rec.photo.equipment.35mm: By Thread

rec.photo.equipment.35mm: By Thread

488 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Previous Folder, Thread view | Next Folder, Thread view | List of Folders

Starting: Sun Jun 06 2004 - 02:38:28 EDT
Ending: Mon Jun 28 2004 - 22:52:32 EDT

A confession about my favorite equipment Gordon Moat (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 16:35:10 EDT)
Lens for Nikkormat EL Dave54755 (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 11:55:02 EDT)

Re: Lens for Nikkormat EL Scott Schuckert (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 07:59:30 EDT)

Re: Lens for Nikkormat EL Geoffrey S. Mendelson (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:37:41 EDT)

Re: Lens for Nikkormat EL Kiron Kid (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 00:13:30 EDT)
Re: Lens for Nikkormat EL Scott Schuckert (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 09:20:53 EDT)

it's a disgrace what has happened to this group billypat (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 10:44:22 EDT)

Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 11:48:34 EDT)

Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Barney (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 14:04:30 EDT)
Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Joseph Meehan (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 16:10:45 EDT)

Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Richard Cockburn (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 16:14:27 EDT)
Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Steve Young (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 16:49:00 EDT)
Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Richard Cockburn (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 16:57:12 EDT)
Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Steve Young (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 18:30:47 EDT)
Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Sabineellen (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 16:54:21 EDT)
Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Joseph Meehan (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 19:12:58 EDT)
Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Sabineellen (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 20:51:02 EDT)
Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Joseph Meehan (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 06:28:44 EDT)
Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group AnOvercomer02_at_email.domain.hidden (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 04:16:01 EDT)
Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Lionel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 05:17:37 EDT)
Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group AnOvercomer02_at_email.domain.hidden (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 15:00:19 EDT)

Re: it's a disgrace what has happened to this group Barney (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 14:07:52 EDT)

TONGUE FUCK my HONEY HOLE George Preddy (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 10:29:55 EDT)
BUNG FUCK my HONEY HOLE George Preddy (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 10:28:19 EDT)
Open letter to Lionel Betty Swallocks (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 10:17:10 EDT)

Re: Open letter to Lionel Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 10:32:38 EDT)

My new Contax gear. Lewis Lang (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 10:07:04 EDT)
ASSHOLE FUCKING and CUM SHOTS Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 09:59:52 EDT)

Re: ASSHOLE FUCKING and CUM SHOTS Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 10:10:15 EDT)

Re: ASSHOLE FUCKING and CUM SHOTS Steve Young (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 10:06:21 EDT)

Re: ASSHOLE FUCKING and CUM SHOTS Lionel (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:25:13 EDT)
Re: ASSHOLE FUCKING and CUM SHOTS Orville Wright (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 06:17:28 EDT)

PENIS COCK CUM FUCKED ASSHOLE crap Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 09:54:56 EDT)
CUM FUCKING my TITS SUCKED Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 09:51:57 EDT)
MOTHERFUCKING my CORN HOLE Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 09:50:05 EDT)
Bart van der Wolf SUCKS COCK and BALLS Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 09:12:18 EDT)
Lionel Lies Again Orville Wright (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 08:59:19 EDT)

Re: Lionel Lies Again Steve Young (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 11:57:17 EDT)

Re: Lionel Lies Again Bart van der Wolf (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 15:13:29 EDT)

Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet Orville Wright (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 08:46:51 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet Chabon (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 09:41:31 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet pickle (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 02:54:29 EDT)

[OT] Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet John McWilliams (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 01:35:22 EDT)

Who are the cowards hounding Steve Kramer? Crownfield (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 12:55:08 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet O. K. (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 14:12:42 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet Steve Kramer (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 21:26:08 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet Alan Street (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 21:48:22 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet Steve Kramer (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 03:52:41 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet headquarters (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 23:40:38 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet Rick Armstrong (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 03:01:00 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet TP (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:42:51 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet Steve Kramer (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 00:50:48 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet pickle (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 08:16:57 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet Rick Armstrong (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 09:06:00 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer is WAY too talked about on Usenet LarbGai (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 09:25:23 EDT)

Re: Sigma Digital SLR Cameras. Zebedee (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 08:33:53 EDT)

Re: Sigma Digital SLR Cameras. TP (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 08:55:34 EDT)
Re: Sigma Digital SLR Cameras. Giorgio Preddio (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 07:19:53 EDT)

Re: Sigma Digital SLR Cameras. Randall Ainsworth (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 08:18:03 EDT)

Photography Review Terje (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 08:16:50 EDT)
Mike Lipphardt SUCKS COCK and BALLS Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 07:38:27 EDT)
Rob Finch SUCKS Jen McLeod's TWAT Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 07:21:32 EDT)
Duke University SUCKS COCK Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 07:12:04 EDT)
Holy Crap! Doesn't anyone talk photography here? lcseds (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 07:11:40 EDT)

Re: Holy Crap! Doesn't anyone talk photography here? Mike Lipphardt (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 07:29:21 EDT)

Re: Holy Crap! Doesn't anyone talk photography here? lcseds (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 08:06:04 EDT)

Re: Holy Crap! Doesn't anyone talk photography here? Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 07:47:58 EDT)

Re: Holy Crap! Doesn't anyone talk photography here? Mike Lipphardt (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 09:00:24 EDT)

Re: Holy Crap! Doesn't anyone talk photography here? Gordon Moat (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 14:47:08 EDT)

Re: Holy Crap! Doesn't anyone talk photography here? Sabineellen (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 17:03:50 EDT)

Re: Holy Crap! Doesn't anyone talk photography here? Gordon Moat (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 19:46:58 EDT)
Re: Holy Crap! Doesn't anyone talk photography here? Skip M (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 22:40:07 EDT)

Re: Holy Crap! Doesn't anyone talk photography here? TP (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 17:19:50 EDT)

Re: Holy Crap! Doesn't anyone talk photography here? Gordon Moat (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 19:48:16 EDT)

FUCK FUCK my TURD HOLE Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 06:05:27 EDT)
Spew CUM on my ANAL CRESCENT Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 06:03:41 EDT)
Fuck my Aussie ASSHOLE! Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 05:59:06 EDT)
Kenko pro 300 on D70 + Sigma 50-500 ? gal (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 05:46:31 EDT)
Nikon D70 Nude Gallery Peter J Ross (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 04:57:21 EDT)
RFD: rec.photo.digital reorganisation Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 04:18:42 EDT)

