Photo Resources  Photo Gallery	Web PhotoDigital.net

Date view Thread view Subject view Attachment view Previous Folder, Author view Next Folder, Author view List of Folders 100 Messages Starting: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:11:38 EST Ending: Sun Nov 27 2005 - 00:30:23 EST Author Subject Date Albert L.   Alternatives to 2x enlarging Tue Oct 26 2004 - 13:14:48 EDT Andy Phillips   Re: What happens to film as it ages? Sat Oct 23 2004 - 16:09:51 EDT Argon3   Re: Tri-X Mon Oct 25 2004 - 11:26:37 EDT   Re: Tri-X Sun Oct 24 2004 - 21:23:16 EDT   Re: Alternatives to 2x enlarging Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:19:13 EDT Bob G   Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Mon Oct 25 2004 - 13:47:21 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Mon Oct 25 2004 - 12:25:14 EDT Bob Salomon   Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera Fri Oct 29 2004 - 13:40:40 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Mon Oct 25 2004 - 14:07:10 EDT   Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) Wed Oct 27 2004 - 16:57:54 EDT   Re: Ball head for (old) Linhof tripod Wed Oct 27 2004 - 11:17:58 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Tue Oct 26 2004 - 13:28:52 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:21:47 EDT brian   Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:52:55 EDT Chris Ellinger   Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:11:50 EDT   Re: Alternatives to 2x enlarging Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:18:01 EDT Chris Maness   Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) Wed Oct 27 2004 - 18:16:02 EDT   Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) Wed Oct 27 2004 - 17:31:21 EDT   Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) Wed Oct 27 2004 - 17:16:31 EDT   Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) Wed Oct 27 2004 - 16:51:30 EDT   Infrared on LF (Filters?) Wed Oct 27 2004 - 16:26:46 EDT Collin Brendemuehl   Re: More on the restart Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:44:10 EDT   Re: More on the restart Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:35:43 EDT   Re: More on the restart Nice Portrait! Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:33:55 EDT   More on the restart Wed Oct 20 2004 - 08:50:28 EDT Donald Qualls   Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Mon Oct 25 2004 - 10:43:33 EDT   Re: Cheapest E6 Wed Oct 20 2004 - 16:42:26 EDT   Re: Cheapest E6 Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:49:37 EDT   Re: Alternatives to 2x enlarging Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:48:52 EDT   Re: Tri-X Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:34:39 EDT Douglas   Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:37:08 EDT   Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:21:54 EDT f/256   Re: Alternatives to 2x enlarging Tue Oct 26 2004 - 22:31:08 EDT Frank Pittel   Re: Tri-X Wed Oct 27 2004 - 00:27:55 EDT   Re: Tri-X Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:10:32 EDT   Re: Tri-X Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:21:15 EDT Gregory W Blank   Re: Meaningless drivel/NG's digress into Name calling etc. Wed Oct 20 2004 - 08:27:32 EDT Hemi4268   Re: Roll film back and focal length Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:35:38 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:33:11 EDT   Re: Alternatives to 2x enlarging Tue Oct 26 2004 - 16:13:40 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:25:40 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:17:40 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:10:22 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:02:57 EDT http://tinyurl.com/ii35   Re: this statement is made pending the issue of the official complaint against matt parker Fri Oct 29 2004 - 05:40:17 EDT Jim Phelps   Re: Meaningless drivel/NG's digress into Name calling etc. Wed Oct 20 2004 - 05:10:07 EDT jjs   Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera Fri Oct 29 2004 - 11:57:52 EDT   Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Mon Oct 25 2004 - 12:26:50 EDT   Re: Speaking of sheet films (Tri-X /Bush thread) --Hows the J&C House brand in 4x5 thru 11x14? Efke sheet films? Mon Oct 25 2004 - 12:24:23 EDT   Re: Tri-X Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:38:23 EDT   Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) Thu Oct 28 2004 - 08:12:50 EDT   Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) Wed Oct 27 2004 - 17:54:52 EDT   Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) Wed Oct 27 2004 - 16:59:00 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Tue Oct 26 2004 - 19:27:42 EDT   Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Wed Oct 20 2004 - 12:45:28 EDT   Re: More on the restart Wed Oct 20 2004 - 12:43:15 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:42:20 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Tue Oct 26 2004 - 14:17:15 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:54:32 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:39:10 EDT John McGraw   Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) Thu Oct 28 2004 - 04:23:23 EDT   Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) Thu Oct 28 2004 - 04:23:22 EDT Jos. Burke   Re: Cheapest E6 Wed Oct 20 2004 - 22:28:02 EDT Largformat   Re: Roll film back and focal length Fri Oct 29 2004 - 12:07:34 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Wed Oct 27 2004 - 09:26:37 EDT Lloyd Erlick-Usenet   Re: Tri-X Wed Oct 27 2004 - 08:47:49 EDT   Re: Ball head for (old) Linhof tripod Wed Oct 27 2004 - 08:38:11 EDT Matt Ashbrook   Re: Calter 150 filter size Thu Oct 21 2004 - 05:42:19 EDT Matt Clara   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:52:54 EDT matt parker   Re: throw a molotov cocktail through the window of matt parker Wed Oct 27 2004 - 07:41:34 EDT mr. chip   Re: Infrared on LF (Filters?) Wed Oct 27 2004 - 19:06:29 EDT Msherck   Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? Fri Oct 29 2004 - 09:44:38 EDT   Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? Thu Oct 28 2004 - 10:35:02 EDT Nick Zentena   Re: Cheapest E6 Wed Oct 20 2004 - 13:08:16 EDT   Re: Cheapest E6 Wed Oct 20 2004 - 08:11:55 EDT Phil Tobias   Re: Not even a newbie question re: 4x5 camera Fri Oct 29 2004 - 13:04:26 EDT rafe bustin   Re: Tri-X Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:40:50 EDT   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:32:54 EDT Richard Knoppow   Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Wed Oct 27 2004 - 06:53:39 EDT Shelley   Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:01:46 EDT   Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Thu Oct 21 2004 - 07:49:29 EDT sympatico.ca   Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10" Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:15:15 EDT   Re: Tri-X Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:01:55 EDT Tom Ferguson   Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:51:25 EDT Tom Phillips   Re: Tri-X Wed Oct 27 2004 - 01:45:18 EDT   Re: Tri-X Wed Oct 27 2004 - 01:43:27 EDT   Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Wed Oct 20 2004 - 20:56:03 EDT   Re: Tri-X Tue Oct 26 2004 - 21:59:55 EDT   Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Wed Oct 20 2004 - 18:28:46 EDT   Re: Tri-X Tue Oct 26 2004 - 19:09:07 EDT   Re: Tri-X Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:45:24 EDT   Re: Tri-X Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:33:05 EDT   Re: Tri-X Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:31:29 EDT   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:00:37 EDT   Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:56:36 EDT   Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:48:59 EDT   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:27:16 EDT   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Wed Oct 20 2004 - 08:50:24 EDT Uranium Committee   Re: Meaningless drivel/NG's digress into Name calling etc. Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:17:52 EDT Wise Ass Poaster   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Wed Oct 20 2004 - 19:08:20 EDT Last message date: Sun Nov 27 2005 - 00:30:23 EST Archived on: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 01:14:28 EST Date view Thread view Subject view Attachment view Previous Folder, Author view Next Folder, Author view List of Folders

Feedback, Contact Us, Legal Information, Your Privacy Copyright ©1998-2004 metro.isp Inc.    All rights reserved.