rec.photo.equipment.35mm: By Thread

rec.photo.equipment.35mm: By Thread

492 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Previous Folder, Thread view | Next Folder, Thread view | List of Folders

Starting: Sun Jun 06 2004 - 02:38:28 EDT
Ending: Mon Jun 28 2004 - 22:52:32 EDT

Re: RGPM VOTE RESULTS (Uncensored) Orville Wright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 22:44:21 EDT)
rpe35mm Shoot-In favors digital? Mike Henley (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 20:32:25 EDT)
A question about lens hood Mojtaba (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 18:52:15 EDT)

Re: A question about lens hood Nick Zentena (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:06:19 EDT)
Re: A question about lens hood Nordon (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:32:34 EDT)
Re: A question about lens hood Mojtaba (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 20:18:56 EDT)
Re: A question about lens hood Slingblade (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 22:57:58 EDT)
Re: A question about lens hood Alan Browne (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 10:00:14 EDT)

Hi I'm an idiot Lionel Lauer (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:35:27 EDT)
AMAZING flash movies of Sydney Moon former Penthouse pet Lionel Lauer (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:22:05 EDT)
Re: come on everyone, flash Rick Armstrong (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:11:09 EDT)

Re: come on everyone, flash LongCoolWoman (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 18:00:41 EDT)

Re: come on everyone, flash Harvey R. Stone (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 11:48:45 EDT)

Re: come on everyone, flash lopez the wolf (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 12:11:53 EDT)
Re: come on everyone, flash ian (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 02:06:44 EDT)
Re: come on everyone, flash William Graham (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 00:28:33 EDT)

Re: come on everyone, flash Rick Armstrong (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 15:20:26 EDT)

Re: come on everyone, flash Edwin Pawlowski (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 07:23:43 EDT)

Re: come on everyone, flash Miche (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 17:26:14 EDT)

Re: come on everyone, flash Frank Reid (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 08:27:21 EDT)

[SI] Local culture - Alan's shot Alan Browne (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 10:20:59 EDT)

Re: [SI] Local culture - Alan's shot Bouser (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:26:20 EDT)

Re: [SI] Local culture - Alan's shot Alan Browne (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 10:03:44 EDT)

Re: [SI] Local culture - Alan's shot Justin F. Knotzke (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 11:14:43 EDT)

Re: [SI] Local culture - Alan's shot Alan Browne (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 13:48:45 EDT)

Re: [SI] Local culture - Alan's shot Justin F. Knotzke (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 13:56:35 EDT)
Re: [SI] Local culture - Alan's shot Alan Browne (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 11:05:45 EDT)
Re: [SI] Local culture - Alan's shot Justin F. Knotzke (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 14:41:28 EDT)
Re: [SI] Local culture - Alan's shot Alan Browne (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 10:49:19 EDT)

Re: [SI] Local culture - Alan's shot Richard Cockburn (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 10:02:01 EDT)

zx-60 rewind problems NItro Waite (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 14:42:41 EDT)

Re: zx-60 rewind problems Bob Hickey (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 20:02:37 EDT)

If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? nospamphoto_at_email.domain.hidden (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 13:48:42 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Mike (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 13:55:08 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Alan Browne (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 14:05:39 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Sabineellen (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 14:21:43 EDT)
Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? nospamphoto_at_email.domain.hidden (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 14:44:38 EDT)
Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Ted Azito (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 21:09:32 EDT)
Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Sabineellen (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 21:48:04 EDT)
Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Alan Browne (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 10:13:34 EDT)
Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Matt Clara (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 01:39:16 EDT)
Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Alan Browne (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 12:39:05 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Bandicoot (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 21:15:52 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Jimmy Smith (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 18:04:48 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Bandicoot (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 21:19:21 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Brian C.Baird (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 18:32:41 EDT)
Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? MarkH (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 01:32:57 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Lionel (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 01:47:57 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Ron Hunter (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 05:31:35 EDT)
Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? MarkH (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 05:43:29 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? paul (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 21:08:45 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Phil Wheeler (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 15:17:40 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? The Dave© (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 01:38:22 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Bouser (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 10:45:11 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Lionel (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 10:58:12 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Phil Cole (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 01:47:56 EDT)
Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Al Denelsbeck (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 02:22:11 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? m II (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 11:54:26 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Ken Oaf (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 08:21:56 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? jean (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 13:57:07 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Phil Wheeler (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 14:31:53 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? MartianSand (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 14:47:40 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Big Bill (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 11:50:33 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Mike (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 12:00:53 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Big Bill (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 21:16:56 EDT)
Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Alan Browne (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 09:57:01 EDT)
Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Harry Krause (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 10:50:06 EDT)
Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? jean (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 12:11:19 EDT)
Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? skymuffins (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 12:15:01 EDT)
Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Sander Vesik (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 14:24:57 EDT)

Re: If you are trapped in ancient time, what would you take? Bandicoot (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 22:05:15 EDT)
LIONEL ENCOURAGES THROW-AWAY E-MAIL ADDRESSES FOR rec.photo.digital.moderated VOTE! HipKatt (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 12:49:46 EDT)

Re: LIONEL ENCOURAGES THROW-AWAY E-MAIL ADDRESSES FOR rec.photo.digital.moderated VOTE! Steve Young (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 13:17:41 EDT)

Re: LIONEL ENCOURAGES THROW-AWAY E-MAIL ADDRESSES FOR rec.photo.digital.moderated VOTE! Bart van der Wolf (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 14:01:58 EDT)
Re: LIONEL ENCOURAGES THROW-AWAY E-MAIL ADDRESSES FOR rec.photo.digital.moderated VOTE! Orville Wright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 18:09:44 EDT)

Kimberlee Vanderhoof Mary (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 12:22:54 EDT)
Kimberlee Vanderhoof Mary (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 12:22:38 EDT)
Kimberlee Vanderhoof Mary (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 12:21:39 EDT)

Re: Kimberlee Vanderhoof RustY © (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 12:54:58 EDT)

Re: Kimberlee Vanderhoof Orville Wright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 23:04:32 EDT)

Re: Kimberlee Vanderhoof Darrell Larose (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 13:41:52 EDT)

Pentax history Mike (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 02:54:10 EDT)

Re: Pentax history michel.[pas]carrere-[de]gee[spam] (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 11:07:00 EDT)

Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? Radio Man (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 01:10:36 EDT)

Re: Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? michel.[pas]carrere-[de]gee[spam] (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 01:17:30 EDT)

Re: Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? michel.[pas]carrere-[de]gee[spam] (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 11:11:44 EDT)

