PhotoDigital.netPhoto Resources  Photo Gallery
Google
  Web PhotoDigital.net

rec.photo.equipment.35mm Discussion: By Thread

100 Messages
Starting:Sun Jun 06 2004 - 02:38:28 EDT Ending:Tue Nov 22 2005 - 00:52:13 EST

SubjectAuthor Date
How much is a Nikon F camera worth?BrentMon Jun 07 2004 - 18:50:13 EDT
Re: How much is a Nikon F camera worth?PhotodadMon Jun 07 2004 - 19:06:44 EDT
--> Re: How much is a Nikon F camera worth?BrentMon Jun 07 2004 - 23:30:10 EDT
--> Re: How much is a Nikon F camera worth?PhotodadTue Jun 08 2004 - 04:46:13 EDT
--> Re: How much is a Nikon F camera worth?BrentTue Jun 08 2004 - 09:31:08 EDT
--> Re: How much is a Nikon F camera worth?PhotodadTue Jun 08 2004 - 13:09:54 EDT
--> Re: How much is a Nikon F camera worth?BrentTue Jun 08 2004 - 14:13:23 EDT
Re: How much is a Nikon F camera worth?Bill HiltonMon Jun 07 2004 - 20:22:48 EDT
--> Re: How much is a Nikon F camera worth?Matt ClaraMon Jun 07 2004 - 20:53:22 EDT
--> Re: How much is a Nikon F camera worth?Bob HickeyMon Jun 07 2004 - 21:51:27 EDT
--> Re: How much is a Nikon F camera worth?Chris LoffredoTue Jun 08 2004 - 03:29:25 EDT
Re: How much is a Nikon F camera worth?Chris LoffredoTue Jun 08 2004 - 03:36:18 EDT
--> Re: How much is a Nikon F camera worth?BrentTue Jun 08 2004 - 19:42:18 EDT
--> Re: How much is a Nikon F camera worth?Chris LoffredoWed Jun 09 2004 - 00:10:26 EDT
--> Re: How much is a Nikon F camera worth?TomThu Jun 10 2004 - 00:05:24 EDT
--> Re: How much is a Nikon F camera worth?EDGY01Wed Jun 16 2004 - 02:39:51 EDT
B&W developmentNick JMon Jun 07 2004 - 18:26:33 EDT
Re: B&W developmentBob HickeyMon Jun 07 2004 - 18:58:51 EDT
--> Re: B&W developmentNick JMon Jun 07 2004 - 19:52:13 EDT
--> Re: B&W developmentChris LoffredoTue Jun 08 2004 - 03:43:12 EDT
--> Re: B&W developmentBob HickeyTue Jun 08 2004 - 07:18:43 EDT
Re: B&W developmentcolumbotrekMon Jun 07 2004 - 19:43:50 EDT
--> Re: B&W developmentNick JMon Jun 07 2004 - 19:56:22 EDT
--> Re: B&W developmentNick ZentenaMon Jun 07 2004 - 20:04:16 EDT
--> Re: B&W developmentBob HickeyTue Jun 08 2004 - 13:45:40 EDT
Re: B&W developmentian greenMon Jun 07 2004 - 20:14:51 EDT
Re: B&W developmentAl DenelsbeckMon Jun 07 2004 - 20:05:19 EDT
--> Re: B&W developmentian greenMon Jun 07 2004 - 20:51:49 EDT
--> Re: B&W developmentJustin F. KnotzkeTue Jun 08 2004 - 09:46:17 EDT
Re: B&W developmentNick ZentenaMon Jun 07 2004 - 20:00:16 EDT
--> Re: B&W developmentWilliam GrahamTue Jun 08 2004 - 18:39:01 EDT
Re: B&W developmentAlan BrowneTue Jun 08 2004 - 10:19:46 EDT
--> Re: B&W developmentMatt ClaraTue Jun 08 2004 - 18:29:17 EDT
--> Re: B&W developmentAlan BrowneWed Jun 09 2004 - 10:22:46 EDT
ND 4X or 8X for the Konica Hexar AF (Silver)badrMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:38:05 EDT
Re: ND 4X or 8X for the Konica Hexar AF (Silver)Martin FrancisMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:46:53 EDT
Re: slide film projectorzorgMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:26:55 EDT
Re: slide film projectorMalcolm StewartMon Jun 07 2004 - 18:05:19 EDT
--> Re: slide film projectorBarneyFri Jun 11 2004 - 13:21:17 EDT
--> Re: slide film projectorMalcolm StewartFri Jun 11 2004 - 19:57:55 EDT
Re: slide film projectorRay PaseurWed Jun 09 2004 - 15:57:22 EDT
Older Nikon Lenses on the D70 SLR (updated)Ray PaseurMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:52:10 EDT
Finest grained 35mm film?Lung FishMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:34:56 EDT
Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Ed E.Mon Jun 07 2004 - 15:50:03 EDT
Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Gordon MoatMon Jun 07 2004 - 17:08:38 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Lewis LangMon Jun 07 2004 - 17:58:19 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Gordon MoatTue Jun 08 2004 - 03:06:08 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Lewis LangWed Jun 09 2004 - 19:39:43 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Gordon MoatWed Jun 09 2004 - 20:24:09 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Lewis LangWed Jun 09 2004 - 23:30:49 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Gordon MoatThu Jun 10 2004 - 14:08:20 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Lewis LangThu Jun 10 2004 - 23:29:53 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Gordon MoatFri Jun 11 2004 - 03:09:04 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Lewis LangFri Jun 11 2004 - 21:14:46 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Gordon MoatSat Jun 12 2004 - 03:00:33 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Lewis LangMon Jun 14 2004 - 02:35:22 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Gordon MoatMon Jun 14 2004 - 14:34:56 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Lewis LangMon Jun 14 2004 - 15:05:30 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Gordon MoatTue Jun 15 2004 - 14:18:49 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Lewis LangTue Jun 15 2004 - 20:37:59 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Skip MThu Jun 10 2004 - 00:03:16 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Gordon MoatThu Jun 10 2004 - 00:46:56 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Skip MWed Jun 09 2004 - 20:20:12 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Gordon MoatWed Jun 09 2004 - 21:23:57 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Skip MThu Jun 10 2004 - 00:04:47 EDT
Re: Finest grained 35mm film?mr. chipMon Jun 07 2004 - 17:13:01 EDT
Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Tony SpadaroMon Jun 07 2004 - 17:59:09 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Frank PittelSun Jun 27 2004 - 00:38:03 EDT
Re: Finest grained 35mm film?MikeMon Jun 07 2004 - 23:22:39 EDT
Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Ray PaseurWed Jun 09 2004 - 15:54:57 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Al DoyleTue Jun 15 2004 - 11:25:11 EDT
Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Chris BrownMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:33:45 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Lewis LangMon Jun 07 2004 - 18:11:32 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?ThomasHMon Jun 07 2004 - 20:41:15 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Lewis LangWed Jun 09 2004 - 19:36:03 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?ThomasHFri Jun 18 2004 - 21:22:08 EDT
--> Re: Finest grained 35mm film?Bob HickeyMon Jun 07 2004 - 21:43:58 EDT
Is this group a dwindling crowd?Mike HenleyMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:13:51 EDT
Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?Alan BrowneMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:58:26 EDT
--> Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?Justin F. KnotzkeMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:37:38 EDT
--> Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?Matt ClaraMon Jun 07 2004 - 19:22:51 EDT
--> Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?Richard CockburnMon Jun 07 2004 - 19:34:20 EDT
Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?Lisa HortonMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:00:28 EDT
--> Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?Nick ZentenaMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:28:37 EDT
--> Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?Lisa HortonTue Jun 08 2004 - 14:35:55 EDT
--> Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?TPTue Jun 08 2004 - 15:00:00 EDT
--> Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?Sander VesikTue Jun 08 2004 - 21:51:34 EDT
--> Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?Tony ParkinsonWed Jun 09 2004 - 17:42:23 EDT
--> Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?Pieter LitchfieldThu Jun 10 2004 - 15:30:27 EDT
Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?William GrahamMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:10:18 EDT
--> Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?ian greenMon Jun 07 2004 - 20:29:33 EDT
Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?Bob HickeyMon Jun 07 2004 - 19:39:15 EDT
--> Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?Mike HenleyTue Jun 08 2004 - 06:15:06 EDT
Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?Chris BMon Jun 07 2004 - 20:50:44 EDT
--> Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?Mike HenleyTue Jun 08 2004 - 06:13:52 EDT
Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?z-one-bTue Jun 08 2004 - 11:37:26 EDT
Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?DallasTue Jun 08 2004 - 14:38:17 EDT
Re: Is this group a dwindling crowd?Martin FrancisMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:16:50 EDT
Tough-as-nails lightmeterMartin FrancisMon Jun 07 2004 - 14:28:59 EDT
Re: Tough-as-nails lightmeterMikeMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:04:43 EDT
--> Re: Tough-as-nails lightmeterMartin FrancisMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:24:14 EDT
--> Re: Tough-as-nails lightmeterMikeMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:30:13 EDT
[SI] Bowser's Funny ShotBowzreMon Jun 07 2004 - 14:19:49 EDT
Re: high-end (ish) compact zoom soughtSabineellenMon Jun 07 2004 - 13:37:35 EDT
Re: high-end (ish) compact zoom soughtMartin FrancisMon Jun 07 2004 - 17:17:09 EDT
Re: Choose a standard zoom lens for MaxxumMike LipphardtMon Jun 07 2004 - 14:17:13 EDT
Re: Choose a standard zoom lens for MaxxumLewis LangMon Jun 07 2004 - 17:54:02 EDT
--> Re: Choose a standard zoom lens for MaxxumJames CloudTue Jun 08 2004 - 13:13:04 EDT
--> Re: Choose a standard zoom lens for MaxxumAlan BrowneTue Jun 08 2004 - 13:58:41 EDT
--> Re: Choose a standard zoom lens for MaxxumLewis LangWed Jun 09 2004 - 23:23:16 EDT
--> Re: Choose a standard zoom lens for MaxxumAlan BrowneThu Jun 10 2004 - 11:13:50 EDT
--> Re: Choose a standard zoom lens for MaxxumLewis LangThu Jun 10 2004 - 23:17:21 EDT
--> Re: Choose a standard zoom lens for MaxxumTomFri Jun 11 2004 - 15:53:28 EDT
--> Re: Choose a standard zoom lens for MaxxumLewis LangFri Jun 11 2004 - 21:46:21 EDT
--> Re: Choose a standard zoom lens for MaxxumTomSat Jun 12 2004 - 14:09:57 EDT
--> Re: Choose a standard zoom lens for MaxxumLewis LangMon Jun 14 2004 - 02:26:49 EDT
--> Re: Choose a standard zoom lens for MaxxumBill TuthillMon Jun 14 2004 - 14:11:26 EDT
--> Re: Choose a standard zoom lens for MaxxumBill TuthillWed Jun 09 2004 - 13:26:59 EDT
--> Re: Choose a standard zoom lens for MaxxumLewis LangWed Jun 09 2004 - 23:21:44 EDT
--> Re: Choose a standard zoom lens for MaxxumJames CloudFri Jun 11 2004 - 13:45:53 EDT
--> Re: Choose a standard zoom lens for MaxxumLewis LangFri Jun 11 2004 - 21:44:26 EDT
Re: Fuji 400 X-tra film Rules!Sander VesikMon Jun 07 2004 - 18:57:58 EDT
Re: Negative scratched -- photo lab thinks it's my filmThe DaveŠMon Jun 07 2004 - 20:05:31 EDT
