>"Darrell Larose" <no_at_spam.com> wrote in message news:<PqIvc.339268$0qd.168313_at_twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com>...
>> "Georgette Preddy" <georgette_preddy_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1067e702.0406030423.6ca23e15_at_posting.google.com...
>> > "BillyBob" <NEWSMAN_at_NOSPAM.COM> wrote in message
>> news:<jczvc.13366$x9.1515_at_nwrddc02.gnilink.net>...
>> >
>> > > > Foveon never, ever interpolates (guesses) the color of a pixel, except
>> > > > at its 13.72MP setting. But even at it's 13.72MP output, Foveon
>> > > > photographs are much more accurate than Bayer digtial interpolations,
>> > > > since Foveon starts from a photographic baseline (100% optical) rather
>> > > > than digitally interpolated baseline (25% optical).
>> > >
>> > > If the Foveon is so good why is Sigma the only company to ship such a
>> > > product to date? The number speak for themselves
>> >
>> > Sigma has an exclusive deal with Foveon to sell the Pro 10M sensor.
>> > The 5M is now under contract with Polaroid. Foveon themselves
>> > manufactured and sold their phenomenal 6-figure studio camera.
>> > Hasselblad contracted the 36MP (48MP by Bayer standards) Foveon
>> > sensoor (which Hasselblad named the only digital technology worthy of
>> > their consideration) for their dfinity line, and several were produced
>> > and reviewed, but the deal fell through when Hasselblad decided such
>> > extreme quality digital would threaten or end their film sales.
>> > Hasselblad never entered the digital business.
>>
>> I doubt that as Hasselblad didn't sell film.
>
>They most certainly do make film cameras! They don't make digital
>cameras, because after Foveon left they rejected Bayer technology as
>junk unworthy of their name.
Your statement above claims that they sold film, your reading
comprehension of even your own posts is pathetic.