Re: Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? m II (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 01:30:00 EDT)

Re: Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? LEDMRVM (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 08:23:10 EDT)

Re: Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? m II (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 11:03:17 EDT)

Re: Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? Radio Man (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 01:34:52 EDT)

Re: Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? Mike (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 02:50:13 EDT)

Re: Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? TP (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 06:16:50 EDT)

Re: Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? TP (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 13:14:07 EDT)

Re: Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? Lewis Lang (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 21:39:11 EDT)
Re: Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? Bandicoot (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 13:11:09 EDT)
Re: Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? TP (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 13:29:25 EDT)
Re: Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? Bandicoot (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 17:23:26 EDT)

Re: Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? Nick Zentena (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 06:51:29 EDT)
Re: Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? Collin Brendemuehl (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 08:26:41 EDT)
Re: Pentax "K" & "M" Lenses ? Warren B. Hapke (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 16:30:36 EDT)

[SI] 'Local Culture' now posted Al Denelsbeck (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 20:57:29 EDT)

Re: [SI] 'Local Culture' now posted Sabineellen (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 21:09:27 EDT)

Re: [SI] 'Local Culture' now posted Al Denelsbeck (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 22:30:36 EDT)

Re: [SI] 'Local Culture' now posted Orville Wright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:39:33 EDT)

Re: [SI] 'Local Culture' now posted Sabineellen (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:48:37 EDT)

Re: [SI] 'Local Culture' now posted TP (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:58:36 EDT)
Re: [SI] 'Local Culture' now posted Orville Wright (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 06:12:25 EDT)
Re: [SI] 'Local Culture' now posted Orville Wright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 22:59:33 EDT)
Re: [SI] 'Local Culture' now posted The Dave© (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 23:05:10 EDT)
Re: [SI] 'Local Culture' now posted Lionel (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 23:45:49 EDT)
Re: [SI] 'Local Culture' now posted Sabineellen (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 23:48:42 EDT)

Re: [SI] 'Local Culture' now posted AnOvercomer02_at_email.domain.hidden (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 18:28:55 EDT)

[SI] Bowser's "local culture" shot Bowzre (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 19:26:12 EDT)

Re: [SI] Bowser's "local culture" shot Peter Chant (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 19:53:52 EDT)

Re: [SI] Bowser's "local culture" shot C.G. (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:14:48 EDT)

Re: [SI] Bowser's "local culture" shot Peter Chant (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:42:01 EDT)

Re: [SI] Bowser's "local culture" shot Orville Wright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 18:22:20 EDT)

Re: [SI] Bowser's "local culture" shot Charles Schuler (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:04:57 EDT)

Re: [SI] Bowser's "local culture" shot Orville Wright (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 04:54:32 EDT)
Re: [SI] Bowser's "local culture" shot Charles Schuler (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 11:55:05 EDT)

megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Mike Henley (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 19:21:17 EDT)

Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Bowzre (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 19:31:36 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Bill Hilton (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 21:48:20 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Chris Brown (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 05:00:48 EDT)

Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Sander Vesik (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 08:20:08 EDT)

Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Chris Brown (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 09:59:26 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Sabineellen (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 11:12:30 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Chris Brown (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 11:59:11 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? TP (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 13:05:54 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Greg Campbell (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 13:38:50 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Chris Brown (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 14:37:58 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Greg Campbell (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:49:58 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Chris Brown (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 04:55:53 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Sander Vesik (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 11:41:36 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Sander Vesik (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 18:10:05 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Chris Brown (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:43:32 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Sabineellen (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 20:54:27 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Skip M (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 00:24:49 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Leonhard Pang (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 05:39:19 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Skip M (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 01:14:08 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Leonhard Pang (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 00:19:38 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Lewis Lang (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 21:12:51 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Lewis Lang (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 21:16:20 EDT)

Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Leonhard Pang (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 16:36:31 EDT)

Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Alan Browne (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 10:35:42 EDT)

Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Sander Vesik (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 18:23:56 EDT)

Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Sabineellen (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 18:55:41 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Alan Browne (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:06:27 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Sander Vesik (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 11:40:25 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Alan Browne (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 13:33:19 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Chris Brown (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:45:21 EDT)
Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Sabineellen (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 20:49:06 EDT)

Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? bmoag (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 11:46:36 EDT)

Re: megapixel equivalent of 35mm scanned at 4800 dpi ? Sabineellen (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 13:19:40 EDT)

F100 serial question Carl (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 13:02:46 EDT)

Re: F100 serial question Alan Browne (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 13:34:25 EDT)

Re: F100 serial question Carl (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 16:00:41 EDT)

Re: F100 serial question Alan Browne (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 10:09:16 EDT)
Re: F100 serial question Sander Vesik (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:11:48 EDT)

Re: F100 serial question Eric Shune (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 14:06:10 EDT)

Vivitar 40D flash question Michael Marcelletti (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 12:06:31 EDT)

Re: Vivitar 40D flash question Pete (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 21:11:07 EDT)

POPS LOVE THE D60 !!! Annika1980 (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 11:18:02 EDT)

Re: POPS LOVE THE D60 !!! TP (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 12:22:53 EDT)

Re: POPS LOVE THE D60 !!! Annika1980 (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 14:15:38 EDT)

Re: POPS LOVE THE D60 !!! TP (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 16:04:58 EDT)

Re: POPS LOVE THE D60 !!! Alan Browne (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 12:36:44 EDT)

Re: POPS LOVE THE D60 !!! Annika1980 (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 14:18:04 EDT)

Re: POPS LOVE THE D60 !!! Alan Browne (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 15:20:18 EDT)
Re: POPS LOVE THE D60 !!! Bart van der Wolf (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 17:12:08 EDT)

LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people Orville Wright (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 10:41:19 EDT)

Re: LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people Steve Young (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 10:56:21 EDT)
Re: LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people Soapy (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 07:58:43 EDT)

Re: LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people Orville Wright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:11:14 EDT)

Re: LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people Soapy (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 18:23:59 EDT)
Re: LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people ± (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 04:49:47 EDT)
Re: LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people Soapy (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 01:19:17 EDT)
Re: LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people ± (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 03:24:06 EDT)
Re: LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people Bill Cleere (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 17:36:45 EDT)

Re: LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people ± (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 04:24:10 EDT)

Re: LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people John McWilliams (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 10:39:19 EDT)
Re: LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people Steve Young (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 11:10:57 EDT)
Re: LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people Orville Wright (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 21:55:45 EDT)
Re: LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people Soapy (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 18:38:35 EDT)
Re: LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people ± (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 04:51:07 EDT)
Re: LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people Soapy (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 01:18:12 EDT)
Re: LIONEL GETS DISSED FOR HIS SIG: Accused of talking about killing people ± (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 03:10:18 EDT)

