Photo Resources  Photo Gallery	Web PhotoDigital.net

Date view Thread view Subject view Attachment view Previous Folder, Author view Next Folder, Author view List of Folders 100 Messages Starting: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:11:38 EST Ending: Sun Nov 27 2005 - 00:30:23 EST Author Subject Date Argon3   Re: Tri-X Sat Oct 23 2004 - 13:29:01 EDT   Re: Tri-X Fri Oct 22 2004 - 11:37:29 EDT BBarlow690   Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? Sun Oct 24 2004 - 15:58:31 EDT Bernhard Ess   Re: Roll film back and focal length Sun Oct 24 2004 - 11:36:12 EDT   Roll film back and focal length Sun Oct 24 2004 - 10:25:09 EDT Bob G   Re: Roll film back and focal length Sun Oct 24 2004 - 14:08:43 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:31:54 EDT Bob Monaghan   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Sun Oct 17 2004 - 18:53:34 EDT Bob Salomon   Re: Roll film back and focal length Sun Oct 24 2004 - 10:33:52 EDT DanSMeyers   Re: Hardware is getting tiring. Time to shoot! Fri Oct 22 2004 - 07:03:35 EDT David Nebenzahl   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Mon Oct 18 2004 - 12:24:43 EDT   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Mon Oct 18 2004 - 12:04:41 EDT   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Sat Oct 16 2004 - 19:00:21 EDT   Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Sat Oct 16 2004 - 15:33:12 EDT Donald Qualls   Re: Cheapest E6 Wed Oct 20 2004 - 07:15:43 EDT   Re: What happens to film as it ages? Sat Oct 16 2004 - 10:25:01 EDT Douglas   Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:30:46 EDT   Re: Tri-X Sat Oct 23 2004 - 15:17:13 EDT   Re: Tri-X Sat Oct 23 2004 - 14:27:48 EDT   Re: Tri-X Sat Oct 23 2004 - 13:03:27 EDT   Re: Tri-X Fri Oct 22 2004 - 21:54:40 EDT   Re: Tri-X Fri Oct 22 2004 - 21:10:15 EDT   Re: Tri-X Fri Oct 22 2004 - 20:34:47 EDT dr bob   Re: What happens to film as it ages? Sun Oct 17 2004 - 10:22:51 EDT   Re: What happens to film as it ages? Sun Oct 17 2004 - 09:49:42 EDT Dr. Ronin   Question on Convertible Lenses Fri Oct 22 2004 - 13:56:12 EDT f/256   Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10" Tue Oct 19 2004 - 18:02:10 EDT Frank Pittel   Re: Tri-X Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:21:55 EDT Geoffrey S. Mendelson   Re: Tri-X Sun Oct 24 2004 - 08:06:00 EDT Gordon Moat   Re: Cheapest E6 Wed Oct 20 2004 - 13:57:39 EDT Gregory W Blank   Re: Tri-X Sun Oct 24 2004 - 15:20:52 EDT   Re: Tri-X Sun Oct 24 2004 - 15:15:13 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Sun Oct 24 2004 - 11:16:10 EDT Helge Nareid   Information about rec.photo.marketplace.large-format [27may2001] Sun Oct 24 2004 - 06:43:42 EDT http://tinyurl.com/ii35   Re: matt parker from cottage grove oregon is a big piece of shit Mon Oct 18 2004 - 06:18:02 EDT   Re: rebuild the cuntface of the spamming scammer matt parker http://tinyurl.com/452ch Mon Oct 18 2004 - 05:36:14 EDT Hunt   Re: What happens to film as it ages? Sun Oct 17 2004 - 01:27:18 EDT   Re: Tray Development Sun Oct 17 2004 - 01:15:56 EDT   Re: sheet film developing is hard Sun Oct 17 2004 - 01:06:55 EDT jjs   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Mon Oct 18 2004 - 11:20:02 EDT   Re: Ilex #5 shutter problem-Cable release! Mon Oct 18 2004 - 11:14:16 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Sun Oct 24 2004 - 14:36:32 EDT   Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Sun Oct 24 2004 - 13:04:59 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:59:16 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:56:26 EDT   Re: Tri-X Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:34:46 EDT   Re: Tri-X Sun Oct 24 2004 - 11:41:18 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Sun Oct 24 2004 - 11:08:20 EDT   Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Fri Oct 22 2004 - 19:33:30 EDT   Re: Tri-X Fri Oct 22 2004 - 14:27:04 EDT   Re: Tri-X Fri Oct 22 2004 - 12:36:47 EDT John Emmons   Re: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? Sat Oct 23 2004 - 11:28:31 EDT Jos. Burke   