PhotoDigital.netPhoto Resources  Photo Gallery
Google
  Web PhotoDigital.net

rec.photo.equipment.large-format Discussion: By Thread

100 Messages
Starting:Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:11:38 EST Ending:Sun Nov 27 2005 - 00:30:23 EST

SubjectAuthor Date
Forte colour film?Nick ZentenaSun Sep 19 2004 - 09:43:24 EDT
Shutter questionGlenn BarrySun Sep 19 2004 - 04:24:28 EDT
Re: Shutter questionNick ZentenaSun Sep 19 2004 - 07:30:29 EDT
Buildings are not always leveljjsSat Sep 18 2004 - 11:59:50 EDT
Re: Buildings are not always levelJean-David BeyerSat Sep 18 2004 - 13:43:12 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always leveljjsSat Sep 18 2004 - 21:04:07 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelGregory BlankSun Sep 19 2004 - 06:55:40 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelMatt ClaraSun Sep 19 2004 - 20:17:14 EDT
Re: Buildings are not always levelJorge GasteazoroSat Sep 18 2004 - 23:34:05 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelArgon3Sun Sep 19 2004 - 00:05:01 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelLargformatMon Sep 20 2004 - 10:03:48 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelBandicootMon Sep 20 2004 - 13:25:48 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelLeonard EvensMon Sep 20 2004 - 14:18:01 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelLargformatMon Sep 20 2004 - 17:04:43 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelBandicootMon Sep 20 2004 - 20:42:13 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelGregory BlankTue Sep 21 2004 - 08:57:39 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always leveljjsTue Sep 21 2004 - 10:40:25 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelGregory BlankTue Sep 21 2004 - 15:35:35 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelDonald QuallsTue Sep 21 2004 - 16:42:06 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelGregory BlankSun Sep 19 2004 - 07:06:25 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always leveljjsSun Sep 19 2004 - 09:16:58 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelGregory BlankSun Sep 19 2004 - 09:32:49 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelbobSun Sep 19 2004 - 13:30:00 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelNicholas O. LindanSun Sep 19 2004 - 13:53:48 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelJorge GasteazoroTue Sep 21 2004 - 15:36:54 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelGregory BlankTue Sep 21 2004 - 18:08:53 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always leveljjsTue Sep 21 2004 - 22:17:32 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelDonald QuallsWed Sep 22 2004 - 22:42:53 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelAtomic Sub CommitteeWed Sep 22 2004 - 23:27:09 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelDonald QuallsThu Sep 23 2004 - 07:33:36 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelJorge GasteazoroTue Sep 21 2004 - 22:43:56 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelGregory BlankWed Sep 22 2004 - 08:35:09 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelJorge GasteazoroWed Sep 22 2004 - 15:18:15 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always leveljjsSun Sep 19 2004 - 09:08:10 EDT
Re: Buildings are not always levelMatt ClaraSun Sep 19 2004 - 20:11:43 EDT
--> Re: Buildings are not always levelJohn McGrawTue Sep 28 2004 - 18:21:02 EDT
Efke 25 revisited (example)jjsSat Sep 18 2004 - 11:55:34 EDT
simple lens adviceJohn HendryThu Sep 16 2004 - 20:26:32 EDT
Re: simple lens adviceArgon3Fri Sep 17 2004 - 23:00:10 EDT
What technika lenses have good coverage and allow front to close?jjsFri Sep 17 2004 - 12:53:11 EDT
Re: What technika lenses have good coverage and allow front to close?Christopher PerezFri Sep 17 2004 - 13:49:15 EDT
--> Re: What technika lenses have good coverage and allow front to close?Kerry L. ThalmannFri Sep 17 2004 - 17:38:00 EDT