Pork pie hats and you stupid morans stupid annika1980 (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 09:55:34 EDT)
KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 400BW Film discontinued? Tramp'oline (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 09:25:08 EDT)

Re: KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 400BW Film discontinued? Barney (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 12:45:10 EDT)

Re: KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 400BW Film discontinued? Sander Vesik (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 06:24:00 EDT)

Re: KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 400BW Film discontinued? Bob Kirkpatrick (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 13:20:11 EDT)
Re: KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 400BW Film discontinued? Sander Vesik (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 15:01:14 EDT)
Re: KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 400BW Film discontinued? Mxsmanic (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 23:04:05 EDT)
Re: KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 400BW Film discontinued? Bill Tuthill (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 18:59:40 EDT)

Re: KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 400BW Film discontinued? Annika1980 (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 14:47:08 EDT)

Re: KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 400BW Film discontinued? Tramp'oline (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 21:08:46 EDT)

Re: KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 400BW Film discontinued? Mxsmanic (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 23:50:59 EDT)

Information about rec.photo.marketplace.35mm [27may2001] Helge Nareid (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 08:44:28 EDT)
Re: PING FNVW: KotM rules check Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 07:50:39 EDT)
Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? Orville Wright (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:56:30 EDT)

Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? chibitul (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 07:05:41 EDT)
Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? Kirk Davison (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 08:13:50 EDT)

Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? pickle (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 08:40:59 EDT)
Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? Steve Kramer (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 09:09:04 EDT)

Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? pickle (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 09:36:40 EDT)
Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? LarbGai (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 18:27:09 EDT)

Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? James Connell (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 13:41:14 EDT)

Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? Takin Gthepiss (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 14:01:17 EDT)
Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? Randall Ainsworth (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 15:32:54 EDT)

Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? Michel Boucher (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 09:04:29 EDT)
Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? Randall Ainsworth (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 10:31:08 EDT)

Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? headquarters (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 23:31:42 EDT)

Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? Crownfield (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 18:11:11 EDT)
Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? headquarters (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 21:33:46 EDT)

Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? The Ranger (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 10:46:33 EDT)

Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? Takin Gthepiss (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 13:56:36 EDT)

Sock puppets demand higher wages. LarbGai (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 18:43:29 EDT)

Re: Sock puppets demand higher wages. Scott (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 22:39:03 EDT)
Re: Sock puppets demand higher wages. Takin Gthepiss (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 04:34:06 EDT)
Re: Sock puppets demand higher wages. Takin Gthepiss (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 04:38:48 EDT)

Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? John Fryatt (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 19:06:52 EDT)
Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? Crownfield (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 18:07:10 EDT)

Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? Michel Boucher (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:28:12 EDT)
Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? maxwell (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:34:39 EDT)

Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? Fedman Kassad (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 20:13:58 EDT)

Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? Rick Armstrong (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 15:33:33 EDT)

Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? Fedman Kassad (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 06:21:09 EDT)

Re: Is Steve Kramer a good photographer? What's the fuss? Richard Cockburn (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 10:03:41 EDT)

Re: Please help me choose lenses for my SLR mike wheeELer (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 02:55:41 EDT)

Re: Please help me choose lenses for my SLR Dick (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 09:27:36 EDT)
Re: Please help me choose lenses for my SLR Dick (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 09:30:20 EDT)

Re: Please help me choose lenses for my SLR mike wheeELer (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 12:24:38 EDT)

Re: Please help me choose lenses for my SLR Alan Browne (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 13:00:20 EDT)

Re: Please help me choose lenses for my SLR mike wheeELer (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 14:27:33 EDT)

Re: Please help me choose lenses for my SLR Skip M (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 15:14:42 EDT)
Re: Please help me choose lenses for my SLR Alan Browne (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 15:47:20 EDT)
Re: Please help me choose lenses for my SLR mike wheeELer (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 02:06:05 EDT)
Re: Please help me choose lenses for my SLR (oops) Alan Browne (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 13:42:42 EDT)

Peter Stavrakoglou Data Registrant (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 22:17:55 EDT)

Re: Peter Stavrakoglou Data Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 08:22:19 EDT)

Digital vs Film Searching_at_email.domain.hidden (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 21:26:03 EDT)

Re: Digital vs Film Tony Spadaro (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 22:57:18 EDT)
Re: Digital vs Film Alan Browne (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 13:07:29 EDT)
Re: Digital vs Film Bowzre (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 19:28:37 EDT)

BEWARE OF RON HUNTER THE TROLL ! He is a troll! Silvio Manuel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:50:05 EDT)

Re: BEWARE OF RON HUNTER THE TROLL ! He is a troll! Silvio Manuel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 21:01:16 EDT)

What's your favorite thai recipe? Ron Hunter (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:32:17 EDT)

Re: What's your favorite thai recipe? Joe English (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 23:38:55 EDT)
Re: What's your favorite thai recipe? Viviane (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 00:46:47 EDT)

Re: What's your favorite thai recipe? Dillon Pyron (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 03:42:39 EDT)

Re: What's your favorite thai recipe? Illume (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 16:39:56 EDT)

Re: What's your favorite thai recipe? Dorkus (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 23:05:54 EDT)
Re: What's your favorite thai recipe? Kevin R (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 14:01:25 EDT)

Re: What's your favorite thai recipe? Kate ...... (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 06:24:21 EDT)

Mike Henley Ron Hunter (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:29:10 EDT)

Re: Mike Henley Silvio Manuel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:41:23 EDT)

does Lionel LIVE in his darkroom? Ron Hunter (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:27:06 EDT)
Avoid Messages by Ron Hunter Silvio Manuel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:16:58 EDT)

Re: Avoid Messages by Ron Hunter Phil Wheeler (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:23:03 EDT)

Re: Avoid Messages by Ron Hunter Ron Hunter (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:40:09 EDT)

Re: Avoid Messages by Ron Hunter Silvio Manuel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:47:54 EDT)
Re: Avoid Messages by Ron Hunter Darrell Larose (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 21:17:57 EDT)
Re: Avoid Messages by Ron Hunter Ron Hunter (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:19:51 EDT)

My name is Bart and I Love Penis!!! Bart van der Wolf (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:15:50 EDT)
Zoom lens emergency HELP Ron Hunter (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:15:50 EDT)

Re: Zoom lens emergency HELP Silvio Manuel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:39:35 EDT)

Some photos I snapped this weekend tell me what you think Ron Hunter (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:01:01 EDT)

