rec.photo.digital: By Thread

rec.photo.digital: By Thread

476 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Previous Folder, Thread view | Next Folder, Thread view | List of Folders

Starting: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:44:28 EST
Ending: Tue Apr 06 2004 - 06:06:10 EDT

Digital Picture Frame Contest Ed (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:06:57 EST)
Re: CCD cleaning philipp (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:36:14 EST)
What batteries do you recommend? SH (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:32:02 EST)

Re: What batteries do you recommend? Brian (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:53:00 EST)
Re: What batteries do you recommend? John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:50:15 EST)
6.003 *****SPAM***** Re: What batteries do you recommend? Dave (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:27:26 EST)

Re: What batteries do you recommend? SH (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:41:15 EST)

6.003 *****SPAM***** Re: What batteries do you recommend? Dave (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:55:07 EST)

Re: What batteries do you recommend? MaDDog (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:47:40 EST)
Re: What batteries do you recommend? Don (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:52:13 EST)
Re: What batteries do you recommend? Cool Hand (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 23:50:03 EST)

Re: What batteries do you recommend? John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 01:45:10 EST)

Re: What batteries do you recommend? Ron Hunter (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 05:04:08 EST)
Re: What batteries do you recommend? John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:52:12 EST)
Re: What batteries do you recommend? Cool Hand (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 17:13:24 EST)
Re: What batteries do you recommend? Ron Hunter (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 20:36:31 EST)
Re: What batteries do you recommend? John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:07:01 EST)
Re: What batteries do you recommend? Ron Hunter (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 05:21:13 EST)

Re: What batteries do you recommend? Lucas Tam (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 00:18:35 EST)

Re: What batteries do you recommend? Ron G (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 16:47:25 EST)

Re: What batteries do you recommend? Ron Hunter (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 20:39:56 EST)
Re: What batteries do you recommend? John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:12:56 EST)
Re: What batteries do you recommend? Ron Hunter (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 05:23:22 EST)
Re: What batteries do you recommend? BillB (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 22:33:33 EST)
Re: What batteries do you recommend? Ron Hunter (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 06:22:20 EST)
Re: What batteries do you recommend? Daniel Prince (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 22:04:14 EST)
Re: What batteries do you recommend? Ron G (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 08:08:56 EST)

Sony Cyber-Shot Lens question Prowler99 (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:27:59 EST)

Re: Sony Cyber-Shot Lens question Gener (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:47:58 EST)

Re: Sony Cyber-Shot Lens question Prowler99 (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:13:26 EST)

Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Vernon Davis (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:15:05 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Joseph Kewfi (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:29:22 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Tony Spadaro (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:43:16 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Chris (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 23:55:22 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon MarkH (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 00:01:25 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Vin (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 01:42:03 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon MarkH (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:55:17 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Vin (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 17:43:03 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 06:21:30 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:23:58 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon TP (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:19:20 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon DM (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:11:30 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon ink (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 07:02:56 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon ink (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 07:05:07 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 02:26:36 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Bhup (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:34:05 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 02:28:13 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 06:19:36 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:25:36 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:30:14 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon brian (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 20:34:33 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 06:12:00 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Tom Monego (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 10:08:25 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Martin Francis (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 15:41:38 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 06:26:20 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:49:13 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Gordon Moat (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:34:07 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon - thanks! Vernon Davis (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 21:36:26 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon - thanks! Gordon Moat (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 01:36:06 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon - thanks! Paolo Pizzi (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 02:30:23 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 06:34:25 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Gordon Moat (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 18:04:56 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 02:47:02 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 03:55:22 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon George Preddy (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 09:34:35 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 09:40:18 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Steve m... (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 10:39:34 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon MarkH (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 17:45:00 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Martin Francis (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 15:23:45 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 01:01:03 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 05:04:48 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon DM (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 01:02:25 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 05:05:38 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 01:04:27 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 05:03:17 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon MarkH (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 06:47:19 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon ~ Darrell Larose ~ (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 14:01:10 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 19:56:45 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon MarkH (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 22:08:57 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 13:19:56 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 13:55:14 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Tom Monego (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 14:10:01 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 04:42:55 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon MarkH (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 06:16:18 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 17:35:37 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 18:41:19 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 03:32:27 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 03:39:23 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Alan Browne (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 01:06:37 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon MarkH (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 00:11:22 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 17:41:14 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 18:43:23 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 03:33:20 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 03:41:29 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon MarkH (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 02:28:23 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 13:15:18 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 13:58:16 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 04:49:41 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Guy Scharf (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 16:45:30 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 04:52:53 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 19:57:46 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 13:44:50 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 14:39:56 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 05:00:57 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 10:47:22 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 17:52:27 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 19:05:26 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 19:58:26 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 13:46:44 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 14:56:47 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 05:02:38 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Skip M (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 00:19:54 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Skip M (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 01:11:42 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon George Preddy (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 15:31:10 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Bart van der Wolf (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 17:56:46 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon George Preddy (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 15:31:07 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 15:59:07 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Skip M (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 19:46:59 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon George Preddy (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 15:31:10 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon George Preddy (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 15:31:10 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Alan Browne (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 22:25:16 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 13:47:26 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 14:57:33 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 05:03:01 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 13:50:23 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 15:03:14 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 05:04:57 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Fred A. Miller (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 15:44:12 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 05:05:57 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Skip M (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 23:59:26 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon George Preddy (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 10:23:10 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 11:10:14 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Fred A. Miller (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 11:44:41 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon TP (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 05:09:09 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Skip M (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 23:20:34 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon George Preddy (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 00:07:09 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 01:13:06 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon David Littlewood (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 18:18:53 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Skip M (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 01:19:31 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Skip M (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 01:28:18 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 01:51:40 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 21:58:36 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 02:31:09 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Alan Browne (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 15:04:39 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon TP (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 02:54:33 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 17:42:52 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 18:45:01 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 17:46:16 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 18:55:11 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Alan Browne (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 01:04:45 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 03:42:59 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 10:00:53 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Alan Browne (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:39:42 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:57:48 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 17:47:32 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 18:46:14 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Alan Browne (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 00:57:55 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 03:35:29 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 03:42:36 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Alan Browne (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:42:25 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 17:57:12 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 19:15:44 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 18:01:51 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 19:26:30 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 18:05:12 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 19:19:45 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon MarkH (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 02:44:59 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 18:07:49 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 19:27:53 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 03:54:44 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 10:19:13 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 18:09:53 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 19:32:28 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 04:12:29 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon MarkH (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 07:13:46 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 10:37:57 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 18:11:33 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 19:35:37 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 04:17:42 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 11:07:04 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Alan Browne (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 01:18:58 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 04:29:49 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Alan Browne (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 11:38:16 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 18:15:25 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 19:37:01 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 04:35:05 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 11:23:16 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Alan Browne (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 01:08:23 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Paolo Pizzi (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 04:39:57 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 11:31:05 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Alan Browne (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:24:46 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon MarkH (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 02:55:20 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon George Preddy (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 23:37:49 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 00:37:07 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon George Preddy (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 15:23:23 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 15:35:58 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Skip M (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 19:24:47 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon TP (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 06:39:30 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Alan Browne (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 17:29:10 EST)
Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Alan Browne (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 19:04:42 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon John Navas (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 19:32:41 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Alan Browne (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 19:55:46 EST)

