Photo Resources  Photo Gallery	Web PhotoDigital.net

Date view Subject view Author view Attachment view Previous Folder, Thread view Next Folder, Thread view List of Folders 100 Messages Starting: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:11:38 EST Ending: Sun Nov 27 2005 - 00:30:23 EST Subject Author Date Re: More on the restart Nice Portrait! Jos. Burke Wed Oct 20 2004 - 21:31:45 EDT Re: More on the restart Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 18:35:25 EDT Ball head for (old) Linhof tripod Malcolm Stewart Tue Oct 26 2004 - 06:05:05 EDT Re: Ball head for (old) Linhof tripod Bob Salomon Tue Oct 26 2004 - 06:16:18 EDT Re: Ball head for (old) Linhof tripod Lloyd Erlick-Usenet Wed Oct 27 2004 - 08:38:11 EDT --> Re: Ball head for (old) Linhof tripod Bob Salomon Wed Oct 27 2004 - 11:17:58 EDT Thanks to all three who replied JC in Ireland Tue Oct 19 2004 - 18:43:11 EDT Re: throw a molotov cocktail through the window of matt parker matt parker Mon Oct 25 2004 - 05:20:15 EDT lens board: copal what? Art Reitsch Tue Oct 19 2004 - 09:58:11 EDT Re: lens board: copal what? Bob G Tue Oct 19 2004 - 11:59:18 EDT G-Claron 210 for 8x10" Pay Mon Oct 18 2004 - 17:14:12 EDT Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10" Andrew Koenig Mon Oct 18 2004 - 17:23:54 EDT --> Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10" Pay Sat Oct 23 2004 - 08:05:13 EDT --> Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10" Shelley Mon Oct 18 2004 - 17:33:26 EDT --> Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10" f/256 Mon Oct 18 2004 - 18:24:51 EDT --> Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10" Shelley Mon Oct 18 2004 - 23:21:46 EDT --> Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10" f/256 Tue Oct 19 2004 - 18:02:10 EDT Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10" Jos. Burke Tue Oct 19 2004 - 21:19:44 EDT --> Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10" sympatico.ca Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:15:15 EDT Strange Lens ... or broken? jjs Mon Oct 18 2004 - 16:29:30 EDT Re: Strange Lens ... or broken? Argon3 Mon Oct 18 2004 - 16:56:26 EDT --> Re: Strange Lens ... or broken? jjs Mon Oct 18 2004 - 17:04:29 EDT Speaking of sheet films (Tri-X /Bush thread) --Hows the J&C House brand in 4x5 thru 11x14? Efke sheet films? Jos. Burke Sun Oct 24 2004 - 22:59:39 EDT moving up to this format - advice welcome JC in Ireland Mon Oct 18 2004 - 14:05:04 EDT Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Argon3 Mon Oct 18 2004 - 14:25:10 EDT --> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Hunt Sun Oct 24 2004 - 19:28:51 EDT Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Tom Phillips Tue Oct 19 2004 - 09:51:06 EDT Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Bandicoot Tue Oct 19 2004 - 15:30:26 EDT --> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome JC in Ireland Wed Oct 20 2004 - 20:18:18 EDT --> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 20:35:53 EDT --> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 20:56:03 EDT --> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Chris Ellinger Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:11:50 EDT --> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Shelley Thu Oct 21 2004 - 07:49:29 EDT --> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome JC in Ireland Thu Oct 21 2004 - 18:38:04 EDT --> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome jjs Thu Oct 21 2004 - 10:54:47 EDT --> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Shelley Thu Oct 21 2004 - 08:01:46 EDT --> Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Bandicoot Thu Oct 21 2004 - 18:50:38 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Donn Cave Mon Oct 25 2004 - 00:47:56 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob G Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:14:18 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob Salomon Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:27:52 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob G Mon Oct 25 2004 - 12:25:14 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob Salomon Mon Oct 25 2004 - 14:07:10 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Donn Cave Tue Oct 26 2004 - 01:35:12 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 10:40:50 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob Salomon Tue Oct 26 2004 - 11:01:06 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 11:48:11 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob Salomon Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:21:47 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:39:10 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:54:32 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob Salomon Tue Oct 26 2004 - 13:28:52 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 14:17:15 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:25:40 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:42:20 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:33:11 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:10:22 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:02:57 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 19:27:42 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:35:38 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:17:40 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:56:26 