Re: RFD: rec.photo.digital reorganisation Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 04:30:00 EDT)

Lionel....SPANKED AGAIN ! Orville Wright (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 02:05:46 EDT)
All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Orville Wright (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 00:45:29 EDT)

Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 00:49:49 EDT)

Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Steve Young (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 02:36:34 EDT)

Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 02:58:53 EDT)
Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Orville Wright (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 08:05:28 EDT)
Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Steve Young (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 11:14:37 EDT)
Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Bart van der Wolf (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:11:02 EDT)
Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Orville Wright (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 06:25:55 EDT)
Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Bart van der Wolf (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 09:06:02 EDT)
Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Orville Wright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:18:17 EDT)
Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Lionel (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 23:11:56 EDT)
[OT troll] Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Lionel (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 00:13:04 EDT)
Re: [OT troll] Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Steve Young (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 00:58:22 EDT)
Re: [OT troll] Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Lionel (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:30:39 EDT)
Re: [OT troll] Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 05:53:39 EDT)
Re: [OT troll] Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Orville Wright (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 06:10:14 EDT)
Re: [OT troll] Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 06:19:35 EDT)
Re: [OT troll] Re: All Eyes On Spankard Lionel Lionel (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 18:02:38 EDT)

(423) 876-0393 Call Annika1980 Doug Pain (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 00:27:55 EDT)
D60 vs. F-104 !!! Annika1980 (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 00:10:19 EDT)
ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Orville Wright (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 23:59:13 EDT)

Re: ALERT: More lies from the snuhtards. Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 00:17:01 EDT)

Re: ALERT: More lies from the snuhtards. Orville Wright (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 08:11:51 EDT)

Re: ALERT: More lies from the snuhtards. Doug (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 23:01:54 EDT)

Re: ALERT: More lies from the snuhtards. Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:43:29 EDT)

Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Richard Cockburn (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 00:24:18 EDT)

Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 00:46:45 EDT)

Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Steve Young (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 01:45:46 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Orville Wright (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 08:08:29 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! ± (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 05:14:44 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Big Red Helmut (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 18:43:36 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Gary L.Burnore (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 11:00:21 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Big Red Helmut (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 18:42:24 EDT)
Kooky Lionel's Blacklits!!! Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:23:43 EDT)
Re: Kooky Lionel's Blacklits!!! Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 06:54:04 EDT)
Re: Kooky Lionel's Blacklits!!! Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Orville Wright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:44:46 EDT)
Re: Kooky Lionel's Blacklits!!! Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Soapy (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 18:25:49 EDT)
Re: Kooky Lionel's Blacklits!!! Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Soapy (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 01:07:56 EDT)

Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Skip M (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 01:45:24 EDT)

Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! ± (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 04:39:19 EDT)

Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Soapy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:21:51 EDT)

Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Bart van der Wolf (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 07:55:09 EDT)

Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Sander Vesik (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 11:36:05 EDT)

Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 11:56:17 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 19:56:35 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Lionel (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 01:00:38 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Roland Karlsson (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 05:40:46 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:01:07 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Lionel (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:38:01 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 08:19:03 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Lionel (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 22:26:22 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 06:36:58 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Orville Wright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:32:52 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Doug (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 23:10:39 EDT)
Re: ALERT: LIONEL WANTS TO MODERATE the photography newsgroups! Roland Karlsson (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 16:07:41 EDT)

(201) 567-9259 Lewis Lang Derrick Westfield (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 23:25:35 EDT)
Lewis Lang (201) 567-9259 Derrick Westfield (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 23:23:20 EDT)
NIGGER HATER- Dallas Dahms Road Runner (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 23:04:36 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer LOVES SUCKING COCK Steve Kramer (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 21:28:23 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer LOVES SUCKING COCK Nick J (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 22:13:54 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer LOVES SUCKING COCK Steve Kramer (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 00:26:33 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer LOVES SUCKING COCK Takin Gthepiss (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 04:19:08 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer LOVES SUCKING COCK pickle (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 02:55:13 EDT)

Dallas Dahms Hates NIGGERS Road Runner (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 20:48:40 EDT)
Dallas Dahms Hates NIGGERS Road Runner (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 20:48:29 EDT)
Dallad Dahms Hates NIGGERS Road Runner (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 20:47:40 EDT)

Re: Dallad Dahms Hates NIGGERS Whitey B Pistoff (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 21:22:58 EDT)

[SI] XXXII Theme street shooter (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 20:13:41 EDT)

Re: [SI] XXXII Theme Lionel (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 23:44:36 EDT)

Re: [SI] XXXII Theme Annika1980 (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 00:12:20 EDT)

Re: [SI] XXXII Theme Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 00:21:31 EDT)
Re: [SI] XXXII Theme Annika1980 (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 00:28:35 EDT)
Re: [SI] XXXII Theme Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 04:55:57 EDT)
Re: [SI] XXXII Theme Dallas (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 09:59:27 EDT)
Re: [SI] XXXII Theme Bowzre (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 11:00:59 EDT)

Re: [SI] XXXII Theme TP (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 09:28:49 EDT)

Re: [SI] XXXII Theme Alan Browne (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 10:37:32 EDT)
Re: [SI] XXXII Theme Mark M (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 16:45:05 EDT)
Re: [SI] XXXII Theme Ken Nadvornick (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 17:07:18 EDT)

Re: [SI] XXXII Theme TP (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 11:09:04 EDT)

Lens for Minolta SRT101? Craig Williams (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 19:27:04 EDT)

Re: Lens for Minolta SRT101? Bill Hilton (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 19:32:50 EDT)

Re: Lens for Minolta SRT101? Craig Williams (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 19:47:09 EDT)

Re: Lens for Minolta SRT101? Ken Rosenbaum (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 22:39:11 EDT)

Re: Lens for Minolta SRT101? Lunaray (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 21:00:44 EDT)

Re: Lens for Minolta SRT101? Bill Hilton (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 22:13:38 EDT)

Bill Tallman (360) 681-0247 (USA) Janis Joplin (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 19:22:44 EDT)
Mark J Morgan: (619) 766 - 4751 (USA) Janis Joplin (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:57:17 EDT)
it was good to be here ian green (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:32:51 EDT)
William Graham-(503) 566-9858 (USA) Janis Joplin (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:27:37 EDT)
Tony Spadaro (919) 929-1343 (USA) Janis Joplin (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:17:23 EDT)
Lisa Horton- (650) 345-7127 (USA) Janis Joplin (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 17:08:45 EDT)
Dallas Dahms- 2783 632 32 18 (South Africa) Janis Joplin (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 17:01:27 EDT)

