"John Navas" <spamfilter0_at_navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:aGq6c.536$Fo4.3786_at_typhoon.sonic.net...
> [POSTED TO rec.photo.digital - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> I would expect it to have essentially identical imaging performance --
same
> sensor (presumably), just a different lens mount.
Agreed, it should have identical performance, since all sub-systems are the
same. But, the Canon lens mount has different physical characteristics than
the Nikon mount, like the flange to film plane distance which may affect
imaging. It's possible that the larger lens opening and flange to sensor
plane distance may give it an advantage. I'm not sure, but I am curious.
>
> In <usq6c.35368$JL2.402054_at_attbi_s03> on Thu, 18 Mar 2004 23:41:14 GMT,
> "Bowzah" <not_at_this.time> wrote:
>
> >It will be interesting to see if this unit suffers from the same
> >color-shifting that plagues the Nikon mount version. If not, well, it may
> >warrant a very close look.
> >
> >"BandHPhoto" <bandhphoto_at_aol.com> wrote in message
> >news:20040318165004.06733.00001580_at_mb-m05.aol.com...
> >>
<http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/cameras/proSLRc/proS > >> LRcIndex.jhtml?id=0.1.18.18.7.14&lc=en>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> John Navas
> [PLEASE NOTE: Ads belong *only* in rec.photo.marketplace.digital, as per
> <http://bobatkins.photo.net/info/charter.htm> <http://rpdfaq.50megs.com/>]
