rec.photo.equipment.35mm: By Thread

rec.photo.equipment.35mm: By Thread

477 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Previous Folder, Thread view | Next Folder, Thread view | List of Folders

Starting: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:51:39 EST
Ending: Tue Apr 06 2004 - 06:08:01 EDT

Ever hear of Garry's Camera Repair? Bob Huckleby (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 16:04:09 EST)

Re: Handicapped Professionals - Question Doug Payne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:40:36 EST)
Re: Handicapped Professionals - Question Paul Schmidt (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 20:36:24 EST)
Re: Handicapped Professionals - Question Dallas (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 09:32:17 EST)

Re: Handicapped Professionals - Question Dallas (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 05:27:46 EST)

Re: Handicapped Professionals - Question Chris (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 11:25:00 EST)

FS: 77 GE FLASHCUBES, NOS, $20 + Postage RLucch2098 (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:12:04 EST)

Re: FS: more spam dslr (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:28:05 EST)

Re: 77 GE FLASHCUBES, NOS, $20 + Postage Tony Spadaro (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 13:02:00 EST)

Re: 77 GE FLASHCUBES, NOS, $20 + Postage Steve Young (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 13:41:22 EST)

Re: 77 GE FLASHCUBES, NOS, $20 + Postage William Graham (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:50:53 EST)
Cameras in Movies Philip Hiscock (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 09:14:20 EST)
Cell phone cameras help catch crooks Mxsmanic (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 01:50:20 EST)
closeup-up photography : accessories SKR (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 01:34:05 EST)
Model Release Form Mike Smith (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 01:24:27 EST)

Re: Model Release Form William Graham (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 01:48:20 EST)
Re: Model Release Form TP (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:10:56 EST)
Re: Model Release Form Mike Smith (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 14:06:35 EST)

Re: Model Release Form Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 15:12:26 EST)

Re: Model Release Form z-one-b (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 16:24:48 EST)
Re: Model Release Form Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 16:47:31 EST)
Re: Model Release Form Mike Smith (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 18:23:38 EST)
Re: Model Release Form Alan Browne (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 20:17:04 EST)

Re: PING - Al Denelsbeck Al Denelsbeck (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:50:37 EST)

Re: PING - Al Denelsbeck Matt Clara (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 22:33:46 EST)

SORRY (FS) WRONG NG Joe (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:03:10 EST)

Re: SORRY (FS) WRONG NG Bowzah (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:39:48 EST)

Minolta -2 for Maxxum $3 Joe (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:00:49 EST)

Re: Minolta -2 for Maxxum $3 Joe (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:01:30 EST)

FS :Tamron B5FH Hood Joe (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:57:22 EST)
FS Minolta 200mm MC Joe (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:54:58 EST)
Photodo MTF charts - workaround. Alan Browne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:50:37 EST)

Re: Photodo MTF charts - workaround. Bowzah (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:40:28 EST)

Re: Photodo MTF charts - workaround. Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:33:11 EST)

color management software The Dave© (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:25:31 EST)

Re: color management software Mike Lipphardt (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:31:26 EST)

Re: color management software The Dave© (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:49:00 EST)

Re: color management software Mike Lipphardt (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:58:59 EST)
Re: color management software Alan Browne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:00:27 EST)
Re: color management software Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:43:07 EST)
Re: color management software Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:55:12 EST)
Re: color management software Tony Parkinson (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 11:04:55 EST)
Re: color management software Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 11:48:22 EST)

Re: color management software Tony (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 13:32:11 EST)
Very basic color management question The Dave© (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:41:56 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question Flycaster (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:52:56 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question John Navas (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:08:44 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question Flycaster (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:31:32 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question The Dave© (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:48:16 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question John Navas (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:45:40 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question Flycaster (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:51:37 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question John Navas (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:07:45 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question Ron Hunter (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:09:03 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question John Navas (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:28:33 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question Ron Hunter (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:02:38 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question John Navas (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:14:12 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question Rudy Garcia (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:24:34 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question m II (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 22:42:56 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question William D. Tallman (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:47:18 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question Ron Hunter (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:09:31 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question The Dave© (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 01:06:51 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question Rudy Garcia (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:00:03 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question David J Taylor (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 03:57:23 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question Ron Hunter (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:08:57 EST)
Re: Very basic color management question John Navas (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 23:04:05 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question Mike Lipphardt (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:01:13 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question The Dave© (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:25:31 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question Mike Lipphardt (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:26:14 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question mark_digital (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:04:36 EST)

[SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Alan Browne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:35:26 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Paolo Pizzi (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:55:24 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 11:18:08 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Paolo Pizzi (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 19:58:28 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Alan Browne (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 10:12:16 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments jimkramer (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 18:42:03 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments street shooter (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:05:56 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Alan Browne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:47:21 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments ian green (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:51:42 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Al Denelsbeck (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:59:30 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Rich Pos (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 02:26:19 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:24:28 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:51:55 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Rich Pos (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 00:33:40 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments -attn: Rich Pos Alan Browne (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 13:38:42 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments -attn: Rich Pos Rich Pos (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 15:13:23 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments -attn: Rich Pos Alan Browne (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 15:20:28 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments -attn: Rich Pos Rich Pos (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 15:40:02 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:12:12 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Paolo Pizzi (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 20:01:38 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Paolo Pizzi (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 19:59:54 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Simon Stanmore (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 19:36:25 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Alan Browne (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 10:22:45 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Dallas (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 09:32:20 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Simon Stanmore (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 14:38:34 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments jimkramer (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 09:31:45 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Alan Browne (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 10:20:32 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Paolo Pizzi (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 14:22:56 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Alan Browne (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 16:26:46 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Charlie Dilks (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 21:34:19 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Alan Browne (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 22:20:03 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Paolo Pizzi (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 16:12:40 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Alan Browne (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 17:06:40 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments Paolo Pizzi (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 21:02:46 EST)

Erwin Puts Praises Canon???? Jeremy (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:59:43 EST)

Re: Erwin Puts Praises Canon???? Paul Schmidt (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:17:06 EST)

Re: Manfrotto QR on Kirk King Cobra and Wimberley? Bill Hilton (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:58:36 EST)
Re: Manfrotto QR on Kirk King Cobra and Wimberley? Scott Elliot (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:13:20 EST)

Ping: Anyone who might try to reach me... Al Denelsbeck (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:14:09 EST)
OT Is Tony S involved in this? >>>The root of all *EVIL*<<< m II (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:51:15 EST)

Re: OT Is Tony S involved in this? >>>The root of all *EVIL*<<< Alan Browne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:49:11 EST)
>>>The root of all *EVIL*<<< ? Steve Young (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:53:11 EST)
Re: OT Is Tony S involved in this? >>>The root of all *EVIL*<<< Alan D-W (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:00:01 EST)

Re: OT Is Tony S involved in this? >>>The root of all *EVIL*<<< m II (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:27:15 EST)

Re: OT Is Tony S involved in this? >>>The root of all *EVIL*<<< Deathwalker (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:14:25 EST)

Re: OT Is Tony S involved in this? >>>The root of all *EVIL*<<< Tony Parkinson (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:51:47 EST)
Re: OT Is Tony S involved in this? >>>The root of all *EVIL*<<< Alan D-W (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:53:34 EST)

Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Alan F Cross (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:00:25 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Snowman (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:40:36 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Alan F Cross (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:12:02 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance PhotoMan (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 10:18:56 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Chris Brown (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 10:28:34 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance BG250 (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:49:00 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Chris Brown (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:31:18 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Lewis Lang (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:18:57 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Skip M (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:36:33 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:25:12 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Snowman (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 10:04:18 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Alan F Cross (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 10:20:36 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:57:38 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Mark M (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 20:20:25 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Bruce Graham (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 03:26:35 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance columbotrek (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:38:22 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Doug Kanter (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 12:40:58 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Doug Kanter (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 12:42:50 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Alan F Cross (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:45:56 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Patrick L. (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:32:36 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:59:29 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance John Navas (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:39:42 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance John (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:15:11 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 18:02:29 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance columbotrek (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:05:06 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance John Navas (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:50:10 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance brian (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 14:26:34 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance John Navas (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 23:01:18 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance brian (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 14:27:31 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance John Navas (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 17:28:22 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance brian (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 22:11:37 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance John Navas (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 23:46:19 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance John Navas (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 00:09:17 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Lewis Lang (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 04:17:43 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance brian (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 11:35:41 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Lewis Lang (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 12:54:58 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance brian (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 17:02:12 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Lewis Lang (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 03:53:22 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance brian (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 14:10:04 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Lewis Lang (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 18:10:35 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance brian (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 06:55:34 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Lewis Lang (Sun Mar 28 2004 - 22:57:12 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Rico Tudor (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 02:32:11 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance brian (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 07:58:14 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Alan Browne (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 10:53:44 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance John Navas (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 11:57:30 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance brian (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 14:32:12 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance Alan Browne (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 16:24:35 EST)
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance brian (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 22:22:30 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance TP (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:09:07 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance brian (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 14:24:50 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance brian (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 14:31:39 EST)

