Photo Resources  Photo Gallery	Web PhotoDigital.net

Date view Subject view Author view Attachment view Previous Folder, Thread view Next Folder, Thread view List of Folders 100 Messages Starting: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:11:38 EST Ending: Sun Nov 27 2005 - 00:30:23 EST Subject Author Date Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10" Pay Sat Oct 23 2004 - 08:05:13 EDT Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10" f/256 Tue Oct 19 2004 - 18:02:10 EDT Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Nick Zentena Mon Oct 18 2004 - 14:41:08 EDT Roll film back and focal length Bernhard Ess Sun Oct 24 2004 - 10:25:09 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob Salomon Sun Oct 24 2004 - 10:33:52 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Sun Oct 24 2004 - 11:08:20 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bernhard Ess Sun Oct 24 2004 - 11:36:12 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob G Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:31:54 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:59:16 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob G Sun Oct 24 2004 - 14:08:43 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Sun Oct 24 2004 - 14:36:32 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Donn Cave Mon Oct 25 2004 - 00:47:56 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob G Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:14:18 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob Salomon Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:27:52 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob G Mon Oct 25 2004 - 12:25:14 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob Salomon Mon Oct 25 2004 - 14:07:10 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Donn Cave Tue Oct 26 2004 - 01:35:12 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 10:40:50 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob Salomon Tue Oct 26 2004 - 11:01:06 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 11:48:11 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob Salomon Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:21:47 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:39:10 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:54:32 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Bob Salomon Tue Oct 26 2004 - 13:28:52 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 14:17:15 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:25:40 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:42:20 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:33:11 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:10:22 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:02:57 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Tue Oct 26 2004 - 19:27:42 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:35:38 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Hemi4268 Tue Oct 26 2004 - 15:17:40 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:56:26 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Louie Powell Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:46:04 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Gregory W Blank Sun Oct 24 2004 - 11:16:10 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Jos. Burke Sun Oct 24 2004 - 22:41:02 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Richard Knoppow Sun Oct 24 2004 - 18:16:33 EDT Re: Roll film back and focal length Largformat Wed Oct 27 2004 - 09:26:37 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Jorge Gasteazoro Thu Oct 28 2004 - 20:47:27 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Largformat Fri Oct 29 2004 - 12:07:34 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Fri Oct 29 2004 - 14:42:46 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Largformat Fri Oct 29 2004 - 15:46:45 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Fri Oct 29 2004 - 17:48:43 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Largformat Fri Oct 29 2004 - 19:23:50 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length CamArtsMag Fri Oct 29 2004 - 19:42:52 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Fri Oct 29 2004 - 20:45:26 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length rafe bustin Fri Oct 29 2004 - 22:57:03 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Gregory W Blank Fri Oct 29 2004 - 22:56:15 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Gregory W Blank Fri Oct 29 2004 - 16:37:03 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length jjs Fri Oct 29 2004 - 17:50:24 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Gregory W Blank Fri Oct 29 2004 - 22:29:16 EDT --> Re: Roll film back and focal length Jorge Gasteazoro Sat Oct 30 2004 - 02:13:15 EDT Re: matt parker from cottage grove oregon is a big piece of shit http://tinyurl.com/ii35 Mon Oct 18 2004 - 06:18:02 EDT Information about rec.photo.marketplace.large-format [27may2001] Helge Nareid Sun Oct 24 2004 - 06:43:42 EDT Cheapest E6 No One Tue Oct 19 2004 - 12:59:51 EDT Re: Cheapest E6 No One Tue Oct 19 2004 - 16:03:39 EDT Re: Cheapest E6 Gordon Moat Wed Oct 20 2004 - 13:57:39 EDT Re: Cheapest E6 Donald Qualls Wed Oct 20 2004 - 07:15:43 EDT Re: Cheapest E6 Tom Phillips Sat Oct 23 2004 - 23:54:19 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Nick Zentena Sun Oct 24 2004 - 07:50:13 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Tom Phillips Sun Oct 24 2004 - 16:10:17 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Gregory W Blank Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:15:59 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Tom Phillips Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:28:26 