rec.photo.equipment.35mm: By Author

rec.photo.equipment.35mm: By Author

486 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Previous Folder, Author view | Next Folder, Author view | List of Folders

Starting: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:27:32 EST
Ending: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:56:37 EST

Al Denelsbeck
Re: how reliable is the exposure on the back of the box? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 07:07:25 EST)

Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:27:35 EST)

Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:58:13 EST)

Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:25:44 EST)

Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:27:40 EST)

Al Hodgkins
Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 20:31:30 EST)

Alan Browne
Re: Nikon Wide Angle Dilema (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 17:51:48 EST)

Minolta 450i (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:46:19 EST)

Re: NASA tests - can i really really trust 'em? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:27:06 EST)

Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:24:11 EST)

Washington Post Article - faked photo - comments by photographer (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:20:16 EST)

Re: Dumb, theoretical question - aperture / "gain" (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:46:50 EST)

Re: Dumb, theoretical question - aperture / "gain" (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:31:30 EST)

Re: Ebay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** (That should get his attention) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:19:06 EST)

Re: Tamron AF28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 LD Aspherical IF XR (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:13:36 EST)

Re: Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 13:29:02 EST)

Re: Cucina Italiana (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 13:23:32 EST)

Re: advice on finding work? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 13:12:46 EST)

Re: Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 12:53:36 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 12:34:06 EST)

Re: Abuse: Newtear attack originating from your networkl (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 12:21:13 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 12:03:12 EST)

Re: Good UK repair houses for Canon AE1? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 12:00:59 EST)

Re: Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:41:45 EST)

Re: how reliable is the exposure on the back of the box? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:38:27 EST)

Re: how reliable is the exposure on the back of the box? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:39:27 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film --Ping Mx (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:32:56 EST)

Re: Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:22:08 EST)

Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:16:25 EST)

Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:51:26 EST)

Re: Not in the charter... Re: Auction on ebay for Pentax K-1000se With two lens, auto strobe, and case (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:45:13 EST)

Re: Filtering help... (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:44:08 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:43:17 EST)

Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:41:57 EST)

Re: Incredible Newsgroup (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:23:15 EST)

Re: Dumb, theoretical question - aperture / "gain" (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:08:38 EST)

Re: Dumb, theoretical question - aperture / "gain" (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:07:51 EST)

Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:52:16 EST)

Re: Not in the charter... Re: Auction on ebay for Pentax K-1000se With two lens, auto strobe, and case (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:39:54 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:53:04 EST)

Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:36:09 EST)

Re: Canon T90 Won't Shoot (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:19:48 EST)

Re: FA: AGFA KARAT 36 GERMAN 35mm CAMERA- A Beauty@$18 (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:46:22 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:34:30 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:31:29 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:24:37 EST)

Re: what the hell???? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:22:58 EST)

Re: Nikon G lenses on N90s (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:20:00 EST)

Re: what the hell???? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:13:47 EST)

Re: Auction on ebay for SPAM and case (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:57:01 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:00:53 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:47:14 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:17:39 EST)

Re: Spammer Squashed (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:58:07 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:00:43 EST)

Re: Spammer Squashed (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:59:31 EST)

Re: Abuse: Newtear attack originating from your networkl (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:54:51 EST)

Re: Dumb, theoretical question - aperture / "gain" (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:46:46 EST)

Re: Waterproof Camera and Kayaking? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:42:37 EST)

Re: Abuse: Newtear attack originating from your networkl (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 11:10:31 EST)

Re: Abuse: Newtear attack originating from your networkl (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 11:08:12 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 11:06:43 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 11:05:42 EST)

Re: Dumb, theoretical question - aperture / "gain" (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 10:54:27 EST)

Re: Dumb, theoretical question - aperture / "gain" (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 10:48:35 EST)

Annika1980
Re: D60 GOES TO THE OLYMPICS !!! (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:34:55 EST)

AnOvercomer02_at_email.domain.hidden
Re: Behold the Light. (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 02:36:56 EST)

Re: [POLL] Who killed Christ? (Mel Gibson Movie) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 02:03:55 EST)

Re: [POLL] Who killed Christ? (Mel Gibson Movie) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 01:36:02 EST)