Re: Pro Lenses : Nikon or Canon Skip M (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 19:38:26 EST)

Re: How to photograph an aquarium? Steve (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:40:41 EST)
D70 and Adobe RAW Marli (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:33:50 EST)

Re: D70 and Adobe RAW Paolo Pizzi (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:47:38 EST)

Anyone have repair manual/exploded diagram of the Nikon CP800? Rob Aries (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:13:46 EST)
Re: Scanning photo prints v. negatives. Ian Smith (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:43:22 EST)
Comments on Canon S-330 wanted Ed (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:44:01 EST)

Re: Comments on Canon S-330 wanted John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:49:23 EST)

Re: Comments on Canon S-330 wanted Ed (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:26:04 EST)

Re: Comments on Canon S-330 wanted Ed (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:39:22 EST)
Re: Comments on Canon S-330 wanted John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:47:28 EST)
Re: Comments on Canon S-330 wanted John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:43:30 EST)

Confused on how to do CD Artwork Dennis Herrick (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:15:44 EST)

Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork Lucas Tam (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:06:53 EST)

Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork Dennis Herrick (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:12:38 EST)

Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:42:28 EST)
Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork Lucas Tam (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 07:07:30 EST)
Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork Dennis Herrick (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 22:06:24 EST)
Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork Lucas Tam (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 13:17:04 EST)

Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork Jeffrey Herrick (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 23:04:16 EST)
Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork bob (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 10:21:48 EST)

Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork John Navas (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 12:03:43 EST)

Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork bob (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 14:14:27 EST)
Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork John Navas (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 14:53:24 EST)
Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork Dennis Herrick (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 23:16:20 EST)
Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork John Navas (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 00:55:24 EST)
Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork Dennis Herrick (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 23:12:32 EST)
Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork John Navas (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 00:58:32 EST)
Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork Dennis Herrick (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 14:17:01 EST)
Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork Dan Wojciechowski (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 13:11:56 EST)

Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork bob (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 10:23:00 EST)

Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork Dennis Herrick (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 11:57:01 EST)

Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork John Navas (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 12:07:39 EST)

Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork John Navas (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 12:06:27 EST)

Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork Dennis Herrick (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 23:18:39 EST)
Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork John Navas (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 01:03:56 EST)

Re: Confused on how to do CD Artwork Dennis Herrick (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 09:33:40 EST)

D100 Raw Images Undersaturated? stephen (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:03:55 EST)

Re: D100 Raw Images Undersaturated? Don (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:20:06 EST)

Re: D100 Raw Images Undersaturated? Flycaster (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:30:41 EST)

Re: D100 Raw Images Undersaturated? Flycaster (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:32:25 EST)
RE: D100 Raw Images Undersaturated? Michael Schnell (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:54:25 EST)

New web forum for Nikon Coolpix 4500 Users.. Sid Daley (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:47:16 EST)
Is he Gone? Gary Eickmeier (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:39:03 EST)

Re: Is he Gone? Steve Young (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:34:34 EST)

Re: Is he Gone? Gary Eickmeier (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 23:28:23 EST)

Re: Is he Gone? Steve Young (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 05:27:18 EST)

Re: Is he Gone? manhole_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 23:44:37 EST)

Re: Is he Gone? Steve Young (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 16:28:17 EST)

Re: Is he Gone? John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 16:33:40 EST)
Re: Is he Gone? Steve Young (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 21:30:10 EST)
Re: Is he Gone? John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:01:00 EST)
Re: Is he Gone? Lisa Horton (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:15:05 EST)
Re: Is he Gone? Steve Young (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:23:39 EST)
Re: Is he Gone? Lisa Horton (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:37:37 EST)
Re: Is he Gone? Alan Browne (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 17:22:00 EST)
Re: Is he Gone? Steve Young (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 23:57:50 EST)
Re: Is he Gone? John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 15:47:05 EST)
Re: Is he Gone? Steve Young (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 23:09:21 EST)
Re: Is he Gone? John Doe (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 10:18:45 EST)

Re: Is he Gone? Bart van der Wolf (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 07:37:56 EST)
Re: Is he Gone? Steve Young (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 08:33:02 EST)

Re: Is he Gone? John Navas (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 11:56:51 EST)

Re: Epson printing help needed Flycaster (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:33:16 EST)
D70 Compatibility Questions Nick S. (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:15:20 EST)

Re: D70 Compatibility Questions -=Plane Mad=- (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:53:47 EST)

OFOTO Super Enlargements Jeremy (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:02:39 EST)

Re: OFOTO Super Enlargements Don (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:16:40 EST)
Re: OFOTO Super Enlargements Ron Andrews (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:45:52 EST)
Re: OFOTO Super Enlargements Tom Monego (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 09:33:41 EST)
Re: OFOTO Super Enlargements Kevin McMurtrie (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 01:48:10 EST)

Re: OFOTO Super Enlargements Jeremy (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 08:54:30 EST)

Resolution of digi pix vs film pix Jim Garner (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:55:08 EST)

Re: Resolution of digi pix vs film pix Jeremy (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:14:59 EST)
Re: Resolution of digi pix vs film pix Chris Brown (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:26:54 EST)

Re: Resolution of digi pix vs film pix David J. Littleboy (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:20:42 EST)

Re: Resolution of digi pix vs film pix Chris Brown (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:48:28 EST)

Coolpix 2100 question P and H Macguire (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:33:07 EST)

Re: Coolpix 2100 question Douglas W. Hoyt (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:43:37 EST)

Re: Coolpix 2100 question Douglas W. Hoyt (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:52:18 EST)

Re: Coolpix 2100 question P and H Macguire (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:43:04 EST)

Casio EX-S3 and Sony 5MP DSC-V1 opinions? Wm (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:12:48 EST)
The Crusaders kick NZ rugby ass! KuntlynFaker_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:54:58 EST)

Re: The Crusaders kick NZ rugby ass! phantomb (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:10:54 EST)
Re: The Crusaders kick NZ rugby ass! grant (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:25:20 EST)