Re: Some photos I snapped this weekend tell me what you think janet santana (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 16:01:45 EDT)
Re: Some photos I snapped this weekend tell me what you think stewy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 23:15:52 EDT)

NIGGERS cant take PICTURES - TOO STUPID NIGGER Blake (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 19:07:02 EDT)
I am German and I SUCK COCK Gordon Moat (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 18:44:44 EDT)
BLACK AFRICAN NIGGERS FUCK WHITE SLUTS not NIGGER BITCHES AFRICAN NIGGER (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 18:29:29 EDT)
FUCKING NIGGERS love WATERMELON FOR MASTURBATION WATERMELON NIGGER (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 18:24:33 EDT)

Re: FUCKING NIGGERS love WATERMELON FOR MASTURBATION Silvio Manuel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:33:51 EDT)

BLACK NIGGERS have BIG COCKS and FUCK WHITE HOES NIGGER Gregory (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 18:20:19 EDT)
NIGGERS FUCK WHITE CUNTS and HOES FUCKING NIGGER (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 18:17:25 EDT)
MOTHERFUCKING NIGGERS FUCK WHITE SLUTTY Hoes NIGGER Jack (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 18:14:15 EDT)
Questions for Steve Young (Usenet Voting Procedures) Keith Borland (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 17:35:21 EDT)

Re: Questions for Steve Young (Usenet Voting Procedures) Steve Young (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 00:31:45 EDT)

Re: Questions for Steve Young (Usenet Voting Procedures) Bart van der Wolf (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 09:22:55 EDT)

Re: Questions for Steve Young (Usenet Voting Procedures) Charles (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 10:57:40 EDT)
Re: Questions for Steve Young (Usenet Voting Procedures) Steve Young (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 10:05:05 EDT)
Re: Questions for Steve Young (Usenet Voting Procedures) Sander Vesik (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 16:40:21 EDT)
Re: Questions for Steve Young (Usenet Voting Procedures) Steve Young (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 17:30:49 EDT)

Re: Questions for Steve Young (Usenet Voting Procedures) Lionel (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 18:28:25 EDT)

Re: Questions for Steve Young (Usenet Voting Procedures) Steve Young (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 20:45:18 EDT)

Re: Questions for Steve Young (Usenet Voting Procedures) Lionel (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 20:58:55 EDT)

Hey troll... EAT THIS! Mike Henley (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 14:10:52 EDT)

Re: Hey troll... EAT THIS! colm (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 15:20:02 EDT)
Re: Hey troll... EAT THIS! TP (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:48:09 EDT)
Re: Hey troll... EAT THIS! Mike Henley Sucks Cock (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 17:06:09 EDT)
Re: Hey troll... EAT THIS! Gijs Rietveld (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 17:11:07 EDT)
Re: Hey troll... EAT THIS! Chuck (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 17:19:16 EDT)
Re: Hey troll... EAT THIS! Alan D-W (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 17:34:18 EDT)

[Q:] Sony DSC-W1 Anybody use this camera yet? Any thoughts? unavailable (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 13:53:33 EDT)

Re: [Q:] Sony DSC-W1 Anybody use this camera yet? Any thoughts? A.F. Hobbacher (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 02:51:00 EDT)

Re: [Q:] Sony DSC-W1 Anybody use this camera yet? Any thoughts? Bob Roetker (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 14:19:55 EDT)

[OT] Man I'm getting frustrated! Al Denelsbeck (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 12:58:06 EDT)

Re: [OT] Man I'm getting frustrated! Steve Young (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 13:11:19 EDT)

Re: [OT] Man I'm getting frustrated! Bandicoot (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 21:51:15 EDT)

Re: [OT] Man I'm getting frustrated! Bowzre (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 13:14:35 EDT)
Re: [OT] Man I'm getting frustrated! Tony Spadaro (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 13:57:42 EDT)

Re: [OT] Man I'm getting frustrated! Steve Young (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 14:12:38 EDT)

Re: [OT] Man I'm getting frustrated! C.G. (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 14:17:21 EDT)
Re: [OT] Man I'm getting frustrated! Tony Parkinson (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 15:34:52 EDT)
Re: [OT] Man I'm getting frustrated! AnOvercomer02_at_email.domain.hidden (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 15:54:53 EDT)

Re: [OT] Man I'm getting frustrated! colm (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:52:56 EDT)

Re: [OT] Man I'm getting frustrated! Steve Kramer (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 21:37:32 EDT)
some old sh**, different day Pieter Litchfield (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 12:09:42 EDT)

Re: some old sh**, different day C.G. (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 12:16:00 EDT)

Re: some old sh**, different day Justin Thyme (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 18:07:08 EDT)

Re: some old sh**, different day colm (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 06:35:37 EDT)
Re: some old sh**, different day Justin Thyme (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 08:04:33 EDT)

Re: some old sh**, different day Steve Young (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 12:47:21 EDT)

Re: some old sh**, different day colm (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 15:21:53 EDT)

Re: some old sh**, different day Steve Young (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 14:56:44 EDT)

Re: some old sh**, different day Chris Loffredo (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 14:13:40 EDT)

Re: some old sh**, different day The Dave© (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:39:45 EDT)

Re: some old sh**, different day Steve Kramer (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 21:34:24 EDT)

Re: some old sh**, different day The Dave© (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:39:45 EDT)
Re: some old sh**, different day Dallas (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 13:10:44 EDT)

BUTT FUCKED NIGGERS SHIT on WHITE BOY'S COCKS FUCKING NIGGER (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 12:04:16 EDT)
BLACK NIGGERS love FUCKING WHITE BITCHES Negro Nigger (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 11:57:12 EDT)
NIGGERS don't EAT PUSSY OF NIGGER BITCHES NIGGER (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 11:52:27 EDT)
Joseph Meehan (614) 876-6814 Tina Peena (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 07:01:18 EDT)

Re: Joseph Meehan (614) 876-6814 Lionel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 07:17:43 EDT)

Re: Joseph Meehan (614) 876-6814 Joseph Meehan (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 10:30:10 EDT)
Re: Joseph Meehan (614) 876-6814 Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 07:01:24 EDT)

Re: Joseph Meehan (614) 876-6814 Orville Wright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:06:32 EDT)

Re: Joseph Meehan (614) 876-6814 Soapy (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 19:24:33 EDT)

Joseph Meehan Public Data Phil Askey (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 06:55:31 EDT)
Great D60 golf photos !!! Annika1980 (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 00:13:26 EDT)

PORN ALERT: was, Great D60 golf photos !!! Mark M (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 00:49:14 EDT)

