Hecate <hecate_at_newsguy.com> wrote in message news:<dashk019h8d6rkgd5mqhhf93v5mo2tqfmk_at_4ax.com>...
> On 15 Sep 2004 03:10:40 -0700, n1patrick_at_hotmail.com (Patrick P.)
> wrote:
>
>
> >If Mitsubishi is making Lacie displays are they sharing technology?
> >Does the Lacie photon19vision uses the same screen as the
> >NEC-Mitsubishi LCD1980SX?
>
> Mitsubishi sell their tubes to a variety of other manufacturers to
> include in their CRTs. Iiyama is another one (and generally seem to do
> a better job than Mitsubishi when the resulting CRTs are compared). I
> don't know whether those specific tubes are the same, you'd need to do
> some research.
>
> >Hecate, do you think the Eizo L767 will do the trick or does it have
> >to be the very expensive CG18?
>
> The L767 is excellent and will do the job. But, note that I just read
> a review for the L768 which I assume is it's replacement, and an
> improvement on the 767. However, the price is still about the same.
> You will get superb colour rendition which is accurate with almost any
> Eizo LCD/TFT screen.
>
> --
>
> Hecate - The Real One
> Hecate_at_newsguy.com
> veni, vidi, reliqui
Thanks for all the replies.
Hecate, can you please provide the link to the review. I'd like to
have a look.
Looking at the specs the only difference I saw between the 2 models
was the 768 has the rotate to portrait format option and a contrast
ratio of 1000:1 as opposed to the 767 which has a contrast of 500:1
and no rotate option. Is there anything else?
I'm not sure anymore what's the significance of the contrast rating.
Eizo's best color lcd (CG18 and 21) has a contrast of 400:1. Which
leads me to assume that it is better for this ratio of be lower. Can
anyone explain how this works?
| 
