rec.photo.equipment.35mm: By Author

rec.photo.equipment.35mm: By Author

477 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Previous Folder, Author view | Next Folder, Author view | List of Folders

Starting: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:51:39 EST
Ending: Tue Apr 06 2004 - 06:08:01 EDT

Al Denelsbeck
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:59:30 EST)

Re: PING - Al Denelsbeck (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:50:37 EST)

Ping: Anyone who might try to reach me... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:14:09 EST)

Test, ignore (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 07:31:34 EST)

Re: What age for kids to start? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 17:57:46 EST)

Alan Browne
Re: FA TONS of SPAM Great Deal of ebay crap! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:28:45 EST)

Re: Bowser (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:12:31 EST)

Re: Model Release Form (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 16:47:31 EST)

Re: FA TONS of SPAM Great Deal of ebay crap! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 16:37:49 EST)

Re: Model Release Form (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 15:12:26 EST)

Re: color management software (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 11:48:22 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 11:18:08 EST)

Re: color management software (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:55:12 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:51:55 EST)

Re: color management software (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:43:07 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:37:41 EST)

Re: Photodo MTF charts - workaround. (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:33:11 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:24:28 EST)

Re: FA: ARGUS MODEL M BAKELITE CAMERA, ART-DECO, 1939, (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:13:04 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:12:12 EST)

Re: [SI] Clever manipulation (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:11:19 EST)

Re: FA: ARGUS MODEL M BAKELITE CAMERA, ART-DECO, 1939, (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 09:55:49 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:47:21 EST)

Re: Nikon scanner vs. Minolta scanner (Mon Mar 15 2004 - 16:48:40 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:03:40 EST)

Re: new analoge pics (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:44:15 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:23:18 EST)

Re: color management software (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:00:27 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:57:47 EST)

Photodo MTF charts - workaround. (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:50:37 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:39:14 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:26:04 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:57:40 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:58:39 EST)

[SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:35:26 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 12:12:46 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 12:01:45 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:50:24 EST)

Re: OT Is Tony S involved in this? >>>The root of all *EVIL*<<< (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:49:11 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 23:41:03 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 23:08:16 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:57:33 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:55:33 EST)

Re: new analoge pics (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:39:47 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - 'Held Together' Comments (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:10:38 EST)

Re: Bowser (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:11:51 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:49:47 EST)

Re: Anyone help with flash photography at events (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:06:09 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:20:54 EST)

Re: Any one here bought a P&S digital camera? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:38:29 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - 'Held Together' Comments (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:13:29 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:11:01 EST)

Re: Anyone help with flash photography at events (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:38:41 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:34:06 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:28:00 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:07:58 EST)

Re: new analoge pics (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:01:45 EST)

Re: new analoge pics (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 14:59:06 EST)

Alan D-W
Re: OT Is Tony S involved in this? >>>The root of all *EVIL*<<< (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:53:34 EST)

Re: OT Is Tony S involved in this? >>>The root of all *EVIL*<<< (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:00:01 EST)

Alan F Cross
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:45:56 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 10:20:36 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:12:02 EST)

Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:00:25 EST)

Andrew Eremin
Re: OT - A toast to ye! (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:09:06 EST)

Andrew Koenig
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:45:49 EST)

Annika1980
Re: [SI] XXIV - 'Held Together' Comments (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:59:49 EST)

Re: [SI] No Comments ! (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:54:21 EST)

Bandicoot
Re: What age for kids to start? (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 07:19:28 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 07:14:02 EST)

Re: Traveling Photo Equipment (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 07:10:03 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:38:50 EST)

Re: For CD cover use slide or print film? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:33:03 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:20:38 EST)

Re: [EQ] Favourite tales of equipment screwups in the field (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:34:44 EST)

Re: OT - A toast to ye! (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:08:39 EST)

BG250
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:49:00 EST)

Bill Hilton
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:03:46 EST)

Re: Manfrotto QR on Kirk King Cobra and Wimberley? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:58:36 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:35:11 EST)

Bill Tuthill
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:46:59 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:08:37 EST)