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Jos. Burke Sun Oct 24 2004 - 22:41:02 EDT Re: Cheapest E6 Gordon Moat Tue Oct 19 2004 - 15:59:15 EDT Re: Cheapest E6 Argon3 Tue Oct 19 2004 - 17:12:20 EDT Re: Cheapest E6 Mark Cudworth Tue Oct 19 2004 - 17:35:51 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Argon3 Tue Oct 19 2004 - 18:14:29 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Nick Zentena Tue Oct 19 2004 - 18:39:25 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Gregory W Blank Tue Oct 19 2004 - 19:45:24 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Jos. Burke Wed Oct 20 2004 - 22:28:02 EDT Re: Cheapest E6 Nick Zentena Tue Oct 19 2004 - 18:36:36 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Donald Qualls Wed Oct 20 2004 - 07:15:43 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Tom Phillips Sat Oct 23 2004 - 23:54:19 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Nick Zentena Sun Oct 24 2004 - 07:50:13 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Tom Phillips Sun Oct 24 2004 - 16:10:17 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Gregory W Blank Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:15:59 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Tom Phillips Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:28:26 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:19:06 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Tom Phillips Mon Oct 25 2004 - 17:02:44 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 17:40:32 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Tom Phillips Mon Oct 25 2004 - 17:42:54 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 18:27:26 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Tom Phillips Mon Oct 25 2004 - 21:29:59 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 21:46:35 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Tom Phillips Mon Oct 25 2004 - 21:54:12 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Nick Zentena Wed Oct 20 2004 - 08:11:55 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Donald Qualls Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:49:37 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Nick Zentena Wed Oct 20 2004 - 13:08:16 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Donald Qualls Wed Oct 20 2004 - 16:42:26 EDT Re: Cheapest E6 Donald Qualls Tue Oct 19 2004 - 18:50:31 EDT Re: Cheapest E6 Uranium Committee Tue Oct 19 2004 - 21:10:23 EDT Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? Matt Clara Tue Oct 26 2004 - 07:46:58 EDT Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Donald Qualls Sun Oct 24 2004 - 18:29:10 EDT Re: Tri-X jjs Sun Oct 24 2004 - 21:45:34 EDT Re: Tri-X Donald Qualls Sun Oct 24 2004 - 22:37:19 EDT Re: Tri-X Douglas Sun Oct 24 2004 - 21:40:30 EDT Re: Tri-X No One Sun Oct 24 2004 - 22:12:40 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Douglas Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:16:40 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Argon3 Mon Oct 25 2004 - 11:26:37 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Uranium Committee Mon Oct 25 2004 - 21:48:02 EDT Re: Tri-X Lloyd Erlick-Usenet Wed Oct 27 2004 - 08:47:49 EDT Re: Tri-X Donald Qualls Sun Oct 24 2004 - 18:26:26 EDT Re: Tri-X Gregory W Blank Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:19:33 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:35:31 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:24:50 EDT Re: Tri-X Frank Pittel Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:11:53 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Mon Oct 25 2004 - 16:36:34 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Frank Pittel Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:21:15 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Tue Oct 26 2004 - 19:09:07 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Frank Pittel Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:10:32 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Tue Oct 26 2004 - 21:59:55 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Frank Pittel Wed Oct 27 2004 - 00:27:55 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Wed Oct 27 2004 - 01:43:27 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Wed Oct 27 2004 - 01:45:18 EDT Re: Tri-X rafe bustin Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:40:50 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Donald Qualls Sun Oct 24 2004 - 22:42:21 EDT --> Re: Tri-X rafe bustin Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:10:47 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Donald Qualls Mon Oct 25 2004 - 10:41:32 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Donald Qualls Tue Oct 26 2004 - 06:38:07 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:31:29 EDT --> Re: Tri-X rafe bustin Tue Oct 26 2004 - 08:06:25 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Donald Qualls Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:34:39 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:45:24 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:33:05 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Frank Pittel Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:15:00 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Mon Oct 25 2004 - 17:34:14 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 