Re: The Crusaders kick NZ rugby ass! andrew smith (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:57:11 EST)

Re: The Crusaders kick NZ rugby ass! grant (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 17:18:15 EST)

Re: The Crusaders kick NZ rugby ass! Bobs (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:04:24 EST)

Re: The Crusaders kick NZ rugby ass! Mr Scebe (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 05:34:42 EST)

How do I find out who is photographing me DonnyD81_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:52:08 EST)

Re: How do I find out who is photographing me Daedalus (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:30:47 EST)

Re: How do I find out who is photographing me Nibbler (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:35:13 EST)

Re: How do I find out who is photographing me George Kerby (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:42:00 EST)

Re: How do I find out who is photographing me Mark M (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 03:59:19 EST)

Re: How do I find out who is photographing me CtlAltDel (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:42:32 EST)

Re: How do I find out who is photographing me George Kerby (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:00:53 EST)

Re: How do I find out who is photographing me Craig Bailey (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:11:37 EST)

Re: How do I find out who is photographing me Nibbler (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:14:09 EST)
Re: How do I find out who is photographing me Martin Bishop (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 08:35:51 EST)

Re: How do I find out who is photographing me Craig Bailey (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:52:34 EST)

Re: How do I find out who is photographing me shephed (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:58:37 EST)
Re: How do I find out who is photographing me Emmett Heinz Curley Bartlo (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:00:53 EST)

Re: How do I find out who is photographing me m II (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:48:58 EST)
Re: How do I find out who is photographing me Ron Andrews (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:33:42 EST)

Re: How do I find out who is photographing me Emmett Heinz Curley Bartlo (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:31:11 EST)

Re: How do I find out who is photographing me John Griffin (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:49:29 EST)

Re: Known rapist David Lee Kollberg (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:33:04 EST)

Re: Known rapist Bob (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:23:45 EST)

[SU] KONCEPT #4 "Landmarks" Leroy Jolicoeur (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:41:11 EST)
[SU] #3 "Reflections" GALLERY PUBLISHED Leroy Jolicoeur (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:20:16 EST)

Re: [SU] #3 "Reflections" GALLERY PUBLISHED parv (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:02:04 EST)

Re: [SU] #3 "Reflections" GALLERY PUBLISHED parv (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:21:22 EST)

dye sub printer question Kenneth Oakman (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:38:00 EST)

Re: dye sub printer question Canongirly (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:28:39 EST)

Re: dye sub printer question mark_digital (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 13:10:54 EST)

non-canon flash with canon g5? frans (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:53:57 EST)

Re: non-canon flash with canon g5? Sorby (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:16:41 EST)
Re: non-canon flash with canon g5? John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:25:33 EST)
Re: non-canon flash with canon g5? Mark B. (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:11:43 EST)

Re: non-canon flash with canon g5? frans (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 04:26:54 EST)

Intelligent sharpening tools Morgan Ohlson (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:54:12 EST)

Re: Intelligent sharpening tools Bill Hilton (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:12:53 EST)
Re: Intelligent sharpening tools Mark Johnson (Mon Mar 15 2004 - 21:21:04 EST)

Re: Intelligent sharpening tools Mark Johnson (Mon Mar 15 2004 - 21:51:56 EST)

Fuji S7000 and Compact Flash Cards Jim Spen (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:37:35 EST)
Genuine Fractals - completely overated? neville stanikk (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:38:40 EST)

Re: Genuine Fractals - completely overated? Bill Hilton (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:04:56 EST)
Re: Genuine Fractals - completely overated? Tony Spadaro (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:06:01 EST)
Re: Genuine Fractals - completely overated? Marvin Margoshes (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:37:04 EST)
Re: Genuine Fractals - completely overated? Tom Monego (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:15:54 EST)
Re: Genuine Fractals - completely overated? Dr. Bob (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:04:36 EST)
Re: Genuine Fractals - completely overated? Mark M (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:56:35 EST)

5.299 *****SPAM***** Re: FA: Canon Speedlite 380EX Mint condition, no reserve - currently $10.50 - ends Thrusday Dave (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:52:31 EST)
Re: Who is the best guitarist ever? Noway Jose (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:19:59 EST)
Camera broken by airport X-ray? Stuart (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:44:41 EST)

Re: Camera broken by airport X-ray? Don (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:10:40 EST)
Re: Camera broken by airport X-ray? Joseph Meehan (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:13:18 EST)
Re: Camera broken by airport X-ray? Neon John (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:32:48 EST)

Re: Camera broken by airport X-ray? Stuart (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:21:49 EST)

Re: Camera broken by airport X-ray? Jack (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:41:50 EST)

5.498 *****SPAM***** Re: I'll never believe another Epson owner Azzz1588 (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:44:43 EST)

Re: I'll never believe another Epson owner John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:01:15 EST)

5.498 *****SPAM***** Re: I'll never believe another Epson owner Azzz1588 (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 08:33:14 EST)

5.498 *****SPAM***** Re: Known rapist Azzz1588 (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:44:33 EST)
EXIF date and time editing Dave Oddie (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:21:25 EST)

Re: EXIF date and time editing Stuart Middleton-White (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:42:18 EST)

Re: EXIF date and time editing Dave Oddie (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:09:31 EST)

Re: EXIF date and time editing Stuart Middleton-White (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:30:47 EST)
Re: EXIF date and time editing NightOwl (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:44:39 EST)

question wide and zoom Hugo Sousa (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 08:52:26 EST)
Re: Large Group Family Weddings Joseph Meehan (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:44:23 EST)

Re: Large Group Family Weddings Ken Burns (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:07:17 EST)

Re: Large Group Family Weddings Jack (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:59:07 EST)

Re: Large Group Family Weddings Joseph Meehan (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:09:34 EST)
Re: Large Group Family Weddings Tom Monego (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:32:50 EST)
Re: Large Group Family Weddings RustY © (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 13:09:37 EST)
Re: Large Group Family Weddings bob (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:00:58 EST)
Re: Large Group Family Weddings George Kerby (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:18:07 EST)
Re: Large Group Family Weddings Tom (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 16:52:17 EST)
Re: Large Group Family Weddings George Kerby (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 18:23:07 EST)
Re: Large Group Family Weddings bob (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:04:51 EST)

Re: Large Group Family Weddings mark_digital (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 10:18:59 EST)

what is colour space? fake name (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:26:48 EST)

Re: what is colour space? jpc (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:13:32 EST)

Re: what is colour space? Tom Monego (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:38:49 EST)