Re: Dallas Dahms- 2783 632 32 18 (South Africa) Dallas (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 01:01:05 EDT)

Martin Francis 01212334196 (UK) Janis Joplin (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 16:54:03 EDT)
Martin Francis01212334196 (UK) Janis Joplin (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 16:54:33 EDT)
subject induced refraction? Alan Browne (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 15:33:10 EDT)

Re: subject induced refraction? Al Denelsbeck (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 17:59:07 EDT)

Re: subject induced refraction? Alan Browne (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 20:06:20 EDT)

Re: subject induced refraction? Sabineellen (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:21:50 EDT)

Re: compacts with SLR image quality??!??? Bandicoot (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 13:44:37 EDT)

Re: compacts with SLR image quality??!??? Bandicoot (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 13:56:25 EDT)

Re: Pictures of busty european teens 1465 Sabineellen (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 10:16:16 EDT)

Re: Pictures of busty european teens 1465 Peter Chant (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 14:09:57 EDT)

New photos posted Robert Feinman (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 09:34:02 EDT)
well thats the practical done Deathwalker (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:23:53 EDT)
Penny for your thoughts on this Travel/Hiking Camera System Spencer Douglas (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 04:44:08 EDT)

Re: Penny for your thoughts on this Travel/Hiking Camera System Bowzre (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 16:07:36 EDT)

Re: Penny for your thoughts on this Travel/Hiking Camera System Spencer Douglas (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 22:17:46 EDT)
Re: Penny for your thoughts on this Travel/Hiking Camera System Spencer Douglas (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 22:38:32 EDT)

Re: Penny for your thoughts on this Travel/Hiking Camera System Bruce Graham (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 00:42:21 EDT)
Re: Penny for your thoughts on this Travel/Hiking Camera System René Ernst Nielsen (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 01:47:18 EDT)

Re: Penny for your thoughts on this Travel/Hiking Camera System Chris Loffredo (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 02:55:07 EDT)

Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Orville Wright (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 03:09:12 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Michael Wolf (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 04:43:13 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Steve Kramer (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:01:11 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Takin Gthepiss (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:59:00 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? McLeod (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 07:29:58 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Steve Kramer (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 09:13:22 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? McLeod (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 07:14:12 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Guy Scharf (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 13:16:51 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Karrey Nation (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 03:23:24 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Rick Armstrong (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 07:35:18 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Steve Kramer (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 08:41:54 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Rick Armstrong (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 09:01:10 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Alan Browne (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 11:22:49 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Insane Ranter (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 14:48:47 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? kilikini (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 14:52:59 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? LarbGai (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:27:14 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Insane Ranter (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 19:17:11 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? pickle (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 03:43:56 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? up2u2 (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 21:18:24 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Rick Armstrong (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 16:59:37 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? A Mate (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:30:31 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Takin Gthepiss (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:48:12 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? O. K. (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:58:16 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Takin Gthepiss (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:00:47 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Steve Kramer (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 09:10:08 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Takin Gthepiss (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 09:57:01 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? O. K. (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 10:44:55 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Steve Kramer (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 11:50:02 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? LarbGai (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 12:09:46 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Takin Gthepiss (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 14:36:21 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Big Red Helmut (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 17:57:54 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Rick Armstrong (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 06:47:00 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Karen O'Mara (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 13:45:11 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? O. K. (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 14:15:22 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Rick Armstrong (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 16:43:17 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? O. K. (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:06:27 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? chilly (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 07:53:58 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Karen O'Mara (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 15:20:17 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? LarbGai (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 18:34:18 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Rick Armstrong (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 03:27:48 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Steve Kramer (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 22:01:39 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? LarbGai (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:22:25 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Rick Armstrong (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 06:51:56 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? RonT (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 14:30:32 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Dan Goodman (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 20:01:14 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? Richard (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 07:18:13 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? O. K. (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 09:04:00 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? LarbGai (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 12:17:13 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? The Hacketts (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 20:36:42 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer....WHO IS HE? LarbGai (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 04:23:14 EDT)

zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? W Chan (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 02:58:14 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Richard Cockburn (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 04:41:13 EDT)
Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Scott Schuckert (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 08:42:12 EDT)
Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Randall Ainsworth (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 09:49:53 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Paul Howland (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 13:13:55 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? David Dyer-Bennet (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 16:06:05 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Doug Payne (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 16:23:31 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? David Dyer-Bennet (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 01:11:14 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Wayne Moses (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 09:11:48 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Michael Scarpitti (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 16:51:18 EDT)
Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? brian (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 07:54:14 EDT)
Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Michael Scarpitti (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 16:27:17 EDT)
Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Alan Browne (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:16:48 EDT)
Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? brian (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 17:09:30 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Skip M (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:01:12 EDT)
Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Bob (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 21:52:08 EDT)
Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Michael Scarpitti (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 22:08:11 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Nick J (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 22:11:25 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Michael Scarpitti (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 09:33:52 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Kevin McMurtrie (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 03:37:31 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Lewis Lang (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 03:02:47 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? TP (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 06:28:54 EDT)
Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Lewis Lang (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:14:00 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Orville Wright (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 23:25:41 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Linda Terrell (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 01:54:39 EDT)
Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Crownfield (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 17:36:54 EDT)

Re: zoom lens Nikkor vs. Sigma vs. Tamron?? Fred T. Mahusay (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 20:50:23 EDT)

Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Orville Wright (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 01:55:43 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Peter File (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 02:37:52 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Richard Cockburn (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 04:37:18 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions MFP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:42:00 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:27:42 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions MFP (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 13:19:43 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Jeroen Wenting (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 15:18:07 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Giorgio Preddio (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 07:27:13 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Randall Ainsworth (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 08:19:23 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 09:06:01 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions John McWilliams (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 11:28:41 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Alan Browne (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 11:53:36 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Randall Ainsworth (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 13:51:11 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Giorgio Preddio (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 20:53:18 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Randall Ainsworth (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 21:56:22 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Giorgio Preddio (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 04:36:15 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Alan D-W (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 09:58:43 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Giorgio Preddio (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 10:18:23 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Big Bill (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 10:59:16 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Randall Ainsworth (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 10:23:05 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Big Bill (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 10:55:18 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Big Bill (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 10:57:00 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Skip M (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 11:15:00 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Giorgio Preddio (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 10:58:47 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Phil Wheeler (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 11:50:32 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Alan D-W (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 17:33:57 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions David Kilpatrick (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 18:50:39 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Skip M (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 19:49:23 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Georgette Preddy (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 00:10:10 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Phil Wheeler (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 09:20:05 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Sander Vesik (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 06:33:51 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Randall Ainsworth (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 19:12:38 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Giorgio Preddio (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 06:31:14 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions John Ewing (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 07:08:56 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Mick Sterbs (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 11:16:34 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Big Bill (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 13:48:34 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Brian C.Baird (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 13:02:54 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Big Bill (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 16:45:14 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Giorgio Preddio (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 11:01:06 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Big Bill (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 16:47:14 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions imbsysop (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 03:24:46 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Mick Sterbs (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 11:17:49 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Phil Wheeler (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 11:20:58 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Mike Kohary (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 17:22:16 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Mark B. (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 17:52:36 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Mike Kohary (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 18:42:41 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Randall Ainsworth (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 19:13:01 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Mark B. (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:55:43 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Skip M (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 17:58:35 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Mick Sterbs (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:43:03 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions TP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:27:08 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Zebedee (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:49:43 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Chris (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 09:13:09 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Randall Ainsworth (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 09:41:16 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Bhup (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 09:37:54 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Brian C.Baird (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 09:49:52 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Peter File (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 13:27:22 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Mark B. (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 06:06:52 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Skip M (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 22:55:06 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Jeroen Wenting (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 15:19:50 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Alan D-W (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 15:57:59 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions bagal (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 17:35:05 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions David Kilpatrick (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:16:43 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions David J. Littleboy (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:47:09 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions David Kilpatrick (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 19:13:19 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions bagal (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 14:39:21 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Georgette Preddy (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 20:54:56 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions LESLIE SCHEHL (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 22:28:13 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Georgette Preddy (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 05:05:45 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Mick Sterbs (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 05:10:52 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Georgette Preddy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 13:04:40 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 06:31:12 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Randall Ainsworth (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 01:26:42 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Jeroen Wenting (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 12:37:10 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Randall Ainsworth (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 13:59:42 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:05:53 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Mark B. (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 23:33:53 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions TP (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 04:17:57 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Mark B. (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 22:51:19 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Mick Sterbs (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 04:05:47 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Mark B. (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 06:11:18 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Gymmy Bob (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 20:25:43 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Wayne Moses (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 13:09:06 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Giorgio Preddio (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 07:29:35 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Alan D-W (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 12:04:31 EDT)

Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Phil Wheeler (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 12:35:59 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Georgette Preddy (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 15:10:22 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions adm (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 16:34:44 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Big Bill (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 16:48:15 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions grant kinsley (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 16:45:05 EDT)
Re: Sigma SD10/Lenses Opinions Skip M (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 17:47:26 EDT)

I love SUCKING COCK EDGY01 (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 22:50:19 EDT)

Re: I love SUCKING COCK Lionel (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 23:53:29 EDT)

Re: I love SUCKING COCK Orville Wright (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 00:15:32 EDT)

Re: I love SUCKING COCK Ricardo Morte (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 20:15:57 EDT)

Lionel Finds A White Chick Ren Stimpy (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 22:44:33 EDT)

Re: Lionel Finds A White Chick Lionel (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 23:51:20 EDT)
Re: Lionel Finds A White Chick Orville Wright (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 01:26:03 EDT)
Re: Lionel Finds A White Chick Sabineellen (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 01:53:42 EDT)

Re: Lionel Finds A White Chick Ricardo Morte (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 20:19:28 EDT)

Re: Lionel Finds A White Chick Lionel (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 20:42:31 EDT)
Re: Lionel Finds A White Chick Orville Wright (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 08:24:44 EDT)
Re: Lionel Finds A White Chick Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 08:31:14 EDT)

Skip Middleton Request Homo Erectus (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 22:15:43 EDT)
MAXXUM 7000 Lens Options daryl1138 (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 22:26:16 EDT)

Re: MAXXUM 7000 Lens Options Mike Lipphardt (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:45:54 EDT)
Re: MAXXUM 7000 Lens Options Alan Browne (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 12:22:05 EDT)
Re: MAXXUM 7000 Lens Options Magnus W (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 07:44:58 EDT)

Olympus C-60 opinions please unavailable (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 20:04:49 EDT)
Nikon may drop film compacts in another year Tony Spadaro (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:27:09 EDT)

Re: Nikon may drop film compacts in another year Sabineellen (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 19:46:20 EDT)
Re: Nikon may drop film compacts in another year Barney (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 20:49:20 EDT)

Re: Nikon may drop film compacts in another year Sabineellen (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 22:17:19 EDT)

Re: Nikon may drop film compacts in another year Barney (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 14:29:15 EDT)

Re: Nikon may drop film compacts in another year TP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:23:45 EDT)

Re: Nikon may drop film compacts in another year Ted Azito (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:59:59 EDT)

Re: Nikon may drop film compacts in another year TP (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 04:23:08 EDT)

Re: Nikon may drop film compacts in another year Martin Francis (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 16:42:15 EDT)

Re: Nikon may drop film compacts in another year Ted Azito (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 00:58:23 EDT)

Cord to connect Minolta Spotmeter F to Minolta 5600 HS (D) flash? Dave Yuhas (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:24:05 EDT)

Re: Cord to connect Minolta Spotmeter F to Minolta 5600 HS (D) flash? Alan Browne (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:44:49 EDT)

Re: Cord to connect Minolta Spotmeter F to Minolta 5600 HS (D) flash? Dave Yuhas (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 22:02:10 EDT)

Re: Cord to connect Minolta Spotmeter F to Minolta 5600 HS (D) flash? Alan Browne (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 12:06:50 EDT)

Re: Cord to connect Minolta Spotmeter F to Minolta 5600 HS (D) flash? Magnus W (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 19:34:34 EDT)

Review for several Maxxum lenses. Elie A Shammas (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:53:29 EDT)