Bob Hickey
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 07:35:30 EST)

Re: Cat keeps pissing in bag (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:58:01 EST)

Re: Canon Rebel TI only 16months!? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:53:50 EST)

Re: Anyone help with flash photography at events (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:39:16 EST)

Bob Huckleby
Ever hear of Garry's Camera Repair? (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 16:04:09 EST)

Re: Canon Service - Where? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 22:26:19 EST)

Bob Martin
Fix for Canon AE-1 shutter "creak"? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:32:47 EST)

Bowzah
Re: Bowser (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 16:52:41 EST)

Re: Photodo MTF charts - workaround. (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:40:28 EST)

Re: SORRY (FS) WRONG NG (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:39:48 EST)

Re: Leica Audio System For Sale (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 07:23:11 EST)

Re: Bowser (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:36:34 EST)

brian
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 14:31:39 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 14:26:34 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 14:24:50 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:39:54 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:41:15 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:19:04 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 05:27:45 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 05:18:44 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 05:22:30 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 05:03:25 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:52:04 EST)

Bruce Graham
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 03:26:35 EST)

Chris
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:48:36 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:47:20 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:15:17 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:00:34 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:13:19 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:03:03 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:06:15 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:04:30 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:46:36 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:19:31 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:24:26 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:33:46 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:16:51 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 07:54:08 EST)

Re: Photoshop in propaganda use (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 07:20:09 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 00:03:04 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:14:42 EST)

Re: Who uses a Canon F1? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:05:02 EST)

Re: Traveling Photo Equipment (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:37:28 EST)

Re: Who uses a Canon F1? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:30:24 EST)

Chris B
Re: OT - A toast to ye! (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:56:15 EST)

Chris Brown
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:31:18 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 10:28:34 EST)

columbotrek
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:05:06 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:38:22 EST)

creak
Tamron SP 17-35mm Di vs. Canon EF 17-40mm L (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:42:29 EST)

Dallas
Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 08:30:31 EST)

Re: Bowser (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 23:47:33 EST)

Re: Who uses a Canon F1? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 23:47:31 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 23:47:34 EST)

Who uses a Canon F1? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:03:29 EST)

Dave Haynie
Re: Film vs Digital Photography: THE FINAL DEBATE (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:43:46 EST)

David Chien
Re: Canon Rebel TI only 16months!? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:18:49 EST)

David J Taylor
Re: Very basic color management question (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 03:57:23 EST)

David J. Littleboy
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 00:28:36 EST)

David Kilpatrick
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 08:02:43 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:28:26 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:17:29 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:22:59 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:00:39 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:09:34 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 05:22:36 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 05:21:38 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:08:29 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:03:04 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:00:05 EST)

Deathwalker
Re: Anti-halation backing (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 14:09:03 EST)

Re: OT Is Tony S involved in this? >>>The root of all *EVIL*<<< (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:14:25 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:43:09 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:36:12 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:27:17 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:24:56 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:14:45 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:10:30 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:00:10 EST)

DM
Re: FA: ARGUS MODEL M BAKELITE CAMERA, ART-DECO, 1939, (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 01:09:07 EST)

Re: Photoshop in propaganda use (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 00:32:28 EST)

Doug
Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 03:01:06 EST)

Doug Kanter
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 12:42:50 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 12:40:58 EST)

Doug Payne
Re: Handicapped Professionals - Question (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:40:36 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:31:28 EST)

Drew Saunders
Re: Who uses a Canon F1? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 17:11:39 EST)

Re: Leica R and Leicaflex (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:50:51 EST)

dslr
Re: FA TONS of SPAM Great Deal of ebay crap! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:10:22 EST)

Re: FS: more spam (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:28:05 EST)

Ed E.
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:30:23 EST)

Fletis Humplebacker
Re: *Digital Photography Help* (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:10:30 EST)

Flycaster
Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:51:37 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:31:32 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:52:56 EST)

Fred A. Miller
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 00:40:37 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 23:22:18 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:43:30 EST)

George Kerby
Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:43:59 EST)

Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:33:11 EST)

George Preddy
Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 06:55:55 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:52:49 EST)

Re: The big lie! Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 01:53:14 EST)

Gordon Moat
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:21:02 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:06:53 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:12:57 EST)

Re: Anyone help with flash photography at events (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:41:37 EST)

HLim371292
Re: T70 and 199A (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:39:53 EST)

Howie Axelrod
Re: Traveling Photo Equipment (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:28:01 EST)

Ian Brown
Re: Traveling Photo Equipment (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:30:12 EST)

Traveling Photo Equipment (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:02:12 EST)

ian green
Re: Cat keeps pissing in bag (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 15:11:21 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:46:11 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - 'Held Together' Comments (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:56:45 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:51:42 EST)

bw photos more (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 11:25:01 EST)

Jeremy
Erwin Puts Praises Canon???? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:59:43 EST)

Jim Phelps
Re: Who uses a Canon F1? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 17:00:42 EST)

jimkramer
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 18:42:03 EST)

Joe
SORRY (FS) WRONG NG (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:03:10 EST)

Re: Minolta -2 for Maxxum $3 (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:01:30 EST)

Minolta -2 for Maxxum $3 (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:00:49 EST)

FS :Tamron B5FH Hood (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:57:22 EST)

FS Minolta 200mm MC (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:54:58 EST)

John
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:15:11 EST)

John J
Re: Leica R and Leicaflex (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:24:23 EST)

John Navas
Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:14:12 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:50:10 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:07:45 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:58:26 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:28:33 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:23:49 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:33:09 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:45:40 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:08:44 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:39:42 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:42:41 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:39:30 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:46:35 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:54:12 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:42:42 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:40:25 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:08:10 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:06:26 EST)

Joseph Kewfi
Re: Who uses a Canon F1? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:13:57 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - 'Held Together' Comments (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:04:55 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - 'Held Together' Comments (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:01:07 EST)

JPS_at_email.domain.hidden
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 18:02:29 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:48:32 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:43:57 EST)

LEDMRVM
Re: FA TONS of SPAM Great Deal of ebay crap! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 15:51:11 EST)

Lewis Lang
Re: For CD cover use slide or print film? (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:17:43 EST)

Re: camera buy recommedation (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:13:35 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 01:47:12 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:18:57 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:50:52 EST)

Re: A2 Review --slightly OT for the r.p.e.35mm (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:49:09 EST)

Lisa Horton
Re: FA TONS of SPAM Great Deal of ebay crap! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:19:35 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 01:22:53 EST)

m II
Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 22:42:56 EST)

Re: OT Is Tony S involved in this? >>>The root of all *EVIL*<<< (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:27:15 EST)

OT Is Tony S involved in this? >>>The root of all *EVIL*<<< (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:51:15 EST)

Mark M
Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 03:23:10 EST)

Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:04:28 EST)

Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:01:17 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:23:16 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:18:02 EST)

mark_digital
Re: Very basic color management question (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:04:36 EST)

Martin Francis
Re: camera buy recommedation (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 18:45:38 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:24:00 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:14:58 EST)

Re: Tamron 17-35 f/2.8-4 or Sigma 17-35 f/2.8-4? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:05:29 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:57:48 EST)

Re: help select camera for scientific use. (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:35:24 EST)

Matt Clara
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:36:21 EST)

Re: PING - Al Denelsbeck (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 22:33:46 EST)

Re: new analoge pics (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:59:38 EST)

Re: OT - A toast to ye! (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:46:49 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:41:28 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:47:24 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:43:21 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:39:31 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:57:49 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:56:08 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:49:37 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:46:00 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:37:24 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:26:16 EST)

McLeod
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:13:08 EST)

Re: Anyone help with flash photography at events (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:16:06 EST)

Michael
5.259 *****SPAM***** Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:11:27 EST)

Mike
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:08:41 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:25:52 EST)

Mike Lipphardt
Re: color management software (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:58:59 EST)

Re: color management software (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:31:26 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:30:21 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:26:14 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:01:13 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:02:55 EST)