Re: Tri-X Fri Oct 22 2004 - 14:32:04 EDT   Re: Ilex #5 shutter problem-Cable release! Sat Oct 16 2004 - 18:57:08 EDT Louie Powell   Re: Roll film back and focal length Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:46:04 EDT Matt Clara   Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Sun Oct 24 2004 - 17:22:27 EDT   OT: Anyone here ever submit to LensWork? Sat Oct 23 2004 - 08:54:51 EDT matt parker   Re: rebuild the cuntface of the spamming scammer matt parker http://tinyurl.com/452ch Fri Oct 22 2004 - 06:23:52 EDT   build the cuntface of the spamming scammer matt parker http://tinyurl.com/452ch Fri Oct 22 2004 - 06:15:33 EDT   Re: parker from cottage grove oregon is a big piece of shit Fri Oct 22 2004 - 05:50:24 EDT Nicholas O. Lindan   Re: Clarify: T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Tue Oct 19 2004 - 14:36:34 EDT   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Mon Oct 18 2004 - 13:27:52 EDT Nick Zentena   Re: Cheapest E6 Sun Oct 24 2004 - 07:50:13 EDT   Re: moving up to this format - advice welcome Mon Oct 18 2004 - 14:41:08 EDT No One   Re: Tri-X - Now very very OT Sun Oct 24 2004 - 15:58:09 EDT   Re: Tri-X Sat Oct 23 2004 - 15:36:24 EDT   Re: Tri-X Sat Oct 23 2004 - 15:32:07 EDT   Cheapest E6 Tue Oct 19 2004 - 12:59:51 EDT   Re: Tri-X Sat Oct 23 2004 - 11:05:05 EDT   Re: Tri-X Sat Oct 23 2004 - 10:53:02 EDT   Re: Cheapest E6 Tue Oct 19 2004 - 16:03:39 EDT   Re: Tri-X Fri Oct 22 2004 - 21:03:17 EDT   Re: Tri-X Fri Oct 22 2004 - 16:07:24 EDT   Tri-X Fri Oct 22 2004 - 09:36:29 EDT Pay   Re: G-Claron 210 for 8x10" Sat Oct 23 2004 - 08:05:13 EDT rafe bustin   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Mon Oct 18 2004 - 08:41:43 EDT Richard Knoppow   Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Sun Oct 24 2004 - 18:26:45 EDT   Re: Roll film back and focal length Sun Oct 24 2004 - 18:16:33 EDT   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Sun Oct 17 2004 - 20:45:37 EDT   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Sat Oct 16 2004 - 16:51:53 EDT   Re: Ilex #5 shutter problem-Cable release! Fri Oct 22 2004 - 07:27:08 EDT Ronin   Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Sun Oct 24 2004 - 17:45:49 EDT   Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Sun Oct 24 2004 - 17:40:41 EDT   Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Sun Oct 24 2004 - 12:03:31 EDT Shelley   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Mon Oct 18 2004 - 09:29:22 EDT Stacey   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Mon Oct 18 2004 - 02:20:28 EDT   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Sun Oct 17 2004 - 19:53:28 EDT   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Sat Oct 16 2004 - 22:49:07 EDT Thor Lancelot Simon   Re: Tray Development Sun Oct 17 2004 - 11:19:26 EDT Tom Ferguson   Re: Question on Convertible Lenses Sun Oct 24 2004 - 14:32:15 EDT Tom Phillips   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Mon Oct 18 2004 - 12:07:48 EDT   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Mon Oct 18 2004 - 12:04:36 EDT   Re: Cheapest E6 Sun Oct 24 2004 - 16:10:17 EDT   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Mon Oct 18 2004 - 11:54:08 EDT   Re: Cheapest E6 Sat Oct 23 2004 - 23:54:19 EDT   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Sun Oct 17 2004 - 05:27:01 EDT   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Sun Oct 17 2004 - 05:22:54 EDT   Re: Flaw in T. Phillips "Digital is not photography" argument Sun Oct 17 2004 - 05:08:35 EDT Uranium Committee   Re: Tri-X Sat Oct 23 2004 - 22:40:13 EDT   Re: Meaningless drivel/NG's digress into Name calling etc. Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:17:25 EDT Last message date: Sun Nov 27 2005 - 00:30:23 EST Archived on: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 01:14:28 EST Date view Thread view Subject view Attachment view Previous Folder, Author view Next Folder, Author view List of Folders

Feedback, Contact Us, Legal Information, Your Privacy Copyright ©1998-2004 metro.isp Inc.    All rights reserved.