Re: Review for several Maxxum lenses. Crecybattl (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 19:05:17 EDT)
Re: Review for several Maxxum lenses. parv (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 01:23:16 EDT)
Re: Review for several Maxxum lenses. Bill Tuthill (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 14:24:41 EDT)

Re: Review for several Maxxum lenses. Elie (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 15:27:11 EDT)

Re: Review for several Maxxum lenses. Alan Browne (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 16:45:22 EDT)
Re: Review for several Maxxum lenses. Elie A Shammas (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 09:34:45 EDT)
Re: Review for several Maxxum lenses. Alan Browne (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 16:54:59 EDT)

Re: please vote best wedding photographer Sabineellen (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:40:31 EDT)
[Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Alan Browne (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:36:39 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Alan Browne (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:41:53 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Michael Scarpitti (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 22:26:16 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Richard Cockburn (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:00:43 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Skip M (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:19:44 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Nick J (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:50:14 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Chris B (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 19:34:09 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit S Lee (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 22:14:25 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Michael Benveniste (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 00:03:38 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Ken Nadvornick (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 01:10:36 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Chris Brown (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 04:27:13 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Collin Brendemuehl (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 07:58:21 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Alan Browne (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 13:15:46 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Collin Brendemuehl (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 19:48:05 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Chris Loffredo (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 03:02:12 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Alan Browne (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 10:25:14 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Dallas (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 13:07:56 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Ted Azito (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 21:20:09 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit Ross Peebles (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 09:15:15 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Alan Browne (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 15:25:50 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Michael Benveniste (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 18:40:30 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Alan Browne (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:14:15 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Chris Brown (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 19:49:10 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Alan Browne (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 15:25:08 EDT)

[Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results (corr) Alan Browne (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 11:21:20 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results (corr) Chris Brown (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 16:11:07 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results (corr) Alan Browne (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 17:00:40 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results (corr) Bandicoot (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 22:56:58 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Orville Wright (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 08:39:50 EDT)

Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Mick Sterbs (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 09:02:28 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results dylan (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 15:14:38 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results David Nebenzahl (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 10:25:38 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 19:09:28 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Frank ess (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 19:18:58 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 20:24:11 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results D.R. (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 23:43:21 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 01:34:30 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results John McWilliams (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 03:21:15 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Bandicoot (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 09:02:34 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 01:58:35 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Sander Vesik (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 12:30:16 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results adm (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 12:45:30 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Anthony Ralph (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 13:31:15 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results adm (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 14:26:43 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Alan Browne (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 14:34:26 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Sander Vesik (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 15:16:05 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results adm (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 15:39:31 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 02:12:24 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results adm (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 04:01:56 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Alan Browne (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 12:10:53 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Sander Vesik (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 18:22:41 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Phil Wheeler (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 18:26:17 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 21:51:58 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results TP (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 05:05:14 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Frank ess (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 13:10:40 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results one_of_many (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 13:51:26 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 16:11:58 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results TP (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 17:39:54 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Bandicoot (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 20:29:20 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 00:17:27 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results TP (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 04:35:48 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Any Moose Poster (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 08:52:05 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results imbsysop (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 09:03:15 EDT)
[OT] Re: [Survey] - John McWilliams (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 10:29:51 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Sander Vesik (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 10:55:16 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Bob Hickey (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 17:40:19 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 02:06:45 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 02:04:09 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Chris Loffredo (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 14:03:53 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 02:17:53 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Chris Loffredo (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 05:44:49 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Bandicoot (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 11:23:41 EDT)
[OT] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results John McWilliams (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 11:59:37 EDT)
Re: [OT] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Bandicoot (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 20:33:24 EDT)
Re: [OT] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results John McWilliams (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 10:27:22 EDT)
Re: [OT] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results James (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 10:37:52 EDT)
Re: [OT] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results John McWilliams (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 11:14:37 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results William Graham (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 16:21:42 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results adm (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 16:58:38 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Michael Scarpitti (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 11:52:11 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Sander Vesik (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 07:14:49 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results adm (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 07:51:08 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results John McWilliams (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 11:24:59 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Silvio Manuel (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 14:48:18 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results John McWilliams (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 15:55:20 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Michael Scarpitti (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 11:55:30 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results John McWilliams (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 17:35:28 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Michael Scarpitti (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 11:54:06 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Frank ess (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 11:57:44 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Sander Vesik (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 18:44:57 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Alan Browne (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 10:39:04 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Michael Scarpitti (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 09:24:29 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Chris B (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 10:56:12 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Stacey (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 11:04:03 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Silvio Manuel (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 11:37:37 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results adm (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 18:41:35 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Randall Ainsworth (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 11:22:40 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Richard Cockburn (Thu Jun 24 2004 - 02:49:47 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Nicholas O. Lindan (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 14:42:20 EDT)
Re: [Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results Bandicoot (Wed Jun 23 2004 - 17:26:31 EDT)

Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? Jim Hutchison (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:40:22 EDT)
Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? Chris B (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 19:37:08 EDT)

Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? Alan Browne (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 20:01:17 EDT)

Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? Chris B (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 20:29:33 EDT)

Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? Sander Vesik (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:18:04 EDT)
Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? Bill Tuthill (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 13:02:42 EDT)
Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? David Chien (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 19:22:23 EDT)
Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? Chris B (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 16:11:11 EDT)
Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? Mxsmanic (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 23:16:06 EDT)

Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? Lewis Lang (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 03:20:36 EDT)

Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? TP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:14:14 EDT)
Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? Lewis Lang (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 23:29:18 EDT)
Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? Dallas (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 09:59:26 EDT)
Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? Lewis Lang (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 00:37:11 EDT)

Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? --Lewis Alan Browne (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 13:12:27 EDT)

Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? --Lewis Philip Homburg (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 17:09:05 EDT)
Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? --Lewis Lewis Lang (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 23:23:14 EDT)
Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? --Lewis Philip Homburg (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 03:53:34 EDT)
Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? --Lewis Lewis Lang (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 00:38:40 EDT)
Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? --Lewis Lewis Lang (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 23:19:35 EDT)
Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? --Lewis Alan Browne (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 10:19:09 EDT)

Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? Joseph Meehan (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 20:47:11 EDT)

Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? MJS (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 00:09:10 EDT)
Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? TP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:18:27 EDT)

