Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Attachment view

From: Mark (nospam_at_email.domain.hidden)
Date: Mon Feb 16 2004 - 21:00:31 EST

• Next message: Collin Brendemuehl: "Bulk Aerographic"
• Previous message: Dan Quinn: "Safelab - was Ventilate or Scrub"
• Next in thread: Robert S. Dean: "Re: Sixty-year-old undeveloped film"
• Reply: Robert S. Dean: "Re: Sixty-year-old undeveloped film"
• Reply: brian: "Re: Sixty-year-old undeveloped film"
• Reply: Richard Knoppow: "Re: Sixty-year-old undeveloped film"
• Reply: Stefan Patric: "Re: Sixty-year-old undeveloped film"
• Reply: Mark: "Re: Sixty-year-old undeveloped film"

---

I recently liberated a box of old photos and negatives from my grandfather's
personal effects. Along with the developed items, I found three rolls of
apparently
exposed but undeveloped 35mm film. One is Kodak "Panatomic," and the other
two are Kodak "Panchromatic SS" and "Panchromatic SX." I assume the latter
are color film. Assuming they're contemporary with the other 35mm negatives,
they were exposed around 1940. Is there any chance that they'll produce
usable
negatives, or are they junk?

Thanks
-Mark

---

• Next message: Collin Brendemuehl: "Bulk Aerographic"
• Previous message: Dan Quinn: "Safelab - was Ventilate or Scrub"
• Next in thread: Robert S. Dean: "Re: Sixty-year-old undeveloped film"
• Reply: Robert S. Dean: "Re: Sixty-year-old undeveloped film"
• Reply: brian: "Re: Sixty-year-old undeveloped film"
• Reply: Richard Knoppow: "Re: Sixty-year-old undeveloped film"
• Reply: Stefan Patric: "Re: Sixty-year-old undeveloped film"
• Reply: Mark: "Re: Sixty-year-old undeveloped film"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Attachment view

Feedback, Contact Us, Legal Information, Your Privacy Copyright ©1998-2004 metro.isp Inc.    All rights reserved.