Re: Test, ignore (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:06:18 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:05:16 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 07:31:04 EST)

Mike Smith
Re: Model Release Form (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 14:06:35 EST)

Model Release Form (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 01:24:27 EST)

Morris Coleman
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:14:48 EST)

Mxsmanic
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 12:41:00 EST)

Cell phone cameras help catch crooks (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 01:50:20 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 00:51:44 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 00:50:46 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:05:14 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:04:48 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:03:46 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:02:46 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:09:14 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:08:01 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:07:28 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:05:16 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:59:55 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:54:45 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:54:19 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:52:25 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:46:31 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:16:47 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:15:21 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:10:39 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:12:19 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:01:50 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:00:42 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:50:11 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:49:05 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:47:52 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:47:33 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:47:14 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:43:39 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:40:16 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:38:17 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:38:58 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:37:33 EST)

Neil Harrington
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 14:23:33 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 14:15:52 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 11:14:30 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 11:02:20 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 11:01:06 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:33:17 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:21:40 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 08:42:08 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 18:29:19 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 18:14:55 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:50:19 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:41:06 EST)

Nikkorguy
Re: new analoge pics (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:50:49 EST)

Re: Anti-halation backing (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:21:46 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:11:38 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 15:17:25 EST)

Paolo Pizzi
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:27:22 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:26:00 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:21:54 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:17:23 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:13:35 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:06:22 EST)

Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:55:24 EST)

Re: [SI] Clever manipulation (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:51:10 EST)

Re: [SI] Clever manipulation (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:37:49 EST)

parv
[SI] - Annika/Bret, Received my entry? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 23:53:34 EST)

Patrick L.
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:32:36 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:37:03 EST)

Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:19:04 EST)

Re: Anyone help with flash photography at events (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 14:34:14 EST)

Re: Anyone help with flash photography at events (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 14:31:45 EST)

Paul Schmidt
Re: Erwin Puts Praises Canon???? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:17:06 EST)

Peter Chant
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:08:19 EST)

Re: Cat keeps pissing in bag (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:01:56 EST)

Peter Irwin
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:40:19 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:57:10 EST)

Phil Stripling
Re: new analoge pics (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 00:33:44 EST)

Philip Hiscock
Cameras in Movies (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 09:14:20 EST)

PhotoMan
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 10:18:56 EST)

Re: Who uses a Canon F1? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:50:21 EST)

Re: Fix for Canon AE-1 shutter "creak"? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:47:25 EST)

Re: Who uses a Canon F1? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:13:16 EST)

Re: Who uses a Canon F1? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:56:45 EST)

Re: Who uses a Canon F1? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:05:04 EST)

Ray Fischer
Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 01:47:45 EST)

Re: OT - BUSH/KEN LAY Letters (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 01:43:27 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 01:36:41 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 01:34:30 EST)

Rich Pos
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 02:26:19 EST)

RLucch2098
FS: 77 GE FLASHCUBES, NOS, $20 + Postage (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:12:04 EST)

Re: FA: ARGUS MODEL M BAKELITE CAMERA, ART-DECO, 1939, (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:00:05 EST)

Re: FA TONS of SPAM Great Deal of ebay crap! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 09:44:26 EST)

ROBMURR
Re: Canon Service - Where? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:43:08 EST)

Roger Halstead
Re: Kodak T-Max P3200 film development (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 03:54:41 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 03:39:26 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:50:24 EST)

Ron
Free online photo album (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:24:34 EST)

Ron Andrews
Re: Besseler Super D question (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:47:34 EST)

Ron Hunter
Re: Very basic color management question (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:09:31 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:08:57 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:02:38 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:09:03 EST)

Rudy Garcia
Re: Very basic color management question (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:00:03 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:24:34 EST)

Scott Elliot
Re: Manfrotto QR on Kirk King Cobra and Wimberley? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:13:20 EST)

Skip M
Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 09:47:25 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 09:43:50 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:54:03 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:16:47 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:41:21 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:36:33 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:38:50 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 00:16:23 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 00:14:40 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:46:57 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:44:21 EST)