Re: Wedding photographers - is 28-75 long enough? James Cloud (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 00:21:53 EDT)
Re: Why do Steve Young and the trolls agree about Lionel? Steve Young (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 12:15:58 EDT)
Re: Lisa Horton: CUNT SLUTTY PIG Skip M (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:16:59 EDT)
Re: A Lithium battery warning question Matt Clara (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:11:02 EDT)
Re: A Lithium battery warning question croweflight (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:18:54 EDT)

Re: A Lithium battery warning question Ken Rosenbaum (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 10:44:37 EDT)

Re: A Lithium battery warning question Ken Rosenbaum (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 11:11:58 EDT)
Re: A Lithium battery warning question Mxsmanic (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 13:58:33 EDT)

Re: A Lithium battery warning question croweflight (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 14:16:49 EDT)

Re: Mark J Morgan Public Data Skip M (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:16:23 EDT)
Re: Mark J Morgan Public Data Mark M (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 04:19:24 EDT)
Re: Mark J Morgan Public Data TP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:09:28 EDT)

Re: Mark J Morgan Public Data Mark M (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 10:54:59 EDT)

Re: Mark J Morgan Public Data TP (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 04:22:28 EDT)

Re: Mark J Morgan Public Data Mark M (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 11:07:34 EDT)
Re: Mark J Morgan Public Data Skip M (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 22:53:51 EDT)
Re: Mark J Morgan Public Data Mark M (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 23:17:04 EDT)
Re: Mark J Morgan Public Data stupid annika1980 (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 09:59:59 EDT)

Re: Entry level body with spot metering? Jim Hutchison (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:46:13 EDT)
Re: Entry level body with spot metering? TP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:03:30 EDT)

Re: Entry level body with spot metering? Martin Francis (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 16:42:17 EDT)

Re: Entry level body with spot metering? TP (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 04:21:40 EDT)

Re: Lionel frames yet ANOTHER perp ! Orville Wright (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 01:17:36 EDT)

Re: Lionel frames yet ANOTHER perp ! Steve Young (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 09:16:36 EDT)

Re: Lionel frames yet ANOTHER perp ! Bart van der Wolf (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 09:42:25 EDT)

Re: Lionel frames yet ANOTHER perp ! Stevet Thompson (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 19:39:09 EDT)

Re: Lionel frames yet ANOTHER perp ! Lionel (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 22:53:38 EDT)

Re: Lionel frames yet ANOTHER perp ! Paul H. (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 14:43:26 EDT)

Re: Lionel frames yet ANOTHER perp ! Big Red Helmut (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:10:13 EDT)

Re: Dallas Dahms is a Racist Mall Photographer ! ! David Starr (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:42:52 EDT)

Re: Dallas Dahms is a Racist Mall Photographer ! ! Orville Wright (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 01:20:22 EDT)

Re: Dallas Dahms is a Racist Mall Photographer ! ! Lisa Horton (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 14:13:06 EDT)

Re: Dallas Dahms is a Racist Mall Photographer ! ! TP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:51:30 EDT)

Re: Dallas Dahms is a Racist Mall Photographer ! ! Lisa Horton (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 13:32:30 EDT)
Re: Dallas Dahms is a Racist Mall Photographer ! ! Dallas (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 13:37:31 EDT)

Re: Dallas Dahms is a Racist Mall Photographer ! ! Steve Young (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 14:27:44 EDT)
Re: Dallas Dahms is a Racist Mall Photographer ! ! Orville Wright (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 23:44:59 EDT)
Re: Dallas Dahms is a Racist Mall Photographer ! ! Steve Young (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 02:54:36 EDT)

Re: SPANKARD LIONEL GETS DISSED AGAIN ! -was- Re: Lisa Horton ------- Dave Bouvier in the ------- EVERY NIGHT Orville Wright (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 01:10:34 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Paul Repacholi (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:00:04 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Michael Scarpitti (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 12:42:59 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Bill Tuthill (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 13:45:03 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Sander Vesik (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 14:55:01 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Richard Williams (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 08:01:16 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Sander Vesik (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 15:17:29 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Bandicoot (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 22:14:05 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Michael Scarpitti (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 10:32:14 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection parv (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 01:05:38 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Lionel (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 02:05:42 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Tom Arne Orthe (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 04:36:45 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Bandicoot (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 22:16:34 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Mxsmanic (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 12:49:57 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Andrey Tarasevich (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:10:27 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Sander Vesik (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:57:28 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Alan Browne (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:24:14 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Sander Vesik (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:05:42 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Stephen H. Westin (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 10:03:56 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Stephen H. Westin (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:22:23 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Lewis Lang (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:07:39 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Stephen H. Westin (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 10:07:05 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Bill Hilton (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 11:58:09 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection howard (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 12:25:38 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Lewis Lang (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:24:21 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection The Dave© (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:18:15 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Matt Clara (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:01:21 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection TP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:43:58 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Alan Browne (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 12:54:31 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Matt Clara (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 17:48:15 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Sabineellen (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 08:32:48 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Richard Williams (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 14:20:06 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Gordon Moat (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 14:31:09 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Lewis Lang (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 09:25:55 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Woodard R. Springstube (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 23:10:29 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Lewis Lang (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:59:57 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Bill Hilton (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 19:35:33 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Mxsmanic (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 01:28:39 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Stephen H. Westin (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 10:10:28 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Hzakas (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 01:41:39 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection jj_at_email.domain.hidden (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 14:13:07 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Alan Browne (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 15:39:32 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Hzakas (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 20:54:27 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Matt Clara (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:18:38 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Alan Browne (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:25:40 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Matt Clara (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:03:35 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Jerry L. (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 21:20:18 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection jj_at_email.domain.hidden (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 15:10:26 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Matt Clara (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 17:38:34 EDT)
Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection Frank Pittel (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 20:04:52 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection ThomasH (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 03:53:02 EDT)

Re: Insane new TSA rule for film inspection TP (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 04:35:05 EDT)

Re: Nikkor 24-120mm 3.5-5.6 VR Ray Paseur (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 10:23:59 EDT)

Re: Nikkor 24-120mm 3.5-5.6 VR [BnH] (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 11:31:22 EDT)

Re: Nikkor 24-120mm 3.5-5.6 VR Ray Paseur (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 21:10:13 EDT)