Re: [POLL] Who killed Christ? (Mel Gibson Movie) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 00:53:48 EST)

Re: [POLL] Who killed Christ? (Mel Gibson Movie) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 00:36:27 EST)

Re: [POLL] Who killed Christ? (Mel Gibson Movie) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 00:15:29 EST)

Re: Behold the Light. (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 23:33:29 EST)

Re: A Shot On The Fly. (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 23:03:34 EST)

Re: A Shot On The Fly. (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 23:02:29 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:02:26 EST)

Behold the Light. (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:49:26 EST)

A Shot On The Fly. (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:30:05 EST)

AresFC
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:04:13 EST)

Bandicoot
Re: Ebay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** (That should get his attention) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 08:49:23 EST)

Bhup
Re: Good UK repair houses for Canon AE1? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:37:04 EST)

Bill Kofoed
Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 06:34:45 EST)

Re: Auction on ebay for SPAM (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:40:10 EST)

Re: Auction on ebay for SPAM and case (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:39:49 EST)

Re: Auction SPAMon ebay (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:39:04 EST)

Bill Tuthill
Re: Waterproof Camera and Kayaking? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 11:00:17 EST)

BILWIL
Re: 500mm Mirror Lens shade (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 09:32:46 EST)

bmoag
Re: how reliable is the exposure on the back of the box? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 12:37:15 EST)

Re: Just got my XD-11 Body - odd viewfinder light refraction question (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 11:14:56 EST)

Bob Hickey
Re: Dumb, theoretical question - aperture / "gain" (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:44:12 EST)

Borghesia
Re: Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 12:08:23 EST)

Re: Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:11:04 EST)

Bowzah
Re: Auction SPAMon ebay (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:00:26 EST)

brian
Re: Dumb, theoretical question - aperture / "gain" (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:41:53 EST)

Re: Dumb, theoretical question - aperture / "gain" (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:41:52 EST)

Re: Dumb, theoretical question - aperture / "gain" (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:41:54 EST)

Brian Crawford
Re: Canon T90 Won't Shoot (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 17:34:35 EST)

bumblebee
Re: SAUSAGE & PEPPERS: Bake or fry? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:11:21 EST)

C J D
Re: Dumb, theoretical question - aperture / "gain" (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 03:44:39 EST)

Chris
Re: Nikon Wide Angle Dilema (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:55:33 EST)

Re: how reliable is the exposure on the back of the box? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:49:44 EST)

Re: Washington Post Article - faked photo - comments by photographer (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 17:54:47 EST)

Re: Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 17:50:39 EST)

Re: All trolls are hereby put on notice (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 13:02:14 EST)

Re: Good UK repair houses for Canon AE1? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 23:37:09 EST)

Re: advice on finding work? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 23:29:33 EST)

Chris Brown
Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 05:38:09 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:32:37 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:20:49 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:05:18 EST)

Chris Jothi
Good UK repair houses for Canon AE1? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:52:55 EST)

ChrisJ9876
Re: Tamron AF28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 LD Aspherical IF XR (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 13:40:11 EST)

columbotrek
Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:11:25 EST)

Colyn
Re: Leica IIIc? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:06:00 EST)

Re: Leica IIIc? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 10:59:50 EST)

Re: Filtering help... (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:33:13 EST)

Re: Leica IIIc? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:53:18 EST)

Re: Leica IIIc? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:33:59 EST)

Re: Leica IIIc? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:48:25 EST)

Re: Leica IIIc? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:40:29 EST)

Re: Leica IIIc? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:38:25 EST)

Re: Filtering help... (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 11:12:08 EST)

Dallas
Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:44:39 EST)

Re: Canon T90 Won't Shoot (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:44:45 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:44:46 EST)

Daniel Seriff
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:47:33 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:25:58 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:54:39 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:43:00 EST)

darrint68_at_email.domain.hidden
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:58:15 EST)

David
Re: advice on finding work? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:49:25 EST)

Re: advice on finding work? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:39:58 EST)

David J Taylor
Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:24:19 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:24:18 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:24:18 EST)

David J. Littleboy
Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 20:19:14 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 13:00:48 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 12:49:56 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 12:31:08 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 02:01:24 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 02:00:10 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 01:42:08 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 23:31:54 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 23:33:11 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:13:13 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:27:11 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:50:35 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:42:03 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:57:30 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:51:29 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 11:06:07 EST)