18:47:17 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 19:41:11 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Mon Oct 25 2004 - 21:49:57 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Mon Oct 25 2004 - 21:48:07 EDT --> Re: Tri-X jjs Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:38:23 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Gregory W Blank Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:22:00 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Donald Qualls Sun Oct 24 2004 - 22:46:13 EDT Re: Tri-X Gregory W Blank Sun Oct 24 2004 - 15:20:52 EDT Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT No One Sun Oct 24 2004 - 22:15:54 EDT Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Uranium Committee Sun Oct 24 2004 - 18:45:37 EDT Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT No One Sun Oct 24 2004 - 22:24:06 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Douglas Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:59:48 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Gregory W Blank Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:36:21 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Donald Qualls Mon Oct 25 2004 - 07:44:01 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:29:19 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Donald Qualls Mon Oct 25 2004 - 10:43:33 EDT Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Douglas Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:37:08 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Gregory W Blank Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:27:11 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Douglas Mon Oct 25 2004 - 00:19:02 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:27:41 EDT Re: Tri-X No One Sat Oct 23 2004 - 15:36:24 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Mon Oct 18 2004 - 14:17:05 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Mon Oct 18 2004 - 14:19:59 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Nicholas O. Lindan Mon Oct 18 2004 - 17:54:45 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Frank Pittel Mon Oct 18 2004 - 19:47:59 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Tue Oct 19 2004 - 10:53:35 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Nicholas O. Lindan Tue Oct 19 2004 - 11:06:51 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Stacey Sun Oct 17 2004 - 19:53:28 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Matt Clara Tue Oct 19 2004 - 09:20:48 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Tue Oct 19 2004 - 10:07:04 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument sally Tue Oct 19 2004 - 11:52:04 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:27:16 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Matt Clara Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:52:54 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:00:37 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Wise Ass Poaster Wed Oct 20 2004 - 19:08:20 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Tue Oct 19 2004 - 10:56:05 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument sally Tue Oct 19 2004 - 11:39:59 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument sally Tue Oct 19 2004 - 11:53:33 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Gregory W Blank Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:58:48 EDT --> Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Tue Oct 19 2004 - 12:14:18 EDT --> Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Nicholas O. Lindan Tue Oct 19 2004 - 14:36:34 EDT --> Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Tue Oct 19 2004 - 16:20:22 EDT --> Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:48:59 EDT --> Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Wed Oct 20 2004 - 12:45:28 EDT --> Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 18:28:46 EDT --> Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:56:36 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Matt Clara Tue Oct 19 2004 - 18:29:25 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Tue Oct 19 2004 - 19:01:16 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Matt Clara Tue Oct 19 2004 - 20:06:39 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 08:50:24 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument rafe bustin Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:32:54 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Uranium Committee Tue Oct 19 2004 - 21:15:22 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Gordon Moat Wed Oct 20 2004 - 04:19:21 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Mon Oct 18 2004 - 12:04:36 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Tue Oct 19 2004 - 09:02:16 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Tue Oct 19 2004 - 10:55:07 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Tue Oct 19 2004 - 11:00:22 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Stacey Mon Oct 18 2004 - 02:20:28 EDT Last message date: Sun Nov 27 2005 - 00:30:23 EST Archived on: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 01:14:28 EST Date view Subject view Author view Attachment view Previous Folder, Thread view Next Folder, Thread view List of Folders

Feedback, Contact Us, Legal Information, Your Privacy Copyright ©1998-2004 metro.isp Inc.    All rights reserved.