Re: Mortarboard tradition - which side does the tassle go after receivingthe diploma? Skip M (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:08:22 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer - more of his bullshit Takin Gthepiss (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:20:21 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer - more of his bullshit Peter Aitken (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 19:49:32 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer - more of his bullshit Takin Gthepiss (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:57:08 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer - headquarters (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 05:42:13 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer - headquarters (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 03:04:50 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer - more of his bullshit Takin Gthepiss (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:53:50 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer - more of his bullshit Takin Gthepiss (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 07:18:45 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer - more of his bullshit Takin Gthepiss (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:11:02 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer - Tony Parkinson (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 19:11:04 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer - TP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:05:08 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer - Chas (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 13:36:42 EDT)

Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED ThomasH (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 03:09:36 EDT)

Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Alan Browne (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 10:28:20 EDT)

Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED ThomasH (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 01:25:49 EDT)

Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Bart van der Wolf (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 06:50:13 EDT)
Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Alan Browne (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 11:24:22 EDT)
Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Kennedy McEwen (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 13:02:16 EDT)
Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Alan Browne (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 15:19:29 EDT)
Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Gordon Moat (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 18:38:56 EDT)
Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Kennedy McEwen (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 20:33:32 EDT)
Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Alan Browne (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 13:18:38 EDT)
Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Kennedy McEwen (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 19:07:48 EDT)
Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Alan Browne (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 11:17:13 EDT)

Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Oliver Kunze (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 13:30:15 EDT)
Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED RSD99 (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 21:53:11 EDT)

Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Bart van der Wolf (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 09:29:24 EDT)

Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED ThomasH (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 03:17:15 EDT)

Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED RSD99 (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 12:37:26 EDT)

Re: Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED Don (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 11:35:26 EDT)
Re: Olympus RC vs Rollei 35 karl.kathy (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 23:38:04 EDT)

Re: Olympus RC vs Rollei 35 Sabineellen (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 00:43:30 EDT)

Re: Olympus RC vs Rollei 35 Borghesia (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 17:54:41 EDT)

Re: Olympus RC vs Rollei 35 Phil Tobias (Tue Jun 15 2004 - 22:54:44 EDT)
Re: Best P&S under $300? TP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:00:42 EDT)

Re: Best P&S under $300? Egrfx63 (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 13:20:22 EDT)

Re: Best P&S under $300? Sabineellen (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 14:52:06 EDT)

Re: Best P&S under $300? David Chien (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 15:00:08 EDT)

Re: Best P&S under $300? Sabineellen (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:26:29 EDT)

Re: Best P&S under $300? TP (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 04:15:35 EDT)
Re: Best P&S under $300? Sabineellen (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 14:29:21 EDT)
Re: Best P&S under $300? TP (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 17:18:40 EDT)

Re: One size fits all, should I? Skip M (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:02:35 EDT)
Re: Upgrade from Nikon FM2 to FM3A? Lewis Lang (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:06:07 EDT)
Re: Opinions on Sigma 170-500mm f/5-6.3? Surfworx Photography (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 20:26:03 EDT)

Re: Opinions on Sigma 170-500mm f/5-6.3? Bernd (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 03:22:01 EDT)
Re: Opinions on Sigma 170-500mm f/5-6.3? Call me what you like (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 04:02:43 EDT)

Re: Opinions on Sigma 170-500mm f/5-6.3? TP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:05:02 EDT)
Re: Opinions on Sigma 170-500mm f/5-6.3? Bernd (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 14:49:55 EDT)

Re: Cleaning Leatherette Jeremy (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 21:27:37 EDT)
Re: 24-120mm 3.5-5.6 VR TP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:53:57 EDT)

Re: 24-120mm 3.5-5.6 VR David Ruether (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 11:25:15 EDT)

Re: OT - David Ruether Bill Davis (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 19:13:49 EDT)
Re: OT - David Ruether EDGY01 (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 22:47:06 EDT)
Re: OT - David Ruether fabrizio (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 09:18:22 EDT)
Re: OT - David Ruether 123 (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 10:32:37 EDT)
Re: [OT Troll] Re: MELTDOWN: Lionel Loses His Marbles ! Walter Sickert (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:51:40 EDT)

Re: [OT Troll] Re: MELTDOWN: Lionel Loses His Marbles ! ± (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 05:11:34 EDT)

Re: MELTDOWN: Lionel Loses His Marbles ! Walter Sickert (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:51:39 EDT)

Re: MELTDOWN: Lionel Loses His Marbles ! ± (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 05:13:03 EDT)

Re: MELTDOWN: Lionel Loses His Marbles ! Meat-->Plow (Tue Jun 15 2004 - 07:53:21 EDT)
Re: MELTDOWN: Lionel Loses His Marbles ! Walter Sickert (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:51:39 EDT)
Re: [OT Troll] Some questions for Steve Young. Steve Young (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 20:48:30 EDT)

Re: [OT Troll] Some questions for Steve Young. Mike (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 21:22:57 EDT)

Re: [OT Troll] Some questions for Steve Young. Richard Cockburn (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 21:38:42 EDT)

Re: [OT Troll] Some questions for Steve Young. Steve Young (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 14:07:26 EDT)
Re: [OT Troll] Some questions for Steve Young. Orville Wright (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 01:32:21 EDT)
Re: KEH Camera Brokers Mark G. (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 21:06:07 EDT)
Re: Leica M Ted Azito (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 19:57:49 EDT)
Re: Leica M Lewis Lang (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:27:33 EDT)

Re: Leica M EDGY01 (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 22:44:40 EDT)

Re: Leica M Lewis Lang (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 03:43:49 EDT)

Re: Leica M Barney (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 15:28:39 EDT)

Re: Leica M Barney (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 16:10:50 EDT)

Re: Leica M TP (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 17:20:51 EDT)

Re: Leica M TP (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 18:21:01 EDT)

Re: Nikon D1 Digital Equipment Deathwalker (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 18:12:04 EDT)
Re: Nikon D1 Digital Equipment Deathwalker (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 18:10:09 EDT)
Re: Steve Kramer Data Steve Kramer (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 07:11:39 EDT)

Re: Steve Kramer Data Lionel (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 07:49:27 EDT)

Re: Tony Spadaro Data Leslie (Sun Jun 13 2004 - 23:56:29 EDT)
Re: Can existing film equipments be used for digital erra? Barney (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 15:14:36 EDT)
Re: Instructions needed for a Nikon Lens Paddleman (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 08:19:25 EDT)

Re: Instructions needed for a Nikon Lens Jeroen Wenting (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 15:14:36 EDT)