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:19:06 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Tom Phillips Mon Oct 25 2004 - 17:02:44 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 17:40:32 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Tom Phillips Mon Oct 25 2004 - 17:42:54 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 18:27:26 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Tom Phillips Mon Oct 25 2004 - 21:29:59 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 21:46:35 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Tom Phillips Mon Oct 25 2004 - 21:54:12 EDT Re: Cheapest E6 Nick Zentena Wed Oct 20 2004 - 08:11:55 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Donald Qualls Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:49:37 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Nick Zentena Wed Oct 20 2004 - 13:08:16 EDT --> Re: Cheapest E6 Donald Qualls Wed Oct 20 2004 - 16:42:26 EDT Re: Cheapest E6 Donald Qualls Tue Oct 19 2004 - 18:50:31 EDT OT: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? Matt Clara Sat Oct 23 2004 - 08:54:51 EDT Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? John Emmons Sat Oct 23 2004 - 11:28:31 EDT --> Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? BBarlow690 Sun Oct 24 2004 - 15:58:31 EDT --> Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? Matt Clara Tue Oct 26 2004 - 07:46:58 EDT --> Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? Msherck Thu Oct 28 2004 - 10:35:02 EDT --> Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? BBarlow690 Thu Oct 28 2004 - 21:17:50 EDT --> Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? Msherck Fri Oct 29 2004 - 09:44:38 EDT --> Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? BBarlow690 Sat Oct 30 2004 - 09:54:58 EDT --> Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? Msherck Sun Oct 31 2004 - 17:32:46 EST Question on Convertible Lenses Dr. Ronin Fri Oct 22 2004 - 13:56:12 EDT Re: Question on Convertible Lenses jjs Fri Oct 22 2004 - 19:33:30 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Ronin Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:03:31 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses jjs Sun Oct 24 2004 - 13:04:59 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Ronin Sun Oct 24 2004 - 17:40:41 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Tom Ferguson Sun Oct 24 2004 - 14:32:15 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Ronin Sun Oct 24 2004 - 17:45:49 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses jjs Mon Oct 25 2004 - 12:26:50 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Bob G Mon Oct 25 2004 - 13:47:21 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Tom Ferguson Mon Oct 25 2004 - 15:46:26 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses jjs Mon Oct 25 2004 - 16:36:44 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses brian Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:52:55 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Tom Ferguson Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:51:25 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Richard Knoppow Thu Nov 04 2004 - 14:22:31 EST --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Donald Qualls Sun Oct 24 2004 - 18:29:10 EDT Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Richard Knoppow Sun Oct 24 2004 - 18:26:45 EDT --> Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Richard Knoppow Wed Oct 27 2004 - 06:53:39 EDT Tri-X No One Fri Oct 22 2004 - 09:36:29 EDT Re: Tri-X Argon3 Fri Oct 22 2004 - 11:37:29 EDT Re: Tri-X jjs Fri Oct 22 2004 - 12:36:47 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Jos. Burke Fri Oct 22 2004 - 14:32:04 EDT --> Re: Tri-X jjs Fri Oct 22 2004 - 14:27:04 EDT --> Re: Tri-X No One Fri Oct 22 2004 - 16:07:24 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Douglas Fri Oct 22 2004 - 20:34:47 EDT --> Re: Tri-X No One Fri Oct 22 2004 - 21:03:17 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Douglas Fri Oct 22 2004 - 21:10:15 EDT --> Re: Tri-X sympatico.ca Tue Oct 26 2004 - 17:01:55 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Douglas Fri Oct 22 2004 - 21:54:40 EDT --> Re: Tri-X No One Sat Oct 23 2004 - 10:53:02 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Douglas Sat Oct 23 2004 - 15:17:13 EDT --> Re: Tri-X No One Sat Oct 23 2004 - 15:32:07 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Argon3 Sun Oct 24 2004 - 21:23:16 EDT --> Re: Tri-X jjs Sun Oct 24 2004 - 21:45:34 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Donald Qualls Sun Oct 24 2004 - 22:37:19 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Douglas Sun Oct 24 2004 - 21:40:30 EDT --> Re: Tri-X No One Sun Oct 24 2004 - 22:12:40 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Douglas Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:16:40 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Argon3 Mon Oct 25 2004 - 11:26:37 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Uranium Committee Mon Oct 25 2004 - 21:48:02 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Lloyd Erlick-Usenet Wed Oct 27 2004 - 08:47:49 EDT --> Re: Tri-X No One Sat Oct 23 2004 - 11:05:05 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Douglas Sat Oct 23 2004 - 13:03:27 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Argon3 Sat Oct 23 2004 - 13:29:01 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Douglas Sat Oct 23 2004 - 14:27:48 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Uranium Committee Sat Oct 23 2004 - 22:40:13 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Geoffrey S. Mendelson Sun Oct 24 2004 - 08:06:00 EDT --> Re: Tri-X jjs Sun Oct 24 2004 - 11:41:18 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Frank