Test, ignore Al Denelsbeck (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 07:31:34 EST)

Re: Test, ignore Mike Lipphardt (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:06:18 EST)

[SI] - Annika/Bret, Received my entry? parv (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 23:53:34 EST)
Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Patrick L. (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:19:04 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Chris (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 00:03:04 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Tom Thackrey (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 01:16:04 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:50:11 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Gordon Moat (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:21:02 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:49:05 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Patrick L. (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:37:03 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:16:47 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:27:22 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Matt Clara (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:56:08 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Mike Lipphardt (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 07:31:04 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:09:14 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Mike Lipphardt (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:30:21 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:04:48 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Peter Chant (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:08:19 EST)
6.059 *****SPAM***** Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Michael (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 07:15:42 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... William Graham (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 22:30:09 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Chris (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:00:34 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 13:29:30 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 14:19:46 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Mxsmanic (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 15:07:27 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Dallas (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 06:48:35 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Bob Hickey (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 07:35:30 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Matt Clara (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:57:49 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:20:06 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Bandicoot (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:20:38 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:46:28 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:05:14 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Bandicoot (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:38:50 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Mxsmanic (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 00:51:44 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Bandicoot (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 07:14:02 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Matt Clara (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:36:21 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Mxsmanic (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 12:41:00 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Bandicoot (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 20:34:04 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Alan Browne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 12:01:45 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Andrew Koenig (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:45:49 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Roger Halstead (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 20:27:51 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... McLeod (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:13:08 EST)
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... Ed E. (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:30:23 EST)

Free online photo album Ron (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:24:34 EST)
Kodak/Canon SLR Skip M (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:19:21 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Bill Hilton (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:35:11 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Skip M (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:44:21 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Gordon Moat (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:12:57 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Skip M (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:46:57 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Gordon Moat (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:06:53 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 05:24:29 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Bill Tuthill (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:46:59 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Martin Francis (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:57:48 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Bill Hilton (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:03:46 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Martin Francis (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:14:58 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Lisa Horton (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 01:22:53 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Dallas (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 09:32:20 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Dallas (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 09:32:16 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Skip M (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:16:47 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Skip M (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:54:03 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR TP (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:03:59 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Lewis Lang (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:35:23 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Lewis Lang (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 01:47:12 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR TP (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:03:17 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Skip M (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 09:47:25 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Lewis Lang (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:32:17 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Skip M (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 19:26:04 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Lewis Lang (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 17:36:43 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Martin Francis (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 17:46:19 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Lewis Lang (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 18:42:42 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Martin Francis (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 18:48:32 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Lewis Lang (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 04:32:22 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Skip M (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 17:46:57 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Lewis Lang (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 18:41:26 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Bob Hickey (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 18:15:18 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Alan Browne (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 19:56:02 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Lewis Lang (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 02:34:29 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR William Graham (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 03:15:09 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Paul Schmidt (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 08:36:46 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Gordon Moat (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 13:32:22 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Lewis Lang (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 23:35:09 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Deathwalker (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 19:03:16 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Bob Hickey (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 11:12:04 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Doug Payne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:31:28 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:47:14 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Martin Francis (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:24:00 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Tony Spadaro (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:53:57 EST)
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR TP (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:06:16 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR Tony Spadaro (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:52:31 EST)

bw photos more ian green (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 11:25:01 EST)
Fix for Canon AE-1 shutter "creak"? Bob Martin (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:32:47 EST)

Re: Fix for Canon AE-1 shutter "creak"? PhotoMan (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:47:25 EST)

Tamron SP 17-35mm Di vs. Canon EF 17-40mm L creak (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:42:29 EST)
Who uses a Canon F1? Dallas (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:03:29 EST)

Re: Who uses a Canon F1? PhotoMan (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:05:04 EST)
Re: Who uses a Canon F1? Joseph Kewfi (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:13:57 EST)

Re: Who uses a Canon F1? Chris (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:30:24 EST)

Re: Who uses a Canon F1? PhotoMan (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:56:45 EST)
Re: Who uses a Canon F1? Chris (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:05:02 EST)
Re: Who uses a Canon F1? PhotoMan (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:13:16 EST)
Re: Who uses a Canon F1? Drew Saunders (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 17:11:39 EST)
Re: Who uses a Canon F1? PhotoMan (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:50:21 EST)