Not Annika Chris S. (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 06:54:44 EDT)
Re: PORN ALERT: was, Great D60 golf photos !!! Steven Wandy (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 18:31:52 EDT)

Re: PORN ALERT: was, Great D60 golf photos !!! Mark M (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 22:03:13 EDT)

Hoya Vario Cross Filter? Craig Williams (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 23:16:34 EDT)
From a good source: Nikon plans already to drop compact film cameras ThomasH (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 22:29:41 EDT)

Re: From a good source: Nikon plans already to drop compact film cameras Eric Shune (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 01:01:22 EDT)

Re: From a good source: Nikon plans already to drop compact film cameras ThomasH (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 01:35:44 EDT)

Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? Jonathan Sachs (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 22:26:34 EDT)

Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? Matt Clara (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 09:32:49 EDT)

Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? Jonathan Sachs (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 07:31:08 EDT)

Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? TP (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 08:12:43 EDT)
Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? Alan Browne (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 12:39:46 EDT)
Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? TP (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 16:03:57 EDT)
Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? Jonathan Sachs (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 17:06:14 EDT)
Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? TP (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 18:20:43 EDT)
Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? Jonathan Sachs (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 20:55:10 EDT)
Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? TP (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 05:51:30 EDT)
Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? Bandicoot (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 13:16:53 EDT)
Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? Alan Browne (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 10:29:19 EDT)
Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? TP (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 13:05:16 EDT)
Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? Sabineellen (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 23:51:57 EDT)
Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? Jonathan Sachs (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 21:51:01 EDT)
Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? Dallas (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 13:10:46 EDT)
Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? William Graham (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 17:38:28 EDT)
Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? Jonathan Sachs (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 18:51:32 EDT)
Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? Dallas (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 10:38:18 EDT)

Re: Who makes a good reliable ball-and-socket head? Michael Scarpitti (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 11:40:12 EDT)

film vs digital in washington times Mike Henley (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 22:19:07 EDT)

Re: film vs digital in washington times street shooter (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 06:53:11 EDT)

Re: film vs digital in washington times Sabineellen (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 12:05:19 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Tony Spadaro (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 12:49:37 EDT)

Re: film vs digital in washington times Sabineellen (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 13:22:31 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Justin Thyme (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 18:01:30 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Tony Spadaro (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 23:01:28 EDT)

Re: film vs digital in washington times steven.sawyer_at_email.domain.hidden (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 22:46:29 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Mxsmanic (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 15:53:59 EDT)

Re: film vs digital in washington times Justin Thyme (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 08:48:18 EDT)

Re: film vs digital in washington times MikeWhy (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:27:23 EDT)

Re: film vs digital in washington times Justin Thyme (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 18:00:52 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times one_of_many (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 18:19:05 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times JRF (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 18:35:30 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Tony Spadaro (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 12:52:09 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Fil Ament (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 13:13:25 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times one_of_many (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 15:59:53 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Sander Vesik (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:18:29 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times one_of_many (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:23:40 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Sander Vesik (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 11:54:04 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times one_of_many (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 12:25:59 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Mxsmanic (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 16:20:00 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Mike Henley (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 12:44:24 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Mxsmanic (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 16:20:28 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Mxsmanic (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 16:18:06 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Tony Spadaro (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 18:10:44 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times one_of_many (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:20:49 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Tony Spadaro (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 02:05:58 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times RSD99 (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:41:17 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Sabineellen (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 20:47:09 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Tony Spadaro (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 02:07:11 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Philip Homburg (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 03:31:49 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Sander Vesik (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 11:55:21 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Tony Spadaro (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 13:41:06 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Philip Homburg (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 15:08:16 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Alan Browne (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 15:57:46 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Tony Spadaro (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 22:50:34 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times William Graham (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 23:18:57 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times Sabineellen (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 22:20:43 EDT)
Re: film vs digital in washington times William Graham (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 01:19:55 EDT)

Re: film vs digital in washington times Mxsmanic (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 02:18:49 EDT)
Trolls are not bots Mike Henly (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 21:23:46 EDT)

Re: Trolls are not bots Lionel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 00:41:37 EDT)

is the trollspam in this group automated or a person? Mike Henley (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 21:08:13 EDT)

Re: is the trollspam in this group automated or a person? Gordon Moat (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 21:29:21 EDT)

Re: is the trollspam in this group automated or a person? TP (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:41:15 EDT)

Re: is the trollspam in this group automated or a person? Gordon Moat (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 18:25:04 EDT)

Re: is the trollspam in this group automated or a person? Lionel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 00:34:08 EDT)

Another Modest Idea-Fast Flash Sync Ted Azito (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 20:38:19 EDT)

Re: Another Modest Idea-Fast Flash Sync Bill Hilton (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 20:51:26 EDT)

Re: Another Modest Idea-Fast Flash Sync Nick Zentena (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 07:23:36 EDT)

Re: Another Modest Idea-Fast Flash Sync Nick Zentena (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 07:25:07 EDT)
Re: Another Modest Idea-Fast Flash Sync Alan Browne (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 11:03:29 EDT)
Re: Another Modest Idea-Fast Flash Sync TP (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:09:00 EDT)

Dean Humphries for President of the USA Griffin Miffenmunch (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 19:19:40 EDT)

Re: Dean Humphries for President of the USA Coastal Eddie (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 19:32:02 EDT)
Re: Dean Humphries for President of the USA Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:20:01 EDT)

Re: Dean Humphries for President of the USA Walter Sickert (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 15:46:35 EDT)

Re: Dean Humphries for President of the USA Soapy (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 07:53:09 EDT)
Re: Dean Humphries for President of the USA Walter Sickert (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 14:06:52 EDT)
Re: Dean Humphries for President of the USA m II (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 04:10:20 EDT)
Re: Dean Humphries for President of the USA Soapy (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 19:13:10 EDT)
Re: Dean Humphries for President of the USA Walter Sickert (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 19:06:32 EDT)
Re: Dean Humphries for President of the USA Aratzio (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 19:20:14 EDT)
Re: Dean Humphries for President of the USA Soapy (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 19:49:11 EDT)
Re: Dean Humphries for President of the USA Soapy (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 19:28:03 EDT)

Re: Dean Humphries for President of the USA Orville Wright (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 06:04:25 EDT)
Re: Dean Humphries for President of the USA Walter Sickert (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 15:45:15 EDT)

Niggers can't take good pictures. Nigger Lover (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 19:02:32 EDT)

Re: Niggers can't take good pictures. fs (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 20:45:26 EDT)