Re: Instructions needed for a Nikon Lens Patco (Sat Jun 12 2004 - 09:58:29 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Toby (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:51:09 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 10:57:30 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:30:35 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:56:53 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Toby (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 20:00:13 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 05:41:02 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 10:47:18 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Toby (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 11:15:27 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 11:43:41 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 19:26:05 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 10:21:23 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 23:50:05 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 18:18:33 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Rata Rioja (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 18:39:11 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t nappy (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 12:18:15 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations--bullsh*t Bill Fright (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 13:03:38 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations Toby (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 10:35:15 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations FLY135 (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 10:49:48 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations Rata Rioja (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:26:32 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! Toby (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 10:42:16 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! Rata Rioja (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:29:49 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! nappy (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 10:21:23 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! Rata Rioja (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 23:41:41 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! nappy (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 18:18:34 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! Rata Rioja (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 18:38:23 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! nappy (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 12:19:03 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! John McWilliams (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 17:37:07 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! Gary P (Fri Jun 25 2004 - 19:13:13 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! Rata Rioja (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 01:27:46 EDT)
[OT]- IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! John McWilliams (Sun Jun 27 2004 - 11:23:52 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! FLY135 (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 09:46:54 EDT)
[OT] IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! John McWilliams (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 11:46:31 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! Gary P (Mon Jun 28 2004 - 19:02:42 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED -- NOT!!!!!! FLY135 (Tue Jun 15 2004 - 09:15:07 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations Toby (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 10:48:21 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations FLY135 (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 10:52:30 EDT)

Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations John (Sun Jun 13 2004 - 03:44:41 EDT)
Re: OT - IRAQ WMD CONFIRMED by United Nations Hasta (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 14:50:40 EDT)
Re: what hobbies are complementary to photography? Barney (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 20:25:23 EDT)
Re: Battery for Pentac Spotmatic Jeremy (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 21:43:48 EDT)
Re: Cameras at Reagan Funeral Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:10:03 EDT)

Re: Cameras at Reagan Funeral Steve Andrew (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:21:32 EDT)
Re: Cameras at Reagan Funeral Rick (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 20:20:45 EDT)

Re: Question about shooting nudes Barney (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 20:33:04 EDT)
Re: What's the "leica look"? Barney (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 16:04:48 EDT)
Re: What's the "leica look"? TP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:28:45 EDT)
Re: What's the "leica look"? Lewis Lang (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:37:04 EDT)

Re: What's the "leica look"? TP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:13:19 EDT)

Re: What's the "leica look"? Lewis Lang (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 23:40:41 EDT)

Re: What's the "leica look"? Lewis Lang (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:29:19 EDT)
Re: What's the "leica look"? Lewis Lang (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:48:30 EDT)
Re: What's the "leica look"? Lewis Lang (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:50:13 EDT)

Re: What's the "leica look"? Gordon Moat (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:23:51 EDT)

Re: What's the "leica look"? Lewis Lang (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 03:14:28 EDT)

Re: What's the "leica look"? Chris Loffredo (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 04:31:33 EDT)
Re: What's the "leica look"? Mxsmanic (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:17:36 EDT)

Re: What's the "leica look"? Chris Loffredo (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 18:18:07 EDT)

Re: What's the "leica look"? TP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 05:32:20 EDT)

Re: What's the "leica look"? Chris Loffredo (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 03:18:53 EDT)

Re: What's the "leica look"? TP (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 04:33:14 EDT)

Re: What's the "leica look"? brian (Fri Jun 18 2004 - 14:09:56 EDT)
Re: What's the "leica look"? Tim (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 00:54:42 EDT)
Re: What's the "leica look"? Chris Loffredo (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 04:03:25 EDT)
Re: What's the "leica look"? brian (Sat Jun 19 2004 - 12:43:41 EDT)

Leica Flamboasting Held to Standard of Proof Ted Azito (Sun Jun 20 2004 - 20:42:38 EDT)

Re: Leica Flamboasting Held to Standard of Proof Michael Scarpitti (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 10:59:37 EDT)

Re: Leica Flamboasting Held to Standard of Proof Ted Azito (Mon Jun 21 2004 - 21:11:17 EDT)

Re: Leica Flamboasting Held to Standard of Proof brian (Tue Jun 22 2004 - 18:43:40 EDT)

Re: What's the "leica look"? Collin Brendemuehl (Wed Jun 09 2004 - 07:53:41 EDT)
Re: ELECTION: thoughts of a JFK/McCain ticket? Mike Engles (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:45:43 EDT)
Re: [SI] Bowser's Funny Shot Bowzre (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 07:15:05 EDT)

Re: [SI] Bowser's Funny Shot Alan Browne (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 13:14:26 EDT)

Spadaro Finally Says Something Un-Nonsensical Ted Azito (Wed Jun 16 2004 - 20:19:18 EDT)

Re: Spadaro Finally Says Something Un-Nonsensical TP (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 06:25:07 EDT)

Re: Spadaro Finally Says Something Un-Nonsensical Ted Azito (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:31:10 EDT)

Re: Leica dealers "selling more Leicas than ever"! Barney (Wed Jun 09 2004 - 01:57:54 EDT)
Re: why do digital supporters compare it to digitized film? Mike Henley (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 00:11:37 EDT)

Re: why do digital supporters compare it to digitized film? Lionel (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 02:13:19 EDT)

Re: why do digital supporters compare it to digitized film? Sabineellen (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 02:52:13 EDT)

Re: why do digital supporters compare it to digitized film? David J. Littleboy (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 03:07:28 EDT)
Re: why do digital supporters compare it to digitized film? Lionel (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 03:43:23 EDT)
Re: why do digital supporters compare it to digitized film? Alan Browne (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 12:45:24 EDT)

Re: why do digital supporters compare it to digitized film? Ron Hunter (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 04:15:44 EDT)
Re: why do digital supporters compare it to digitized film? Mark Weaver (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 08:00:35 EDT)

Re: why do digital supporters compare it to digitized film? Brian C.Baird (Thu Jun 17 2004 - 09:45:42 EDT)

Last message date: Mon Jun 28 2004 - 22:52:32 EDT
Archived on: Fri Sep 24 2004 - 17:37:34 EDT

488 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Previous Folder, Thread view Next Folder, Thread view List of Folders