Pittel Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:21:55 EDT --> Re: Tri-X jjs Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:34:46 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Gregory W Blank Sun Oct 24 2004 - 15:15:13 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Donald Qualls Sun Oct 24 2004 - 18:26:26 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Gregory W Blank Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:19:33 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:35:31 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:24:50 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Frank Pittel Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:11:53 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Mon Oct 25 2004 - 16:36:34 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Frank Pittel Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:21:15 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Tue Oct 26 2004 - 19:09:07 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Frank Pittel Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:10:32 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Tue Oct 26 2004 - 21:59:55 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Frank Pittel Wed Oct 27 2004 - 00:27:55 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Wed Oct 27 2004 - 01:43:27 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Wed Oct 27 2004 - 01:45:18 EDT --> Re: Tri-X rafe bustin Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:40:50 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Donald Qualls Sun Oct 24 2004 - 22:42:21 EDT --> Re: Tri-X rafe bustin Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:10:47 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Donald Qualls Mon Oct 25 2004 - 10:41:32 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Donald Qualls Tue Oct 26 2004 - 06:38:07 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:31:29 EDT --> Re: Tri-X rafe bustin Tue Oct 26 2004 - 08:06:25 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Donald Qualls Tue Oct 26 2004 - 12:34:39 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:45:24 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Tue Oct 26 2004 - 18:33:05 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Frank Pittel Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:15:00 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Mon Oct 25 2004 - 17:34:14 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 18:47:17 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 19:41:11 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Mon Oct 25 2004 - 21:49:57 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Tom Phillips Mon Oct 25 2004 - 21:48:07 EDT --> Re: Tri-X jjs Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:38:23 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Gregory W Blank Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:22:00 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Donald Qualls Sun Oct 24 2004 - 22:46:13 EDT --> Re: Tri-X Gregory W Blank Sun Oct 24 2004 - 15:20:52 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Douglas Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:30:46 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT No One Sun Oct 24 2004 - 15:58:09 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Matt Clara Sun Oct 24 2004 - 17:22:27 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Douglas Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:21:54 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT No One Sun Oct 24 2004 - 22:15:54 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Uranium Committee Sun Oct 24 2004 - 18:45:37 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT No One Sun Oct 24 2004 - 22:24:06 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Douglas Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:59:48 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Gregory W Blank Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:36:21 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Donald Qualls Mon Oct 25 2004 - 07:44:01 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:29:19 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Donald Qualls Mon Oct 25 2004 - 10:43:33 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Douglas Sun Oct 24 2004 - 20:37:08 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Gregory W Blank Sun Oct 24 2004 - 23:27:11 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Douglas Mon Oct 25 2004 - 00:19:02 EDT --> Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Gregory W Blank Mon Oct 25 2004 - 09:27:41 EDT --> Re: Tri-X No One Sat Oct 23 2004 - 15:36:24 EDT Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument David Nebenzahl Sat Oct 16 2004 - 15:33:12 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Richard Knoppow Sat Oct 16 2004 - 16:51:53 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument David Nebenzahl Sat Oct 16 2004 - 19:00:21 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Stacey Sat Oct 16 2004 - 22:49:07 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Sun Oct 17 2004 - 05:27:01 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Bob Monaghan Sun Oct 17 2004 - 18:53:34 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Nicholas O. Lindan Mon Oct 18 2004 - 13:27:52 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Mon Oct 18 2004 - 14:17:05 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Mon Oct 18 2004 - 14:19:59 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Nicholas O. Lindan Mon Oct 18 2004 - 17:54:45 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Frank Pittel Mon Oct 18 2004 - 19:47:59 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Tue