Re: Niggers can't take good pictures. Tramp'oline (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 20:54:00 EDT)

Re: A confession about my favorite equipment Gordon Moat (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 19:54:19 EDT)

[OT troll] An open letter to RPD's anonymous porno-troll Lionel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 02:50:45 EDT)

Re: [OT troll] An open letter to RPD's anonymous porno-troll Lionel's Mama (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 03:56:00 EDT)

Re: [OT troll] An open letter to RPD's anonymous porno-troll Lionel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 04:22:29 EDT)
Re: [OT troll] An open letter to RPD's anonymous porno-troll Meat-->Plow (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 09:55:52 EDT)
Re: [OT troll] An open letter to RPD's anonymous porno-troll Gary L.Burnore (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 10:02:35 EDT)
Re: [OT troll] An open letter to RPD's anonymous porno-troll Meat-->Plow (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 12:35:58 EDT)
Re: [OT troll] An open letter to RPD's anonymous porno-troll Meat-->Plow (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 09:58:33 EDT)

Re: [OT troll] An open letter to RPD's anonymous porno-troll Jobar Farintosh (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 04:42:06 EDT)

Re: [OT troll] An open letter to RPD's anonymous porno-troll Lionel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 05:33:35 EDT)

Re: [OT troll] An open letter to RPD's anonymous porno-troll Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 07:04:18 EDT)

Re: A confession about my favorite equipment Gordon Moat (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 20:03:02 EDT)
Re: A confession about my favorite equipment Gordon Moat (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 20:03:09 EDT)
Re: A confession about my favorite equipment Gordon Moat (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 20:03:46 EDT)
Re: Lens for Nikkormat EL Scott Schuckert (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 07:59:30 EDT)

Re: Lens for Nikkormat EL Geoffrey S. Mendelson (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:37:41 EDT)

Re: Lens for Nikkormat EL Kiron Kid (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 00:13:30 EDT)
Re: Lens for Nikkormat EL Scott Schuckert (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 09:20:53 EDT)

Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Joseph Meehan (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 19:12:58 EDT)

Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Sabineellen (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 20:51:02 EDT)

Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Joseph Meehan (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 06:28:44 EDT)

Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group AnOvercomer02_at_email.domain.hidden (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 04:16:01 EDT)

Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Lionel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 05:17:37 EDT)

Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group AnOvercomer02_at_email.domain.hidden (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 15:00:19 EDT)

Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Barney (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 14:07:52 EDT)
Re: My new Contax gear. Lewis Lang (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 00:34:23 EDT)
Re: ASSHOLE FUCKING and CUM SHOTS Steve Young (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 10:06:21 EDT)

Re: ASSHOLE FUCKING and CUM SHOTS Lionel (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:25:13 EDT)

Re: ASSHOLE FUCKING and CUM SHOTS Orville Wright (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 06:17:28 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet Steve Kramer (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 21:26:08 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet Alan Street (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 21:48:22 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet Steve Kramer (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 03:52:41 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet headquarters (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 23:40:38 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet Rick Armstrong (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 03:01:00 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet TP (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:42:51 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet Steve Kramer (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 00:50:48 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet pickle (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 08:16:57 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet Rick Armstrong (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 09:06:00 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet LarbGai (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 09:25:23 EDT)

Re: Rob Finch SUCKS Jen McLeod's TWAT Ted Azito (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 19:08:38 EDT)

Re: Rob Finch SUCKS Jen McLeod's TWAT Sam Byrams (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:43:37 EDT)

Re: Holy Crap! Doesn't anyone talk photography here? Gordon Moat (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 19:46:58 EDT)
Re: Holy Crap! Doesn't anyone talk photography here? Skip M (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 22:40:07 EDT)
Re: Holy Crap! Doesn't anyone talk photography here? Gordon Moat (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 19:48:16 EDT)
Re: Nikon D70 Nude Gallery ah (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 07:09:38 EDT)

Re: Nikon D70 Nude Gallery Vicar Peter Parsnip (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 07:29:23 EDT)

Re: Nikon D70 Nude Gallery Wim Jay (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 07:40:11 EDT)

Re: Nikon D70 Nude Gallery Vicar Peter Parsnip (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 15:43:49 EDT)
Re: Nikon D70 Nude Gallery Wim Jay (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 18:46:30 EDT)
Re: Nikon D70 Nude Gallery ah (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 19:51:24 EDT)

Re: Lionel....SPANKED AGAIN ! Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:10:22 EDT)
Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Steve Young (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 11:14:37 EDT)

Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Bart van der Wolf (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:11:02 EDT)

Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Orville Wright (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 06:25:55 EDT)

Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Bart van der Wolf (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 09:06:02 EDT)
Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Orville Wright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:18:17 EDT)
Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Lionel (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 23:11:56 EDT)

[OT troll] Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Lionel (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 00:13:04 EDT)

Re: [OT troll] Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Steve Young (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 00:58:22 EDT)

Re: [OT troll] Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Lionel (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:30:39 EDT)
Re: [OT troll] Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 05:53:39 EDT)
Re: [OT troll] Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Orville Wright (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 06:10:14 EDT)
Re: [OT troll] Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 06:19:35 EDT)
Re: [OT troll] Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Lionel (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 18:02:38 EDT)

Re: D60 vs. F-104 !!! Ted Azito (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 19:04:53 EDT)

Re: D60 vs. F-104 !!! Peter Chant (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 19:54:07 EDT)
Re: D60 vs. F-104 !!! Skip M (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 22:34:54 EDT)

Re: ALERT: More lies from the snuhtards. Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:43:29 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Big Red Helmut (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 18:43:36 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Big Red Helmut (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 18:42:24 EDT)
Kooky Lionel's Blacklits!!! Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:23:43 EDT)

Re: Kooky Lionel's Blacklits!!! Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 06:54:04 EDT)

Re: Kooky Lionel's Blacklits!!! Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Orville Wright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:44:46 EDT)

Re: Kooky Lionel's Blacklits!!! Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Soapy (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 18:25:49 EDT)

Re: Kooky Lionel's Blacklits!!! Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Soapy (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 01:07:56 EDT)

Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Skip M (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 01:45:24 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:21:51 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 19:56:35 EDT)

Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Lionel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 01:00:38 EDT)

Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Roland Karlsson (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 05:40:46 EDT)

Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:01:07 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Lionel (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:38:01 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 08:19:03 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Lionel (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 22:26:22 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 06:36:58 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Orville Wright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:32:52 EDT)

Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Doug (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 23:10:39 EDT)

Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Roland Karlsson (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 16:07:41 EDT)

