| Subject | Author | Date |
| Kodak rapid selenium capacity | Fred | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 22:31:13 EST |
| Re: Kodak rapid selenium capacity | Mark A | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 03:52:07 EST |
| Re: Kodak rapid selenium capacity | Richard Knoppow | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 05:30:19 EST |
| --> Re: Kodak rapid selenium capacity | Fred | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 09:25:51 EST |
| --> Re: Kodak rapid selenium capacity | Dan Quinn | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 17:45:41 EST |
| --> Re: Kodak rapid selenium capacity | Fred | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 18:57:18 EST |
| --> 6.499 *****SPAM***** Re: Kodak rapid selenium capacity | Tom Phillips | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 12:24:53 EST |
| --> 6.096 *****SPAM***** Re: Kodak rapid selenium capacity | Fred | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 20:59:00 EST |
| --> Re: Kodak rapid selenium capacity | Dan Quinn | Sun Feb 01 2004 - 20:14:38 EST |
| --> Re: Kodak rapid selenium capacity | Richard Knoppow | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 21:05:22 EST |
| --> Re: Kodak rapid selenium capacity | Richard Knoppow | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 20:52:00 EST |
| Re: Kodak rapid selenium capacity | nick | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 01:42:05 EST |
| --> Re: Kodak rapid selenium capacity | Richard Knoppow | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:30:13 EST |
| --> Re: Kodak rapid selenium capacity | Nicholas O. Lindan | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:00:51 EST |
| --> Re: Kodak rapid selenium capacity | lloyd_at_email.domain.hidden | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 22:57:59 EST |
| Re: Thin negs with Efke 100 sheet film | David Foy | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 19:00:57 EST |
| Re: Thin negs with Efke 100 sheet film | Roman J. Rohleder | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 21:08:46 EST |
| --> Re: Thin negs with Efke 100 sheet film | David Foy | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 17:43:10 EST |
| Easier Tray Developing | Collin Brendemuehl | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 13:17:37 EST |
| Re: Easier Tray Developing | brook | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 19:17:30 EST |
| Re: Easier Tray Developing | Francis A. Miniter | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 23:23:28 EST |
| Re: Easier Tray Developing | Dan Quinn | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 06:34:49 EST |
| Re: Darkroom or Scanner? | Mike King | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 10:34:07 EST |
| Re: Fungus on Slides | Mike King | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 10:31:45 EST |
| Re: motor base | Mike King | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 10:37:40 EST |
| Re: motor base | Jtown2354 | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 19:54:24 EST |
| Why is the sky blue? | David Nebenzahl | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 00:13:53 EST |
| Re: Why is the sky blue? | Tom Phillips | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 17:23:50 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | David Nebenzahl | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 01:18:44 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Jim Phelps | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 02:46:29 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Jon | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 03:41:28 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Jim Phelps | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 06:09:04 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Tom Phillips | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 00:22:04 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Jim Phelps | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 07:37:57 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Tom Phillips | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 00:57:37 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Jon | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:31:50 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Tom Phillips | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 04:44:05 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Mxsmanic | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 03:19:35 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Mxsmanic | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 03:18:23 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Tom Phillips | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 05:06:38 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Mxsmanic | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 17:37:15 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | David Nebenzahl | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 22:37:53 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Mxsmanic | Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:22:35 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Mxsmanic | Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:23:54 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Mxsmanic | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 04:23:18 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Mxsmanic | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 17:35:50 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | David Nebenzahl | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 22:56:58 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Gregory W Blank | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 23:55:43 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | David Nebenzahl | Sun Feb 01 2004 - 04:48:42 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Dennis O'Connor | Sun Feb 01 2004 - 08:31:11 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | jjs | Sun Feb 01 2004 - 09:12:13 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | jjs | Sun Feb 01 2004 - 09:18:25 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Mxsmanic | Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:24:32 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Mxsmanic | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 04:23:59 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Mxsmanic | Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:25:54 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | jjs | Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:41:39 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Mxsmanic | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 04:26:00 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Mxsmanic | Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:12:19 EST |
| Re: Why is the sky blue? | Jean-David Beyer | Sun Feb 01 2004 - 17:45:43 EST |
| Re: Why is the sky blue? | Jean-David Beyer | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 08:03:56 EST |
| Re: Why is the sky blue? | MFHult_at_email.domain.hidden | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 09:50:41 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Jean-David Beyer | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 12:55:30 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | MFHult_at_email.domain.hidden | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 16:49:27 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Tom Phillips | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 10:57:57 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Tom Phillips | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 04:43:57 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | MFHult_at_email.domain.hidden | Sun Feb 08 2004 - 19:07:58 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Tom Phillips | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 07:15:43 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Tom Phillips | Tue Feb 10 2004 - 08:13:47 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Tom Phillips | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 06:04:11 EST |
| --> Re: Why is the sky blue? | Mxsmanic | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 03:23:53 EST |
| Re: Why is the sky blue? | Tom Phillips | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 06:02:41 EST |
| Re: Why is the sky blue? | Mxsmanic | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 03:21:33 EST |
| Re: Why is the sky blue? | Michael Scarpitti | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 09:54:03 EST |
| Re: Why is the sky blue? | Patrick Gainer | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 12:22:06 EST |
| Re: Why is the sky blue? | Richard Knoppow | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 22:13:43 EST |
| Re: Why is the sky blue? | Mxsmanic | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 03:17:35 EST |
| Timer for Unicolor motor base | Jon | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 19:38:44 EST |
| Re: Timer for Unicolor motor base | Nick Zentena | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 20:32:56 EST |
| --> Re: Timer for Unicolor motor base | Jon | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 00:43:00 EST |
| --> Re: Timer for Unicolor motor base | Nick Zentena | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 07:49:16 EST |
| --> Re: Timer for Unicolor motor base | Mike King | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 10:56:16 EST |
| --> Re: Timer for Unicolor motor base | Nicholas O. Lindan | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 15:47:16 EST |
| --> Re: Timer for Unicolor motor base | Jon | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:36:26 EST |
| Re: Timer for Unicolor motor base | Claudio Bonavolta | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 03:56:10 EST |
| --> Re: Timer for Unicolor motor base | Jon | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:33:56 EST |
| --> Re: Timer for Unicolor motor base | Claudio Bonavolta | Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:13:05 EST |
| Issues connecting RH Designs ZoneMaster and StopClock Pro | Tony Terlecki | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 12:32:27 EST |
| Re: Issues connecting RH Designs ZoneMaster and StopClock Pro | Bruce | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 13:33:59 EST |
| --> Re: Issues connecting RH Designs ZoneMaster and StopClock Pro | Tony Terlecki | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 20:52:06 EST |
| --> Re: Issues connecting RH Designs ZoneMaster and StopClock Pro | Dan Williams | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 23:09:43 EST |
| Re: Issues connecting RH Designs ZoneMaster and StopClock Pro | Christopher Woodhouse | Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:17:02 EST |
| Re: Digital travel camera | JimmyTango_at_email.domain.hidden | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 00:33:37 EST |
| Trays for toning | Mike Schuler | Wed Jan 28 2004 - 19:16:08 EST |
| Re: Trays for toning | Richard Knoppow | Wed Jan 28 2004 - 19:42:54 EST |
| --> Re: Trays for toning - impurities, slightly OT | John Walton | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 07:59:48 EST |
| --> Re: Trays for toning - impurities, slightly OT | Tom Phillips | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 05:02:41 EST |
| --> Re: Trays for toning - impurities, slightly OT | Mike Schuler | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 18:19:40 EST |
| --> Re: Trays for toning - impurities, slightly OT | Tom Phillips | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 11:59:35 EST |
