From: Bart van der Wolf (bvdwolf_at_email.domain.hidden)
Date: Tue Jun 15 2004 - 06:39:59 EDT

• Next message: Bob Salomon: "Re: Polarizing filter -- circular or linear?"
• Previous message: E. Magnuson: "Re: Sigma10D review in a Japan web site."
• In reply to: Dave Martindale: "Re: Plenty of reasons to try the SD10"
• Next in thread: Dave Martindale: "Re: Plenty of reasons to try the SD10"
• Reply: Dave Martindale: "Re: Plenty of reasons to try the SD10"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

"Dave Martindale" <davem_at_cs.ubc.ca> wrote in message
news:calrb4$hsg$1_at_mughi.cs.ubc.ca...
SNIP
> If you want a word for "the smallest unit of measurement from
> a sensor, separately counting differences in colour", you'll have to use
> a different word - "pixel" already means something else.

Indeed, time for a futile attempt to redefine "Sample" ;-) Not.

Bart

• Next message: Bob Salomon: "Re: Polarizing filter -- circular or linear?"
• Previous message: E. Magnuson: "Re: Sigma10D review in a Japan web site."
• In reply to: Dave Martindale: "Re: Plenty of reasons to try the SD10"
• Next in thread: Dave Martindale: "Re: Plenty of reasons to try the SD10"
• Reply: Dave Martindale: "Re: Plenty of reasons to try the SD10"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]