David Littlewood
Re: Behold the Light. (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 17:59:53 EST)

Re: Canon 420EX vs 550EX (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:17:18 EST)

Re: Behold the Light. (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:14:02 EST)

Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:29:05 EST)

Re: Dumb, theoretical question - aperture / "gain" (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 12:06:24 EST)

David Rennick
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:46:51 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:44:12 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:34:11 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:26:45 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:24:51 EST)

Deathwalker
Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:01:44 EST)

Re: Good UK repair houses for Canon AE1? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:39:31 EST)

Re: [SI] Mandate # XXIV... (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:32:59 EST)

Re: NASA tests - can i really really trust 'em? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:29:41 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:21:23 EST)

Re: advice on finding work? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:17:23 EST)

Diabolik
Re: Soccer vs Baseball vs American Football (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 09:15:33 EST)

DKCC
Tamron AF28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 LD Aspherical IF XR (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 13:16:30 EST)

Doug Payne
Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:22:42 EST)

Re: Abuse: Newtear attack originating from your networkl (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:30:11 EST)

Douglas MacDonald
Re: Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:36:57 EST)

Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 02:11:01 EST)

dslr
Re: External flash won't fire on DRebel (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 17:07:19 EST)

Re: Ebay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** (That should get his attention) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 13:09:45 EST)

dubl clutch
Re: Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:32:23 EST)

Edwin Petree
Re: Abuse: Newtear attack originating from your networkl (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:49:32 EST)

Ernest T. Bass
Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:35:37 EST)

Re: Teleconverter Idea II (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:12:49 EST)

fake name
Re: Ebay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** (That should get his attention) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:14:28 EST)

Frank ess
Re: Spammer Squashed (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:15:40 EST)

George Johnston
External flash won't fire on DRebel (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:45:52 EST)

George Kerby
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:17:44 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:28:33 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:26:33 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:16:01 EST)

Gerald Place
Re: advice on finding work? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 04:28:36 EST)

Gordon Moat
Re: advice on finding work? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:42:44 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:35:05 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:13:36 EST)

Greg Lovern
82mm Lens Hood for Old Vivitar 20/3.8 (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 06:27:07 EST)

Henry Hooray
Re: Tennis VS Raquetball VS Badminton (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:32:41 EST)

HopOne Internet Abuse
Re: Spammer IP Server (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 03:20:50 EST)

Jacek Gonsalves
Wanted:Takumar 300, 400 lenses M42 mount (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 09:09:37 EST)

Jefferson N. Glapski
Re: Soccer vs Baseball vs American Football (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 12:10:09 EST)

John Navas
Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 10:27:23 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 10:19:25 EST)

Re: Spammer Squashed (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:35:09 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:21:23 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:28:16 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:29:54 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:26:54 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:24:56 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:18:48 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:16:05 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:17:57 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:11:09 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:02:51 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 01:02:58 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:56:07 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:55:04 EST)

Re: Spammer Squashed (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:00:31 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:51:08 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:54:58 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:01:21 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:58:54 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:21:17 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:18:54 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:18:21 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:17:53 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:16:33 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:05:46 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:02:23 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:25:11 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:18:48 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:14:41 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:11:19 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:06:51 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:08:56 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:09:43 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:09:13 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:03:44 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:04:36 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:16:32 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:11:59 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:58:26 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:50:09 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:51:06 EST)

Joseph Kewfi
Re: Nikon Wide Angle Dilema (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 18:00:48 EST)

Joseph Meehan
Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 05:36:37 EST)

JPS_at_email.domain.hidden
Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 10:53:55 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 10:47:51 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 10:20:45 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 10:15:15 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 10:11:23 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:59:54 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:56:43 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:24:03 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:12:52 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:01:28 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:02:19 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:05:26 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:03:11 EST)

JR
Re: Nikon Wide Angle Dilema (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 17:48:47 EST)

k
how reliable is the exposure on the back of the box? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:45:34 EST)

Karen Nakamura
Re: Leica IIIc? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 10:06:56 EST)

Kevin Neilson
Re: Nikon Wide Angle Dilema (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 17:48:05 EST)

