rec.photo.darkroom Discussion: By Thread

Subject	Author	Date
is 5 years old	Joe	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 20:56:59 EDT
Re: is 5 years old	Gregory Blank	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 21:25:38 EDT
--> Re: is 5 years old	Joe	Tue Oct 25 2005 - 09:03:47 EDT
Re: is 5 years old	Richard Knoppow	Tue Oct 25 2005 - 00:13:36 EDT
--> Re: is 5 years old	Joe	Tue Oct 25 2005 - 09:04:46 EDT
--> Re: is 5 years old	Andrew Price	Tue Oct 25 2005 - 14:01:30 EDT
--> Re: is 5 years old	Joe	Wed Oct 26 2005 - 00:58:33 EDT
--> Re: is 5 years old	Richard Knoppow	Wed Oct 26 2005 - 20:22:58 EDT
--> Re: is 5 years old	Peter Irwin	Wed Oct 26 2005 - 21:30:29 EDT
--> Re: is 5 years old	Richard Knoppow	Sat Oct 29 2005 - 18:28:52 EDT
--> Re: is 5 years old	Andrew Price	Sat Oct 29 2005 - 19:31:26 EDT
--> Re: is 5 years old	Peter	Mon Oct 31 2005 - 15:41:16 EST
--> Re: is 5 years old	Peter Irwin	Sat Oct 29 2005 - 23:09:43 EDT
--> Re: is 5 years old	Andrew Price	Fri Oct 28 2005 - 16:23:32 EDT
Re: is 5 years old	Joe	Fri Nov 11 2005 - 19:48:03 EST
how much does sodium sulfite accelerate developing times?	mmmmark_at_email.domain.hidden	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 18:05:58 EDT
Re: how much does sodium sulfite accelerate developing times?	Jean-David Beyer	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 21:46:12 EDT
--> Re: how much does sodium sulfite accelerate developing times?	mmmmark_at_email.domain.hidden	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 22:02:00 EDT
--> Re: how much does sodium sulfite accelerate developing times?	Rod Smith	Tue Oct 25 2005 - 01:00:07 EDT
Re: how much does sodium sulfite accelerate developing times?	UC	Tue Oct 25 2005 - 12:35:09 EDT
--> Re: how much does sodium sulfite accelerate developing times?	Mike King	Tue Oct 25 2005 - 13:37:56 EDT
--> Re: how much does sodium sulfite accelerate developing times?	UC	Tue Oct 25 2005 - 13:52:02 EDT
--> Re: how much does sodium sulfite accelerate developing times?	PATRICK GAINER	Tue Oct 25 2005 - 21:20:05 EDT
--> Re: how much does sodium sulfite accelerate developing times?	UC	Thu Oct 27 2005 - 12:15:40 EDT
--> Re: how much does sodium sulfite accelerate developing times?	UC	Thu Oct 27 2005 - 12:26:54 EDT
Staple negs to proofs?	lew	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 08:53:04 EDT
Re: Staple negs to proofs?	Draco	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 09:33:53 EDT
Re: Staple negs to proofs?	Nicholas O. Lindan	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 10:01:49 EDT
Re: Staple negs to proofs?	Stephen	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 10:28:15 EDT
Re: Staple negs to proofs?	Mike King	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 11:00:32 EDT
--> Re: Staple negs to proofs?	Pieter Litchfield	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 12:39:57 EDT
--> Re: Staple negs to proofs?	Draco	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 14:20:37 EDT
--> Re: Staple negs to proofs?	michaeleschuler_at_email.domain.hidden	Wed Oct 26 2005 - 11:53:33 EDT
Re: Staple negs to proofs?	Francis A. Miniter	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 14:49:35 EDT
Re: Staple negs to proofs?	lew	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 15:46:06 EDT
Re: Staple negs to proofs?	Draco	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 17:20:06 EDT
Re: Staple negs to proofs?	seog	Sat Nov 05 2005 - 13:08:42 EST
SELLING A MAMIYA 645 / 1000S M645 WITH EXTRAS !!!! GOOD DEAL	Miguel Escobar	Sun Oct 23 2005 - 23:59:39 EDT
Information about rec.photo.marketplace.darkroom [27march2005]	Helge Nareid	Sun Oct 23 2005 - 16:14:04 EDT
Measuring Density Range	Alan Smithee	Sat Oct 22 2005 - 15:45:18 EDT
Re: Measuring Density Range	Nicholas O. Lindan	Sat Oct 22 2005 - 17:54:01 EDT
--> Re: Measuring Density Range	Alan Smithee	Sat Oct 22 2005 - 21:45:13 EDT
--> Re: Measuring Density Range	Francis A. Miniter	Sat Oct 22 2005 - 23:33:19 EDT
--> Re: Measuring Density Range	Richard Knoppow	Sun Oct 23 2005 - 14:31:08 EDT
--> Re: Measuring Density Range	Mike King	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 10:56:31 EDT
--> Re: Measuring Density Range	UC	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 10:16:42 EDT
Re: Measuring Density Range	PATRICK GAINER	Sun Oct 23 2005 - 17:48:42 EDT
Pressure or Processing?	dan.c.quinn_at_email.domain.hidden	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 18:22:40 EDT
Re: Pressure or Processing?	John	Sat Oct 22 2005 - 00:52:21 EDT
--> Re: Pressure or Processing?	Nicholas O. Lindan	Sat Oct 22 2005 - 10:19:16 EDT
--> Re: Pressure or Processing?	dan.c.quinn_at_email.domain.hidden	Sun Oct 23 2005 - 17:57:27 EDT
Re: Pressure or Processing?	David Nebenzahl	Sat Oct 22 2005 - 15:37:35 EDT
Re: Pressure or Processing?	dan.c.quinn_at_email.domain.hidden	Fri Oct 28 2005 - 06:28:21 EDT
the next best thing to pyro	Joe	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 16:34:21 EDT
Re: the next best thing to pyro	Nicholas O. Lindan	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 16:38:13 EDT