Re: Who uses a Canon F1? Jim Phelps (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 17:00:42 EST)

Re: Who uses a Canon F1? Dallas (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 23:47:31 EST)

Traveling Photo Equipment Ian Brown (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:02:12 EST)

Re: Traveling Photo Equipment Chris (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:37:28 EST)

Re: Traveling Photo Equipment Ian Brown (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:30:12 EST)

Re: Traveling Photo Equipment Howie Axelrod (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:28:01 EST)

Re: Traveling Photo Equipment Bandicoot (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 07:10:03 EST)

Re: Traveling Photo Equipment Ian Brown (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 10:09:03 EST)
Re: Traveling Photo Equipment Chris (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 11:36:34 EST)

Re: Traveling Photo Equipment Chris (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 11:28:38 EST)
Re: Traveling Photo Equipment ROBMURR (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 13:40:18 EST)

Re: Leica R and Leicaflex John J (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:24:23 EST)
Re: Leica R and Leicaflex Drew Saunders (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:50:51 EST)
Re: Bowser Bowzah (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:36:34 EST)

Re: Bowser Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:11:51 EST)

Re: Bowser Dallas (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 23:47:33 EST)

Re: Bowser Bowzah (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 16:52:41 EST)
Re: Bowser Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:12:31 EST)
Re: Bowser Bowzah (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 11:33:43 EST)
Re: Bowser Alan Browne (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 12:12:34 EST)

Re: Bowser Annika1980 (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 23:56:26 EST)

Re: Canon Service - Where? ROBMURR (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:43:08 EST)

Re: Canon Service - Where? Bob Huckleby (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 22:26:19 EST)

Re: Besseler Super D question Ron Andrews (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:47:34 EST)
Re: For CD cover use slide or print film? Bandicoot (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:33:03 EST)

Re: For CD cover use slide or print film? Lewis Lang (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:17:43 EST)

Re: For CD cover use slide or print film? Bandicoot (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 09:09:53 EST)

Re: For CD cover use slide or print film? Lewis Lang (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 17:50:34 EST)
Re: For CD cover use slide or print film? Bandicoot (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 20:41:51 EST)
Re: For CD cover use slide or print film? Lewis Lang (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 23:22:01 EST)

Re: For CD cover use slide or print film? Joseph Meehan (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 04:51:45 EST)
Re: [SI] No Comments ! Annika1980 (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:54:21 EST)
Re: Canon Rebel TI only 16months!? David Chien (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:18:49 EST)
Re: Canon Rebel TI only 16months!? Bob Hickey (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:53:50 EST)
Re: Photoshop in propaganda use Chris (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 07:20:09 EST)
Re: Photoshop in propaganda use DM (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 00:32:28 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - 'Held Together' Comments ian green (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:56:45 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - 'Held Together' Comments Joseph Kewfi (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:04:55 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - 'Held Together' Comments Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:13:29 EST)
Re: [SI] XXIV - 'Held Together' Comments Annika1980 (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:59:49 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - 'Held Together' Comments Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:10:38 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - 'Held Together' Comments Simon Stanmore (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 14:44:20 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - 'Held Together' Comments Joseph Kewfi (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:01:07 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - 'Held Together' Comments street shooter (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 05:07:48 EST)
Re: help select camera for scientific use. Martin Francis (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:35:24 EST)
Re: Anyone help with flash photography at events Gordon Moat (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:41:37 EST)
Re: Anyone help with flash photography at events Patrick L. (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 14:34:14 EST)
Re: Anyone help with flash photography at events Patrick L. (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 14:31:45 EST)

Re: Anyone help with flash photography at events McLeod (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:16:06 EST)

Re: Anyone help with flash photography at events Bob Hickey (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 14:55:44 EST)

Re: Anyone help with flash photography at events Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:38:41 EST)

Re: Anyone help with flash photography at events Bob Hickey (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:39:16 EST)