Larry Caldwell
Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 00:46:44 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 09:42:34 EST)

LarryLarry2003
Re: Canon 28-135 F3.5-5.6 IS USM Vs. Sigma 24-135 F2.8-4.5 (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 08:18:19 EST)

Lewis Lang
Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 13:37:56 EST)

Re: Incredible Newsgroup (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 11:57:43 EST)

Lionel
Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:12:17 EST)

Re: Behold the Light. (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:10:31 EST)

Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:57:09 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 07:41:51 EST)

Lisa Horton
Re: Canon T90 Won't Shoot (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:41:13 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:35:34 EST)

Re: Canon T90 Won't Shoot (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:55:59 EST)

Re: Popular Photography - Anything but ads these days? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:30:11 EST)

Luca Cappelli
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:37:21 EST)

m II
Re: Behold the Light. (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:02:37 EST)

Re: Behold the Light. (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:39:51 EST)

Re: Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 12:47:10 EST)

Re: how reliable is the exposure on the back of the box? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 00:23:05 EST)

Re: Abuse: Newtear attack originating from your networkl (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 00:08:55 EST)

Re: how reliable is the exposure on the back of the box? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 23:52:48 EST)

Re: Ebay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** (That should get his attention) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 23:46:31 EST)

Ebay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** (That should get his attention) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 23:45:36 EST)

M-Wolverine
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 12:50:42 EST)

Magnus W
Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 18:36:40 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 18:17:01 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 06:13:05 EST)

Mark M
Re: Canon 420EX vs 550EX (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 13:05:25 EST)

Re: Extension tubes (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 02:06:56 EST)

Re: D60 GOES TO THE OLYMPICS !!! (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 01:56:20 EST)

Martin Francis
5.204 *****SPAM***** Re: Incredible Newsgroup (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:46:57 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:20:53 EST)

Martin Kaltoft
Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 09:11:43 EST)

Matt Clara
Re: Nikon Wide Angle Dilema (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 20:02:08 EST)

Nikon Wide Angle Dilema (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 17:37:28 EST)

Re: advice on finding work? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:10:37 EST)

Re: Filtering help... (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:08:52 EST)

Re: Leica IIIc? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:07:40 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:54:19 EST)

McLeod
Re: Spammer Squashed (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:02:39 EST)

Michael Scarpitti
Re: Canon T90 Won't Shoot (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:01:41 EST)

Re: Canon T90 Won't Shoot (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:59:17 EST)

Re: Canon T90 Won't Shoot (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:07:00 EST)

5.73 *****SPAM***** Re: Incredible Newsgroup (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:00:31 EST)

Re: Canon T90 Won't Shoot (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:46:06 EST)

Michele Dall'Agata
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 07:00:22 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 06:52:17 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 06:42:10 EST)

Mike
Re: Cat keeps pissing in bag (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 20:48:20 EST)

Re: Ebay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** (That should get his attention) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 01:03:23 EST)

Re: Auction on ebay for SPAM and case (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:27:25 EST)

Re: Auction on ebay for SPAM and case (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:41:13 EST)

Re: Auction on ebay for SPAM and case (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:39:03 EST)

Re: Auction SPAMon ebay (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:12:33 EST)

Mike Latondresse
Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:56:29 EST)

MikeWhy
Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 05:15:41 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 05:15:40 EST)

Re: Dumb, theoretical question - aperture / "gain" (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:14:57 EST)

MoParMaN
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:55:27 EST)

MXP
Re: Leica IIIc? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:59:25 EST)

Re: Leica IIIc? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:49:30 EST)

Re: Leica IIIc? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:31:21 EST)

Leica IIIc? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:13:09 EST)

Mxsmanic
Re: Nikon Wide Angle Dilema (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 20:22:30 EST)

Re: Nikon Wide Angle Dilema (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:46:16 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:44:23 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:42:20 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:41:57 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:27:36 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:23:13 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:20:11 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:18:41 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:19:08 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:17:32 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 06:55:01 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 06:51:00 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 01:33:27 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 01:32:03 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 01:28:53 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 01:26:23 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 01:23:18 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 01:20:49 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 01:19:49 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 01:17:42 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:20:15 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:54:43 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:55:36 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:52:30 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:53:10 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:52:11 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:13:16 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:14:18 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:11:10 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:04:07 EST)