Re: what is colour space? jpc (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:24:10 EST)
Re: what is colour space? mark_digital (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:06:02 EST)
Re: what is colour space? Bill Hilton (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:44:25 EST)
5.222 *****SPAM***** Re: what is colour space? jpc (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 00:32:31 EST)
Re: what is colour space? Bill Hilton (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:55:54 EST)
Re: what is colour space? mark_digital (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 06:40:35 EST)
Re: what is colour space? jpc (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 08:11:02 EST)
Re: what is colour space? mark_digital© (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 16:11:20 EST)
Re: what is colour space? Bill Hilton (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:19:05 EST)
Re: what is colour space? Rachael of Nex, the Wiccan Rat (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:11:46 EST)
5.222 *****SPAM***** Re: what is colour space? jpc (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 08:39:36 EST)

Re: what is colour space? Flycaster (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:05:18 EST)

Re: Canon digital rebel Raw format Just Me (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:18:14 EST)

Re: Canon digital rebel Raw format Fred A. Miller (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:13:43 EST)

Georgia Pacific papers? Jason Quick (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:18:09 EST)
Printing Four-up? Jason Quick (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:16:39 EST)

Re: Printing Four-up? David J Taylor (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:24:35 EST)
Re: Printing Four-up? Ken Burns (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:34:58 EST)

Re: Printing Four-up? Ron Hunter (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:17:56 EST)

Re: Printing Four-up? John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:26:04 EST)

Re: Printing Four-up? Jason Quick (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:05:17 EST)

Re: Printing Four-up? John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:13:15 EST)
Re: Printing Four-up? High Sierra (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:31:05 EST)
Re: Printing Four-up? Phil Rose (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:55:31 EST)

Re: Printing Four-up? HRosita (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:19:46 EST)
Re: Best Digital Magazine????????? Lucrezia (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 04:04:50 EST)
Re: Sony DSC-V1 digital camera manual Jens Christensen (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:30:31 EST)
Re: WTB: Sony DSC-V1 digital camera manual John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:23:33 EST)
Re: WTB: Sony DSC-V1 digital camera manual Larry (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:01:15 EST)

Re: WTB: Sony DSC-V1 digital camera manual eb7g (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:22:40 EST)

Re: WTB: Sony DSC-V1 digital camera manual ben (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:38:46 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Eddie Bromhead (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 03:59:09 EST)
Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? BillH (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:52:54 EST)
Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? imbsysop (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:54:09 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Rachael of Nex, the Wiccan Rat (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:40:06 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Nibbler (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:31:05 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Rachael of Nex, the Wiccan Rat (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:07:29 EST)
Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? pltrgyst (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 23:14:43 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Robertwgross (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:45:07 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Nibbler (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:00:48 EST)
Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Ron Hunter (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:12:52 EST)
Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Ken Weitzel (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:35:37 EST)
Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Robertwgross (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 23:54:04 EST)
Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Robertwgross (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 23:40:02 EST)
Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Nibbler (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:50:31 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Lionel (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 23:55:09 EST)
Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Ron Hunter (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:10:55 EST)
Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Chris Quinn (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:50:39 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Ryan Robbins (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:57:28 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Tom Monego (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 08:32:20 EST)
Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Alan F Cross (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:15:37 EST)
Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Michael Meissner (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:09:16 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Nibbler (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:36:24 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Doug (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:25:06 EST)
Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Frank ess (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:00:16 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Nibbler (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:37:40 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Larry (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:55:04 EST)
Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Sorby (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:39:10 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Charlie Self (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:46:57 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Marvin Margoshes (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:49:03 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Daniel W. Rouse Jr. (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:15:46 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? bob (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:12:47 EST)
Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? RAD (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:39:06 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Ken Weitzel (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:32:08 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Nibbler (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:39:12 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Bob Thomas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:13:51 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Bob Thomas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 02:00:51 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Lionel (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 03:54:15 EST)

Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? SH (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:34:06 EST)
Re: Who has a clever idea for storing AAs ? Mark M (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:34:18 EST)
Re: How can I fix 128MB card Ron G (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:14:52 EST)
Re: How can I fix 128MB card John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:21:07 EST)

Re: How can I fix 128MB card Don (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:26:49 EST)

Re: How can I fix 128MB card John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:06:12 EST)

Re: How can I fix 128MB card NEWS (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:45:42 EST)

Re: How can I fix 128MB card Nibbler (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:08:19 EST)

Re: How can I fix 128MB card Nibbler (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:17:11 EST)

Re: How can I fix 128MB card John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:07:59 EST)

Re: How can I fix 128MB card Sf (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:52:17 EST)
Re: How can I fix 128MB card Nibbler (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:21:17 EST)

Re: How can I fix 128MB card Hogleg44/40 (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 19:20:37 EST)
Re: Which digital camera allows you infinite record time when connected to a computer? Dan J. S. (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:53:01 EST)
Re: Which digital camera allows you infinite record time when connected to a computer? Don (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:23:58 EST)
Re: CRIAwatch (Canadian Recording Industry Association Watch) CorSter (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:36:00 EST)
Re: Chuck Lysaght will be thrilled was Re: March 01 - Nambla Endorses Kerry m II (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:13:26 EST)
Re: Rugby is gay, get a life Mr Scebe (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 02:07:50 EST)
Re: Rugby is gay, get a life Gregory Nazarko (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:39:53 EST)

Re: Rugby is gay, get a life Bluto (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:21:22 EST)
5.243 *****SPAM***** Re: Rugby is gay, get a life didgerman (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:00:36 EST)

Re: Rugby is gay, get a life ~#Bluebird#~ (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:36:20 EST)

5.739 *****SPAM***** Re: Rugby is gay, get a life didgerman (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 07:49:12 EST)
Re: Rugby is gay, get a life ~#Bluebird#~ (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 11:49:17 EST)
5.739 *****SPAM***** Re: Rugby is gay, get a life didgerman (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 05:53:04 EST)
Re: Rugby is gay, get a life DaveyWavey (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 17:06:52 EST)
5.739 *****SPAM***** Re: Rugby is gay, get a life didgerman (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 05:56:51 EST)

Re: Rugby is gay, get a life Brad Anton (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 01:24:14 EST)
Re: Rugby is gay, get a life Peter Ashford (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 04:03:39 EST)
Re: Rugby is gay, get a life Alan Luchetti (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:56:38 EST)

Re: Rugby is gay, get a life dechucka (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:14:56 EST)

Re: 256 vs 128 CSM1 (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:17:35 EST)

Re: 256 vs 128 Nibbler (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:26:20 EST)

Re: Ho's can't resist me PsyberZombie (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:04:09 EST)
Re: Ho's can't resist me Mr Nifty (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:47:50 EST)
Re: What's Most Important When Buying Online? JJ (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:18:45 EST)
Re: What's Most Important When Buying Online? Ron Hunter (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 05:39:38 EST)