Re: Anyone help with flash photography at events Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:06:09 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:38:58 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Matt Clara (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:26:16 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:43:39 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? brian (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 05:03:25 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:01:50 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? brian (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:19:04 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:46:31 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? William Graham (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:23:20 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Matt Clara (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:37:24 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? ian green (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:46:11 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Chris (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 09:21:51 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:40:16 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Chris (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:14:42 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:47:14 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? brian (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 05:18:44 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:10:39 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? brian (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:39:54 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Chris (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:33:46 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:54:19 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Chris (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:04:30 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:02:46 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:52:25 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Matt Clara (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:49:37 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:54:45 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Matt Clara (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:39:31 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Chris (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:03:03 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Chris (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:16:51 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:59:55 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Matt Clara (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:43:21 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Chris (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:13:19 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? William Graham (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:38:38 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Chris (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:47:20 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Chris (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 07:54:08 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mike Lipphardt (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:05:16 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Peter Irwin (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:57:10 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Chris (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:19:31 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Peter Irwin (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:40:19 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Chris (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:46:36 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:05:16 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? William Graham (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:38:38 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Chris (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:48:36 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? The Dave© (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 23:07:31 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Bob Hickey (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 08:09:50 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Chris (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:24:26 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:07:28 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Chris (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:06:15 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Morris Coleman (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:14:48 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? The Dave© (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:20:59 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:47:33 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? brian (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 05:22:30 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:12:19 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? brian (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:41:15 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:08:01 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Matt Clara (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:41:28 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Alan Browne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:57:47 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? William Graham (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:44:34 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Matt Clara (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:46:00 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Nikkorguy (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:17:25 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:03:46 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Alan Browne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:23:18 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Nikkorguy (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:11:38 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? William Graham (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:48:03 EST)

5.259 *****SPAM***** Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Michael (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:11:27 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:47:52 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? brian (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 05:27:45 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:15:21 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Matt Clara (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:47:24 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Alan Browne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:26:04 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Chris (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:15:17 EST)
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Alan Browne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:03:40 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? William Graham (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:53:19 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? brian (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:52:04 EST)
6.059 *****SPAM***** Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Michael (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 20:01:49 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? Andrew Price (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 14:50:30 EST)
Re: OT - A toast to ye! Andrew Eremin (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:09:06 EST)

Re: OT - A toast to ye! Chris B (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:56:15 EST)

Re: OT - A toast to ye! William Graham (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:26:57 EST)
Re: OT - A toast to ye! Bandicoot (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 10:45:15 EST)

Re: OT - A toast to ye! Matt Clara (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:46:49 EST)

Re: OT - A toast to ye! Bandicoot (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:08:39 EST)
Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm Lewis Lang (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:50:52 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm Bill Tuthill (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:08:37 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm Alan Browne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:57:40 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm David Kilpatrick (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:03:04 EST)
Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm Deathwalker (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:14:45 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm David Kilpatrick (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:00:05 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:20:54 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm David Kilpatrick (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 05:21:38 EST)
Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm David Kilpatrick (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 05:22:36 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm Deathwalker (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 15:37:36 EST)
Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:28:00 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm Lewis Lang (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:49:09 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm Deathwalker (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:10:30 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:34:06 EST)

Re: camera buy recommedation Martin Francis (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 18:45:38 EST)

Re: camera buy recommedation Lewis Lang (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:13:35 EST)

Re: camera buy recommedation Martin Francis (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 07:31:28 EST)

Re: camera buy recommedation Lewis Lang (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 16:54:31 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Jeremy (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 17:23:47 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Lewis Lang (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 18:18:34 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Bandicoot (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 21:01:36 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Lewis Lang (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 22:49:42 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Paul Schmidt (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 22:24:37 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Rich Pos (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 22:58:49 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Tony Parkinson (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 01:29:04 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Bandicoot (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 23:07:58 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Alan Browne (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 09:49:40 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Lewis Lang (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 22:52:47 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Paul Schmidt (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 09:08:07 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Lewis Lang (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 12:42:26 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Alan Browne (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 13:14:18 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation William Graham (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 00:42:09 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Alan Browne (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 09:47:33 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Paul Schmidt (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 11:05:31 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Alan Browne (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 12:51:20 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Paul Schmidt (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 13:47:06 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Alan Browne (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 14:28:11 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Paul Schmidt (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 23:17:12 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Alan Browne (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 10:15:27 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Paul Schmidt (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 13:16:27 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Jeremy (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 15:14:13 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Alan Browne (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 10:07:18 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Martin Francis (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 19:17:39 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Alan Browne (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 19:43:12 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Tony Parkinson (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 01:37:43 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation TP (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 05:04:28 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Alan Browne (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 10:53:09 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Bandicoot (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 23:16:09 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Paul Schmidt (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 23:31:35 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Alan Browne (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 10:45:19 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Paul Schmidt (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 11:12:56 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Mike Lipphardt (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 11:50:36 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Paul Schmidt (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 12:05:44 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Nick C (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 18:52:01 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Alan Browne (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 19:22:23 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Paul Schmidt (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 22:54:53 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Nick C (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 01:10:53 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation William Graham (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 19:17:59 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Alan Browne (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 11:31:03 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Mike Lipphardt (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 11:36:13 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation William Graham (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 17:33:10 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Alan Browne (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 17:50:23 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation William Graham (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 19:27:26 EST)
Re: camera buy recommedation Bandicoot (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 23:05:54 EST)