Re: Negative scratched -- photo lab thinks it's my filmJoseph MeehanMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:29:40 EDT
Re: Negative scratched -- photo lab thinks it's my filmMartin FrancisMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:27:19 EDT
Re: Negative scratched -- photo lab thinks it's my filmBart van der WolfMon Jun 07 2004 - 18:04:22 EDT
Re: Negative scratched -- photo lab thinks it's my filmRon AndrewsMon Jun 07 2004 - 21:28:46 EDT
Re: Film format in single-use cameras?Bob HickeyMon Jun 07 2004 - 21:21:37 EDT
Re: Ping Thaddeus Lipshitz, Leroy JolicoeurBowzreMon Jun 07 2004 - 14:20:59 EDT
Re: he finally snuffed itAnnika1980Mon Jun 07 2004 - 21:42:12 EDT
Re: he finally snuffed itDeathwalkerMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:59:31 EDT
Re: he finally snuffed itAndrew PriceMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:06:35 EDT
Re: candid photography lesson number one?MxsmanicMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:06:42 EDT
Re: candid photography lesson number one?MxsmanicMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:09:03 EDT
Re: candid photography lesson number one?C J DMon Jun 07 2004 - 19:31:47 EDT
Re: candid photography lesson number one?Tramp'olineMon Jun 07 2004 - 09:45:40 EDT
Re: candid photography lesson number one?Michael ScarpittiMon Jun 07 2004 - 14:47:40 EDT
Re: candid photography lesson number one?Alan BrowneMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:45:41 EDT
--> Re: candid photography lesson number one?Michael ScarpittiMon Jun 07 2004 - 22:14:43 EDT
Re: candid photography lesson number one?MxsmanicMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:09:22 EDT
Re: Your favourite non-zoom lenses of all time...Chris LoffredoMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:42:48 EDT
Re: Your favourite non-zoom lenses of all time...Drew SaundersMon Jun 07 2004 - 14:03:07 EDT
Re: and I thought 4 bodies was too many!The DaveŠMon Jun 07 2004 - 14:58:50 EDT
Re: and I thought 4 bodies was too many!Gordon MoatMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:52:46 EDT
--> Re: and I thought 4 bodies was too many!Lewis LangMon Jun 07 2004 - 17:46:24 EDT
--> Re: and I thought 4 bodies was too many!Gordon MoatTue Jun 08 2004 - 00:34:31 EDT
--> Re: and I thought 4 bodies was too many!Lewis LangWed Jun 09 2004 - 16:50:39 EDT
--> Re: and I thought 4 bodies was too many!InfocusTue Jun 08 2004 - 17:06:51 EDT
--> Re: and I thought 4 bodies was too many!Gordon MoatTue Jun 08 2004 - 17:35:01 EDT
Re: and I thought 4 bodies was too many!Joseph KewfiSun Jun 06 2004 - 11:47:56 EDT
Re: Leica dealers "selling more Leicas than ever"!MxsmanicMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:03:51 EDT
Re: ; still use film? Consider-Marilyn MonroeLewis LangMon Jun 07 2004 - 17:14:45 EDT
Re: Martin FrancisMartin FrancisMon Jun 07 2004 - 13:37:35 EDT
Re: Martin FrancisMatt ClaraMon Jun 07 2004 - 14:53:31 EDT
--> Re: Martin FrancisDoug PayneMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:06:32 EDT
--> Re: Martin FrancisAlan BrowneMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:49:30 EDT
--> Re: Martin FrancisGordon MoatMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:49:51 EDT
--> Re: Martin FrancisDoug PayneTue Jun 08 2004 - 08:15:03 EDT
--> Re: Martin FrancisGordon MoatTue Jun 08 2004 - 14:50:21 EDT
--> Re: Martin FrancisMartin FrancisMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:21:34 EDT
Re: Does the "50 lpmm barrier" still stand?Stephen H. WestinMon Jun 07 2004 - 13:38:57 EDT
Re: Does the "50 lpmm barrier" still stand?RSD99Mon Jun 07 2004 - 14:23:17 EDT