Re: What's Most Important When Buying Online? Brent Geery (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:48:53 EST)

Re: What's Most Important When Buying Online? mark_digital (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:13:43 EST)
Re: What's Most Important When Buying Online? Joey (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:15:00 EST)

Re: What's Most Important When Buying Online? Douglas W. Hoyt (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:06:00 EST)
Re: What's Most Important When Buying Online? JJ (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:14:17 EST)

Re: What's Most Important When Buying Online? Dan J. S. (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:47:20 EST)

5.214 *****SPAM***** Re: What's Most Important When Buying Online? JJ (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:48:49 EST)

5.214 *****SPAM***** Re: What's Most Important When Buying Online? Dan J. S. (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:33:01 EST)

Re: What's Most Important When Buying Online? NightOwl (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:51:42 EST)

Re: What's Most Important When Buying Online? RAD (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:32:07 EST)

Re: What's Most Important When Buying Online? JJ (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:23:07 EST)

Re: What's Most Important When Buying Online? RAD (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:23:47 EST)

Re: What's Most Important When Buying Online? JJ (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:04:47 EST)

Re: What's Most Important When Buying Online? JJ (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:50:26 EST)
Re: Mac G5 OS 10 and a Epson 7600 Need help with print utilities Hamish Reid (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:32:21 EST)
Re: Best Oly white balance techniques? al-Farrob (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:07:39 EST)

Re: Best Oly white balance techniques? Phil Rose (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:15:56 EST)

Re: Best Oly white balance techniques? Azzz1588 (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 08:33:17 EST)
Re: What to buy - Fuji S500, Olympus 740, HP 945 or Minolta Z1 ? Larry (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:46:46 EST)

Re: What to buy - Fuji S500, Olympus 740, HP 945 or Minolta Z1 ? Tal Fucus (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:05:54 EST)

Re: What to buy - Fuji S500, Olympus 740, HP 945 or Minolta Z1 ? Josef G. (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:21:27 EST)

Re: What to buy - Fuji S500, Olympus 740, HP 945 or Minolta Z1 ? BenOne© (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:08:03 EST)

Re: What to buy - Fuji S500, Olympus 740, HP 945 or Minolta Z1 ? Malcolm (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:30:05 EST)
Re: Recommendations for good Airshow camera. Tom Monego (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 08:30:00 EST)

Re: Recommendations for good Airshow camera. John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:15:29 EST)

5.204 *****SPAM***** Re: Recommendations for good Airshow camera. Paolo Pizzi (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 23:45:22 EST)
Re: Recommendations for good Airshow camera. Capt Nud (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 08:42:29 EST)
Re: Noise while shooting with Canon Digital Rebel Nibbler (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 08:46:18 EST)
Re: Noise while shooting with Canon Digital Rebel John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:07:22 EST)
Re: Noise while shooting with Canon Digital Rebel Boba (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:05:26 EST)
Re: Noise while shooting with Canon Digital Rebel Boba (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:53:54 EST)
Re: Noise while shooting with Canon Digital Rebel Ken Burns (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:54:35 EST)

Re: Noise while shooting with Canon Digital Rebel Boba (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:03:40 EST)

Re: Noise while shooting with Canon Digital Rebel Lionel (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 00:33:32 EST)

Re: Any source for mounting plates for BP-511 battery series? Don (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:29:12 EST)
Re: William Hung IS the American Idol mark_digital (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:16:52 EST)
Re: [SU]: When will "Reflections" be open for public viewing? Fuzzy Logic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:59:11 EST)
Re: ot: ebay situation John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:05:32 EST)
Re: Need digital camera with 28mm to +100mm lens bob (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:10:13 EST)
Re: Newbie question(s): took pictures, now what? ;^) bencon (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:58:25 EST)
Re: Oly E-1 Polarizing Filter Questions Fred A. Miller (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:45:30 EST)
Re: Sandisk SD cards etc. RAD (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:56:59 EST)

Re: Sandisk SD cards etc. Ron Hunter (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:28:22 EST)

Re: Sandisk SD cards etc. Ron Hunter (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 20:22:10 EST)
Re: Sandisk SD cards etc. Barry Smith (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 03:53:17 EST)

Re: Sandisk SD cards etc. Prognathous (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:16:09 EST)

Re: Sandisk SD cards etc. Barry Smith (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 02:52:32 EST)

Re: Sandisk SD cards etc. Ron Hunter (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 05:06:23 EST)

Re: Sandisk SD cards etc. Mark M (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:54:03 EST)
Re: slave flash three - cheap but NO AAA batteries Neon John (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:23:59 EST)
Re: Need for moderator Doug (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:51:39 EST)

Re: Need for moderator Steve Young (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:49:53 EST)

Re: Need for moderator Doug (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:08:55 EST)

Re: Need for moderator Steve Young (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:03:09 EST)
Re: Need for moderator Steve Young (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 10:39:21 EST)

5.498 *****SPAM***** Re: Need for moderator Azzz1588 (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 08:33:16 EST)

Re: Need for moderator bob (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:06:33 EST)
Re: Do any modern groups use a violin bow on their guitars? George Kerby (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:49:42 EST)
Re: Do any modern groups use a violin bow on their guitars? Randall Ainsworth (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:51:34 EST)
Re: Do any modern groups use a violin bow on their guitars? Sheldon (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:04:06 EST)
Re: This one time at band camp No Way (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:50:36 EST)
Re: Kodak DX6490- Problems ejecting SD Memory Card? Dave K. (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:42:58 EST)

Re: Kodak DX6490- Problems ejecting SD Memory Card? Nibbler (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:20:47 EST)

Re: Kodak DX6490- Problems ejecting SD Memory Card? Nibbler (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:25:04 EST)

Re: Kodak DX6490- Problems ejecting SD Memory Card? Craig Bailey (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:00:11 EST)
Re: Kodak DX6490- Problems ejecting SD Memory Card? Ron Hunter (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:26:38 EST)
Re: Kodak DX6490- Problems ejecting SD Memory Card? BenOne© (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:19:04 EST)

Re: Kodak DX6490- Problems ejecting SD Memory Card? Dave K. (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:43:47 EST)

Re: Kodak DX6490- Problems ejecting SD Memory Card? Ron Hunter (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 13:42:49 EST)

Re: Kodak DX6490- Problems ejecting SD Memory Card? c_e (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 03:47:14 EST)
Re: Nikon Coolscan III vs Minolta Dimage Scan Dual III Gordon Moat (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:15:49 EST)
Re: 10 x Op Zoom? Don Coon (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:58:15 EST)