Oct 19 2004 - 10:53:35 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Nicholas O. Lindan Tue Oct 19 2004 - 11:06:51 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Stacey Sun Oct 17 2004 - 19:53:28 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument rafe bustin Mon Oct 18 2004 - 08:41:43 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Shelley Mon Oct 18 2004 - 09:29:22 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Sun Oct 17 2004 - 05:22:54 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Richard Knoppow Sun Oct 17 2004 - 20:45:37 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Mon Oct 18 2004 - 11:54:08 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument David Nebenzahl Mon Oct 18 2004 - 12:04:41 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Mon Oct 18 2004 - 12:07:48 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Matt Clara Tue Oct 19 2004 - 09:20:48 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Tue Oct 19 2004 - 10:07:04 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument sally Tue Oct 19 2004 - 11:52:04 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:27:16 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Matt Clara Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:52:54 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:00:37 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Wise Ass Poaster Wed Oct 20 2004 - 19:08:20 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Tue Oct 19 2004 - 10:56:05 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument sally Tue Oct 19 2004 - 11:39:59 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument sally Tue Oct 19 2004 - 11:53:33 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Gregory W Blank Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:58:48 EDT --> Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Tue Oct 19 2004 - 12:14:18 EDT --> Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Nicholas O. Lindan Tue Oct 19 2004 - 14:36:34 EDT --> Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Tue Oct 19 2004 - 16:20:22 EDT --> Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:48:59 EDT --> Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Wed Oct 20 2004 - 12:45:28 EDT --> Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 18:28:46 EDT --> Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:56:36 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Matt Clara Tue Oct 19 2004 - 18:29:25 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Tue Oct 19 2004 - 19:01:16 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Matt Clara Tue Oct 19 2004 - 20:06:39 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Wed Oct 20 2004 - 08:50:24 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument rafe bustin Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:32:54 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Uranium Committee Tue Oct 19 2004 - 21:15:22 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Gordon Moat Wed Oct 20 2004 - 04:19:21 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Mon Oct 18 2004 - 12:04:36 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument David Nebenzahl Mon Oct 18 2004 - 12:24:43 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Tue Oct 19 2004 - 09:02:16 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Tue Oct 19 2004 - 10:55:07 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Tue Oct 19 2004 - 11:00:22 EDT --> Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Stacey Mon Oct 18 2004 - 02:20:28 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tom Phillips Sun Oct 17 2004 - 05:08:35 EDT Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument jjs Mon Oct 18 2004 - 11:20:02 EDT Re: rebuild the cuntface of the spamming scammer matt parker http://tinyurl.com/452ch matt parker Fri Oct 22 2004 - 06:23:52 EDT Re: rebuild the cuntface of the spamming scammer matt parker http://tinyurl.com/452ch http://tinyurl.com/ii35 Mon Oct 18 2004 - 05:36:14 EDT build the cuntface of the spamming scammer matt parker http://tinyurl.com/452ch matt parker Fri Oct 22 2004 - 06:15:33 EDT Re: parker from cottage grove oregon is a big piece of shit matt parker Fri Oct 22 2004 - 05:50:24 EDT Re: Hardware is getting tiring. Time to shoot! DanSMeyers Fri Oct 22 2004 - 07:03:35 EDT Re: Meaningless drivel/NG's digress into Name calling etc. Uranium Committee Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:17:25 EDT Re: What happens to film as it ages? dr bob Sun Oct 17 2004 - 09:49:42 EDT Re: What happens to film as it ages? Donald Qualls Sat Oct 16 2004 - 10:25:01 EDT Re: What happens to film as it ages? dr bob Sun Oct 17 2004 - 10:22:51 EDT --> Re: What happens to film as it ages? Andy Phillips Sat Oct 23 2004 - 16:09:51 EDT Re: What happens to film as it ages? No One Fri Oct 15 2004 - 15:26:02 EDT Re: What happens to film as it ages? Hunt Sun Oct 17 2004 - 01:27:18 EDT Re: Ilex #5 shutter problem-Cable release! Jos. Burke Sat Oct 16 2004 - 18:57:08 EDT Re: Ilex #5 shutter problem-Cable release! jjs Mon Oct 18 2004 - 11:14:16 EDT --> Re: Ilex #5 shutter problem-Cable release! Richard Knoppow Fri Oct 22 2004 - 07:27:08 EDT Re: sheet film developing is hard Hunt Sun Oct 17 2004 - 01:06:55 EDT Re: Tray Development Hunt Sun Oct 17 2004 - 01:15:56 EDT Re: Tray Development Thor Lancelot Simon Sun Oct 17 2004 - 11:19:26 EDT Last message date: Sun Nov 27 2005 - 00:30:23 EST Archived on: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 01:14:28 EST Date view Subject view Author view Attachment view Previous Folder, Thread view Next Folder, Thread view List of Folders

Feedback, Contact Us, Legal Information, Your Privacy Copyright ©1998-2004 metro.isp Inc.    All rights reserved.