Re: What technika lenses have good coverage and allow front to close?Bob SalomonFri Sep 17 2004 - 14:20:49 EDT
--> Re: What technika lenses have good coverage and allow front to close?jjsFri Sep 17 2004 - 15:07:06 EDT
Re: What technika lenses have good coverage and allow front to close?Brian DowneySat Sep 18 2004 - 04:11:07 EDT
135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?jjsFri Sep 17 2004 - 10:45:35 EDT
Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?Christopher PerezFri Sep 17 2004 - 11:29:36 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?jjsFri Sep 17 2004 - 11:42:09 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?Christopher PerezFri Sep 17 2004 - 12:20:49 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?jjsFri Sep 17 2004 - 12:50:46 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?Christopher PerezFri Sep 17 2004 - 13:38:45 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?jjsFri Sep 17 2004 - 14:49:31 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?Christopher PerezFri Sep 17 2004 - 15:58:30 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?Leigh Marrin/KM6JEFri Sep 17 2004 - 19:45:35 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?jjsFri Sep 17 2004 - 11:45:52 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?Christopher PerezFri Sep 17 2004 - 13:40:32 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?StaceySat Sep 18 2004 - 22:16:32 EDT
Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?Steve HamleyFri Sep 17 2004 - 16:26:18 EDT
Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?Dan FrommFri Sep 17 2004 - 17:45:02 EDT
Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?JPMOSEMon Sep 20 2004 - 15:02:24 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?jjsMon Sep 20 2004 - 21:12:47 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?jjsMon Sep 20 2004 - 21:08:33 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?JPMOSETue Sep 21 2004 - 09:51:56 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?jjsTue Sep 21 2004 - 10:37:14 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?Bob SalomonTue Sep 21 2004 - 11:14:30 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?jjsTue Sep 21 2004 - 12:02:50 EDT
--> Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?JPMOSEWed Sep 22 2004 - 07:23:56 EDT
Re: 135mm F3.5 Planar is rare?JPMOSEMon Sep 20 2004 - 15:09:26 EDT
speed graphic useMatt AshbrookFri Sep 17 2004 - 10:37:31 EDT
Re: speed graphic useDavid NebenzahlFri Sep 17 2004 - 10:48:22 EDT
--> Re: speed graphic usejjsFri Sep 17 2004 - 11:16:25 EDT
Re: speed graphic useDonald QuallsFri Sep 17 2004 - 10:51:11 EDT
--> Re: speed graphic useDMLStarSat Sep 18 2004 - 02:23:38 EDT
Re: speed graphic useRichard KnoppowSun Sep 19 2004 - 18:52:45 EDT
360mm lenses in Copal #1 that cover 8x10?Christopher PerezThu Sep 16 2004 - 18:12:26 EDT
Re: 360mm lenses in Copal #1 that cover 8x10?Steve HamleyThu Sep 16 2004 - 23:05:51 EDT
--> Re: 360mm lenses in Copal #1 that cover 8x10?Stephan GoldsteinFri Sep 17 2004 - 06:46:03 EDT
--> Re: 360mm lenses in Copal #1 that cover 8x10?Christopher PerezFri Sep 17 2004 - 10:30:30 EDT
--> Re: 360mm lenses in Copal #1 that cover 8x10?Kerry L. ThalmannFri Sep 17 2004 - 16:20:09 EDT
--> Re: 360mm lenses in Copal #1 that cover 8x10?Christopher PerezFri Sep 17 2004 - 16:35:43 EDT
--> Re: 360mm lenses in Copal #1 that cover 8x10?Kerry L. ThalmannFri Sep 17 2004 - 16:16:38 EDT
--> Re: 360mm lenses in Copal #1 that cover 8x10?jjsFri Sep 17 2004 - 19:43:37 EDT
--> Re: 360mm lenses in Copal #1 that cover 8x10?Steve HamleyFri Sep 17 2004 - 21:02:37 EDT
--> Re: 360mm lenses in Copal #1 that cover 8x10?Kerry L. ThalmannSat Sep 18 2004 - 02:08:43 EDT
Re: 360mm lenses in Copal #1 that cover 8x10?Nick ZentenaFri Sep 17 2004 - 14:03:53 EDT
--> Re: 360mm lenses in Copal #1 that cover 8x10?Christopher PerezFri Sep 17 2004 - 15:57:31 EDT
Re: 360mm lenses in Copal #1 that cover 8x10?Kerry L. ThalmannFri Sep 17 2004 - 17:28:22 EDT