Re: 10 x Op Zoom? John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:47:11 EST)

Re: 10 x Op Zoom? billy radio (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 16:18:24 EST)
Re: Can standard DVD players read VCD disks mark_digital (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:28:12 EST)

Re: Can standard DVD players read VCD disks John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:53:23 EST)

Re: Can standard DVD players read VCD disks mark_digital© (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 23:07:56 EST)

Re: Can standard DVD players read VCD disks John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 23:42:47 EST)

Re: Can standard DVD players read VCD disks Michael Meissner (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 23:48:14 EST)
Re: Can standard DVD players read VCD disks Chris Quinn (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:53:37 EST)
Re: New Digital Camera Tests gene ohara (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:15:55 EST)

Re: New Digital Camera Tests Jim Waggener (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:49:33 EST)

Re: New Digital Camera Tests p.mc (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:01:38 EST)
Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? Don Gentile (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:07:26 EST)

Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? George Kerby (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:08:18 EST)
Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? nospam (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:43:51 EST)

Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? Guido Vollbeding (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:29:39 EST)

Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? Bart van der Wolf (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 09:41:21 EST)
Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? Guido Vollbeding (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 11:07:32 EST)
Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? David J Taylor (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 11:13:16 EST)
Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? Guido Vollbeding (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 11:25:05 EST)
Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? David J Taylor (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:50:23 EST)
Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:29:48 EST)
Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 17:48:39 EST)
Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? Bart van der Wolf (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:03:52 EST)
Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? Dave Martindale (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 11:29:19 EST)
Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? Dave Martindale (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 11:24:21 EST)
Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? Guido Vollbeding (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 11:37:45 EST)
Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? George Kerby (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:11:47 EST)
Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:37:28 EST)

Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? Steven M. Scharf (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 11:42:54 EST)
Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? Paul H. (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:18:57 EST)

Re: Sigma SD9 or Canon 300D? Don Gentile (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 02:12:13 EST)
5.994 *****SPAM***** Re: Seneca bods and weaves (was Re: Fake Photos at Einsatzgruppenarchives.com? Azzz1588 (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:44:22 EST)
Re: Dry Mountinging Inkjet Prints Robert Feinman (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:06:31 EST)
Re: Nice Free Photo Editor al-Farrob (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:17:56 EST)

Re: Nice Free Photo Editor Fred A. Miller (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:26:17 EST)

Re: Nice Free Photo Editor me (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:31:49 EST)
Re: Zoom For Canon Rebel JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 05:37:41 EST)

Re: Zoom For Canon Rebel Don Coon (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:16:49 EST)

Re: Zoom For Canon Rebel JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:27:13 EST)

Re: Zoom For Canon Rebel jean (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 14:26:07 EST)
Re: Olympus D 490-Z won't turn on; common Olympus problem? Robert Oliver (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:21:10 EST)
Re: Olympus D 490-Z won't turn on; common Olympus problem? Ron G (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:33:56 EST)
Re: Artistic photo editing Old Nick (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:02:38 EST)
Re: Artistic photo editing Mike Kohary (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:15:27 EST)
Re: Photo Size vs. Standard Frames Don Stauffer (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:18:01 EST)
Re: Higher ISO = increased noise imbsysop (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 05:40:27 EST)
Re: EOS 10 Lenses? Simon Gardner (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 08:24:48 EST)

Re: EOS 10 Lenses? William Jackson (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 08:51:15 EST)

Re: EOS 10 Lenses? Don Coon (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:05:31 EST)

Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Nigel Evans (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 05:06:25 EST)

Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Mr Scebe (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 05:53:37 EST)

Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) rick boyd (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 17:12:01 EST)
Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Ferdi Greyling (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:10:56 EST)

Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) John Krempasky (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:17:12 EST)

Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Ferdi Greyling (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 05:19:32 EST)
Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Bobs (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 08:01:56 EST)

Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Greig Blanchett (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 19:03:03 EST)

Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Ferdi Greyling (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:13:27 EST)

Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Peter Ashford (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 19:09:47 EST)
Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Peter Ashford (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 04:06:27 EST)
Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Ben (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 08:05:23 EST)
Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Ferdi Greyling (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:06:11 EST)

Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Doug Sorensen (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:32:08 EST)

Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Ferdi Greyling (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 05:22:26 EST)
Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Mr Scebe (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 03:48:49 EST)
Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Ferdi Greyling (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 13:08:54 EST)

6.054 *****SPAM***** Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Leon (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:14:22 EST)

Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) William A. T. Clark (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:10:04 EST)

Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Ferdi Greyling (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 05:24:00 EST)
6.054 *****SPAM***** Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Leon (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 07:47:30 EST)

Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) William A. T. Clark (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 08:57:15 EST)
Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Ali Day (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 09:38:08 EST)
Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) William A. T. Clark (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 10:29:11 EST)
Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Mr Scebe (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 03:52:53 EST)

Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) JD (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:26:59 EST)

Re: Which is tougher: RUGBY or FOOTBALL (American) Ferdi Greyling (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:03:50 EST)
Re: Is Paintball a REAL SPORT??? IceMan (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:55:51 EST)
Re: Is Paintball a REAL SPORT??? Insane Ranter (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:14:18 EST)
Re: Is Paintball a REAL SPORT??? Jeff Goslin (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:22:45 EST)

Re: Is Paintball a REAL SPORT??? Harold Burton (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:32:29 EST)

Re: Is Paintball a REAL SPORT??? Jeff Goslin (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 08:11:54 EST)

Re: Is Paintball a REAL SPORT??? IceMan (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:58:11 EST)

Re: Is Paintball a REAL SPORT??? Harold Burton (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 22:51:17 EST)
Re: Is Paintball a REAL SPORT??? z (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 04:23:09 EST)
Re: Is Paintball a REAL SPORT??? John M. Smith (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:32:38 EST)
Re: IXUS 400 or 430 is there a difference? Leonard (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:08:44 EST)
Re: How to take good pics without a histogram Tom Monego (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 08:26:06 EST)
Re: How to take good pics without a histogram bob (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:35:56 EST)
Re: How to take good pics without a histogram Tom Monego (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:14:31 EST)
Re: How to take good pics without a histogram JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 04:55:27 EST)
Re: God-dammit!!!! kenneth_lad (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:42:06 EST)

Re: God-dammit!!!! Frank ess (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:45:32 EST)
Re: God-dammit!!!! George Kerby (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:51:49 EST)

Re: God-dammit!!!! agent yellow (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:58:21 EST)

Re: God-dammit!!!! George Kerby (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:24:58 EST)

Re: God-dammit!!!! kenneth_lad (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:03:47 EST)

Re: God-dammit!!!! George Kerby (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:30:02 EST)
Re: God-dammit!!!! kenneth_lad (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:57:59 EST)