Re: camera buy recommedation DJA (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 10:25:11 EST)
Re: Tamron 17-35 f/2.8-4 or Sigma 17-35 f/2.8-4? Martin Francis (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:05:29 EST)
Re: *Digital Photography Help* Fletis Humplebacker (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:10:30 EST)
Re: What age for kids to start? Bandicoot (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 07:19:28 EST)
Re: What age for kids to start? Al Denelsbeck (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 17:57:46 EST)
Re: T70 and 199A HLim371292 (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:39:53 EST)
Re: FA TONS of SPAM Great Deal of ebay crap! RLucch2098 (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 09:44:26 EST)

Re: FA TONS of SPAM Great Deal of ebay crap! LEDMRVM (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 15:51:11 EST)
Re: FA TONS of SPAM Great Deal of ebay crap! Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 16:37:49 EST)

Re: FA TONS of SPAM Great Deal of ebay crap! Steve Young (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:06:15 EST)

Re: FA TONS of SPAM Great Deal of ebay crap! dslr (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:10:22 EST)
Re: FA TONS of SPAM Great Deal of ebay crap! Lisa Horton (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:19:35 EST)
Re: FA TONS of SPAM Great Deal of ebay crap! Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:28:45 EST)
Re: FA TONS of SPAM Great Deal of ebay crap! Steve Young (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 07:33:56 EST)

Re: FA: ARGUS MODEL M BAKELITE CAMERA, ART-DECO, 1939, DM (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 01:09:07 EST)
Re: FA: ARGUS MODEL M BAKELITE CAMERA, ART-DECO, 1939, Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 09:55:49 EST)

Re: FA: ARGUS MODEL M BAKELITE CAMERA, ART-DECO, 1939, RLucch2098 (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:00:05 EST)

Re: FA: ARGUS MODEL M BAKELITE CAMERA, ART-DECO, 1939, Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:13:04 EST)
Re: FA: ARGUS MODEL M BAKELITE CAMERA, ART-DECO, 1939, Tony Spadaro (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 13:05:08 EST)

Re: FA: ARGUS MODEL M BAKELITE CAMERA, ART-DECO, 1939, Steve Young (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 13:32:47 EST)

Re: FA: ARGUS MODEL M BAKELITE CAMERA, ART-DECO, 1939, Steve Young (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 12:13:41 EST)

Re: new analoge pics Nikkorguy (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:50:49 EST)
Re: new analoge pics Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 14:59:06 EST)
Re: new analoge pics Matt Clara (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:59:38 EST)

Re: new analoge pics Alan Browne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:44:15 EST)

Re: new analoge pics Douglas MacDonald (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 16:11:18 EST)

Re: new analoge pics Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:01:45 EST)

Re: new analoge pics William Graham (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:29:55 EST)

Re: new analoge pics Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:39:47 EST)
Re: new analoge pics Phil Stripling (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 00:33:44 EST)

Re: new analoge pics m II (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 15:42:42 EST)
Re: Anti-halation backing Nikkorguy (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:21:46 EST)
Re: Anti-halation backing Deathwalker (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 14:09:03 EST)
Re: [SI] Clever manipulation Paolo Pizzi (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:37:49 EST)

Re: [SI] Clever manipulation Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:11:19 EST)

Re: [SI] Clever manipulation Paolo Pizzi (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 19:53:41 EST)

Re: [SI] Clever manipulation Steve Young (Sun Mar 28 2004 - 08:18:31 EST)

Re: [SI] Clever manipulation Dallas (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 13:44:54 EST)
Re: [SI] Clever manipulation Paolo Pizzi (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:51:10 EST)
Re: Kodak T-Max P3200 film development Roger Halstead (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 03:54:41 EST)
Re: Tamrac "Adaptall" lenses? TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 05:01:12 EST)

Re: Tamrac "Adaptall" lenses? Tony Parkinson (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:31:28 EST)