Re: Tony Spadaro (919) 929-1343 (USA) Ted Azito (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 21:14:39 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Karrey Nation (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 03:23:24 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Rick Armstrong (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 07:35:18 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Steve Kramer (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 08:41:54 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Rick Armstrong (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 09:01:10 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Alan Browne (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 11:22:49 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Insane Ranter (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 14:48:47 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Rick Armstrong (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 06:47:00 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? LarbGai (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 18:34:18 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Rick Armstrong (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 03:27:48 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Steve Kramer (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 22:01:39 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? LarbGai (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:22:25 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Rick Armstrong (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 06:51:56 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? RonT (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 14:30:32 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? The Hacketts (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 20:36:42 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? LarbGai (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 04:23:14 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Wayne Moses (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 09:11:48 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Michael Scarpitti (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 16:51:18 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? brian (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 07:54:14 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Michael Scarpitti (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 16:27:17 EDT)
Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Alan Browne (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:16:48 EDT)
Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? brian (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 17:09:30 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Skip M (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:01:12 EDT)
Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Kevin McMurtrie (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 03:37:31 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Lewis Lang (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 03:02:47 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? TP (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 06:28:54 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Lewis Lang (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:14:00 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Orville Wright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 23:25:41 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Skip M (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 22:55:06 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Georgette Preddy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 13:04:40 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Jeroen Wenting (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 12:37:10 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Randall Ainsworth (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 13:59:42 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:05:53 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Mark B. (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 23:33:53 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions TP (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:17:57 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Mark B. (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 22:51:19 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Mick Sterbs (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 04:05:47 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Gymmy Bob (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 20:25:43 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Wayne Moses (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 13:09:06 EDT)
Re: MAXXUM 7000 Lens Options Alan Browne (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 12:22:05 EDT)
Re: MAXXUM 7000 Lens Options Magnus W (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 07:44:58 EDT)
Re: Nikon may drop film compacts in another year Ted Azito (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 00:58:23 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Ted Azito (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 21:20:09 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Ross Peebles (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 09:15:15 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Alan Browne (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 15:25:50 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Michael Benveniste (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 18:40:30 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Alan Browne (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:14:15 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Chris Brown (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:49:10 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Alan Browne (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 15:25:08 EDT)

[Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results (corr) Alan Browne (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 11:21:20 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results (corr) Chris Brown (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 16:11:07 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results (corr) Alan Browne (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 17:00:40 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results (corr) Bandicoot (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 22:56:58 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Orville Wright (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 08:39:50 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Mick Sterbs (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 09:02:28 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results dylan (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 15:14:38 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results David Nebenzahl (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 10:25:38 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 19:09:28 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Frank ess (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 19:18:58 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 20:24:11 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results D.R. (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 23:43:21 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 01:34:30 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results John McWilliams (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 03:21:15 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Bandicoot (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 09:02:34 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 01:58:35 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Sander Vesik (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 12:30:16 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results adm (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 12:45:30 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Anthony Ralph (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 13:31:15 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results adm (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 14:26:43 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Alan Browne (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 14:34:26 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Sander Vesik (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 15:16:05 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results adm (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 15:39:31 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 02:12:24 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results adm (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 04:01:56 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Alan Browne (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 12:10:53 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Sander Vesik (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 18:22:41 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Phil Wheeler (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 18:26:17 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 21:51:58 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results TP (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 05:05:14 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Frank ess (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 13:10:40 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results one_of_many (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 13:51:26 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 16:11:58 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results TP (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 17:39:54 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Bandicoot (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 20:29:20 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 00:17:27 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results TP (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 04:35:48 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Any Moose Poster (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 08:52:05 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results imbsysop (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 09:03:15 EDT)
[OT] Re: [Survey] - John McWilliams (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 10:29:51 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Sander Vesik (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 10:55:16 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Bob Hickey (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 17:40:19 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 02:06:45 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 02:04:09 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Chris Loffredo (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 14:03:53 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 02:17:53 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Chris Loffredo (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 05:44:49 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Bandicoot (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 11:23:41 EDT)
[OT] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results John McWilliams (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 11:59:37 EDT)
Re: [OT] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Bandicoot (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 20:33:24 EDT)
Re: [OT] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results John McWilliams (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 10:27:22 EDT)
Re: [OT] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results James (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 10:37:52 EDT)
Re: [OT] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results John McWilliams (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 11:14:37 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 16:21:42 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results adm (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 16:58:38 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Michael Scarpitti (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 11:52:11 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Sander Vesik (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 07:14:49 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results adm (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 07:51:08 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results John McWilliams (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 11:24:59 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Silvio Manuel (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 14:48:18 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results John McWilliams (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 15:55:20 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Michael Scarpitti (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 11:55:30 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results John McWilliams (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 17:35:28 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Michael Scarpitti (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 11:54:06 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Frank ess (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 11:57:44 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Sander Vesik (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 18:44:57 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Alan Browne (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 10:39:04 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Michael Scarpitti (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 09:24:29 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Chris B (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 10:56:12 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Stacey (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 11:04:03 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Silvio Manuel (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 11:37:37 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results adm (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 18:41:35 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Randall Ainsworth (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 11:22:40 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Richard Cockburn (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 02:49:47 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Nicholas O. Lindan (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 14:42:20 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Bandicoot (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 17:26:31 EDT)

Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? Lewis Lang (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 00:37:11 EDT)
Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? --Lewis Lewis Lang (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 00:38:40 EDT)
Re: A Lithium battery warning question Bandicoot (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 18:44:06 EDT)
Re: A Lithium battery warning question croweflight (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 14:16:49 EDT)
Re: Mark J Morgan Public Data Skip M (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 22:53:51 EDT)

Re: Mark J Morgan Public Data Mark M (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 23:17:04 EDT)

Re: Mark J Morgan Public Data stupid annika1980 (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 09:59:59 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Bandicoot (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 22:14:05 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Bandicoot (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 22:16:34 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Bandicoot (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 22:00:35 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Bandicoot (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 22:08:56 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Bill Hilton (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 22:25:39 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection TP (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:16:35 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection ThomasH (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 15:04:38 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Bandicoot (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 23:29:38 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Mxsmanic (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 00:17:59 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Woodard R. Springstube (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 23:10:29 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Gordon Moat (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 14:27:19 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Frank Pittel (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 20:04:52 EDT)
Re: NETKKKOP ALERT!!!!!!! Re: WHY PLONK SNUH FOR "STEVE YOUNG"? Re: [OT] *sigh* Looks like our porno-troll is back again. Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:25:55 EDT)
Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED ThomasH (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 01:25:49 EDT)

Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Bart van der Wolf (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 06:50:13 EDT)

Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Alan Browne (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 11:24:22 EDT)

Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Kennedy McEwen (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 13:02:16 EDT)
Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Alan Browne (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 15:19:29 EDT)
Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Gordon Moat (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 18:38:56 EDT)
Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Kennedy McEwen (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:33:32 EDT)
Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Alan Browne (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 13:18:38 EDT)
Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Kennedy McEwen (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 19:07:48 EDT)

Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Alan Browne (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 11:17:13 EDT)

Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Oliver Kunze (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 13:30:15 EDT)
Re: OT - David Ruether GoCycle (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 07:20:09 EDT)
Re: OT - David Ruether David Ruether (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 22:54:49 EDT)
Re: [OT Troll] Some questions for Steve Young. Steve Young (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 11:08:25 EDT)
Re: Can existing film equipments be used for digital erra? Al Denelsbeck (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 12:16:00 EDT)

Re: Can existing film equipments be used for digital erra? jaekim (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 03:51:10 EDT)

Re: Can existing film equipments be used for digital erra? Tony Spadaro (Sat Jun 12 2004 - 12:49:48 EDT)
Re: Can existing film equipments be used for digital erra? jaekim (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 03:36:23 EDT)
Re: Can existing film equipments be used for digital erra? Alan Browne (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 18:54:12 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 19:26:05 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 10:21:23 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 23:50:05 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 18:18:33 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 18:39:11 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 12:18:15 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Bill Fright (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 13:03:38 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:57:51 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:58:15 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 10:22:16 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 10:48:29 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 18:18:33 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t imbsysop (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 05:19:34 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Bill Fright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 09:38:22 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t FLY135 (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 13:18:23 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Gary P (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 20:11:18 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 04:31:19 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 16:22:23 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 18:30:30 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t John McWilliams (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 20:50:36 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 17:26:45 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t John McWilliams (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 20:51:13 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Steve R. (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 09:04:19 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t david.mccall (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 00:30:01 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t david.mccall (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 00:53:59 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t John McWilliams (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 02:48:57 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Gary P (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 05:41:51 EDT)
Re: OT - cutting down the posts? John McWilliams (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 10:58:05 EDT)
Re: OT - cutting down the posts? Silvio Manuel (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 21:50:54 EDT)
Re: OT - cutting down the posts? Lionel (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 23:26:25 EDT)
Re: OT - cutting down the posts? Silvio Manuel (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 05:15:46 EDT)
[OT] : OT - cutting down the posts? John McWilliams (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 09:41:32 EDT)
Re: OT - cutting down the posts? Gary P (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 01:04:57 EDT)
Re: OT - cutting down the posts? Matt Clara (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 22:55:36 EDT)
Re: OT - cutting down the posts? Gary P (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 20:52:27 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 04:27:40 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 05:15:29 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t John McWilliams (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 11:41:34 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 18:33:42 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t John McWilliams (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 20:28:51 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 04:11:11 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 10:20:11 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t John McWilliams (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 10:59:43 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Gary P (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 20:24:38 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 17:29:19 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 18:11:03 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t John McWilliams (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 20:29:41 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 10:20:14 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t imbsysop (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 10:32:41 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 18:45:47 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t John McWilliams (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 20:48:02 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 09:37:22 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t FLY135 (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 10:13:46 EDT)
[OT] IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t John McWilliams (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 11:52:25 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Auntie Nappy (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 12:28:09 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t John McWilliams (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 17:36:25 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 01:31:31 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Gary P (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 02:33:21 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! nappy (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 10:21:23 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! Rata Rioja (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 23:41:41 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! nappy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 18:18:34 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! Rata Rioja (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 18:38:23 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! nappy (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 12:19:03 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! John McWilliams (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 17:37:07 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! Gary P (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 19:13:13 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! Rata Rioja (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 01:27:46 EDT)
[OT]- IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! John McWilliams (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 11:23:52 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! FLY135 (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 09:46:54 EDT)
[OT] IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! John McWilliams (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 11:46:31 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! Gary P (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 19:02:42 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! FLY135 (Tue Jun 15 2004 - 09:15:07 EDT)
Re: Identification of George Preddy - Cracked spooge (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 00:39:27 EDT)

Re: Identification of George Preddy - Cracked Soapy (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 07:47:00 EDT)

Re: Identification of George Preddy - Cracked spooge (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 00:59:35 EDT)

Re: Identification of George Preddy - Cracked Bill Cleere (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 11:34:05 EDT)
Re: Identification of George Preddy - Cracked spooge (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 23:45:46 EDT)
Re: Identification of George Preddy - Cracked Bill Cleere (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 19:08:23 EDT)
Re: Identification of George Preddy - Cracked Soapy (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 19:16:10 EDT)
Re: Identification of George Preddy - Cracked spooge (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 23:45:48 EDT)
Re: Identification of George Preddy - Cracked Soapy (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 01:26:13 EDT)
Re: Identification of George Preddy - Cracked ± (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 01:52:55 EDT)

Re: Identification of George Preddy - Cracked ± (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 04:50:37 EDT)

Re: Identification of George Preddy - Cracked Soapy (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 18:39:14 EDT)

Re: Identification of George Preddy - Cracked Bill Cleere (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 18:52:03 EDT)
Re: Identification of George Preddy - Cracked ± (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 04:18:00 EDT)

Re: Identification of George Preddy - Cracked Soapy (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 07:47:48 EDT)
Re: Trip to Boston. What to see? EDGY01 (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 03:29:06 EDT)
Re: What's the "leica look"? Tim (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 00:54:42 EDT)
Re: What's the "leica look"? Chris Loffredo (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 04:03:25 EDT)

Re: What's the "leica look"? brian (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 12:43:41 EDT)

Leica Flamboasting Held to Standard of Proof Ted Azito (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 20:42:38 EDT)

Re: Leica Flamboasting Held to Standard of Proof Michael Scarpitti (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 10:59:37 EDT)

Re: Leica Flamboasting Held to Standard of Proof Ted Azito (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 21:11:17 EDT)

Re: Leica Flamboasting Held to Standard of Proof brian (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 18:43:40 EDT)

Re: What's the "leica look"? Collin Brendemuehl (Wed Jun 09 2004 - 07:53:41 EDT)
Re: Finest grained 35mm film? ThomasH (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 21:22:08 EDT)

Last message date: Mon Jun 28 2004 - 22:52:32 EDT
Archived on: Fri Sep 24 2004 - 17:37:34 EDT

492 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Previous Folder, Thread view Next Folder, Thread view List of Folders