDT
Re: Tri-X	Lloyd Erlick-Usenet	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 08:47:49 EDT
Re: More on the restart	Collin Brendemuehl	Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:35:43 EDT
Re: More on the restart Nice Portrait!	Collin Brendemuehl	Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:33:55 EDT
Re: Ball head for (old) Linhof tripod	Lloyd Erlick-Usenet	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 08:38:11 EDT
Re: throw a molotov cocktail through the window of matt parker	matt parker	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 07:41:34 EDT
Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome	Chris Ellinger	Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:11:50 EDT
Re: Question on Convertible Lenses	Richard Knoppow	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 06:53:39 EDT
Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome	Shelley	Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:01:46 EDT
Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome	Shelley	Thu Oct 21 2004 - 07:49:29 EDT
Re: Calter 150 filter size	Matt Ashbrook	Thu Oct 21 2004 - 05:42:19 EDT
Re: Tri-X	Tom Phillips	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 01:45:18 EDT
Re: Tri-X	Tom Phillips	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 01:43:27 EDT
Re: Tri-X	Frank Pittel	Wed Oct 27 2004 - 00:27:55 EDT
Re: Cheapest E6	Jos. Burke	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 22:28:02 EDT
Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome	Tom Phillips	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 20:56:03 EDT
Re: Alternatives to 2x enlarging	f/256	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 22:31:08 EDT
Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument	Wise Ass Poaster	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 19:08:20 EDT
Re: Tri-X	Tom Phillips	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 21:59:55 EDT
Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument	Tom Phillips	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 18:28:46 EDT
Re: Question on Convertible Lenses	Tom Ferguson	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:51:25 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	Hemi4268	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:35:38 EDT
Re: Tri-X	Frank Pittel	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:10:32 EDT
Re: Cheapest E6	Donald Qualls	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 16:42:26 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	jjs	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 19:27:42 EDT
Re: Tri-X	Tom Phillips	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 19:09:07 EDT
Re: Tri-X	Tom Phillips	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:45:24 EDT
Re: Tri-X	Tom Phillips	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:33:05 EDT
Re: Tri-X	Tom Phillips	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:31:29 EDT
Re: Tri-X	Frank Pittel	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:21:15 EDT
Re: Question on Convertible Lenses	brian	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:52:55 EDT
Re: Cheapest E6	Nick Zentena	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 13:08:16 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	Hemi4268	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:33:11 EDT
Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10"	sympatico.ca	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:15:15 EDT
Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument	jjs	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 12:45:28 EDT
Re: More on the restart	jjs	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 12:43:15 EDT
Re: Alternatives to 2x enlarging	Argon3	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:19:13 EDT
Re: Tri-X	sympatico.ca	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:01:55 EDT
Re: Cheapest E6	Donald Qualls	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:49:37 EDT
Re: Alternatives to 2x enlarging	Hemi4268	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 16:13:40 EDT
Re: Alternatives to 2x enlarging	Donald Qualls	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:48:52 EDT
Re: Meaningless drivel/NG's digress into Name calling etc.	Uranium Committee	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:17:52 EDT
Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument	Tom Phillips	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:00:37 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	jjs	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:42:20 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	Hemi4268	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:25:40 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	Hemi4268	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:17:40 EDT
Re: Alternatives to 2x enlarging	Chris Ellinger	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:18:01 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	Hemi4268	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:10:22 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	Hemi4268	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:02:57 EDT
Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument	Tom Phillips	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:56:36 EDT
Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument	Matt Clara	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:52:54 EDT
Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument	Tom Phillips	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:48:59 EDT
Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument	Tom Phillips	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:27:16 EDT
Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument	rafe bustin	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:32:54 EDT
Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument	Tom Phillips	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 08:50:24 EDT
More on the restart	Collin Brendemuehl	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 08:50:28 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	jjs	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 14:17:15 EDT
Re: Cheapest E6	Nick Zentena	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 08:11:55 EDT
Re: Meaningless drivel/NG's digress into Name calling etc.	Gregory W Blank	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 08:27:32 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	Bob Salomon	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 13:28:52 EDT
Alternatives to 2x enlarging	Albert L.	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 13:14:48 EDT
Re: Tri-X	Donald Qualls	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:34:39 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	jjs	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:54:32 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	jjs	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:39:10 EDT
Re: Meaningless drivel/NG's digress into Name calling etc.	Jim Phelps	Wed Oct 20 2004 - 05:10:07 EDT
Re: Roll film back and focal length	Bob Salomon	Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:21:47 EDT