Re: God-dammit!!!! Charles Robinson (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:21:25 EST)

Re: Should I Buy a Nikon 5400? David J Taylor (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 05:15:44 EST)

Re: Should I Buy a Nikon 5400? Roger Halstead (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:28:00 EST)

Re: Should I Buy a Nikon 5400? David J Taylor (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 05:01:33 EST)

Re: Should I Buy a Nikon 5400? Claudius Jones (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 13:11:17 EST)

Re: Should I Buy a Nikon 5400? Jerry McG (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 08:34:59 EST)
Re: New CCD concept Charles Douglas Wehner (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:18:07 EST)

Re: New CCD concept Mark Herring (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 08:42:24 EST)
Re: New CCD concept Roland Karlsson (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:42:02 EST)

Re: New CCD concept Charles Douglas Wehner (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 07:29:51 EST)

Re: New CCD concept Roland Karlsson (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:12:59 EST)
Re: New CCD concept Nibbler (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 16:29:01 EST)
Re: New CCD concept Ray Fischer (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 15:08:11 EST)

Re: New CCD concept Nibbler (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 15:36:57 EST)

Re: New CCD concept Roland Karlsson (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:35:49 EST)

Re: New CCD concept Rudy Garcia (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 23:14:55 EST)

Re: New CCD concept Mark Herring (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 22:11:35 EST)

Re: New CCD concept Nibbler (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 16:00:24 EST)

Re: New CCD concept Charles Douglas Wehner (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 07:09:06 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Randall Ainsworth (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:52:29 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:42:15 EST)

Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Prognathous (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:22:14 EST)

Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:23:50 EST)

Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Larry (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:59:05 EST)

Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:21:16 EST)

Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? David J. Littleboy (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:28:43 EST)

Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Wayne J (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:48:59 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Flycaster (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:39:44 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:25:11 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Flycaster (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 20:27:20 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? David J. Littleboy (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 20:56:49 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Flycaster (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 23:50:59 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? David J. Littleboy (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 00:21:44 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Flycaster (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:21:10 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 21:40:06 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Jupiter (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 05:55:03 EST)

Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:26:23 EST)

Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:02:45 EST)

Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Guido Vollbeding (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:08:43 EST)

Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? David J. Littleboy (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:10:36 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Guido Vollbeding (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:22:57 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? David J. Littleboy (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:29:57 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Guido Vollbeding (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:42:57 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Lionel (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 08:06:08 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Peter A. Stavrakoglou (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:31:35 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Guido Vollbeding (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 07:42:45 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? YoYo (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 09:38:38 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? David J. Littleboy (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 09:49:16 EST)

Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Prognathous (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:28:31 EST)
Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Jake Patterson (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 22:54:08 EST)

Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? John Navas (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 23:27:10 EST)

Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Prognathous (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 03:22:16 EST)

Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:46:15 EST)

Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? Prognathous (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:32:47 EST)

Re: minolta dslr or sigma sd 10? George Preddy (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 02:32:01 EST)
Re: Digital Depth of Field Joseph Meehan (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:39:20 EST)

Re: Digital Depth of Field David J. Littleboy (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 08:06:52 EST)
Re: Digital Depth of Field Leonard Evens (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:52:15 EST)

Re: Digital Depth of Field Gisle Hannemyr (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:48:28 EST)

Re: Digital Depth of Field Leonard Evens (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 08:57:01 EST)
Re: Digital Depth of Field Gisle Hannemyr (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 10:20:49 EST)
Re: Digital Depth of Field Kennedy McEwen (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 17:06:02 EST)

Re: Digital Depth of Field Al (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:41:23 EST)
Re: Digital Depth of Field Rudy Garcia (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:02:53 EST)
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? Azzz1588 (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 05:30:39 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? Texas Longhorns (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:11:45 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? zbzbzb (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:46:01 EST)
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? Azzz1588 (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 08:33:15 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? Texas Longhorns (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 10:48:22 EST)
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? zbzbzb (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:24:28 EST)
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? Azzz1588 (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 00:15:27 EST)
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? Texas Longhorns (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:26:01 EST)
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? George Kerby (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:40:30 EST)
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? zbzbzb (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:17:11 EST)
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? Noway Jose (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 10:25:56 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? Noway Jose (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:17:36 EST)
Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? George Kerby (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:07:22 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? Texas Longhorns (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:25:40 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? George Kerby (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:21:22 EST)

Re: Why Americans are fat and smelly? Noway Jose (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 10:33:29 EST)
Re: Getting prints Steve Wilbur (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:08:26 EST)

Re: Getting prints John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:30:44 EST)
Re: Getting prints zbzbzb (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 23:01:09 EST)

Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? Howard Beale (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:37:05 EST)

Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? Mike C. (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:25:33 EST)

Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? El Queso (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 23:02:04 EST)
Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? Howard Beale (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:43:57 EST)
Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? El Queso (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:15:29 EST)
Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? Howard Beale (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:42:19 EST)

Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? Mike C. (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:26:36 EST)

Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? El Queso (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:14:31 EST)
Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? Howard Beale (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 09:30:55 EST)

Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? El Queso (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:14:09 EST)

Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? Howard Beale (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 09:37:56 EST)

Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? Stratmanik (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 07:56:52 EST)

Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? Ultra (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 07:04:16 EST)

Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? Don Freeman (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:30:22 EST)

Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? Howard Beale (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 06:11:07 EST)
Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? Tim (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:18:08 EST)

6.204 *****SPAM***** Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? Mike C. (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:27:51 EST)