Re: Does the "50 lpmm barrier" still stand?William GrahamMon Jun 07 2004 - 23:07:03 EDT
Re: below $1000 film vs digitalStaceyMon Jun 07 2004 - 19:52:44 EDT
Re: below $1000 film vs digitalStaceyMon Jun 07 2004 - 19:56:27 EDT
Re: Do you only use manual metering?Michael ScarpittiMon Jun 07 2004 - 14:45:34 EDT
Re: Do you only use manual metering?Alan BrowneMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:29:57 EDT
--> Re: Do you only use manual metering?Michael ScarpittiMon Jun 07 2004 - 21:50:53 EDT
--> Re: Do you only use manual metering?Frank PittelMon Jun 07 2004 - 22:37:22 EDT
--> Re: Do you only use manual metering?Bob HickeyTue Jun 08 2004 - 07:39:49 EDT
--> Re: Do you only use manual metering?Frank PittelWed Jun 09 2004 - 01:04:57 EDT
--> Re: Do you only use manual metering?Michael ScarpittiTue Jun 08 2004 - 15:32:11 EDT
--> Re: Do you only use manual metering?Frank PittelWed Jun 09 2004 - 01:02:26 EDT
Re: Do you only use manual metering?Tzortzakakis DimitriosThu Jun 03 2004 - 12:43:54 EDT
Re: Do you only use manual metering?Alan BrowneMon Jun 07 2004 - 14:07:11 EDT
Re: Do you only use manual metering?Frank PittelMon Jun 07 2004 - 19:20:31 EDT
Re: Do you only use manual metering?Michael ScarpittiMon Jun 07 2004 - 20:30:18 EDT
Re: Do you only use manual metering?LionelTue Jun 08 2004 - 00:05:22 EDT
Re: Do you only use manual metering?Sander VesikMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:50:26 EDT
Re: Do you only use manual metering?Michael ScarpittiMon Jun 07 2004 - 14:46:44 EDT
Re: Do you only use manual metering?Alan BrowneMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:44:50 EDT
--> Re: Do you only use manual metering?Michael ScarpittiMon Jun 07 2004 - 21:47:05 EDT
--> Re: Do you only use manual metering?Michael ScarpittiMon Jun 07 2004 - 21:53:47 EDT
Re: Do you only use manual metering?Chris BrownMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:32:12 EDT
Re: Do you only use manual metering?SabineellenMon Jun 07 2004 - 15:24:24 EDT
Re: Do you only use manual metering?Frank PittelMon Jun 07 2004 - 19:13:57 EDT
Re: Kirk filter stack caps - opinions?Michael C. SmithMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:15:18 EDT
Re: South African photographer neededDallasMon Jun 07 2004 - 13:37:32 EDT
Re: South African photographer neededDeathwalkerMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:01:56 EDT
--> Re: South African photographer neededDallasTue Jun 08 2004 - 14:38:19 EDT
--> Re: South African photographer neededDeathwalkerTue Jun 08 2004 - 18:15:18 EDT
--> Re: South African photographer neededTPWed Jun 09 2004 - 06:11:08 EDT
--> Re: South African photographer neededDallasWed Jun 09 2004 - 14:45:17 EDT
--> Re: South African photographer neededWilliam GrahamWed Jun 09 2004 - 19:51:40 EDT
--> Re: South African photographer neededMark MWed Jun 09 2004 - 23:13:59 EDT
Re: South African photographer neededAndrew PriceTue Jun 01 2004 - 16:43:09 EDT
Re: BAN: Photography on USA trains and busesWilliam GrahamMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:20:03 EDT
Re: BAN: Photography on USA trains and busesWilliam GrahamMon Jun 07 2004 - 16:15:28 EDT
Re: 35 film *popularly* dead within 2-5 years.Sander VesikMon Jun 07 2004 - 19:06:52 EDT
Re: 35 film *popularly* dead within 2-5 years.Alan BrowneMon Jun 07 2004 - 14:09:43 EDT
Re: 35 film *popularly* dead within 2-5 years.Justin F. KnotzkeMon Jun 07 2004 - 14:48:38 EDT
Re: 35 film *popularly* dead within 2-5 years.McLeodSat Jun 05 2004 - 00:25:26 EDT

Last message date: Tue Nov 22 2005 - 00:52:13 EST Archived on: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 01:03:03 EST