Re: Any one here bought a P&S digital camera? Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:38:29 EST)
Re: Faulty F-stop reading TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:59:42 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! William Graham (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 23:18:19 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Roger Halstead (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:50:24 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! William Graham (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 22:26:59 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Roger Halstead (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 03:39:26 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! William Graham (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:08:17 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Neil Harrington (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 08:42:08 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! William Graham (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:37:24 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Neil Harrington (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 19:49:22 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Alan Browne (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 10:21:15 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! William Graham (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 21:54:32 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! William Graham (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 22:14:49 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! William Graham (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 23:43:04 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Paolo Pizzi (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 21:26:40 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! William Graham (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 00:13:10 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Roger Halstead (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 02:59:17 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Whatabout criminals Morris Coleman (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 11:20:10 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Whatabout criminals Neil Harrington (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 14:44:42 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Whatabout criminals Paolo Pizzi (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 15:31:55 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Whatabout criminals William Graham (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 23:53:25 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Whatabout criminals Paolo Pizzi (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 16:24:11 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Whatabout criminals William Graham (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 17:48:45 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Whatabout criminals Paolo Pizzi (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 21:07:39 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Whatabout criminals William Graham (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 22:05:13 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Whatabout criminals Paolo Pizzi (Sun Mar 28 2004 - 15:45:00 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Whatabout criminals Neil Harrington (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 13:36:26 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Whatabout criminals Nick C (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 22:58:22 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Whatabout criminals McLeod (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 06:51:23 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Whatabout criminals Nick C (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 18:02:45 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Whatabout criminals Nick C (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 12:51:42 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Whatabout criminals Paolo Pizzi (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 16:29:20 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Neil Harrington (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 14:23:33 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! William Graham (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 22:26:59 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Neil Harrington (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 14:15:52 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! William Graham (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:01:12 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Neil Harrington (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 19:50:54 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! William Graham (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 00:37:57 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Paolo Pizzi (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:06:22 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Mike (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:25:52 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Mike (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:08:41 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! brian (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 17:47:29 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Paolo Pizzi (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:17:23 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Neil Harrington (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:21:40 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Paolo Pizzi (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:13:35 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Neil Harrington (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:41:06 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Mike Lipphardt (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:02:55 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Neil Harrington (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 18:14:55 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! William Graham (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 22:26:59 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Paolo Pizzi (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:27:22 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Neil Harrington (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:33:17 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! William Graham (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:41:47 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Paolo Pizzi (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:26:00 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Neil Harrington (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 11:01:06 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! William Graham (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:20:27 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Roger Halstead (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 19:40:44 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Nick C (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 02:33:21 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Alan Browne (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 11:20:15 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Nick C (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 23:24:05 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Alan Browne (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 10:39:16 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Nick C (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 18:36:24 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Alan Browne (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 19:43:11 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! William Graham (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 21:34:04 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Nick C (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 23:35:13 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Neil Harrington (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 10:01:38 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Paolo Pizzi (Sun Mar 28 2004 - 15:41:01 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Nick C (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 03:07:21 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Neil Harrington (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:50:19 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Neil Harrington (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 18:29:19 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Neil Harrington (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 11:02:20 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Paolo Pizzi (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:21:54 EST)
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Neil Harrington (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 11:14:30 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! Nick C (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 02:31:35 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:37:33 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Dallas (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 23:47:34 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Mxsmanic (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 00:50:46 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Dallas (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 08:30:31 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie William Graham (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 16:59:10 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Mxsmanic (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 03:26:49 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie William Graham (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 21:43:29 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Mxsmanic (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 02:18:18 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie William Graham (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 02:57:21 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Mxsmanic (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 04:04:45 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie William Graham (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 23:07:21 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 01:18:32 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie William Graham (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 01:43:57 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 04:18:44 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie William Graham (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 04:32:34 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 04:40:53 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie William Graham (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 03:07:49 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Dallas (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 10:20:32 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Dallas (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 23:55:09 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Martin Francis (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 20:31:40 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:38:17 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:11:01 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 23:08:16 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie William Graham (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 23:36:05 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Alan Browne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:58:39 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie William Graham (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:48:12 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:57:33 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Lewis Lang (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 01:22:54 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie William Graham (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 01:39:19 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie William Graham (Sun Mar 14 2004 - 02:27:02 EST)
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie William Graham (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:45:31 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:55:33 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:56:23 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Mxsmanic (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:00:42 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie Verotel (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:33:23 EST)
Re: Tokina 80-400 II TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:55:36 EST)
Re: Nikon scanner vs. Minolta scanner Alan Browne (Mon Mar 15 2004 - 16:48:40 EST)
Re: [OT] Epson's Digital M solution TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:52:54 EST)
Re: Leica Audio System For Sale Bowzah (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 07:23:11 EST)
Re: Nikon FE /105mm Wm Gardner (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:08:08 EST)
Re: [EQ] Favourite tales of equipment screwups in the field Bandicoot (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:34:44 EST)
Re: Monopod head suggestions? Wm Gardner (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:16:47 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Ray Fischer (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 01:36:41 EST)
Re: The big lie! Foveon is the best so deal with it George Preddy (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 01:53:14 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:40:12 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Skip M (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:38:50 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:43:36 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it George Preddy (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:52:49 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it John Navas (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:58:26 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it George Preddy (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 06:55:55 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Skip M (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 09:43:50 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it John Navas (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 22:35:10 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Alan Browne (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:37:41 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it George Preddy (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 21:59:36 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Skip M (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 01:55:25 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Pepys (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 03:46:22 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Bart van der Wolf (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 07:44:52 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Randall Ainsworth (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 10:18:49 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it John Navas (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 22:36:33 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 12:34:49 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Skip M (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:03:49 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it John Navas (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:40:25 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:48:32 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:07:58 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it David Kilpatrick (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:08:29 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:49:47 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it David Kilpatrick (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:09:34 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it David Kilpatrick (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:00:39 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it John Navas (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:39:30 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it David Kilpatrick (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:17:29 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it John Navas (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:33:09 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Alan Browne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 12:12:46 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it David Kilpatrick (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:28:26 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Alan Browne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:39:14 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it John Navas (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:23:49 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it TP (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 03:57:33 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it David Kilpatrick (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 08:02:43 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it John Navas (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:46:35 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it David Kilpatrick (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:22:59 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Fred A. Miller (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 23:22:18 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:43:57 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:37:44 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it TP (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:42:34 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it John Navas (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:06:26 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Fred A. Miller (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:43:30 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Skip M (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:05:15 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Mark M (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:18:02 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Deathwalker (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:00:10 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it John Navas (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:08:10 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Skip M (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:15:36 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Deathwalker (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:27:17 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Deathwalker (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:36:12 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it John Navas (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:54:12 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Alan Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 23:41:03 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Skip M (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 00:14:40 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Fred A. Miller (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 00:40:37 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Skip M (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:41:21 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Alan Browne (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:50:24 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Deathwalker (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:43:09 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Skip M (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 00:16:23 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it David J. Littleboy (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 00:28:36 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Deathwalker (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:24:56 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it John Navas (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:42:42 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Mark M (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:23:16 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it DM (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 01:41:12 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Ray Fischer (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 01:34:30 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it John Navas (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:42:41 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it David Starr (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 07:56:46 EST)
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it Tony Parkinson (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 08:18:35 EST)
Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters Ray Fischer (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 01:47:45 EST)

Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters Mark M (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:04:28 EST)

Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters George Kerby (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:33:11 EST)
Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters Ray Fischer (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 07:12:47 EST)

Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters William Graham (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 00:13:25 EST)
Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters Ray Fischer (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 01:43:27 EST)

Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters Mark M (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:01:17 EST)

Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters Doug (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 03:01:06 EST)

Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters Mark M (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 03:23:10 EST)
Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters George Kerby (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:43:59 EST)

Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters Ray Fischer (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 07:02:57 EST)

Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters William Graham (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 19:04:05 EST)
Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters George Kerby (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 19:41:01 EST)
Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters Ray Fischer (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 05:12:13 EST)
Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters Alan Browne (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 09:59:22 EST)
Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters Oooopppsssss_at_email.domain.hidden (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 11:17:11 EST)
Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters William Graham (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 16:45:50 EST)
Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters Paolo Pizzi (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 04:11:32 EST)

Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters Ray Fischer (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 05:08:36 EST)

Re: Film vs Digital Photography: THE FINAL DEBATE Dave Haynie (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:43:46 EST)
Re: Minolta Maxxum 5 Verotel (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 12:10:54 EST)
Re: Cat keeps pissing in bag Bob Hickey (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:58:01 EST)

Re: Cat keeps pissing in bag Peter Chant (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:01:56 EST)

Re: Cat keeps pissing in bag ian green (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 15:11:21 EST)

Last message date: Tue Apr 06 2004 - 06:08:01 EDT
Archived on: Fri Sep 24 2004 - 17:37:04 EDT

477 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Previous Folder, Thread view Next Folder, Thread view List of Folders