--> Re: the next best thing to pyro	Joe	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 17:18:34 EDT
--> Re: the next best thing to pyro	ujazz32_at_email.domain.hidden	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 18:53:07 EDT
--> Re: the next best thing to pyro	Joe	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 23:40:35 EDT
Re: the next best thing to pyro	Frank Pittel	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 19:40:43 EDT
--> Re: the next best thing to pyro	Joe	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 23:41:58 EDT
--> Re: the next best thing to pyro	John	Sat Oct 22 2005 - 00:32:53 EDT
--> Re: the next best thing to pyro	Frank Pittel	Sat Oct 22 2005 - 02:00:39 EDT
--> Re: the next best thing to pyro	ujazz32_at_email.domain.hidden	Sat Oct 22 2005 - 16:06:55 EDT
--> Re: the next best thing to pyro	Rod Smith	Sat Oct 22 2005 - 23:14:45 EDT
--> Re: the next best thing to pyro	ujazz32_at_email.domain.hidden	Sun Oct 23 2005 - 00:15:42 EDT
--> Re: the next best thing to pyro	Thor Lancelot Simon	Sun Oct 23 2005 - 17:18:04 EDT
--> Re: the next best thing to pyro	Joe	Sun Oct 23 2005 - 17:56:37 EDT
--> Re: the next best thing to pyro	Thor Lancelot Simon	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 08:58:59 EDT
--> Re: the next best thing to pyro	ujazz32_at_email.domain.hidden	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 20:14:23 EDT
--> Re: the next best thing to pyro	PATRICK GAINER	Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:39:18 EST
Re: the next best thing to pyro	UC	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 20:16:36 EDT
--> Re: the next best thing to pyro	ujazz32_at_email.domain.hidden	Sun Oct 23 2005 - 23:43:35 EDT
making photograms w\16m film - any advice?	jsamsworth	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 10:35:05 EDT
Re: making photograms w\16m film - any advice?	Francis A. Miniter	Sat Oct 22 2005 - 20:36:16 EDT
Kodak Poly-Toner	Bernie	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 19:46:16 EDT
Re: Kodak Poly-Toner	Richard Knoppow	Sat Oct 22 2005 - 13:48:33 EDT
Another reason to keep your Enlarger	???	Wed Oct 19 2005 - 18:22:20 EDT
Re: Another reason to keep your Enlarger	bill	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 01:22:11 EDT
Re: Digital burying "traditional" photo? Not so fast ...	Frank Pittel	Wed Oct 19 2005 - 19:43:32 EDT
Re: Digital burying "traditional" photo? Not so fast ...	David Nebenzahl	Wed Oct 19 2005 - 20:14:20 EDT
--> Re: Digital burying "traditional" photo? Not so fast ...	Frank Pittel	Wed Oct 19 2005 - 21:00:50 EDT
--> Re: Digital burying "traditional" photo? Not so fast ...	David Nebenzahl	Wed Oct 19 2005 - 23:58:44 EDT
--> Re: Digital burying "traditional" photo? Not so fast ...	Frank Pittel	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 00:42:46 EDT
--> Re: Digital burying "traditional" photo? Not so fast ...	David Nebenzahl	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 00:58:36 EDT
--> Re: Digital burying "traditional" photo? Not so fast ...	Frank Pittel	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 02:28:10 EDT
--> Re: Digital burying "traditional" photo? Not so fast ...	Stewy	Fri Nov 04 2005 - 21:22:34 EST
--> Re: Digital burying "traditional" photo? Not so fast ...	Joshua Putnam	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 01:12:54 EDT
Re: Digital burying "traditional" photo? Not so fast ...	Gregory Blank	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 18:43:44 EDT
--> Re: Digital burying "traditional" photo? Not so fast ...	David Nebenzahl	Tue Oct 25 2005 - 19:10:25 EDT
Re: Digital burying "traditional" photo? Not so fast ...	Rod Smith	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 02:36:45 EDT
Re: Digital burying "traditional" photo? Not so fast ...	Justin Thyme	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 08:24:28 EDT
Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Roman J.Rohleder	Wed Oct 19 2005 - 19:51:46 EDT
Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	UC	Wed Oct 19 2005 - 20:54:07 EDT
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Ralf R. Radermacher	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 04:29:26 EDT
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Scott Schuckert	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 09:46:16 EDT
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	pmp	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 21:14:52 EDT
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Little Green Eyed Dragon	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 21:23:15 EDT
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Bob Hickey	Fri Oct 28 2005 - 17:33:28 EDT
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Rod Smith	Fri Oct 28 2005 - 22:00:28 EDT
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Gregory Blank	Sat Oct 29 2005 - 07:19:52 EDT
Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Roman J.Rohleder	Sun Oct 30 2005 - 10:27:40 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	dan.c.quinn_at_email.domain.hidden	Sun Oct 30 2005 - 17:47:55 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Roman J.Rohleder	Sun Oct 30 2005 - 17:53:16 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	chrisplatt_at_email.domain.hidden	Wed Nov 02 2005 - 09:47:05 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	dan.c.quinn_at_email.domain.hidden	Wed Nov 02 2005 - 17:23:21 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	David Nebenzahl	Fri Nov 04 2005 - 03:30:52 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	dan.c.quinn_at_email.domain.hidden	Fri Nov 04 2005 - 18:02:40 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	John	Fri Nov 04 2005 - 22:27:48 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Helge Nareid	Sat Nov 05 2005 - 06:28:37 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	dan.c.quinn_at_email.domain.hidden	Sat Nov 05 2005 - 17:20:16 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Helge Nareid	Sun Nov 06 2005 - 05:58:15 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Michael Gudzinowicz	Sun Nov 06 2005 - 07:43:43 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	dan.c.quinn_at_email.domain.hidden	Sun Nov 06 2005 - 18:34:33 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Bob Salomon	Sun Nov 06 2005 - 18:42:43 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	dan.c.quinn_at_email.domain.hidden	Sun Nov 06 2005 - 19:42:51 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Bob Salomon	Sun Nov 06 2005 - 19:48:43 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	dan.c.quinn_at_email.domain.hidden	Mon Nov 07 2005 - 05:35:48 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Bob Salomon	Mon Nov 07 2005 - 06:14:30 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	John	Mon Nov 07 2005 - 00:05:54 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	bjw_at_email.domain.hidden	Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:57:20 EST
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	nailer	Fri Nov 04 2005 - 19:49:50 EST
Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Matt Clara	Wed Oct 19 2005 - 21:24:25 EDT
Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	LR Kalajainen	Wed Oct 19 2005 - 19:16:06 EDT
Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	UC	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 12:57:37 EDT
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Rod Smith	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 13:03:19 EDT
Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	dan.c.quinn_at_email.domain.hidden	Sat Oct 29 2005 - 18:44:02 EDT
--> Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo...	Gregory Blank	Sun Oct 30 2005 - 09:51:20 EST
Re: 4 bladed print easles...	Francis A. Miniter	Wed Oct 19 2005 - 18:49:14 EDT
Re: 4 bladed print easles...	pmp	Mon Oct 24 2005 - 21:14:51 EDT
Re: P3200 T-Max film in differant developers	Draco	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 14:18:01 EDT
Re: P3200 T-Max film in differant developers	UC	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 16:18:29 EDT
--> Re: P3200 T-Max film in differant developers	Draco	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 16:50:28 EDT
--> Re: P3200 T-Max film in differant developers	UC	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 18:05:55 EDT
--> Re: P3200 T-Max film in differant developers	David Nebenzahl	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 18:22:15 EDT
--> Re: P3200 T-Max film in differant developers	UC	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 11:55:42 EDT
--> Re: P3200 T-Max film in differant developers	Frank Pittel	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 19:37:34 EDT
--> Re: P3200 T-Max film in differant developers	Draco	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 20:53:35 EDT
Re: P3200 T-Max film in differant developers	Javi L	Tue Oct 18 2005 - 16:27:38 EDT
Re: P3200 T-Max film in differant developers	raoul	Wed Oct 19 2005 - 22:48:41 EDT
Re: P3200 T-Max film in differant developers	raoul	Wed Oct 19 2005 - 22:47:28 EDT
Re: P3200 T-Max film in differant developers	Francis A. Miniter	Wed Oct 19 2005 - 18:38:22 EDT
Re: P3200 T-Max film in differant developers	Frank Pittel	Wed Oct 19 2005 - 19:49:59 EDT
Re: P3200 T-Max film in differant developers	Keith Tapscott	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 11:35:04 EDT
Re: P3200 T-Max film in differant developers	nathantw	Sat Oct 22 2005 - 13:35:23 EDT
Re: Source for powerful magnifying glass...	William Mutch	Thu Oct 20 2005 - 14:43:56 EDT
Re: Meopta lens mount problem....help!	damburgery_at_email.domain.hidden	Sat Oct 22 2005 - 13:18:12 EDT
Re: durst 605 bulb	Mike King	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 01:04:45 EDT
Re: Is Forte having troubles??	Frank Pittel	Wed Oct 19 2005 - 21:06:59 EDT
Re: Is Forte having troubles??	Gregory Blank	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 20:09:51 EDT
--> Re: Is Forte having troubles??	Frank Pittel	Fri Oct 21 2005 - 21:21:38 EDT