Nick Zentena
Re: 82mm Lens Hood for Old Vivitar 20/3.8 (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 08:10:27 EST)

nobody nowhere
Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 06:12:43 EST)

Not in my trousers
Re: advice on finding work? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:52:57 EST)

Nuuk
Re: Canon 28-135 F3.5-5.6 IS USM Vs. Sigma 24-135 F2.8-4.5 (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:18:52 EST)

Paolo Pizzi
Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 17:34:50 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 17:29:53 EST)

Re: Ebay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** (That should get his attention) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:31:08 EST)

Re: Tennis VS Raquetball VS Badminton (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:59:24 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:56:38 EST)

Re: Tamron AF28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 LD Aspherical IF XR (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:47:29 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 02:29:43 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 02:23:58 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 02:19:53 EST)

Patrick L.
Re: Ebay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** (That should get his attention) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 12:37:44 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:22:46 EST)

Paul C
Re: Soccer vs Baseball vs American Football (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:01:18 EST)

Paul Schmidt
Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:47:25 EST)

Re: lens to telescope..how to? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:37:38 EST)

Pepys
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 23:26:18 EST)

Peter Chant
Re: Not in the charter... Re: Auction on ebay for Pentax K-1000se With two lens, auto strobe, and case (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 07:18:35 EST)

Re: Not in the charter... Re: Auction on ebay for Pentax K-1000se With two lens, auto strobe, and case (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:28:14 EST)

Re: Not in the charter... Re: Auction on ebay for Pentax K-1000se With two lens, auto strobe, and case (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:27:42 EST)

Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:19:57 EST)

Peter Irwin
Re: how reliable is the exposure on the back of the box? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:07:18 EST)

Re: how reliable is the exposure on the back of the box? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 23:54:40 EST)

Re: how reliable is the exposure on the back of the box? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 23:26:03 EST)

Phil Stripling
Re: Abuse: Newtear attack originating from your networkl (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 20:10:24 EST)

Re: Abuse: Newtear attack originating from your networkl (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:46:17 EST)

Re: Abuse: Newtear attack originating from your networkl (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:22:11 EST)

PhotoMan
Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 17:03:31 EST)

Re: Teleconverter Idea II (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:02:19 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 10:38:25 EST)

Re: how reliable is the exposure on the back of the box? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 00:36:58 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:59:46 EST)

Re: Dumb, theoretical question - aperture / "gain" (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:02:11 EST)

Pierre Jarvois
5.169 *****SPAM***** Re: Spammer Squashed (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:03:47 EST)

Pieter Litchfield
Re: Waterproof Camera and Kayaking? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:34:25 EST)

pioe[rmv]
Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:34:13 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 17:19:52 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 13:32:52 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:42:02 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:11:20 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 08:57:36 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 07:07:57 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:03:04 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:45:03 EST)

Ray Fischer
Re: Tennis VS Raquetball VS Badminton (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:01:50 EST)

Rich Pos
Re: Washington Post Article - faked photo - comments by photographer (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:42:02 EST)

Re: how reliable is the exposure on the back of the box? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:41:08 EST)

Roadkingmark
Re: FA: canon EOS 10S Package...is this a good deal? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 08:42:57 EST)

Robert Meyers
Re: Ebay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** (That should get his attention) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 13:16:12 EST)

Re: Ebay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** (That should get his attention) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 06:26:32 EST)

Rodney Myrvaagnes
Re: Nikon TC-16A (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:56:16 EST)

Roger Halstead
Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:43:39 EST)

5.299 *****SPAM***** Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 13:47:19 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:07:59 EST)

Roy G. Biv
Re: Nikon TC-16A (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 17:07:39 EST)

Re: Nikon TC-16A (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:05:05 EST)

RP Jones
Cat keeps pissing in bag (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 20:39:47 EST)

sgfan3
Re: Nikon TC-16A (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:02:55 EST)

Simon Stanmore
Re: [SI] Mandate # XXIV... (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 17:36:17 EST)

[SI] Mandate # XXIV... (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 10:37:21 EST)