Kodak/Canon SLR (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:19:21 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:15:36 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:05:15 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:03:49 EST)

SKR
closeup-up photography : accessories (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 01:34:05 EST)

Snowman
Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 10:04:18 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:40:36 EST)

Steve Young
Re: FA TONS of SPAM Great Deal of ebay crap! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:06:15 EST)

Re: 77 GE FLASHCUBES, NOS, $20 + Postage (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 13:41:22 EST)

Re: FA: ARGUS MODEL M BAKELITE CAMERA, ART-DECO, 1939, (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 13:32:47 EST)

Re: FA: ARGUS MODEL M BAKELITE CAMERA, ART-DECO, 1939, (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 12:13:41 EST)

>>>The root of all *EVIL*<<< ? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 11:53:11 EST)

street shooter
Re: [SI] XXIV - "Held Together" Comments (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:05:56 EST)

The Dave©
Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 23:07:31 EST)

Re: color management software (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:49:00 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:48:16 EST)

Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:25:31 EST)

color management software (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:25:31 EST)

Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:41:56 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:20:59 EST)

Tom Thackrey
Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 01:16:04 EST)

Tony
Re: color management software (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 13:32:11 EST)

Tony Parkinson
Re: color management software (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 11:04:55 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 08:18:35 EST)

Re: OT Is Tony S involved in this? >>>The root of all *EVIL*<<< (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:51:47 EST)

Re: Tamrac "Adaptall" lenses? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:31:28 EST)

Tony Spadaro
Re: FA: ARGUS MODEL M BAKELITE CAMERA, ART-DECO, 1939, (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 13:05:08 EST)

Re: 77 GE FLASHCUBES, NOS, $20 + Postage (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 13:02:00 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:53:57 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 17:52:31 EST)

TP
Re: Model Release Form (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:10:56 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:09:07 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:06:16 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:03:17 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 04:03:59 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 03:57:33 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:57:38 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:59:29 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:46:28 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:47:14 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:43:36 EST)

Re: Disappointed with Canon EF 28-135 at close distance (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:25:12 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 09:20:06 EST)

Re: Church wedding, no tripod or flash allowed.... (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 06:27:22 EST)

Re: Kodak/Canon SLR (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 05:24:29 EST)

Re: Faulty F-stop reading (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:59:42 EST)

Re: Tamrac "Adaptall" lenses? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 05:01:12 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:56:23 EST)

Re: Tokina 80-400 II (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:55:36 EST)

Re: [OT] Epson's Digital M solution (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:52:54 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:42:34 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:40:12 EST)

Re: Foveon is the best so deal with it (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:37:44 EST)

Verotel
Re: Minolta Maxxum 5 (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 12:10:54 EST)

William D. Tallman
Re: Very basic color management question (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:47:18 EST)

William Graham
Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 18:01:12 EST)

Re: 77 GE FLASHCUBES, NOS, $20 + Postage (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:50:53 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:41:47 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:37:24 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:20:27 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:08:17 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 16:59:10 EST)

Re: Model Release Form (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 01:48:20 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 22:26:59 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 22:26:59 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 22:26:59 EST)

Re: OT - A toast to ye! (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:26:57 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:23:20 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:53:19 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:48:03 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:44:34 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:38:38 EST)

Re: Would a lens really look like a rifle? (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:38:38 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 23:36:05 EST)

Re: GUNS: Should they be allowed? RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS! (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 23:18:19 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:48:12 EST)

Re: Leica M7 featured in 'Eurotrip' movie (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:45:31 EST)

Re: new analoge pics (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 22:29:55 EST)

Wm Gardner
Re: Monopod head suggestions? (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:16:47 EST)

Re: Nikon FE /105mm (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 10:08:08 EST)

z-one-b
Re: Model Release Form (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 16:24:48 EST)

Last message date: Tue Apr 06 2004 - 06:08:01 EDT
Archived on: Fri Sep 24 2004 - 17:37:05 EDT

477 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Previous Folder, Author view Next Folder, Author view List of Folders