Crown Graphic Special rangefinder adjustmenthassy_userThu Sep 16 2004 - 11:59:20 EDT
Re: Crown Graphic Special rangefinder adjustmenthassy_userFri Sep 17 2004 - 00:49:06 EDT
Re: Crown Graphic Special rangefinder adjustmentMarv SoloffFri Sep 17 2004 - 07:25:23 EDT
--> Re: Crown Graphic Special rangefinder adjustmentjjsFri Sep 17 2004 - 10:08:56 EDT
--> Re: Crown Graphic Special rangefinder adjustmentMarv SoloffFri Sep 17 2004 - 16:00:17 EDT
--> Re: Crown Graphic Special rangefinder adjustmentjjsFri Sep 17 2004 - 19:41:35 EDT
--> Re: Crown Graphic Special rangefinder adjustmentMarv SoloffFri Sep 17 2004 - 20:41:40 EDT
--> Re: Crown Graphic Special rangefinder adjustmentjjsFri Sep 17 2004 - 21:17:59 EDT
--> Re: Crown Graphic Special rangefinder adjustmentDonn CaveSat Sep 18 2004 - 17:21:26 EDT
--> Re: Crown Graphic Special rangefinder adjustmentRichard KnoppowSun Sep 19 2004 - 18:58:23 EDT
--> Re: Crown Graphic Special rangefinder adjustmentRichard KnoppowSun Sep 19 2004 - 18:56:14 EDT
--> Re: Crown Graphic Special rangefinder adjustmentMarv SoloffSun Sep 19 2004 - 20:25:20 EDT
Strobe parts questionhabs4x5Wed Sep 15 2004 - 21:57:57 EDT
Re: Strobe parts questionRSD99Thu Sep 16 2004 - 00:09:07 EDT
--> Re: Strobe parts questionChris EllingerThu Sep 16 2004 - 09:07:37 EDT
IlfordGregory BlankWed Sep 15 2004 - 20:54:31 EDT
Re: TEsting for personal film speedFrank PittelWed Sep 15 2004 - 17:45:06 EDT
Re: TEsting for personal film speedNick ZentenaWed Sep 15 2004 - 18:34:10 EDT
--> Re: TEsting for personal film speedjjsWed Sep 15 2004 - 19:04:46 EDT
--> Re: TEsting for personal film speedNick ZentenaWed Sep 15 2004 - 20:02:31 EDT
--> Re: TEsting for personal film speedFrank PittelThu Sep 16 2004 - 00:27:25 EDT
Re: TEsting for personal film speedUranium CommitteeThu Sep 16 2004 - 14:36:34 EDT
Re: TEsting for personal film speedJohn BartleyWed Sep 15 2004 - 21:26:04 EDT
Re: TEsting for personal film speedNicholas O. LindanThu Sep 16 2004 - 10:58:49 EDT
Re: TEsting for personal film speedDonald QuallsThu Sep 16 2004 - 12:08:09 EDT
--> Re: TEsting for personal film speedjjsThu Sep 16 2004 - 12:16:28 EDT
--> Re: TEsting for personal film speedDonald QuallsThu Sep 16 2004 - 20:42:01 EDT
--> Re: TEsting for personal film speedjjsThu Sep 16 2004 - 21:37:41 EDT
--> Re: TEsting for personal film speedDonald QuallsFri Sep 17 2004 - 07:34:16 EDT
Re: TEsting for personal film speedUranium CommitteeThu Sep 16 2004 - 14:36:06 EDT
Re: TEsting for personal film speedjjsThu Sep 16 2004 - 16:05:06 EDT
--> Re: TEsting for personal film speedUranium CommitteeThu Sep 16 2004 - 22:01:33 EDT
Re: efke 25 4x5 - tried itChristopher PerezThu Sep 16 2004 - 14:20:28 EDT
Re: efke 25 4x5 - tried itGregory BlankThu Sep 16 2004 - 14:50:03 EDT
--> Re: efke 25 4x5 - tried itGregory BlankThu Sep 16 2004 - 15:08:08 EDT
--> Re: efke 25 4x5 - tried itjjsThu Sep 16 2004 - 20:28:16 EDT
--> Re: efke 25 4x5 - tried itGregory BlankThu Sep 16 2004 - 21:04:28 EDT
--> Re: efke 25 4x5 - tried itUranium CommitteeThu Sep 16 2004 - 22:03:05 EDT
Re: efke 25 4x5 - tried itjjsThu Sep 16 2004 - 20:27:19 EDT
--> Re: efke 25 4x5 - tried itChristopher PerezFri Sep 17 2004 - 12:22:03 EDT
--> Re: efke 25 4x5 - tried itGregory BlankFri Sep 17 2004 - 13:28:29 EDT
--> Re: efke 25 4x5 - tried itChristopher PerezFri Sep 17 2004 - 13:44:37 EDT
--> Re: efke 25 4x5 - tried itjjsFri Sep 17 2004 - 15:13:20 EDT
--> Re: efke 25 4x5 - tried itGregory BlankFri Sep 17 2004 - 16:08:37 EDT
--> Re: efke 25 4x5 - tried itPeter De SmidtFri Sep 17 2004 - 21:46:06 EDT
--> Re: efke 25 4x5 - tried itjjsSat Sep 18 2004 - 09:25:59 EDT
--> Re: efke 25 4x5 - tried itPeter De SmidtSat Sep 18 2004 - 10:14:37 EDT
Re: efke 25 4x5 - tried itNeil PurlingWed Sep 22 2004 - 15:10:22 EDT
Re: learning by doingBandicootWed Sep 15 2004 - 18:15:23 EDT
Re: Absolute beginner needs advivceevan clarkeThu Sep 16 2004 - 07:32:10 EDT

Last message date: Sun Nov 27 2005 - 00:30:23 EST Archived on: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 01:14:28 EST