| --> Re: Trays for toning - impurities, slightly OT | Dennis O'Connor | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 08:12:45 EST |
| --> Re: Trays for toning - impurities, slightly OT | brook | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 12:08:04 EST |
| Re: Print Dryers for Flattening Prints | Dan Quinn | Wed Jan 28 2004 - 19:13:12 EST |
| Re: edge shadow on negative 6x7 | Richard Knoppow | Wed Jan 28 2004 - 18:43:35 EST |
| Re: edge shadow on negative 6x7 | Don | Wed Jan 28 2004 - 19:29:07 EST |
| Re: edge shadow on negative 6x7 | Francis A. Miniter | Wed Jan 28 2004 - 21:54:38 EST |
| Re: Quantalog Macbeth Calibration Strip - from "carlo.garau@tiscali.it" | Craig Schroeder | Wed Jan 28 2004 - 22:24:40 EST |
| Re: The difference in enlarging lenses | Richard Knoppow | Wed Jan 28 2004 - 18:42:04 EST |
| Re: The difference in enlarging lenses | HypoBob | Wed Jan 28 2004 - 20:08:18 EST |
| Re: The difference in enlarging lenses | Patrick Gainer | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 00:19:32 EST |
| Re: The difference in enlarging lenses | Dan Quinn | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 18:36:03 EST |
| Re: The difference in enlarging lenses | Richard Knoppow | Wed Jan 28 2004 - 18:42:03 EST |
| Re: The difference in enlarging lenses | Hemi4268 | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 14:34:00 EST |
| --> Re: The difference in enlarging lenses | Richard Knoppow | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 05:36:53 EST |
| Re: The difference in enlarging lenses | Richard Knoppow | Wed Jan 28 2004 - 18:42:02 EST |
| Re: The difference in enlarging lenses | Martin Jangowski | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 06:14:10 EST |
| Re: salvaging a developer | Dan Quinn | Wed Jan 28 2004 - 18:19:10 EST |
| Re: salvaging a developer | otzi | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 22:24:40 EST |
| Re: Excellent Question (was Re: salvaging a developer) | John | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 00:42:52 EST |
| Re: Oh, BTW, a simple test (was Re: salvaging a developer) | br | Wed Jan 28 2004 - 21:15:24 EST |
| Re: Oh, BTW, a simple test (was Re: salvaging a developer) | Tom Phillips | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 04:58:34 EST |
| --> Re: Oh, BTW, a simple test (was Re: salvaging a developer) | ? | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 17:40:08 EST |
| --> Re: Oh, BTW, a simple test (was Re: salvaging a developer) | Tom Phillips | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 11:39:52 EST |
| --> Re: Oh, BTW, a simple test (was Re: salvaging a developer) | ? | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 19:02:25 EST |
| --> Re: Oh, BTW, a simple test (was Re: salvaging a developer) | Tom Phillips | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 12:27:49 EST |
| Re: Oh, BTW, a simple test (was Re: salvaging a developer) | John | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 20:50:33 EST |
| --> Re: Oh, BTW, a simple test (was Re: salvaging a developer) | br | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 22:21:12 EST |
| --> Re: Oh, BTW, a simple test (was Re: salvaging a developer) | John | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 00:16:30 EST |
| --> Re: Oh, BTW, a simple test (was Re: salvaging a developer) | Dennis O'Connor | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 08:06:52 EST |
| --> Re: Oh, BTW, a simple test (was Re: salvaging a developer) | John | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 08:28:37 EST |
| --> Re: Oh, BTW, a simple test (was Re: salvaging a developer) | Dennis O'Connor | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 13:01:22 EST |
| --> Re: Oh, BTW, a simple test (was Re: salvaging a developer) | Tom Phillips | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 06:16:41 EST |
| --> Re: Oh, BTW, a simple test (was Re: salvaging a developer) | John | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 03:05:17 EST |
| --> Re: Oh, BTW, a simple test (was Re: salvaging a developer) | John | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 03:03:07 EST |
| Re: salvaging a developer | lloyd_at_email.domain.hidden | Wed Jan 28 2004 - 14:20:54 EST |
| Re: salvaging a developer | Dan Quinn | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 19:06:55 EST |
| Re: salvaging a developer | Helge | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 09:52:07 EST |
| Re: Extend film development or high grade paper ? | Dan Quinn | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 18:48:34 EST |
| Re: Extend film development or high grade paper ? | Tom Phillips | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 13:58:41 EST |
| --> Re: Extend film development or high grade paper ? | Dan Quinn | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 06:29:04 EST |
| --> Re: Extend film development or high grade paper ? | Tom Phillips | Sat Jan 31 2004 - 07:22:22 EST |
| Re: Extend film development or high grade paper ? | Dan Dunphy | Thu Feb 12 2004 - 00:50:26 EST |
| Re: good review on B&W developers (for 400TX et HP5)? | otzi | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 10:24:40 EST |
| Re: good review on B&W developers (for 400TX et HP5)? | E Colar | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 12:06:23 EST |
| --> Re: good review on B&W developers (for 400TX et HP5)? | Tom Phillips | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 05:25:17 EST |
| Re: Using old b&w films (60') | Mike King | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 10:44:06 EST |
| Re: Newbie-- (WET!) Color printing aid question...Which is best? | Ken Hart | Thu Jan 29 2004 - 23:39:02 EST |
| Re: Gaining (or lossing) grades on a FB paper | Dan Quinn | Wed Jan 28 2004 - 19:32:34 EST |
| Re: Negative Cleaner ? | John Hendry | Fri Jan 30 2004 - 11:00:56 EST |
| Re: Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | Wed Jan 28 2004 - 19:27:35 EST |