Re: Who is the best bassist of all time? El Queso (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 22:56:37 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:50:34 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:38:31 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:22:00 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 20:18:02 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:38:50 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:52:13 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:21:31 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:32:58 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film William Graham (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 00:54:03 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:47:02 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Bart van der Wolf (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 08:09:48 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:22:33 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:34:40 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:10:13 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Lionel (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:24:34 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Chris Brown (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:36:12 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Bart van der Wolf (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 10:36:34 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:43:59 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:29:31 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:10:46 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Bart van der Wolf (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 10:33:28 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Gordon Moat (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:23:32 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Bart van der Wolf (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:34:45 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Bob Hickey (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 07:35:21 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Gordon Richardson (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:32:44 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:29:33 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:42:04 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:17:24 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:22:51 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:24:30 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Lionel (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 23:39:40 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 02:43:49 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Chris Brown (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 04:53:43 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:51:04 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Chris Brown (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 08:31:44 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:23:31 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Chris Brown (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:59:24 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:56:23 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:24:11 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mike Kohary (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 19:02:09 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 04:02:09 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:54:39 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:58:45 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:45:33 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:15:35 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Alan Browne (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 11:14:41 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Alan Browne (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:12:51 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Chris Brown (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 04:55:36 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:57:22 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:07:02 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:25:25 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:42:47 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:18:30 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:46:13 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:19:51 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:55:03 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:55:19 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film David J Taylor (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 03:52:30 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 05:30:00 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film David J Taylor (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 05:35:53 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:00:38 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:14:31 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:57:18 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film David J Taylor (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:41:13 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:58:36 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film David J Taylor (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 13:10:08 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:34:59 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film David J Taylor (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 15:21:38 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 15:33:45 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film David J Taylor (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 15:41:43 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:59:44 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:16:38 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:58:41 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:16:05 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:07:58 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:21:07 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:05:19 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:24:27 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 06:55:14 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 04:20:15 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:03:43 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:33:32 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film David J. Littleboy (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 17:56:56 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:05:13 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:34:26 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:01:52 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:18:36 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:27:11 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:05:17 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mike Kohary (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 00:06:36 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:06:58 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:36:09 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film bob (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:18:44 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:03:42 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film bob (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:11:29 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:28:37 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film bob (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 09:46:04 EST)
5.35 *****SPAM***** Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:04:21 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Lionel (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 01:55:11 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 04:38:18 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Lionel (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 05:13:16 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 08:16:45 EST)
5.299 *****SPAM***** Re: shooting digital vs film bob (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 09:48:17 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:16:03 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film bob (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:51:42 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:51:16 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film bob (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 13:03:44 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film David J. Littleboy (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:01:37 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:55:47 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film bob (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 13:11:10 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 13:57:00 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film bob (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:12:35 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:32:55 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:19:17 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:06:10 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:18:20 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 06:55:38 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mike Kohary (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:17:22 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:07:59 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:37:13 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Alan Browne (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:48:57 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Nick C (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:55:29 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 06:58:15 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:49:37 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:42:42 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film jpc (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 11:24:47 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 04:49:24 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:40:10 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Lionel (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:30:56 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 16:38:54 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 04:47:12 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film jpc (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:45:03 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Alan Browne (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:32:11 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Alan Browne (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:36:07 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film jpc (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:37:00 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Lionel (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:38:21 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film jpc (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:05:30 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film TP (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:14:10 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Bart van der Wolf (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 10:48:44 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 05:14:02 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film jpc (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:31:28 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:04:35 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:01:56 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 11:58:11 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:25:51 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:26:49 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:20:22 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film David J Taylor (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:38:16 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film bob (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 09:54:59 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film David J Taylor (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 10:24:11 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film bob (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 10:58:54 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film David J Taylor (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 11:09:51 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film bob (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 11:16:05 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:38:26 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 04:12:00 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:03:03 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:22:37 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:11:02 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Nick C (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:20:35 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Paul Schmidt (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 07:59:03 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 21:57:33 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:04:49 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:31:14 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:59:24 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 04:34:14 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 09:43:30 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:09:50 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:26:06 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Alan Browne (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:37:27 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:48:55 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Paul Schmidt (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 23:03:24 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 04:37:40 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 09:45:10 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Paul Schmidt (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:59:04 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 13:56:23 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:25:56 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:34:25 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Lionel (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:48:47 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 21:59:37 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:05:37 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:31:51 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:59:47 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Nick C (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:14:28 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:29:03 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Nick C (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 00:34:35 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 02:20:53 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mike Latondresse (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 21:40:11 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:01:58 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:21:13 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:01:16 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:23:26 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Alan Browne (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:16:46 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Nick C (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:56:27 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film The Dave© (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 00:52:59 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Nick C (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:03:47 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Nick C (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:46:31 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:22:13 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Nick C (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:51:08 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 02:14:42 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 17:19:24 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 05:27:03 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:34:13 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:45:47 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:20:58 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:32:00 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 17:24:00 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:48:42 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:54:39 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:23:01 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:35:41 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:31:00 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:09:32 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Alan Browne (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 20:11:36 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:21:07 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:32:11 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:11:10 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:45:05 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:37:45 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 23:03:45 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film William Graham (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 00:48:13 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 13:13:47 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Chris Brown (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 15:30:48 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film William Graham (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 04:04:08 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 13:12:09 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:31:40 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film William Graham (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 00:34:22 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 13:17:36 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film William Graham (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 04:07:27 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 09:46:11 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Gisle Hannemyr (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:32:05 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Nick C (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:51:41 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:07:58 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 13:21:41 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Gisle Hannemyr (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 06:57:03 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 08:28:28 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:07:29 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:25:08 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:32:05 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:01:56 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:37:01 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 19:09:07 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 20:45:46 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:34:30 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 13:58:17 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 05:36:07 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 07:02:03 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 08:07:41 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:51:49 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:37:26 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 13:59:29 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:49:43 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:54:02 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:04:51 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:10:24 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 18:36:50 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 18:32:08 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film brian (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:43:02 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Alan Browne (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 09:40:28 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Lionel (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 09:58:19 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:40:20 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Paul Schmidt (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:37:44 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:17:13 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Paul Schmidt (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 22:44:31 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 23:40:42 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:50:18 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mike Latondresse (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 19:23:51 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 05:38:32 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:52:34 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film brian (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:54:44 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:23:16 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film brian (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 09:58:24 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 11:20:43 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 05:22:05 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:06:50 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:00:39 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Doe (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:32:30 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:14:38 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film TP (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:26:56 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Alan Browne (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:41:10 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Doe (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 08:55:41 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film William Graham (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 00:48:14 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:26:33 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:12:04 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:54:05 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:49:23 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film Mxsmanic (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:33:47 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 13:22:24 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:48:56 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:03:50 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:51:11 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:03:54 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 19:52:39 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 21:24:59 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 06:26:49 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:22:53 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:11:24 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film John Navas (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 15:28:08 EST)
Re: shooting digital vs film pioe[rmv] (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 18:40:13 EST)

Re: shooting digital vs film Lionel (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 07:20:51 EST)
Re: How Does Auto White Balance Work? John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:00:01 EST)

Re: How Does Auto White Balance Work? John Navas (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:44:32 EST)

Re: How Does Auto White Balance Work? hfs2 (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 19:02:21 EST)
Re: Still trying to figure the grey level of an 18% grey card (was: If I shoot a grey card, should this end up as 127 grey?) JPS_at_email.domain.hidden (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 05:15:12 EST)

Re: Still trying to figure the grey level of an 18% grey card (was: If I shoot a grey card, should this end zbzbzb (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:12:08 EST)

Last message date: Tue Apr 06 2004 - 06:06:10 EDT
Archived on: Fri Sep 24 2004 - 17:34:51 EDT

476 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Previous Folder, Thread view Next Folder, Thread view List of Folders