Re: [SI] Ping: Simon Stanmore (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 10:26:57 EST)

Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 04:18:57 EST)

Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:19:05 EST)

Skip M
Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 18:57:37 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 18:48:51 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:54:24 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:50:00 EST)

Re: Canon T90 Won't Shoot (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 00:50:50 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 00:47:26 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 00:45:21 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 00:44:01 EST)

Re: Cucina Italiana (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 00:42:52 EST)

Re: Ebay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** (That should get his attention) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 00:40:58 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:34:07 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:32:19 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:28:33 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:21:19 EST)

Re: Auction on ebay for SPAM (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:15:46 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:55:43 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:56:20 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 10:14:35 EST)

Stefan Patric
Re: how reliable is the exposure on the back of the box? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 17:23:11 EST)

Steve Kramer
Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:11:42 EST)

Steve Young
Re: Abuse: Newtear attack originating from your networkl (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:53:54 EST)

Re: Ebay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** (That should get his attention) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:44:52 EST)

Re: Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:09:05 EST)

Re: Ebay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** (That should get his attention) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:04:07 EST)

Re: Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 12:19:36 EST)

Re: Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 12:00:21 EST)

Re: Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:34:29 EST)

Re: Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 10:31:59 EST)

Re: Spammer Squashed (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 02:58:06 EST)

Re: Spammer Squashed (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 02:58:05 EST)

Re: Auction on ebay for SPAM and case (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:09:53 EST)

Re: Auction on ebay for SPAM and case (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:35:35 EST)

Re: Spammer Squashed (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:14:18 EST)

Re: Spammer Squashed (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:26:32 EST)

Re: Abuse: Newtear attack originating from your networkl (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:08:06 EST)

Re: Spammer Squashed (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 10:17:04 EST)

street shooter
Re: [SI] Ping: Simon Stanmore (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 13:43:09 EST)

[SI] Ping: Simon Stanmore (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:35:14 EST)

Texas Longhorns
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:30:08 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:12:42 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:35:02 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:42:17 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:22:08 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:18:34 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 10:35:05 EST)

ThomasH
Not in the charter... Re: Auction on ebay for Pentax K-1000se With two lens, auto strobe, and case (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 11:42:55 EST)

Timo Labrenz
Re: Best advice on using an umbrella/flash ?? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 10:23:40 EST)

Tom Thackrey
Re: how reliable is the exposure on the back of the box? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:41:18 EST)

TomyB
BARGAIN PHOTOGRAPHY EQUIPTMENT FOR SALE ON E-BAY (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:56:35 EST)

Tony Parkinson
Re: Ebay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** (That should get his attention) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 13:37:14 EST)

Tony Spadaro
Re: Auction SPAMon ebay (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:25:55 EST)

Re:MORE E-BAY SPAM (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:27:14 EST)

Re: Auction SPAMon ebay (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:00:37 EST)

Re: Not in the charter... Re: Auction on ebay for SPAM (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:03:07 EST)

Re: Auction on ebay for SPAM (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:01:09 EST)

Re: Auction on ebay for SPAM and case (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:01:44 EST)

Walter Bushell
Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 09:42:50 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:32:04 EST)

Wapenga
Canon 420EX vs 550EX (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 06:19:55 EST)

who?
Re: Ebay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** eBay ***SPECIAL*** (That should get his attention) (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 13:34:31 EST)

Re: Canon 420EX vs 550EX (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 13:20:01 EST)

William D. Tallman
Re: Anyone care to espouse on DOF for digital (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 16:14:05 EST)

Re: Sorry, (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 12:23:25 EST)

William Graham
Re: shooting digital vs film (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 03:11:38 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:14:13 EST)

Re: Leica IIIc? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:39:27 EST)

Re: Canon or Nikon (got $2,000+ to spend) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:30:20 EST)

Re: what the hell???? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:28:10 EST)

Re: Leica IIIc? (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:21:02 EST)

z-one-b
Re: Canon 420EX vs 550EX (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:22:00 EST)

EOS speedlite manual mode (420ex and 550ex) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:11:01 EST)

Last message date: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:56:37 EST
Archived on: Fri Sep 24 2004 - 17:36:53 EDT

486 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Previous Folder, Author view Next Folder, Author view List of Folders